Russian special military operation in Ukraine #21

Erk wrote:

What is the name of this Russian Non-nuclear EMP weapon?

Firebird wrote:

ArgentinaGuard wrote:Stop talking about Nazism in the Ukraine. They may be unpleasant but the Nazis were serious rivals who cost 40 million lives. And they were very consistent, they did not follow a Jewish president nor were they financed by Semites.
I say this out of respect for the Russian heroes.
Today Russia faces clowns, degenerates and agents of Zionism. Insects that would be exterminated were it not for the support of NATO and the lies of the international press.

It seems like nearly every one of your posts is a defence of Fascism and pointing the finger at "da Jooz" and "the left".

Of course there is a massive amount of Nazism in the Ukraine. For much of the 8 yrs (2015 to about 2018) the forces in the Donbass were overwhelmingly Azov vermin. And the security forces/national guard etc are heavily staffed with Azov and the many similar fascist groups. Otherwise, verminous "Ukrainianism" would never have taken hold.

Zelensky only recently even claimed to be of Jewish descent. And its abundantly clear he is a puppet for the Americans AND the fascist forces controlled by America.

Its much like how America took  Al Qaeda, tried to put it with the Taliban in Afghanistan with a view to attacking the USSR from the South.

The problem in the Ukraine is Fascism, Ukrainian (mostly Nazi) fascism and the international Fascism that calls itself American "full spectrum dominance"/"Washington Consensus".
**** all to do with "da Jooz".

SeigSoloyvov wrote:
A nuclear air to air missile

There is no reason you'd need such a thing

Mir wrote:The US had both a guided and an unguided nuclear tipped air to air missiles. The AIM-26 Falcon and the AIR-2 Genie (unguided rocket).

SeigSoloyvov wrote:and? the thing was completely pointless you do not need nukes to take down a plane those missiles never saw any use because of how pointless and the other problems that came with using nukes.

Arrow wrote:Ukraine fired on the Antonovsky Bridge again. This is a very important bridge for Russian logistics for the south grouping.

https://twitter.com/spriteer_774400/status/1549665196771254273?s=20&t=TmgMRzXCW6uhWMGBtuGzOg

Arrow wrote:There have been perhaps two attacks. They will definitely try to destroy the bridge with more. Why has Russia not developed a strong air defense there?

JohninMK wrote:Apologies if this already posted. If Poland or Hungary did move into Ukraine there would be no Article 5 protection and would they move with air cover?

https://t.me/intelslava/33491

Assessment by the Polish intelligence services of the situation in Ukraine

"The Intelligence Agency (AW) of the Republic of Poland has prepared a report analyzing the current situation in Ukraine. According to the document, a catastrophic situation has developed in the formations of the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

The number of irretrievable losses is more than 300 people per day, and this figure is underestimated by the office of the President to reduce the likelihood of a public outburst and create panic among civilians and the military....

"....Since May of this year, almost all control functions in the planning and conduct of hostilities have been taken over by foreign advisers from the United States, Great Britain and Canada. At the same time, the fact of their presence at command posts is kept secret in order to prevent the entry of NATO military personnel into the captivity of the Russian Armed Forces.

"....According to AW, the leadership of Ukraine also counts on the introduction of two Polish brigades into the western regions of the country - 6 air brigade and 25 air brigade, which, according to the Ukrainian General Staff, will release additional combat-ready units and formations of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in August to be sent to the eastern front....

"....At the same time, the report notes that the American 155-mm M-777 howitzers delivered to Kyiv are not always used for their intended purpose. Instead of conducting counter-battery combat, guns are often used to bombard cities...."

dionis wrote:

Erk wrote:

What is the name of this Russian Non-nuclear EMP weapon?

I was hoping someone would tell me. Well .. rather than name the weapon, highlight if there have been any developments or news regarding weapons like this... ever. Hence why I asked the question about non-nuclear versions of EMP weapons.

Arrow wrote:Ukraine fired on the Antonovsky Bridge again. This is a very important bridge for Russian logistics for the south grouping.

https://twitter.com/spriteer_774400/status/1549665196771254273?s=20&t=TmgMRzXCW6uhWMGBtuGzOg

GarryB wrote:They are just planes.

caveat emptor wrote:Taking out this bridge will put a strain on  logistics for Kherson group. Only crossing left is over New Khakhovka dam.

Kub drone, the little white cross under the target marker

SeigSoloyvov wrote:

The answer is no in order to invoke article five these two conditions must be met exactly.

1. You are a member of NATO before any such invasion.

2. You are attacked on your home soil and you didn't fire the first shot

Anywhere outside of your internationally recognized borders isn't considered your home soil s if you move troops there and they get attacked you cannot invoke article five