They did Skip stage three testing BEFORE they started mass producing the vaccine.
The vaccine requires two injections to work and they are doing the third stage testing on 40,000 people... that is 80,000 injections... when should they have started mass production... next year?
Those quotes you posted are about did Russia steal any data (I never committed on this) and stage 1 and 2 testings (we all know they did stage 1 and 2).
And it also says they started stage three tests on August 26th... two weeks ago.
You are again DEFLECTING quite poorly, SHOW me and I mean show me HARD PROOF.
What hard proof do you need?
The Lancet published the information about the first and second trials... it is a peer reviewed publication so they cannot have just had the results arrive... skim over them and then just republish them on the 4th of September. Experts need to examine the results and discuss with other experts and decide if it is valid and if there are any problems in procedure.
They did or are in the process of stage three testing, You show me that, and fine I am wrong.
Did you even read the article I quoted above?
"While post-registration trials are yet to be completed, Sputnik V is built on the safest and proven available platform".
"So hang on... they said they ran stage three tests and then you say they said they didn't"
OK... you talk about us talking out our ass.... they said they started third stage trials on August 26th and that the two injection vaccine is for 40,000 people... and now you are complaining that it is not finished yet and the results are not out yet?
I read the article again, there is no mention of stage three being completed in the title it even says "may begin in 7-10 days" KEY WORD "MAY". If you are going to start blatantly lying, why would I waste time on you.
That article was dated the 16th of August. The article I posted was after the Lancet published their review of the first two trials... they posted that on September the 4th.
And you can quibble with the word May.... I am sure with such an important vaccine that has shown no problems to date they might just decide not to bother because it is not that important right?
I would think the uncertainty was about whether it would be 7 days or 10 days before the 3rd trial.... not whether the trial would be done at all.
And that article is from the 16th of August so it is just as well they said 7 or 10 days... if they had been strict and said 7 days then you would have been jumping up and down about how it took ten days and why is it in mass production when the haven't done the third stage trials yet... those 80,000 doses must be hand made...
Well, looky here. Apparently it is OK to conduct Phase I and II trials on non-human primates when it comes to western "high tech".
Dude... you are in Canada and I am in New Zealand.... it seems we are going to get the monkey serum based drugs, while the Russians and her real partners will get the good stuff...
Waiving safety rules so they can use vaccines that might have serious side effects... this might be the vaccine that makes all western people infertile.... I am sure there is a movie in that somewhere... except we are doing it to ourselves out of pride instead of asking for the good stuff...
For the record with your first post, you are right in the respect. The proper testing wasn't done to see how safe that vaccine was and your right it wasn't, I agree with that point. So yes they did not do the proper testing and there might be unseen medical problems has a result, the proper testing wasn't done. But this is where your a moron comes in, you are assuming I think it's okay if others do it. No, I do not.
If you read the article I posted the type of vaccine the Russians have developed has been used since the 1950s and has a clear history of safe use. The western alternative vaccine by the British amongst others is based on monkey DNA and has no history so before they will sell it to western countries those countries need to accept a waver promising not to sue the British company if anything goes wrong in five or ten years time... I bet the people who sold asbestos insulation and thalidomide wished there was a global pandemic where they could get countries to sign wavers over future civil law suits when they were in business....
Both excellent products... did exactly what they were supposed to do... but the cost for some far outweighed the benefits...
You are a liar if you can read you will notice the document clearly says they conducted limited stage 1 testing with the Canadian vaccine and the results look promising enough to move forward with stage 2 and then stage 3.
"Early vaccine trials During the multicentre phase 1 trials, researchers demonstrated the vaccine's safety and its ability to provoke an immune response (immunogenicity). The next trials will determine the expanded safety, protective immune response, and efficacy of the vaccine with at-risk populations in Africa".
I suggest you read your articles before you post them you literally made yourself look like an idiot.
So you read the article he posted... why didn't you read mine... or was it not the hymn you are used to reading?
Garry did not debunk jack, I have yet to be shown or given factual proof stage three tests were conducted by the Russians with their vaccine. Until that proof shows up and the proof is labeled before they started to mass-produce it, you, Garry, and Mike are full of it. So keep lashing out because I of valid criticism of the Russians, it just makes you look like a child and personally I find it funny.
You are clearly in defence mode. To run stage three trials they need 80,000 injections worth of the vaccine that comes in two parts to allow them to vaccinate 40,000 people. They started on the 26th of August with many of the tests done in Moscow where a lot of the infected people are.
It will take quite some time to inject that many people and then monitor the results... and then come up with the final results to publish for peer review again like they did with the first two trials.
They had finished the stage one and two tests by the time that article you posted from August the 16th, and the Lancet published their peer review of those first two tests on September the 4th.
It is September the 9th and you want the results of the third test now?
Are you being unreasonable?