Russian special military operation in Ukraine #34

Superb NATO strategy, you know ...

They thought Russia would attack the fortified areas with tanks and infantry, like in one of the exercises in the 70´s or 80´s.
Why?
They believe their own lies. Putin is a dictator. Mighty western sanctions will destroy "his" economy and his underlings will revolt
if he can´t show some victories pretty fast. 
Instead Russia moves slowly, destroys anything with artillery and empties western warehouses.

Regular wrote:Also that TG channel doesn’t link to sources or anything. It just came up with this after EU basically admitted 100k dead Ukrainian soldiers.

No, they said it weeks before von der Leyens little "blunder".

But I appreciate your skepticism, it's the same as mine.

That post you translated John was very good, it was unbiased and explained the faults and pros of both sides in a detailed logical manner. I give it a thumbs up.

The most difficult days await Ukraine and its forces.
Ramzan Kadirov

80k out of 300k mobilized have been deployed to Ukraine thus far and not only have they stopped the hohols dead in their tracks, they're bleeding the pigs white. Man has reason to think out loud.

Honestly I'm disappointed with how NATO high command is running their campaign. They have nigh-unlimited cannon fodder, unmolested safe zones in Poland for men andsupplies and the Russians don't even mind them slipping NATO units in under the piss flag. The Russians were even kind enough to allow NATO real-time persuasive ISR! But you mean to tell me they can't even manage any encirclements or inflict significant casualties on a numerically inferior enemy?

I know most NATO officers would rather be slutting it up in the vibrant local gay scene, or keeping up with their hormone shots but surely they didn't all become this bad at playing war?

This ain´t garbage. Urgent delivery of dead bodies from "Bakhmut" to central 404.

They were so conserned about ABM capabilities of the US that they stoped production of cheap ballistic missiles. Iskander with its technology is a total overkill for any target including US ones.

They need to start work on a new ballistic missile family with different ranges like 300km, 600km and 1500km with common parts but more stages like 1 stage for the first, 2 for the second and 3 for the last with a common warhead part.

Iskander and its maneuvrability + decoys is good for best targets like AD with ABM capability which represent not even 5% of the targets.

Kh-15 was also a good basis for a new air launched BM with good accuracy, conventional warhead and good range.

Iran, North Korea and China are way more advanced in that field, eventhough USSR was the leader of that technology. They are also way better in drone field. That's 2 field they needed for this war.

Sarcasm 


Musicians are moving in, street concerts started

If there are legalistic problems with Rocket ranges for Russia or Iran , the drones can replace them . A single drone with Long range can travel along a Road and hit a civilian truck engine / other vehicle or Tank , and disable and block the Road . Assembly points are the best targets , before shipping , and dispersion . The farther away they get destroyed from the frontlines , and any chance that they are used , the better .

New stuff coming

Artillery working day and night

A few more POW´s

The kh-15 would have been very useful to have now, and would have made the tu-22Ms much more useful in this war.

Not that much. 3 versions existed, a nuclear one, an antiship one with an active radar and a passive one for anti radar use.

They would need a modernized one with iskander homing system. Like the Israeli Rampage missile that proved to be very good.

I mean it's been retired for decades, plenty of time for that

Russians use drone to throw a grenade down a PVC pipe to a basement where VSUshniki are hiding.

#Chronicle of the Special Military Operation for 10-11 Dec 2022

#Crimea:

Ukrainian kamikaze drones attempted strikes against #Simferopol, but Russian air defences shot down all targets on approach.

#Starobelsk Direction (MAP):

In the #Kupyansk - #Svatovo section, units of the AFU's 14th Mechanized Brigade and the 32nd Battalion of the Terrotorial Defence attempted to storm the #Sinkovka - #Lyman 1st line, but failed.

The RF Armed Forces intercepted an Ukrainian SRG near #Dachnoye, most of the group was destroyed and the rest fled into the woods.

In the #Lyman sector, fighting is continues west of #Ploshchanka, where RF forces had previously managed to capture several enemy strongholds. The AFU is trying unsuccessfully to retake lost positions.

Fighting continues in the grey zone at the #Chervonopopovka - #Makeyevka line.

In the #Lysychansk sector, Russian troops have occupied an observation post near #Belogorovka.

#Lugansk People's Republic:

The Ukrainian militants launched rocket and barrel artillery strikes on #Svatovo and #Stakhanov, civilian infrastructure was damaged.

#Donetsk Direction (MAP):

Fighting continues in the centre of #Maryinka, where Russian troops are trying to overcome enemy defences on the central Druzhba Street.

In the #Avdeyevka sector, DPR People's Militia units are fighting in the vicinity of #Pervomayskoye and #Vodyanyoye.

In the #Ugledar sector, the RF Armed Forces have begun an offensive near Bolshaya Novoselka, trying to take advantageous positions.

The enemy militants continue intense shelling of the #Donetsk agglomeration with strikes on the centre of #Donetsk and other settlements, civilians killed.

#Zaporozhye Direction:

Ukrainian militants shelled #Melitopol with HIMARS MLRS. The shells hit the Hunters' Rest Base and killed civilians. Despite the massive strike, not a single military facility was hit. There were no casualties among the military personnel.

Artillery duels continue along the entire line of contact. The RF Armed Forces shelled targets in #Yulyevka, #Orekhov, #Gulyaypole, #Olgovskoye and #Nikopol, while enemy militants shelled #Energodar.

#Kherson Direction:

Russian forces hit AFU positions at the Kherson cotton mill in #Kherson.

In addition, targetshave been hit in #Dudchany, #Berislav, #Zimevka and #Dneprovskoye.

The RF Armed Forces destroyed an enemy SRG on Bolshoy Potemkin Island at the mouth of the #Dnipro River. At least 3 AFU fighters were killed, their bodies fell into the river.

#Odessa Region:

On the night of Friday to Saturday, Russian troops have hit the Novovodesskaya power substation with a Geran-2 kamikaze drone.

In #Odessa, the attack led to a prolonged almost complete loss of electricity supply and problems with the operation of pumping stations.


https://t.me/sitreports/1997

How many tanks did the Ukrainian Armed Forces lose in Bakhmut?

According to the Military Chronicle, from the end of August to the beginning of December, the 54th and 59th brigades of the Armed Forces of Ukraine could irretrievably lose about six to eight tank companies in Bakhmut (Artyomovsk)—from 84 to 112 vehicles. The equipment remaining in service with the Ukrainian forces in Bakhmut is on the verge of failure.

Most of the T-64, T-64BV, and Polish T-72M1 tanks were lost by the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the battles in the north of the city in the Podgorodny area and during several counterattacks in the south in the area of Kurdyumovka, Zelenopolye, and Ozaryanovka. Tanks were also lost in the battles near Opytny, where Ukrainian forces tried to stop the advance of the RF Armed Forces but retreated due to high losses. Interruptions in electricity and a lack of spare parts prevent quick repairs of equipment.

Almost all vehicles have high gun wear, and the crews of Ukrainian Armed Forces tanks regularly encounter bursts of ammunition in the gun breech, after which the vehicle is put out of action. The activity of the artillery of Wagner PMC and the RF Armed Forces also led to high losses of tanks: when a platoon (or company) of tanks is detected, heavy artillery fire of high density opens on armoured vehicles, which does not allow the equipment to manoeuvre and fire.

There are also tactical errors. Short daylight hours limit the capabilities of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in observation and reconnaissance using UAVs, and cold weather forces them to keep vehicles with running engines, which strongly unmasks them and makes them a target for sabotage groups of the RF Armed Forces with Kornet anti-tank systems and Irony surveillance devices that detect enemy equipment in the dark at a distance of 7 km.

https://t.me/Slavyangrad/24545


@Rybar: Another Consequence of Systematic Fire Attacks on Ukraine's Energy Infrastructure

Another power transformer burned down in #Kiev. Apparently, there was a switching overvoltage in the device.

It happened due to the release of overvoltage pulses into the grid from high-voltage line switching caused by the RF Armed Forces' defeat of autotransformers at city substations and thermal power plants. A breakdown occurs inside the windings, an electric arc ignites and then the oil starts to burn. The gas pressure in the tank increases sharply, leading to a depressurisation and subsequent fire.

The incident is further evidence of the cumulative effect of Russian missile strikes. Even in the absence of new raids, elements fail on their own.

🩸 Is this a Clear Sign of the Collapse of Ukraine's Power System?

No: The general control points (GCP) of most facilities are still intact, which theoretically allows, see Recent Comprehensive Assessment, replacing destroyed equipment and assembling back-up circuits.

But it is not the first time transformer fires have occurred that suggests instability and reduced sustainability of the power system. And if strikes continue, the possibility of rebuilding it in the short term will be negligible.


https://t.me/sitreports/2000

Given all the publicity regarding Merkel's recent comments, this had to be produced

Angela Merkel on the Minsk agreements:

5 March 2015: "If the Minsk Agreements are seriously violated, European leaders and the European Commission stand ready to prepare and impose new sanctions."

October 20, 2016: “We discussed a work process that has many sides and that needs to be taken into account when working on topics such as security, political process. And this should continue within the framework of the roadmap for the various steps of the Set of Measures for the Implementation of the Minsk Agreements. And that's progress."

February 18, 2017: Minsk is all we have. Unfortunately, I cannot say that all points of the Minsk agreements have been fulfilled. A long-term ceasefire is needed. My opinion is that we shouldn’t throw away the only thing we have.”

March 17, 2017: “I was very pleased to learn that the US administration and the president personally are committed to the Minsk process. We need to find a solution to this problem. A safe and secure solution must be found for Ukraine, but relations with Russia must also be improved as the situation becomes clearer. The Minsk agreements are a good basis, but, unfortunately, we have not yet reached the process we expected. However, in the coming months, we will continue to work on this issue together with our experts.”

May 20, 2017: "The issue of security, as presented in the Minsk agreements, is a prerequisite for further progress in the political process."

September 2 2017: “In the field of security policy in Europe, we must do everything to improve our contacts again. This includes the implementation of "Minsk". If this works out, then we would have a starting point for even more and more intensive dialogue.”

April 10, 2018: “We discussed the situation that is developing in connection with the implementation of the Minsk agreements. Despite the complexity of the situation, we must not relax efforts, because we are talking about people. Germany and France will continue to look for a way out of the situation together with Ukraine and the Russian Federation.”

August 18, 2018: “We must work to find a solution. This concerns, firstly, the issue of Ukraine. We've been working on this for quite some time now. The basis is and remains - it is the Minsk Agreements. Although it must be stated that we do not yet have a stable truce.”

November 1, 2018: “If there is progress, then we can ease these sanctions. Unfortunately, now the situation is such that the “Minsk agreements” are not observed. If something is done, then only a millimeter forward and immediately back. Germany will also advocate the continuation of these sanctions.”

December 10, 2019: “There is a question, is this document set in stone, or can it be changed. After all, there are certain proposals by President Zelensky to change it. <...> We hope that this document will again be flexible, and it will be revived.”

December 7, 2022: “The Minsk agreements of 2014 were an attempt to give Ukraine time. It used this time to become stronger, as you can see today. Ukraine 2014-2015 is not Ukraine today. <...> It was clear to all of us that the conflict was frozen, that the problem had not been resolved, but this gave Ukraine precious time.”

https://t.me/Slavyangrad/24617