+63
Begome
AlfaT8
zepia
caveat emptor
Big_Gazza
Krepost
ALAMO
Werewolf
RTN
Tolstoy
sepheronx
Sujoy
Gazputin
Belisarius
flamming_python
lyle6
Stealthflanker
Swgman_BK
PeregrineFalcon
limb
Hole
George1
medo
AMCXXL
TMA1
magnumcromagnon
gmsmith1985
tanino
Flanky
galicije83
Podlodka77
LMFS
calripson
PapaDragon
mnztr
GarryB
Jeremy Sun
Arkanghelsk
ult
owais.usmani
Backman
thegopnik
Atmosphere
miketheterrible
Bob Bollusc
lancelot
Autodestruct
Isos
Arrow
Lennox
Scorpius
Cheetah
franco
Mir
Broski
dino00
kvs
Kiko
hoom
The-thing-next-door
marcellogo
JohninMK
Gomig-21
67 posters
Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #8
xeno- Posts : 206
Points : 211
Join date : 2013-02-04
- Post n°501
Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #8
too good to be true?Anyway,congrats...
Arrow- Posts : 2118
Points : 2112
Join date : 2012-02-12
- Post n°502
Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #8
Wow, this is a revolution when it comes to RAM materials

GarryB likes this post
GarryB- Posts : 36285
Points : 36817
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
- Post n°503
Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #8
It would be easier and far cheaper to have an entire machining department at that airfield than to provide it with such a printer.
They are probably expensive and complex now, but over time they will improve and get cheaper, while CNC machines do not have such growth potential...
The very idea of printing things makes sense to have it forward deployed to where it is needed rather than centralised.
In terms of the new stealth material... that is transformational because at the core of the F-35s horrible cost figures is the time it takes to remove and replace stealth coatings during even routine maintenance on the aircraft. Old stealth coatings wear off but have to be sanded off to get to access panels to check electronics and equipment and then need to have its joints taped up and several layers of stealth material recoated over the top with hours needed for each layer to cure within a specific temperature range that makes them less rugged... and soldier proof.
thegopnik- Posts : 1375
Points : 1381
Join date : 2017-09-20
- Post n°504
Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #8
So the patent for the Su-57 stated 1 to 0.1, and we saw the interview before where the Su-57 was stated as 0.5m2 and the F-22 as 0.3m2 to 0.4m2 and that they planned on still lowering the average RCS of the Su-57 by giving it new engines and some modifications with sawtooth nozzles being added. But if we are removing 95% of the radio waves based on the material where we still have to account for the 5% that was not absorbed the average RCS from interview to lowest point possible would be between .025m2 to .005m2 although that would be considered the "average RCS" where every angle and part has been accounted for that RCS. This means the front could be way lower than .005m2 in which this is an absolute win because any adversary stealth aircraft would have to be forced to get very close to the Su-57 and the closer you are the more important maneuverability would be.
GarryB, zardof and Broski like this post
william.boutros- Posts : 146
Points : 148
Join date : 2015-08-13
- Post n°505
Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #8
It is probably not how you calculate RCS.
95% reduction means 1, log reduction. Also, I am sure the original planned coating served a similar purpose.
Additional issues with the current Su-57 version
Engines (will be upgraded in Su-57M)
Engine intakes (will not change in Su 57M although not sure why they didn't improve this bit of the design)
Protruding probes (will change in Su 57M but not the level of F22)
Overall shaping (Will not Change in Su-57M)
Su-57 will not reach the RCS level of F22 with only a new RAM coating.
It doesn't need to either because Su-57 is a defensive weapon intended to fly over friendly airspace with the support of ground radars and contest an attack by a superior stealthy foe.
95% reduction means 1, log reduction. Also, I am sure the original planned coating served a similar purpose.
Additional issues with the current Su-57 version
Engines (will be upgraded in Su-57M)
Engine intakes (will not change in Su 57M although not sure why they didn't improve this bit of the design)
Protruding probes (will change in Su 57M but not the level of F22)
Overall shaping (Will not Change in Su-57M)
Su-57 will not reach the RCS level of F22 with only a new RAM coating.
It doesn't need to either because Su-57 is a defensive weapon intended to fly over friendly airspace with the support of ground radars and contest an attack by a superior stealthy foe.
GarryB- Posts : 36285
Points : 36817
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
- Post n°506
Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #8
Engine intakes might change with the new engines assuming the improved performance potential is achieved, it might allow it to operate at rather higher speeds both in full AB and also in supercruise modes.
Even in the last decade since the Su-57 got airborne their design and stealth tech has probably improved with the use of super computers allowing them to test lots of different designs very quickly... we also know they use scale models with real radar antenna to test actual results so the most promising computer model based designs could be made into physical models and tested to check the computer model with radar and IIR sensors to create a useful data base of such information which could be used to ID targets using IIR and radar signatures only.
You get the level of stealth you pay for... the cost of the US stealth is what makes it useless... it is drawing funds out of HATO budgets, yet is not effective against a range of devices and systems the Russians use now let alone what they will be operating in 10 years time.
Spending trillions of dollars on a stealth technology that is going to be useless is short sighted but the US MIC sees that as a bonus... in 10 years time after they have made enormous profits selling stealth that doesn't work, they will next solution, which will likely be even more expensive no doubt.
The difference between how stealthy an F-22 and an Su-57 is wont make any practical difference on the battlefield as each is likely to be able to defeat their enemies air to air missiles so it will come down to manouvering combat and guns and numbers... the west currently has numbers, but no IADS to support those numbers and make them useful.
F-22s will likely be soon retired and the F-35 is a terrible aircraft that will damage HATO for some time to come economically.
The US edge in stealth is largely meaningless because their air defence forces are not optimised to hunt and deal with stealth targets while Russian air defence is so effectively Russian air defence can detect more stealthy US aircraft and western air defence would struggle to deal with conventional cruise missile and drone and hypersonic weapon threats let alone stealth.
The fact that the stealth is built in to the materials instead of needing to be painted on (and then left to cure for a day) means operational tempo rates can be much higher and operational costs will be rather more comparable to conventional aircraft.
Cheaper to buy and cheaper to operate... and also stealthy... I believe if it was America they would be talking about game changing and new levels and other such bollocks.
Even in the last decade since the Su-57 got airborne their design and stealth tech has probably improved with the use of super computers allowing them to test lots of different designs very quickly... we also know they use scale models with real radar antenna to test actual results so the most promising computer model based designs could be made into physical models and tested to check the computer model with radar and IIR sensors to create a useful data base of such information which could be used to ID targets using IIR and radar signatures only.
You get the level of stealth you pay for... the cost of the US stealth is what makes it useless... it is drawing funds out of HATO budgets, yet is not effective against a range of devices and systems the Russians use now let alone what they will be operating in 10 years time.
Spending trillions of dollars on a stealth technology that is going to be useless is short sighted but the US MIC sees that as a bonus... in 10 years time after they have made enormous profits selling stealth that doesn't work, they will next solution, which will likely be even more expensive no doubt.
The difference between how stealthy an F-22 and an Su-57 is wont make any practical difference on the battlefield as each is likely to be able to defeat their enemies air to air missiles so it will come down to manouvering combat and guns and numbers... the west currently has numbers, but no IADS to support those numbers and make them useful.
F-22s will likely be soon retired and the F-35 is a terrible aircraft that will damage HATO for some time to come economically.
The US edge in stealth is largely meaningless because their air defence forces are not optimised to hunt and deal with stealth targets while Russian air defence is so effectively Russian air defence can detect more stealthy US aircraft and western air defence would struggle to deal with conventional cruise missile and drone and hypersonic weapon threats let alone stealth.
The fact that the stealth is built in to the materials instead of needing to be painted on (and then left to cure for a day) means operational tempo rates can be much higher and operational costs will be rather more comparable to conventional aircraft.
Cheaper to buy and cheaper to operate... and also stealthy... I believe if it was America they would be talking about game changing and new levels and other such bollocks.
Broski likes this post
marcellogo- Posts : 573
Points : 579
Join date : 2012-08-02
Age : 54
Location : Italy
- Post n°507
Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #8
william.boutrous wrote:It is probably not how you calculate RCS.
95% reduction means 1, log reduction. Also, I am sure the original planned coating served a similar purpose.
Additional issues with the current Su-57 version
Engines (will be upgraded in Su-57M)
Engine intakes (will not change in Su 57M although not sure why they didn't improve this bit of the design)
Protruding probes (will change in Su 57M but not the level of F22)
Overall shaping (Will not Change in Su-57M)
Su-57 will not reach the RCS level of F22 with only a new RAM coating.
It doesn't need to either because Su-57 is a defensive weapon intended to fly over friendly airspace with the support of ground radars and contest an attack by a superior stealthy foe.
Actually, an armed confrontation of a Su-57 with a F-22 is more than improbable, last update of the Raptor would be applied just on 120 planes of 187 serial ones produced.
The rest would be used just for training.
No one of F-22 is based abroad or anywhere near to the frontier of another state (except Cuba) and they are tasked with role than in the RUASF are performed by Mig-31 instead.
So the adversary that the Felon would directly face instead would be the F-35A and also the actual production version is more than enough for deal with it.
And also actually there are more J-20 than F-22 in service so leave it to them
GarryB and lancelot like this post
thegopnik- Posts : 1375
Points : 1381
Join date : 2017-09-20
- Post n°508
Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #8
william.boutrus wrote:It is probably not how you calculate RCS.
95% reduction means 1, log reduction. Also, I am sure the original planned coating served a similar purpose.
Additional issues with the current Su-57 version
Engines (will be upgraded in Su-57M)
Engine intakes (will not change in Su 57M although not sure why they didn't improve this bit of the design)
Protruding probes (will change in Su 57M but not the level of F22)
Overall shaping (Will not Change in Su-57M)
Su-57 will not reach the RCS level of F22 with only a new RAM coating.
It doesn't need to either because Su-57 is a defensive weapon intended to fly over friendly airspace with the support of ground radars and contest an attack by a superior stealthy foe.
I took the value of the patent RCS and the value of 5% with the assumption of what Rostec says that 95% of it would all be absorbed. (of course, I know that is a rough estimate since they used a coating for cockpit glass)
Engine intakes: have a curved shape they are not like the F-18 for the 100th time. The engines also have a radar blocker in the intake to reduce RCS. Finally, it can apply the engine mesh screens to further reduce radar profile of the engine in case you need to, at cost of speed, and the second stage engine will have composite fan blades, and treatments to reduce RCS of the engine in the frontal aspect.
The F-22 lacks an infrared system that if the frontal aspect values somehow are .001 or lower on the Su-57 or in your case values that still can't reach .0001m2 from the front only the performance of new infrared systems would track the F-22 before the F-22 radar would track the Su-57. They have had photonic radar prototypes with their modules tested and I heard a full scale production on PICs starts in 2024 which is the year the testing of the 2nd phase Su-57 would end. So rather or not protruding bulbs are a problem for its current infrared system with RAM to cause much of a significant RCS return value with creeping wave return it can be removed if it causes that much of hassle since photonic radars values will be getting close in the EM spectrum to infrared but that is currently not the case.
GarryB- Posts : 36285
Points : 36817
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
- Post n°509
Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #8
All the tiny sub metre measures of stealth are for high frequency Ku and Ka band radar that can actually see the shape of the target, and therefore the shape of the target effects the return.
Think of a person standing in a field in complete darkness. Shine a torch on them and you can see them. Paint them totally black and you can still see them but it is much harder to see them easily compared to if they are white or brightly coloured.
Imagine they pick up a full length mirror and hold it up in front of themselves... your light is reflected directly back at you and you could see them from much much greater distances than if they didn't have a mirror. But now think about what happens if they turn that mirror 45 degrees so instead of reflecting the light from your torch back at you it reflects that light off in another direction... angled up so you can't see the light reflected along the ground either.
But now change the frequency.... instead of using visible light use a thermal imager that does not use visible light at all and you will see a black spot where the mirror is in the field.
L band radar are long enough that they can't see features and shapes, the entire aircraft reflects a signal... more like sonar than radar really... it gives you an indication of presence, how big the object is, how far away it is, and the shift in signal if it is moving and how fast.
If your main radar does not detect anything then your L band wing mounted radar can scan and find a significantly sized object your other radar could not easily detect.
NEBO is a ground based anti stealth system that connects long and short wave radar and computers to process their information to maximise the effectiveness of both radar types and to minimise the problems with each type to get the best possible anti stealth performance and I would think the radar on the Su-35 and Su-57s would be treated the same in terms of optimisation to find and kill stealth targets... aircraft, missiles, and drones.
The difference is that the aircraft have thermal and IRST sensors that can be included in the computations to further improve performance.
And also that Su-57s and Su-35s wont operate alone so multiple aircraft could scan together while other aircraft can just listen for results and the results combined to get a better picture of what is operating in the airspace in front of them.
Think of a person standing in a field in complete darkness. Shine a torch on them and you can see them. Paint them totally black and you can still see them but it is much harder to see them easily compared to if they are white or brightly coloured.
Imagine they pick up a full length mirror and hold it up in front of themselves... your light is reflected directly back at you and you could see them from much much greater distances than if they didn't have a mirror. But now think about what happens if they turn that mirror 45 degrees so instead of reflecting the light from your torch back at you it reflects that light off in another direction... angled up so you can't see the light reflected along the ground either.
But now change the frequency.... instead of using visible light use a thermal imager that does not use visible light at all and you will see a black spot where the mirror is in the field.
L band radar are long enough that they can't see features and shapes, the entire aircraft reflects a signal... more like sonar than radar really... it gives you an indication of presence, how big the object is, how far away it is, and the shift in signal if it is moving and how fast.
If your main radar does not detect anything then your L band wing mounted radar can scan and find a significantly sized object your other radar could not easily detect.
NEBO is a ground based anti stealth system that connects long and short wave radar and computers to process their information to maximise the effectiveness of both radar types and to minimise the problems with each type to get the best possible anti stealth performance and I would think the radar on the Su-35 and Su-57s would be treated the same in terms of optimisation to find and kill stealth targets... aircraft, missiles, and drones.
The difference is that the aircraft have thermal and IRST sensors that can be included in the computations to further improve performance.
And also that Su-57s and Su-35s wont operate alone so multiple aircraft could scan together while other aircraft can just listen for results and the results combined to get a better picture of what is operating in the airspace in front of them.
thegopnik and Broski like this post
Kiko- Posts : 2142
Points : 2168
Join date : 2020-11-11
Age : 74
Location : Brasilia
- Post n°510
Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #8
Rostec has developed a communication complex with AI for the Su-57 fighter, 04.21.2023.
Rostec has developed a communication system with artificial intelligence for the Su-57 fighter.
MOSCOW, April 21 - RIA Novosti. Rostec has developed an artificial intelligence communication system for 5th generation aircraft, the state corporation told reporters.
"Ruselectronics holding of the Rostec State Corporation has developed a set of on-board digital communication tools using artificial intelligence technologies. The equipment is designed for fifth-generation aircraft. Its use will improve the quality of information transfer between aircraft and ground complexes," the corporation said.
Currently, the Russian Aerospace Forces operate 5th generation Su-57 fighters. In particular, as RIA Novosti sources previously reported, they are used during the NWO.
The complex, developed by the specialists of NPP Polet (part of Roselectronics ), operates in the high and very high frequency ranges. The use of cognitive radio technology makes it possible to significantly increase the interference and reconnaissance immunity of the on-board complex communications.
The equipment ensures the reliability of information transmission due to noise-immune coding, interleaving of symbols in the message, common time synchronization in signal processing, the possibility of simultaneous transmission of messages over parallel channels, increasing the range of stable communication, as well as the use of artificial intelligence technologies.
Alexei Komyakov, General Director of NPP Polet, noted that many functional tasks that increase the efficiency of aviation operations are solved with the help of on-board digital communication systems. At present, these complexes are widely used for the exchange of messages between aircraft avionics and ground services.
"Our new complex is an initiative development and is planned to be introduced as part of the S-111 communications complex," he said.
The complex includes computing devices, interleavers and deinterleavers, RF antenna matching devices, digital signal processing units, error-correcting coding and decoding devices, as well as a global navigation satellite system signal receiver with an antenna and a digital signal processing and synchronization bus. The patent for the invention was presented at the Moscow International Salon of Inventions and Innovative Technologies "Archimedes-2023" and received a gold medal.
https://ria.ru/20230421/kompleks-1866808807.html
Rostec has developed a communication system with artificial intelligence for the Su-57 fighter.
MOSCOW, April 21 - RIA Novosti. Rostec has developed an artificial intelligence communication system for 5th generation aircraft, the state corporation told reporters.
"Ruselectronics holding of the Rostec State Corporation has developed a set of on-board digital communication tools using artificial intelligence technologies. The equipment is designed for fifth-generation aircraft. Its use will improve the quality of information transfer between aircraft and ground complexes," the corporation said.
Currently, the Russian Aerospace Forces operate 5th generation Su-57 fighters. In particular, as RIA Novosti sources previously reported, they are used during the NWO.
The complex, developed by the specialists of NPP Polet (part of Roselectronics ), operates in the high and very high frequency ranges. The use of cognitive radio technology makes it possible to significantly increase the interference and reconnaissance immunity of the on-board complex communications.
The equipment ensures the reliability of information transmission due to noise-immune coding, interleaving of symbols in the message, common time synchronization in signal processing, the possibility of simultaneous transmission of messages over parallel channels, increasing the range of stable communication, as well as the use of artificial intelligence technologies.
Alexei Komyakov, General Director of NPP Polet, noted that many functional tasks that increase the efficiency of aviation operations are solved with the help of on-board digital communication systems. At present, these complexes are widely used for the exchange of messages between aircraft avionics and ground services.
"Our new complex is an initiative development and is planned to be introduced as part of the S-111 communications complex," he said.
The complex includes computing devices, interleavers and deinterleavers, RF antenna matching devices, digital signal processing units, error-correcting coding and decoding devices, as well as a global navigation satellite system signal receiver with an antenna and a digital signal processing and synchronization bus. The patent for the invention was presented at the Moscow International Salon of Inventions and Innovative Technologies "Archimedes-2023" and received a gold medal.
https://ria.ru/20230421/kompleks-1866808807.html
GarryB, franco, George1, xeno, LMFS, Hole, Broski and Belisarius like this post
Krepost- Posts : 571
Points : 573
Join date : 2021-12-08
- Post n°511
Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #8
I will leave this here:
franco, LMFS, Hole, lancelot, Scorpius, Broski, Arkanghelsk and Belisarius like this post
|
|