Russian special military operation in Ukraine #7

par far wrote:

walle83 wrote:

Arkanghelsk wrote:NATO will not deploy troops in Ukraine to avoid war with Russia - Alliance Secretary General Stoltenberg, responding to Poland's proposal to send a peacekeeping mission to Ukraine.

NATO shit it's panties big surprise,  no asswhooping for now

Probably the opposite. The war has shown that Russian convential forces are not that good, and probably would get thier ass kicked in a confrontation with Nato forces.

What people in the west don't understand is that the Russian forces in Ukraine are the 2nd and 3rd tier of the Russian armed forces. The 1st tier are being saved in case of a conflict with NATO/US.

Another thing people in the west don't understand is that Russia needs to live right next to Ukraine, so the American way of doing war is not right here(American way is to bomb a country for months, sent in their ground forces and delcare victory).

Russia does not want to destroy Ukraine, it wants to capture it, as much of it intact as possible.

Walle is a piece of shit dude. He is from Sweden. He is just a typical retard spewing nonsense while Garry let's him. His fag army lost against taliban while Russia is actually going against a full fledged army better equipped than anyone they ever fought.

I am requesting GarryB to ban him as he insults the Russian army whom is sacrificing themselves for a better future. Others were banned for a lot less.

Airbornewolf wrote:I got to admit Flaming python, I thought when you said that the sowing season was important to the Russian army, it was irrelevant in the war objectives.

But, apparently the Russian Military agrees with you. so i was wrong.

Supplying fuel to the farmers:

"Russian troops help the farmers of the Kherson region to carry out the sowing campaign on time

For these purposes, the delivery of diesel fuel necessary for the operation of agricultural machinery is organized to remote settlements of the region, accompanied by the Russian Guard"

https://t.me/istorijaoruzija/47850

In the meantime american soldiers/mercenaries burning fields in Syria and Iraq and their politicians steal money from Afghan children.

SeigSoloyvov wrote:There are claims Ukraine captured a Krasukha 4 and will be giving it to the US.

If true that is a massive blunder, why wasn't such an important system destroyed if they had to ditch it.....

Ukrainian claim plenty of things. If it was true you would have a picture. They take pictures as soon as they capture something and put it on twitter two seconds later.

Krashuka jammers aren't jammers that you put on the front line. They can work from russian territory and cover all the actual fronts.

miketheterrible wrote:

par far wrote:

walle83 wrote:

Arkanghelsk wrote:NATO will not deploy troops in Ukraine to avoid war with Russia - Alliance Secretary General Stoltenberg, responding to Poland's proposal to send a peacekeeping mission to Ukraine.

NATO shit it's panties big surprise,  no asswhooping for now

Probably the opposite. The war has shown that Russian convential forces are not that good, and probably would get thier ass kicked in a confrontation with Nato forces.

What people in the west don't understand is that the Russian forces in Ukraine are the 2nd and 3rd tier of the Russian armed forces. The 1st tier are being saved in case of a conflict with NATO/US.

Another thing people in the west don't understand is that Russia needs to live right next to Ukraine, so the American way of doing war is not right here(American way is to bomb a country for months, sent in their ground forces and delcare victory).

Russia does not want to destroy Ukraine, it wants to capture it, as much of it intact as possible.

Walle is a piece of shit dude. He is from Sweden. He is just a typical retard spewing nonsense while Garry let's him. His fag army lost against taliban while Russia is actually going against a full fledged army better equipped than anyone they ever fought.

I am requesting GarryB to ban him as he insults the Russian army whom is sacrificing themselves for a better future.  Others were banned for a lot less.

Leave him alone. Like other pro US fanbois he is seeing how the russian hardware are working as advertized and it is eating him from the inside.

Isos wrote:

miketheterrible wrote:

par far wrote:

walle83 wrote:

Arkanghelsk wrote:NATO will not deploy troops in Ukraine to avoid war with Russia - Alliance Secretary General Stoltenberg, responding to Poland's proposal to send a peacekeeping mission to Ukraine.

NATO shit it's panties big surprise,  no asswhooping for now

Probably the opposite. The war has shown that Russian convential forces are not that good, and probably would get thier ass kicked in a confrontation with Nato forces.

What people in the west don't understand is that the Russian forces in Ukraine are the 2nd and 3rd tier of the Russian armed forces. The 1st tier are being saved in case of a conflict with NATO/US.

Another thing people in the west don't understand is that Russia needs to live right next to Ukraine, so the American way of doing war is not right here(American way is to bomb a country for months, sent in their ground forces and delcare victory).

Russia does not want to destroy Ukraine, it wants to capture it, as much of it intact as possible.

Walle is a piece of shit dude. He is from Sweden. He is just a typical retard spewing nonsense while Garry let's him. His fag army lost against taliban while Russia is actually going against a full fledged army better equipped than anyone they ever fought.

I am requesting GarryB to ban him as he insults the Russian army whom is sacrificing themselves for a better future.  Others were banned for a lot less.

Leave him alone. Like other pro US fanbois he is seeing how the russian hardware are working as advertized and it is eating him from the inside.

I've requested GarryB to intervene.

SeigSoloyvov wrote:

Isos wrote:

SeigSoloyvov wrote:There are claims Ukraine captured a Krasukha 4 and will be giving it to the US.

If true that is a massive blunder, why wasn't such an important system destroyed if they had to ditch it.....

Ukrainian claim plenty of things. If it was true you would have a picture. They take pictures as soon as they capture something and put it on twitter two seconds later.

Krashuka jammers aren't jammers that you put on the front line. They can work from russian territory and cover all the actual fronts.

Hence why I said IF TRUE.

The Russians have shown they do ditch important hardware so its not beyond the realm of possibility.

Which one ? Plenty are fakes or they were stuck in the mud or damaged.

They ditch nothing. Just ukrainian propaganda.

SeigSoloyvov wrote:

Isos wrote:

SeigSoloyvov wrote:There are claims Ukraine captured a Krasukha 4 and will be giving it to the US.

If true that is a massive blunder, why wasn't such an important system destroyed if they had to ditch it.....

Ukrainian claim plenty of things. If it was true you would have a picture. They take pictures as soon as they capture something and put it on twitter two seconds later.

Krashuka jammers aren't jammers that you put on the front line. They can work from russian territory and cover all the actual fronts.

Hence why I said IF TRUE.

The Russians have shown they do ditch important hardware so its not beyond the realm of possibility.

I normally ignore your stupidity but - ditching a BTR or a T-72B3M isn't important hardware dumbass.

Now go back to playing commando in your sandbox.

Isos wrote:

SeigSoloyvov wrote:

Isos wrote:

SeigSoloyvov wrote:There are claims Ukraine captured a Krasukha 4 and will be giving it to the US.

If true that is a massive blunder, why wasn't such an important system destroyed if they had to ditch it.....

Ukrainian claim plenty of things. If it was true you would have a picture. They take pictures as soon as they capture something and put it on twitter two seconds later.

Krashuka jammers aren't jammers that you put on the front line. They can work from russian territory and cover all the actual fronts.

Hence why I said IF TRUE.

The Russians have shown they do ditch important hardware so its not beyond the realm of possibility.

Which one ? Plenty are fakes or they were stuck in the mud or damaged.

They ditch nothing. Just ukrainian propaganda.

You don't realize you are being trapped into circular logic with these morons.

They will repeat nonsense with zero proof - say it was in Ukraine (When Ukraines been caught showing footage from Syria and other states claiming it happened in Ukraine), and say "But it's reported as Russia did X or Y" and then when you prove its Ukrainian propaganda, they go back full circle and repeate the same nonsense.

RIA News
A sabotage group of 7 Ukrainian soldiers was neutralized near Mariupol, RIA Novosti correspondent reports.


https://t.me/boris_rozhin/35995

Isos wrote:

SeigSoloyvov wrote:There are claims Ukraine captured a Krasukha 4 and will be giving it to the US.

If true that is a massive blunder, why wasn't such an important system destroyed if they had to ditch it.....

Ukrainian claim plenty of things. If it was true you would have a picture. They take pictures as soon as they capture something and put it on twitter two seconds later.

Krashuka jammers aren't jammers that you put on the front line. They can work from russian territory and cover all the actual fronts.

This is also how I think the Krashuka works, you don't need it on the front lines, it can be used way behind friendly forces and on your own territory.

Can someone please confirm this?

SeigSoloyvov wrote:You guys insult the Ukies lol

So its okay to insult the side you want to loose, a lot of Ukies are honest guys just defending their homeland from what they see a Russian Invasion and you celebrate their deaths.

Your are NO better honestly.

So your request to ban him for saying the Russians are performing bad is just a dam joke but it does show your true colors, etc no better then the thing you claim to hate and be against.

Because Ukies actually are nazi fucks that deserve it. We also insult you when you tried to convince us you were green beret in Afghanistan posting.

E3 Sentry doesn't work that well in Ukraine even without Mig 31 firing in anger

In reality warfare Mig31 would send R37 to those AWACS and cut off completely C&C from the ground

Once the AWACS are gone also CAS and CAP missions cannot proceed

Russian forces have done very well against NATO with only 50k men

The losses are irreplaceable in terms of human life, but performance wise losing 500 men is stellar against a NATO armed and supported state

It's 50k Russians fighting 400,000 Ukrainians and 25,000 NATO mercenaries of the foreign legion

Along with E3 Sentry support, Arms support, manpower support , and Intel support

So Russia is doing good job

The method of sitting back and chewing the Ukrainian infantry is a good tactic, no need to swallow food without chewing it first

No need for mobilization, the ground forces are waiting quietly at garrison and deployment locations

My deepest condolecences to You, Auslander. May god be with You.

There were 50,000 nazis in Mariupol alone

Most of the force was annihilated

60 to 70,000 at Kiev, same at Kharkov

And 100,000 in Donetsk it's about 300,000

With the national guard and teraborona, and NATO mercs

It's well over 400k

SeigSoloyvov wrote:You guys insult the Ukies lol

So its okay to insult the side you want to loose, a lot of Ukies are honest guys just defending their homeland from what they see a Russian Invasion and you celebrate their deaths.

Your are NO better honestly.

So your request to ban him for saying the Russians are performing bad is just a dam joke but it does show your true colors, etc no better then the thing you claim to hate and be against.

This is a English forum, so people on here may not be from Russia.

I think for the Russians, it would be better if the regular Ukrainian military just surrendered, the Nazi's will killed. I don't think the Russians view the regular Ukrainians as enemies.

I see pictures of dead Ukrainians and just say to myself, this is unnecessary, this is just Slavs killing Slavs(this maybe only my view on here.)

I don't think he should be banned because he is saying that Russia is doing badly, the big thing is, he from the west and west does war differently than Russia. So, he may not understand the tactics that Russia is using.

Long range Denazification has began once more.
Sevastopol just now, not sure if its an ship or an VLS launch from an submarine?.
All i see is an escorting ship silhouette.

Maybe later footage will tell.

Mariupol has fallen, according to DNR guys. Azovites were slaughtered en masse at the very end, extremely gruesome.

Tors aren't ditched. The ones we saw were either destroyed or some old models that russia doesn't operate but ukrainian have from soviet leftover.

Just like those tunguske parked with no signs ob them that are very likely ukrainians that they used for propaganda lies.

On twitter they are full of shit. Always lying.

par far wrote:

Isos wrote:

SeigSoloyvov wrote:There are claims Ukraine captured a Krasukha 4 and will be giving it to the US.

If true that is a massive blunder, why wasn't such an important system destroyed if they had to ditch it.....

Ukrainian claim plenty of things. If it was true you would have a picture. They take pictures as soon as they capture something and put it on twitter two seconds later.

Krashuka jammers aren't jammers that you put on the front line. They can work from russian territory and cover all the actual fronts.

This is also how I think the Krashuka works, you don't need it on the front lines, it can be used way behind friendly forces and on your own territory.

Can someone please confirm this?

You can its range on the manufacturer's website or on rosoboronexport website.

200-600km in that range.