Russia Defence Forum

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


+10
limb
Cyberspec
GarryB
x_54_u43
Hole
medo
JohninMK
bandit6
PapaDragon
Russian_Patriot_
14 posters

    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2

    Mir
    Mir

    Posts : 707
    Points : 709
    Join date : 2021-06-10

    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 2 Empty Re: Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2

    Post  Mir Mon Sep 13, 2021 11:32 am

    Having missiles like the Kh-35U available on aircraft like the Su-30SM and Su-34 would be far more flexible than being on a boat or a land based missile system. Russia certainly has the capability together with the Kh-31's for example. Even the Ka-52 is set to use the Kh-35. It would be a waist sinking a small missile strike craft with something like the Kh-32 or Kinzhal.
    Isos
    Isos

    Posts : 7865
    Points : 7849
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 2 Empty Re: Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2

    Post  Isos Mon Sep 13, 2021 12:15 pm

    Mir wrote:Having missiles like the Kh-35U available on aircraft like the Su-30SM and Su-34 would be far more flexible than being on a boat or a land based missile system. Russia certainly has the capability together with the Kh-31's for example. Even the Ka-52 is set to use the Kh-35. It would be a waist sinking a small missile strike craft with something like the Kh-32 or Kinzhal.

    Kh-35 is pretty useless for the aircaft. They have better weapons like kh-31 for anti ship or kh-59 for ground attack.

    Small missile boat will be destroyed by kh-25 or ATGM launched by an helicopter like when they attack a ukrainian boat.

    For bigger ships they will use a Tzikon to test it... that doesn't happen everyday and would for sure be an isolated accident so they can test the best and most strategic missile they have in a real situation.
    Mir
    Mir

    Posts : 707
    Points : 709
    Join date : 2021-06-10

    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 2 Empty Re: Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2

    Post  Mir Mon Sep 13, 2021 1:18 pm

    Isos wrote:

    Kh-35 is pretty useless for the aircaft. They have better weapons like kh-31 for anti ship or kh-59 for ground attack.

    Small missile boat will be destroyed by kh-25 or ATGM launched by an helicopter like when they attack a ukrainian boat.

    For bigger ships they will use a Tzikon to test it... that doesn't happen everyday and would for sure be an isolated accident so they can test the best and most strategic missile they have in a real situation.

    I would not say that any of the current Russian anti-ship missiles are useless - they are by far the best in the world as far as I am concerned. The latest version of the Kh-35 has a significant range of around 300km and is slightly faster than the equally great Kh-59. Only the Kh-59 Mk2 offers a longer range. Both these missiles are much slower than the Kh-31's but they have significantly longer ranges. All of these missiles have their place in the Russian anti-ship arsenal. What missile to use (including ATGM's) would depend on the situation. For example you won't use an ATGM on a small missile ship if there is a significant anti-air threat in the area.
    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 30564
    Points : 31094
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 2 Empty Re: Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2

    Post  GarryB Tue Sep 14, 2021 5:41 am

    It was spotted on su-34 in Syria back in 2018 during the NATO missile attack.

    Yes, that was for testing.

    How many Su-34s does the Russian Navy operate?

    Having missiles like the Kh-35U available on aircraft like the Su-30SM and Su-34 would be far more flexible than being on a boat or a land based missile system.

    The Russians are not as air power focussed as the west is.

    The Navy would be more likely to sent a patrol boat if there is an incursion or potential incursion... as we saw with the British corvette violating Russian waters in the Crimea.... the planes were Su-24s and they had iron bombs for warning "shots".

    Being a coastal thing if they had to sink it it most likely would have been via a missile launched from a shore battery... or 10.

    Russia certainly has the capability together with the Kh-31's for example.

    And the Kh-59 and Kh-59M (AS-13 and AS-18) and newer models as well...

    Even the Ka-52 is set to use the Kh-35. It would be a waist sinking a small missile strike craft with something like the Kh-32 or Kinzhal.

    I would expect for small missile boats that Hermes or even Kh-38 would be used to remain outside the range of MANPAD air defence.

    Kh-35 is pretty useless for the aircaft. They have better weapons like kh-31 for anti ship or kh-59 for ground attack.

    Kh-35 is actually a rather good missile... many western naval CIWS struggle with missiles flying below 5m... Phalanx being an obvious example...

    I would not say that any of the current Russian anti-ship missiles are useless - they are by far the best in the world as far as I am concerned.

    I totally agree and would suggest a regiment of flanker type aircraft launching dozens of missiles could be smart and being able to carry about 6 decent anti ship missiles per aircraft and there being 24 aircraft means you could climb to reasonable altitude and speed and launch some Kh-35s, and then appear to turn away, and then ten minutes later climb and accelerate again and launch a volley of Kh-31s timed so they arrive first... the enemy ships will likely notice the activity and wonder if they are under attack... with the second volley of high flying mach 3.5 missiles they will know they are under attack and be able to track the missiles streaking towards them.

    But then a ship like a British frigate with 48 missiles is going to struggle... and as it is dealing with the high flying fast missiles will it notice the 4m altitude subsonic missiles sneak over the horizon heading towards them?

    For ships like the upgraded Udaloy then having UKSK means a choice of weapons, but equally in any ship group it might be fighting there will be ships that don't require supersonic missiles to take out... support ships... troop transport ships... tankers... a few Kh-35s can take those down in the background while the faster missiles are dealing with the bigger threats...

    What missile to use (including ATGM's) would depend on the situation. For example you won't use an ATGM on a small missile ship if there is a significant anti-air threat in the area.

    Kh-25L or Hermes would be good choices... even the Grom glide bombs/rocket powered bomb based on the Kh-38 would be rather useful for a variety of targets.
    Mir
    Mir

    Posts : 707
    Points : 709
    Join date : 2021-06-10

    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 2 Empty Re: Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2

    Post  Mir Tue Sep 14, 2021 9:10 am

    GarryB wrote:

    The Russians are not as air power focussed as the west is.

    The Navy would be more likely to sent a patrol boat if there is an incursion or potential incursion... as we saw with the British corvette violating Russian waters in the Crimea.... the planes were Su-24s and they had iron bombs for warning "shots".

    Being a coastal thing if they had to sink it it most likely would have been via a missile launched from a shore battery... or 10.


    The Russians like the Soviets will certainly use air power together with submarines as their primary strike asset against NATO's navies. The Tu-22M3 is a prime example of that power.

    With the British destroyer's incursion and the few brave NATO ships that followed, the Russians showed a lot more teeth than the few warning bombs that were dropped by the Su-24. There was clear footage of Su-30SM's armed with Kh-31's escorting these ships.

    With shore based missiles like the Bal and Bastion systems - you will have to wait for the enemy ships to get into range before you can engage them. Something like the Su-30SM armed with a Kh-31/35/59 can basically pick and choose where and when to strike. That's the flexibility I'm talking about.
    George1
    George1

    Posts : 16580
    Points : 17085
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 2 Empty Re: Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2

    Post  George1 Tue Sep 14, 2021 1:26 pm

    GarryB, franco, PapaDragon, zepia and Russian_Patriot_ like this post

    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 30564
    Points : 31094
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 2 Empty Re: Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2

    Post  GarryB Wed Sep 15, 2021 7:18 am

    The Russians like the Soviets will certainly use air power together with submarines as their primary strike asset against NATO's navies.

    This is probably true, but don't expect them to turn into HATO and suddenly start depending on air power for everything, they will remain largely defensive, and so the anti ship capacity they will use most will be coastal batteries... which includes the Uran (Bal), but Uran is primarily a light anti ship weapon that can be carried by tactical fighters and helicopters as well as smaller patrol ships.

    It wont be the core of the Russian Navy like the Harpoon is for the western navies.

    The Tu-22M3 is a prime example of that power.

    And as I pointed out the Tu-22M3 will likely be carrying Kh-32s, or another weapon that allows good standoff launch range performance for the aircraft.

    The Su-34 is more likely to end up with something like a Brahmos-M type smaller lighter faster version of Brahmos... but based on Zircon... that is maybe 1 ton to 1.5 tons each so it could perhaps carry five-six missiles at a time, or an upgraded Su-33 might do the same.

    With the British destroyer's incursion and the few brave NATO ships that followed, the Russians showed a lot more teeth than the few warning bombs that were dropped by the Su-24. There was clear footage of Su-30SM's armed with Kh-31's escorting these ships.

    That was the Get out of here Stalker... scene.... if it was a British carrier group with landing ships, the aircraft would be fitted with anti radiation models of the Kh-31, and air to air missiles to deal with British carrier based aircraft, but the ships themselves would likely be attacked and sunk with coastal anti ship missiles fired in enormous numbers to overwhelm the defences of the British ships.

    With shore based missiles like the Bal and Bastion systems - you will have to wait for the enemy ships to get into range before you can engage them. Something like the Su-30SM armed with a Kh-31/35/59 can basically pick and choose where and when to strike. That's the flexibility I'm talking about.

    But where do you decide to sink the ships?

    One could argue that the Black Sea is a Russian dominated lake, but it has HATO countries that could host enormous numbers of western fighters if they wanted to... a military coup that overthrows Erdogan and leads to a pro US/pro UK anti Russian idiot could lead to Turkey allowing all sorts of ships into the Black Sea...

    Sinking ships in the Med does not really help Russia because the Su-30s would be vulnerable all the way there and back and while a regiment of Flankers could launch 100 + missiles at the British ships, they are probably not the missiles you would want to lead with for such an attack... the new longer ranged Kh-31s move at Mach 3.5 over about 300km or so but they have much better missiles... why would they not use those?

    The Kh-35 and Kh-31s are excellent missiles for inside the Black Sea or Baltic or Pacific or Northern fleet and out at sea they could also be used in specific situations against certain ships where you only want a 145kg boom instead of something much bigger, but neither are likely to become their primary anti ship missile... the Kh-31 being valuable in this sense as a passive homing anti radar missile too.
    Russian_Patriot_
    Russian_Patriot_

    Posts : 1137
    Points : 1151
    Join date : 2021-06-08
    Location : Perm, Russia

    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 2 Empty Re: Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2

    Post  Russian_Patriot_ Wed Sep 15, 2021 7:27 am

    Presumably Su-34 with an outboard tank with a built-in Sych reconnaissance container
    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 2 J4cxyy10
    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 2 Uayry310
    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 2 Tz5pab10Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 2 Yg8r8o10
    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 2 Zztfhj10

    zepia, Hole and Mir like this post

    Mir
    Mir

    Posts : 707
    Points : 709
    Join date : 2021-06-10

    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 2 Empty Re: Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2

    Post  Mir Wed Sep 15, 2021 9:18 am

    @Gary

    Any enemy carrier or amphibious assault task force approaching the Russian coastline would initially be attacked by the Tu-22M3's with Kh-32's and Mig31's with Kinzhals and SSGN's with Tsirkons etc. As I've said before - these are the principal weapons and missiles Russia would use in attacking major enemy naval ships.

    Any left overs would be sunk or disabled by Su-34's and Su30SM's armed with Kh35/59 and Kh31. Any ships surviving that lot would only then get the attention of the coastal batteries. Russia is certainly not going to wait for any attacking force to first get into land based missile range before attacking these approaching ships. Mind you surface ships and subs will probably feast on the left over well before most of the Bal and Bastions would get a chance to get into action.

    The US and NATO uses air power to minimize body bags but the flexibility of air power should never be underestimated.
    Isos
    Isos

    Posts : 7865
    Points : 7849
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 2 Empty Re: Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2

    Post  Isos Wed Sep 15, 2021 10:27 am

    A bad system if you ask me. If I correctly understand it's a fuel tank with EW/EO system inside ? Too big and the good thing about fuel tank is that you can throw them away and not be slow down by it.

    This one you can't.

    Su-34 has already inbuild systems that could have been upgraded.
    Mir
    Mir

    Posts : 707
    Points : 709
    Join date : 2021-06-10

    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 2 Empty Re: Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2

    Post  Mir Wed Sep 15, 2021 11:18 am

    Isos wrote:A bad system if you ask me. If I correctly understand it's a fuel tank with EW/EO system inside ? Too big and the good thing about fuel tank is that you can throw them away and not be slow down by it.

    This one you can't.

    Su-34 has already inbuild systems that could have been upgraded.

    Yes I can agree to a certain extend with you but the Su-34 is first and foremost an attack aircraft and although it is very well equipped to defend itself from air attack it would certainly try to avoid contact when on a strike or reconnaissance mission. Any recce pod would take up that space and it wont be disposable anyway so you may as well have a duel fuel and recce pod there. Reminds me in a way of the old Mirage IIIE with it's duel fuel and rocked pods. Not ideal but you might as well esp if you want some extra range.

    Sponsored content

    Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2 - Page 2 Empty Re: Su-34 Tactical Bomber: News #2

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Sat Sep 18, 2021 10:06 pm