Russia Defence Forum

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


+58
Stealthflanker
Regular
marcellogo
caveat emptor
LMFS
Lapain
ahmedfire
Mig-31BM2 Super Irbis-E
xeno
Ispan
calripson
owais.usmani
SolidarityWithRussia
Airbornewolf
TMA1
SeigSoloyvov
Isos
Krepost
sepheronx
Dr.Snufflebug
Karl Haushofer
Scorpius
Broski
flamming_python
kvs
JohninMK
Eugenio Argentina
lancelot
Big_Gazza
Belisarius
thegopnik
Walther von Oldenburg
lyle6
d_taddei2
Arkanghelsk
Firebird
Rodion_Romanovic
franco
Mir
Arrow
The-thing-next-door
GarryB
PhSt
starman
crod
VARGR198
GunshipDemocracy
Backman
PapaDragon
ucmvulcan
par far
Odin of Ossetia
mnztr
nomadski
Hole
ALAMO
higurashihougi
Kiko
62 posters

    Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56

    ucmvulcan
    ucmvulcan


    Posts : 1163
    Points : 1163
    Join date : 2022-02-26

    Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56 - Page 33 Empty Re: Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56

    Post  ucmvulcan Wed May 15, 2024 11:07 pm

    ALAMO wrote:Rise your hand, if your mummy dropped you twice - or more if one time was not enough?

    and in his case head first into a pile of lead paint chips

    GarryB and PapaDragon like this post

    Arkanghelsk
    Arkanghelsk


    Posts : 3676
    Points : 3682
    Join date : 2021-12-08

    Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56 - Page 33 Empty Re: Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56

    Post  Arkanghelsk Wed May 15, 2024 11:17 pm

    At this point Ukraine has spent 40+ ATACMS to hit

    - residential building in belgorod

    - some vehicle from s400, not sure if tel or radar

    - some old su27 and mig31

    The US makes 500 a year, if Ukropia spends 100 missiles in 1 month on hitting a fucking radar and some old su27

    It's not exactly a winning formula

    S400 wins all day long

    GarryB, d_taddei2, Eugenio Argentina, Hole and ucmvulcan like this post

    avatar
    mnztr


    Posts : 2798
    Points : 2836
    Join date : 2018-01-21

    Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56 - Page 33 Empty Re: Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56

    Post  mnztr Wed May 15, 2024 11:31 pm

    Arkanghelsk wrote:https://t.me/remylind21/21952

    The big man arrived in China

    What to ask for?

    AESA radars?

    Electromagnetic catapult?

    Drone components?

    We shall see, there's plenty of money to spend

    https://t.me/ukraina_ru/200712

    Who greeted him. Seems quite low key TBH. I expected Beijing to make a bigger statement. No Xi, no Wang Yi

    owais.usmani likes this post

    Kiko
    Kiko


    Posts : 2893
    Points : 2939
    Join date : 2020-11-11
    Age : 75
    Location : Brasilia

    Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56 - Page 33 Empty Re: Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56

    Post  Kiko Thu May 16, 2024 1:06 am

    mnztr wrote:
    Arkanghelsk wrote:https://t.me/remylind21/21952

    The big man arrived in China

    What to ask for?

    AESA radars?

    Electromagnetic catapult?

    Drone components?

    We shall see, there's plenty of money to spend

    https://t.me/ukraina_ru/200712

    Who greeted him. Seems quite low key TBH. I expected Beijing to make a bigger statement. No Xi, no Wang Yi

    Putin was greeted by a guard of honor in Beijing

    Putin left Beijing airport in an Aurus, accompanied by Chinese police.

    BEIJING, May 15 - RIA Novosti. A company of honor guard met Russian President Vladimir Putin at Beijing airport, a RIA Novosti correspondent reports.

    Putin arrived in China on a two-day state visit.

    After the welcoming ceremony, the Russian leader's motorcade left Beijing airport, accompanied by Chinese police and a detachment of motorcyclists. The President travels in an Aurus.

    https://ria.ru/20240515/pekin-1946292899.html

    GarryB, xeno, d_taddei2, Big_Gazza, Hole and Mir like this post

    avatar
    Belisarius


    Posts : 767
    Points : 767
    Join date : 2022-01-04

    Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56 - Page 33 Empty Re: Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56

    Post  Belisarius Thu May 16, 2024 1:09 am

    200 billion $ is quite low for a high intensity conflict like the war in Ukraine. Forget about your list of carriers, Gorshkovs, mig-35... they will be lucky if they can replace all their losses first. Number of destroyed vehicles is huge. Their air force also took a lot of hits. I won't talk about their navy.

    The last time I checked the western media itself stated that Russia spends no more than 300 million dollars a day on SMO and that the Russian armed forces are 15% larger than at the beginning of the war.

    Know what posting NAFO posts makes you right? An IDIOT.

    He is also following the NAFO tactic to discredit Russian air defense, which consists of:

    -Ignore all evidence of successful interceptions.

    -Ignore the fact that there is no air defense capable of intercepting 100% of targets 100% of the time.

    -Pretend that the projectiles that leaked through the defense were the only ones fired.

    And with all this they can scream loudly about how useless the Russian AD is, when in fact they are just masturbating over the 5-10% success rate of Ukrainian attacks.

    GarryB, xeno, d_taddei2, Big_Gazza, kvs, Hole, Mir and ucmvulcan like this post

    avatar
    Belisarius


    Posts : 767
    Points : 767
    Join date : 2022-01-04

    Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56 - Page 33 Empty Re: Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56

    Post  Belisarius Thu May 16, 2024 1:16 am

    🇷🇺⚔🇺🇦 Russian Ministry of Defense reported that air defense systems shot down 5 ATACMS missiles over Crimea.

    The governor reported that no one was injured during the Ukrainian Armed Forces' attack on Sevastopol.

    The Ukrainian Armed Forces shelled Shebekino in the Belgorod region with MLRS; preliminary reports indicate two civilians were injured, the governor of Belgorod stated.

    https://t.me/DDGeopolitics/110611

    No way!! But our local air defense expert stated that the S-400 cannot intercept the ATACMS!!!

    GarryB, xeno, Big_Gazza, kvs, PapaDragon, Hole and ucmvulcan like this post

    avatar
    xeno


    Posts : 244
    Points : 247
    Join date : 2013-02-04

    Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56 - Page 33 Empty Re: Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56

    Post  xeno Thu May 16, 2024 2:11 am

    No, there is no "5-10% success rate of Ukrainian attacks"
    I will say 1%, because Russian AD systems repel dozens of Ukrainian attacks on daily basis since SMO started.
    Those concern trolls like Arrow always post Ukrainian claims like a confirmed fact, so don't take that bait.

    GarryB, Big_Gazza, kvs, Hole and Belisarius like this post

    sepheronx
    sepheronx


    Posts : 8576
    Points : 8838
    Join date : 2009-08-06
    Age : 34
    Location : Canada

    Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56 - Page 33 Empty Re: Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56

    Post  sepheronx Thu May 16, 2024 3:06 am

    Arkanghelsk wrote:https://t.me/remylind21/21952

    The big man arrived in China

    What to ask for?

    AESA radars?

    Electromagnetic catapult?

    Drone components?

    We shall see, there's plenty of money to spend

    https://t.me/ukraina_ru/200712

    Sometimes you say interesting stuff. And sometimes you say the most retarded shit.

    I'm in awe of such a split personality you have.

    franco, xeno, Big_Gazza, ALAMO, PapaDragon, Lapain, Hole and like this post

    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 39229
    Points : 39727
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56 - Page 33 Empty Re: Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56

    Post  GarryB Thu May 16, 2024 5:04 am

    Have you already heard the new ukro anthem?

    Too big... perhaps this would be a better choice...



    Often heard while Benny was getting chased...

    so ATACMs strikes on crimea is the new norm?

    It calls Crimea "occupied Crimea"... this is a Kiev source...

    What happened with Russia arming the Houthis etc against American/NATO ships?

    American ships have already run away haven't they?

    yeah, but most of Ukraine's arsenal against Russian air defenses consisted of using either drones or slow cruise missiles these past 2 years and they get the bare minimum on ATACM missiles supplied. They destroyed S-300 or S-400 launchers in Crimea not too long ago as well with visual evidence of the destroyed launchers on the map with the use of ATACMs. This just proves that Russian long-range air defenses are useless against ATACMs but work against drones or cruise missiles.

    They have been shooting down 90 plus percent of magic western super weapons down for the last three years and you think this might turn things around for them?

    Considering we got more visual proof of another S-400 getting destroyed today. this just shows ATACMs does work or rather that Russia was lucky these past 2 years that Ukraine barely had ATACMs.

    What visual proof, I would not believe anything from Kiev.

    If Russia has been lucky these last 2 years why are they winning?

    Why is one side running out of men?

    This basically concludes patriots and S-300 or S-400 systems are both equally useless to hypersonic missiles where one country barely has any and the other has way more in supply.

    ATACMs are no where near hypersonic. ATACMS are barely improved Scuds.

    Lets not be sour about this and call apples as apples and oranges as oranges. US talks about supplying ATACMs 2 months ago, one month ago some long-range s-300 or s-400 air defense launchers get destroyed and now we are here where an S-400 radar got destroyed. Even Stevie Wonder would see a pattern here.

    Lets differentiate the claims of nazis which you seem to now support. Every western super weapon has required Russian forces to adapt and learn how it works before starting to effectively eliminate it as a threat... they repeatedly reported shooting down dozens of ATACMS and the HIMARs launchers used to fire them over the past few weeks too... did you notice that?

    In comparison Russian missiles seem to bypass western air defence systems with ease... from day one to date... it seems they can't handle Russian missiles and the result is that the targets get hit every time.

    WTF is there to be studied about for the ATACMs if the ATACMS is your average SRBM which the S-300S AND S-400S WERE DESIGNED TO INTERCEPT for some reason can't intercept these missiles when these missiles are used.

    Stop being a dick... ATACMS missiles have been intercepted repeatedly the last few weeks... I don't believe these Kiev sources claiming some got through but even if they did that can happen.

    The entire C4STAR network of HATO is trying to find gaps and weaknesses and all of HATO is funding Kiev and supplying weapons and ammo and they are still getting crushed.

    5 year olds like yourself think you fight a war and everyone on your side lives and the enemy never have any successful attacks and you just shoot the enemy and the end.

    Grow up.

    I don't give a **** about the war but about the false advertising. I dont even think the S-500 designed against ICBM, SLBMs and HGVs would even work against those targets if either the S-300 and S-400s can't deal with average SRBMs.

    We don't even know what actually happened yet and you are claiming things you are pulling from your arse. Turkey seem very happy with S-400 and Israel seem to respect it in Syria too...

    How and what with we don't know but a 90% system success rate against a ten volley is probably a result most AD managements would count as a win.

    Considering the ratio of ATACMS and Russian air defence missiles that would mean HATO loses the war... especially when Russian missiles will have the opposite hit ratio.

    Know what posting NAFO posts makes you right? An IDIOT.

    A flame baiter...

    No way!! But our local air defense expert stated that the S-400 cannot intercept the ATACMS!!!

    Maybe they got lucky and someone with a rubber band gun was there to shoot them down?

    Those concern trolls like Arrow always post Ukrainian claims like a confirmed fact, so don't take that bait.

    When your sources describe Crimea as occupied Crimea then you need better sources... Smile

    sepheronx, Big_Gazza, kvs, Hole, Belisarius and ucmvulcan like this post

    Kiko
    Kiko


    Posts : 2893
    Points : 2939
    Join date : 2020-11-11
    Age : 75
    Location : Brasilia

    Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56 - Page 33 Empty Re: Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56

    Post  Kiko Thu May 16, 2024 8:58 am

    Guns, butter and military Keynesianism. Experts on the “growth model” for Russia, 05.16.2024.

    One of the priorities for the new government is to integrate the economy of the security bloc into the overall economy of the country, the president said. Can this approach be called military Keynesianism - in the RBC material.

    On May 14, the updated composition of the Cabinet of Ministers began work . Key changes include the appointment of economist Andrei Belousov, who previously served as First Deputy Prime Minister, as Minister of Defence and the elevation of the status of Deputy Prime Minister Denis Manturov, who oversees industry (including defense) and technological development, to First Deputy Head of Government.

    It is necessary “to integrate the economy of the entire power bloc and the Ministry of Defence as a key link in this bloc into the overall economy of the country,” said President Vladimir Putin.

    Russia's military budget is growing every year, and in 2024 total spending on defence and security will amount to 8.7% of GDP, Putin said. “This is not 13%, as it was in the USSR, but it is also a significant amount. This is a great resource, and we are obliged to use it efficiently and effectively,” he said.

    In addition, the importance of technological leadership for the country's defence capability is growing. “Today, the winner on the battlefield is the one who is more open to innovation, more open to the most rapid implementation,” said presidential press secretary Dmitry Peskov.

    A number of foreign experts have previously characterized the active role of the Russian state in economic policy and its transition to a “military footing” with the term “military Keynesianism.” Together with economists, RBC looked into whether such a definition was applicable to the course of the new government and what consequences it would have for the Russian economy.

    What is "Military Keynesianism"

    In economic theory, military Keynesianism is understood as an anti-crisis economic policy of the state, which is aimed at increasing aggregate demand by increasing military spending. The term belongs to the contemporaries and followers of the English economist: John Maynard Keynes himself did not have a division between military and civilian Keynesianism, points out Oleg Buklemishev, associate professor of macroeconomic policy and strategic management at the Faculty of Economics of Moscow State University. Initially, Keynesian economic theory assumes that aggregate demand depends on many decisions, both public and private, and government intervention can smooth out fluctuations in economic cycles.

    “Keynes has a very interesting transition: if at first he believed that civilian areas of appropriations should be used to activate rapid economic growth with the help of budget expenditures, then he came to the conclusion that no other Keynesianism, except military, is possible. In a democracy, there is no way to boost the economy except through military spending. This idea is clearly visible in his mind,” notes Buklemishev.

    Today, when they talk about military Keynesianism, they remember two historical examples, the economist points out. The first is the Great Depression and Germany before World War II, which was supposedly able to overcome economic difficulties by preparing for military action. The second story is the United States, which, with the help of military spending at the turn of the 1930s and 1940s, spun the “flywheel of economic growth.”

    “But on closer examination, neither one nor the other stands up to critical scrutiny, since in both cases economic growth began before military spending began, and for completely different reasons. That is, this is not an explanation, and it is unknown whether this is a recipe for economic prosperity,” Buklemishev points out.

    Estimates based on data from the two world wars suggest that armed conflicts did not have a long-term positive impact on the trajectory of economic growth, even for the United States, a country whose “capital base” did not suffer significant damage in these conflicts, notes Bloomberg Economics economist for Russia and Central Asia. and Eastern Europe Alexander Isakov. Mobilization and the growth of government spending temporarily increased business activity, after which it returned to the trend - after the Second World War, for the United States this happened already in the second half of the 1940s.

    Force spending as a way to stimulate economic growth is a method as old as the hills, says Anton Tabakh, chief economist at Expert RA. “Perhaps the US experience of the 1980s is the most striking, since many of the innovations achieved in the sector then pulled the American economy out of the crises of the 1970s,” he believes. At that time, “Reaganomics” was largely based on the growth of government orders for high-tech military-industrial companies.

    Is this concept applicable to Russia?

    The academic literature does not have a clear answer to how increased military spending affects economic growth, points out economist and scientific director of NES Ruben Enikolopov. If we talk about a “moderate” increase, this approach on average around the world probably does not work: “Increasing government spending on defense by $1 increases GDP by less than $1.”

    “If any positive effect is observed, it occurs in developed countries during recessions and in countries with fixed exchange rates and low economic openness in terms of trade,” notes Enikolopov, citing recent studies.

    Economist at Ulster University (Northern Ireland) Lukman said, in a 2023 paper (. pdf ), calculated on data for 133 countries for the period 1960–2012 that an increase in the percentage of military spending and GDP by 1 percentage point. leads to a reduction in economic growth by 1.1 percentage points. At the same time, American scientists Jeff Carter, Heather Ondersin and Glenn Palmer, in a 2021 paper , concluded that the impact of changes in military spending on GDP is nonlinear over time: the initial effect of increasing spending on GDP is negative, but after some time it becomes positive.

    The maximum positive impact of defence spending on GDP is achieved two years after the start of its implementation. “That is, we are now approximately approaching these two years with the peak of the positive impact,” Enikolopov said on the RBC TV channel. At the end of 2023, Russia’s GDP grew by 3.6%, Rosstat reported, and in the first quarter of 2024 - by 4.6%, according to the Central Bank’s assessment.

    Military Keynesianism is not entirely suitable for describing the current model of economic policy, Isakov believes. First, this theory assumes that military-industrial spending primarily aims to stabilize the economic cycle—that is, at the most primitive level, to reduce unemployment by mobilizing the unemployed population either into the armed forces or into industry.

    “This description is poorly consistent with the observed reality, in which the government and the Bank of Russia are rather concerned about overheating of the labor market, abnormally low unemployment and labor shortages,” Isakov points out.

    Secondly, according to military Keynesianism, other expenditures, such as financing transport infrastructure, education, and industrial policy, have lower efficiency than expenditures on the military-industrial complex. “This also does not fully correspond to experience,” the economist states.

    Temporary effect

    Whatever you call the current situation in the Russian economy - military Keynesianism or mobilization economics - one thing is clear: this is a temporary phenomenon that cannot last too long, says Alexey Vedev, head of the Laboratory of Structural Research at the Institute of Economics and Economy of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. According to him, in the medium and long term, exceeding the level of military spending above 3% of GDP is considered dangerous.

    “There is a logical explanation for this - for example, the threat of inflation. Everyone gets real money for making shells, which are simply destroyed, and the money goes to the market. Naturally, a structural imbalance arises. Therefore, neither the mobilization economy nor military Keynesianism can continue for a long time - only two or three years,” says Vedev.

    Indeed, about two years later, the positive momentum from increased military spending is beginning to fade, Enikolopov says. “Either we need to continue pumping in even more money, which is what we are seeing in fact, or there is a compression, because these are all temporary effects,” he noted on the RBC TV channel.

    The expert emphasized that such economic growth can hardly be called “healthy.” “Healthy growth is an increase in productivity, an increase in the quality and quantity of labor, investment, and so on,” Enikolopov listed.

    The development of the military-industrial complex sector can give several positive effects in the long term, noted Prokhor Tebin, head of the sector of international military-economic problems at the Central Committee of the National Research University Higher School of Economics, on the air of RBC. “At the next stage, [the military-industrial complex] may become an additional source for Russian high-tech exports. Plus <...> [there is] a synergistic effect for the civilian economy,” he believes. Recently, technologies, innovations and new approaches are increasingly coming to the military from the civilian one, Tebin clarified.

    After the positive effect from the development of the military-industrial complex has been exhausted, Russia will face a “painful setback,” Vedev is pessimistic. The reason will be accumulated structural imbalances in the economy, excessively high salaries and increased social tension associated with the return of contract employees to their homeland, he points out. TsMAKP economist Dmitry Belousov previously warned about similar consequences : in his opinion, military personnel who receive high payments are unlikely to want to go to jobs with much less compensation.

    Conditional division

    Despite the fact that many call Andrei Belousov a statist economist, a follower of the Keynesian model, this is not entirely true, Vedev believes. “The division into “statists” and “marketists” is, in principle, very arbitrary and illegitimate. Because in fact, in the last 20 years in Russia there has been a conflict between “market people” and “market people”: the Ministry of Finance and the Central Bank advocated excessive financial stability, and the Ministry of Economic Development advocated economic growth,” the economist points out.

    According to Vedev, when 50% of state enterprises in the economy, which, in general, are obliged to obey the government as the owner, “you involuntarily become a statist.” “Although in fact - and Belousov admits this - adaptation to the crisis and forced import substitution occurs due to market factors,” he notes.

    If we put forward hypotheses about what “school of thought” Belousov adheres to, most likely, his views were formed, like most economists, at the university - and his specialty was “cybernetics economist,” argues Isakov.

    “Cybernetics was a popular area of ​​scientific thought in the Soviet Union in the 1970s and 1980s, which proposed supplementing the planned system with a system for operational monitoring of indicators and reactions to their deviations from target trajectories,” explains the economist.

    These developments were based, among other things, on the translated works of cybernetic economists such as Stafford Beer and others, and today a system similar in spirit has been implemented on the basis of the government’s coordination headquarters, which is engaged in constant monitoring of business activity indicators, notes Isakov.

    https://www.rbc.ru/economics/16/05/2024/6644a9f89a794748d72c03e9

    franco, Hole and lyle6 like this post

    Mir
    Mir


    Posts : 3247
    Points : 3249
    Join date : 2021-06-10

    Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56 - Page 33 Empty Re: Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56

    Post  Mir Thu May 16, 2024 9:28 am

    The above is a very interesting article but we also need to understand that Russia is at a very critical point where it is literally fighting for its survival. To survive this onslaught from the west you need good calm heads to run and guide the economy in the right direction. We don't want a repeat of the Cold War again. The new defense minister is an excellent first step to run this ship efficiently.

    The Russians themselves know their history and they realize that some sacrifices will have to be made, but in the end they will survive.

    GarryB and Hole like this post

    Regular
    Regular


    Posts : 3872
    Points : 3846
    Join date : 2013-03-10
    Location : Ukrolovestan

    Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56 - Page 33 Empty Re: Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56

    Post  Regular Thu May 16, 2024 10:02 am

    thegopnik wrote:Crimea is a ATACMS punching bag
    Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56 - Page 33 Scree112
    Yup it happened again.

    Burning ATACMS reserves on Crimea, surely there must be a better more pressing target than bases there. Like targeting railway logistics huns would probably affect frontline more, but on other hand, maybe UMPKs are really hurting them badly.

    Anyway, keep an eye on the bridge, there are rumours they will try to take it down with combined strike. Taking down bridge would be even more desperate peremoha, but chubs be chubs

    GarryB, Big_Gazza, PapaDragon and Mir like this post

    avatar
    Arrow


    Posts : 2789
    Points : 2781
    Join date : 2012-02-12

    Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56 - Page 33 Empty Re: Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56

    Post  Arrow Thu May 16, 2024 10:56 am

    No major progress has been made in the Kharkov region.  Currently, the northern grouping numbers several thousand soldiers.  They are not currently introducing new reserves.  It looks like there will be no major surgery in this direction. Russia still does not have enough soldiers. A minimum of 200,000 troops are needed for the Kharkov region, and there are about 50,000. A few thousand will capture a few villages and that's it. As we see in the current operation.


    Last edited by Arrow on Thu May 16, 2024 11:03 am; edited 1 time in total

    owais.usmani likes this post

    xeno, Big_Gazza and ucmvulcan dislike this post

    Walther von Oldenburg
    Walther von Oldenburg


    Posts : 1674
    Points : 1789
    Join date : 2015-01-23
    Age : 33
    Location : Oldenburg

    Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56 - Page 33 Empty Re: Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56

    Post  Walther von Oldenburg Thu May 16, 2024 11:02 am

    Arrow wrote:No major progress has been made in the Kharkov region.  Currently, the northern grouping numbers several thousand soldiers.  They are not currently introducing new reserves.  It looks like there will be no major surgery in this direction.
    Let's wait and see...

    GarryB likes this post

    avatar
    Belisarius


    Posts : 767
    Points : 767
    Join date : 2022-01-04

    Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56 - Page 33 Empty Re: Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56

    Post  Belisarius Thu May 16, 2024 11:24 am

    M74 submunition from an Atacms shot down last night.

    Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56 - Page 33 Img_2454

    A Russian fighter against the background of a destroyed M1A1SA Abrams tank of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the Berdychi village.

    Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56 - Page 33 Img_2455

    GarryB, xeno, Big_Gazza, kvs, PapaDragon, Hole and Mir like this post

    avatar
    Belisarius


    Posts : 767
    Points : 767
    Join date : 2022-01-04

    Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56 - Page 33 Empty Re: Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56

    Post  Belisarius Thu May 16, 2024 11:36 am

    Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56 - Page 33 Img_2456

    The motorized rifle unit of the combined arms army of the Central Military District received a batch of 23 T-90M Proryv tanks , the Russian Ministry of Defense reported.

    https://t.me/anna_news/66683

    GarryB, xeno, Big_Gazza, kvs, PapaDragon, Hole and Mir like this post

    JohninMK
    JohninMK


    Posts : 14879
    Points : 15018
    Join date : 2015-06-16
    Location : England

    Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56 - Page 33 Empty Re: Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56

    Post  JohninMK Thu May 16, 2024 11:53 am

    Telegram channel "Militarist (https://t.me/infantmilitario/126675)": Fresh analysis of the situation and forecast from the Turks:

    Until next week there will be clear and calm weather on the Black Sea. Everything is suitable for cruise missile attacks, tactical ballistic missile attacks, UAV attacks, and exploding boats. The level of threat to Russian installations in the Black Sea, especially in Crimea and the Kerch Strait region, has increased incredibly.

    Things are not going very well in Kharkov. After the assassination attempt on Fico, unrest in the segment of the anti-Ukrainian war in Europe reached its climax. It looks like NATO is about to do something big to distract attention, boost morale, and bring Western attention back to supporting Ukraine.

    Since the target seems very clear, MI6 and GUR teams may try to do something in remote places behind the front lines, even towards Moscow.
    via @vicktop55
    JohninMK
    JohninMK


    Posts : 14879
    Points : 15018
    Join date : 2015-06-16
    Location : England

    Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56 - Page 33 Empty Re: Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56

    Post  JohninMK Thu May 16, 2024 12:01 pm

    Classic case of Ukrainian common sense Laughing

    Arthur Morgan
    @ArthurM40330824
    7 #Ukrainian soldiers were sent home from #Germany for wearing right-wing extremist symbols - DW
    Any Na_zi symbols are illegal in 🇩🇪 so Ukranian soldiers can't have an exception.

    We are talking about military personnel who were trained in Germany.

    Among them at least 7 cases of wearing Na_zi symbols were recorded.

    The training of these soldiers was immediately stopped in agreement with the #Ukrainian Armed Forces, and they were sent home.

    According to the #German government, upon arrival in #Germany, all #Ukrainian soldiers are warned about the inadmissibility of right-wing extremist symbols.
    But you can't easily remove tattoos or change ideology

    GarryB and PapaDragon like this post

    Hole
    Hole


    Posts : 10872
    Points : 10850
    Join date : 2018-03-24
    Age : 48
    Location : Scholzistan

    Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56 - Page 33 Empty Re: Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56

    Post  Hole Thu May 16, 2024 12:35 pm

    What to ask for?
    China wants a lot of modern weapons from Russia.

    Who greeted him. Seems quite low key TBH.
    Putin landed before sunrise. 

    -Pretend that the projectiles that leaked through the defense were the only ones fired.
    In the last attack on Crimea, all missiles were shot down.
    Damage was done by some sub-munition surviving the hit.

    American ships have already run away haven't they?
    Like the Germans and French.

    about supplying ATACMs 2 months ago
    First ATACMs were delivered nearly a year ago.
    The long-range version is in usage since two months or so.
    Why?
    Because the forward retreating Russian Army pushed the Ukros
    out of range of most interesting PR targets.

    and they realize that some sacrifices will have to be made
    The sacrifice currently consists of some inflation while there is full employment
    and salaries are rising.

    Things are not going very well in Kharkov. 
    According to Budanov all is fine.  clown

    MI6 and GUR teams may try to do something in remote places behind the front lines
    Won´t change the outcome of the SMO.

    GarryB, kvs and Mir like this post

    avatar
    Arrow


    Posts : 2789
    Points : 2781
    Join date : 2012-02-12

    Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56 - Page 33 Empty Re: Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56

    Post  Arrow Thu May 16, 2024 1:08 pm

    ucmvulcan
    ucmvulcan


    Posts : 1163
    Points : 1163
    Join date : 2022-02-26

    Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56 - Page 33 Empty Re: Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56

    Post  ucmvulcan Thu May 16, 2024 1:27 pm

    Arrow wrote:

    Not really a surprise. Again, the goal is not land but to send Ukronazis to Unka Adolf and Grandpa Stepan. This whole war is Verdun. The strategy is to take enough ground to bait the Ukrainians into having to take it back in desperate hopes for a massive pr win, and then dig in and rain down hell for a couple months and wipe out most of the latest NATO standard men and weaponry. Then either fall back or start a new drive on the next few settlements. Really, it makes sense. Ukraine wants to dig in and fight defensive warfare because their wounds are covered with bandaids, cookies from Vicky, and the forlorn hopes of hell and more aid from the United Shits (I love my country but those in power in both parties are pure shit so I will let the autocomplete have its way). The gloomers a few months back told us that this was the master plan by Syrsky and how it was gonna be a game changer. Well, to defeat that plan, actually not a bad one on their part, you attack on new axes of the front because while you don't intend to take Kharkov you know that they know that they cannot lose Kharkov so do just enough to get them out of their positions and then bomb and attack them until there aren't so many as there were. Syrsky's plan of digging in could work, but the leadership in Ukraine cannot have bad optics. The idea of losing Kharkov is not something Zelensky can accept. So sound military thinking is trumped by pr expediency. At high cost to the Ukrainian army, losses they cannot afford, Russia, pretty much withdrawing on their own without pressure, will fall back because the bame of the game is killing nazis not taking land. Zelensky will pin medals on the poor bastards lucky enough to survive the hellscape and another 100 thousand get to shake hands with unka adolph and granpa Stepan.

    GarryB, Big_Gazza, kvs, ALAMO, PapaDragon, Hole, Mir and like this post

    kvs
    kvs


    Posts : 15218
    Points : 15355
    Join date : 2014-09-11
    Location : Turdope's Kanada

    Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56 - Page 33 Empty Re: Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56

    Post  kvs Thu May 16, 2024 1:59 pm

    The RBC article lost me at the absurd claim that Russia is raising aggregate demand (aka GDP) by military spending. This is one of the retarded
    NATzO propaganda talking points. It has no basis in reality. The stimulus in Russia is from import substitution. That is the obvious main
    effect since the sanctions slam the whole economy and not one sector of it. Russia has not doubled it military spending. Suppose it had,
    then it would pumping an additional $60 billion US. But this is less than the downsizing of imports from NATzO and allies. One dollar of imports
    substituted translates into two dollars of GDP increase (termination of the dollar going offshore and use of said dollar on the domestic
    economy).

    The enormous US budget deficits and Pancho Villa money printing in the 10 trillion dollar range is what RBC should be writing about. But then
    the RBC is a 5th column rag so you will not get any proper context from it.

    GarryB, xeno, Big_Gazza, Hole, lyle6, Mir, Broski and Belisarius like this post

    kvs
    kvs


    Posts : 15218
    Points : 15355
    Join date : 2014-09-11
    Location : Turdope's Kanada

    Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56 - Page 33 Empty Re: Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56

    Post  kvs Thu May 16, 2024 2:11 pm

    The phrase "game changer" is one of the markers of the retardation rampant in the NATzO west and its tool, Ukria. If the behaviour of NATzO
    deciders looks retarded it is because it is just that. NATzO deciders are higher functioning autistics. This explains their n-tupling down
    behaviour. Instead of cutting their losses, they will drive further with the same BS just like actual retards.

    The question is why are they autistic. I think it is because of inbreeding. This seems unlikely, but the elites are isolated from the proles and
    their number is not that large. We already had inbreeding in royal families in the past. It is not as pronounced now but similar. The other
    factor is "meritocracy". Autistics can be very "talented" in certain regards (idiot savants is an extreme case) so I see the n-tupling or no
    reverse gear (as Mercouris puts it) behaviour as indicative of the subset that reaches the top. This behaviour works in organizational
    mobility, but it does not work to win wars. There is no "triumph of the wills" that supersedes reality.

    Big_Gazza, Hole, Mir, Broski, Belisarius and ucmvulcan like this post

    ucmvulcan
    ucmvulcan


    Posts : 1163
    Points : 1163
    Join date : 2022-02-26

    Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56 - Page 33 Empty Re: Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56

    Post  ucmvulcan Thu May 16, 2024 2:19 pm

    kvs wrote:The phrase "game changer" is one of the markers of the retardation rampant in the NATzO west and its tool, Ukria.   If the behaviour of NATzO
    deciders looks retarded it is because it is just that.   NATzO deciders are higher functioning autistics.   This explains their n-tupling down
    behaviour.  Instead of cutting their losses, they will drive further with the same BS just like actual retards.  

    The question is why are they autistic.   I think it is because of inbreeding.   This seems unlikely, but the elites are isolated from the proles and
    their number is not that large.   We already had inbreeding in royal families in the past.   It is not as pronounced now but similar.   The other
    factor is "meritocracy".   Autistics can be very "talented" in certain regards (idiot savants is an extreme case) so I see the n-tupling or no
    reverse gear (as Mercouris puts it) behaviour as indicative of the subset that reaches the top.   This behaviour works in organizational
    mobility, but it does not work to win wars.   There is no "triumph of the wills" that supersedes reality.  

    I use the term in mocking derision.

    GarryB and Mir like this post

    Mir
    Mir


    Posts : 3247
    Points : 3249
    Join date : 2021-06-10

    Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56 - Page 33 Empty Re: Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56

    Post  Mir Thu May 16, 2024 2:25 pm

    I think KVS is referring to Blinkens retarded remarks here?

    ucmvulcan likes this post


    Sponsored content


    Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56 - Page 33 Empty Re: Russian special military operation in Ukraine #56

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Wed May 29, 2024 10:00 am