the sheeple are too dumb to see the obvious. They think that since it was OK before it will be OK in the future. This
can be called the steady state fallacy. If reality were steady state, then nothing would exist.
GarryB, Firebird and Hole like this post
GarryB, franco and kvs like this post
GarryB, franco, kvs and Hole like this post
Firebird likes this post
GarryB and kvs like this post
U.K doesn't import Hindus. That stopped after slavery was discontinued in UK. In fact these days its quite the opposite - the entry of Hindus in the U.K is actively discouraged. While the U.K government regularly scouts for students from India who are encouraged to study in UK it's only because foreign students help them to subsidize education for locals. They are forced to leave once their education is over.ALAMO wrote:The same reason why UK "imports" Hindu, Pakistani, etc - is a colonial heritage.
Marocco was a French protectorate since 1912 but was conquered even earlier. Moroccans could just go to France as part of the empire. The same applies to a big part of Africa in general.
So in reality the funny part is what F_P said - those are people who are 3rd generation of the Maroccan population that relocated to the metropolis voluntarily. Yet they radicalized instead of becoming French. This is how Multikulti works in reality - not at all.
GarryB and Odin of Ossetia like this post
Hindus are a race of people just like Slavs are a race. Hinduism is not a religion, there is no book, no papacy, no systematically associated values or commandments. Only western invaders like Brits labelled it as a religion.GarryB wrote:BTW correct me if I am wrong but Hindu is a religion and not a race anyway.
ALAMO, Kiko and Belisarius like this post
jhelb dislikes this post
Odin of Ossetia likes this post
Sujoy wrote:Moroccan football supporters go on a rampage in France after Morocco lost to France. Why does France/Europe even import these scum?
More importantly, Hindus do not go on a rampage in UK no matter what the trigger maybe. And certainly not when India loses to England in a sporting arena.
Really off topic, but the mainly problem with India is the "cast" and social class system.
The beliefs of Hinduism are influenced by the local, regional, caste, or community-driven practices. Yet many beliefs can be common in all variations, these are the core beliefs.
White supremacist like jhelb will be devastated to learn that a popular theory is that "Hindus" themselves came to India from parts of modern day central Russia.
These hindus are known as gypsies in Russia. Gypsies in Russia are beyond competition in terms of the number of crimes committed per thousand people. There is no crime that they do not commit.
Ethnic Russians hate these gypsies
The problem with Gypsies is that majority of their entire population are criminals.
Look at the Red Fort in Delhi, it is not primitive, but it failed to defend India from the British invaders. The Asian Indians had some interesting weapons, but were unable to effectively use them to defend themselves from the British and other invaders; they had gunpowder, guns, and even artillery, but it still did not help.
Tolstoy and Hole like this post
Hole likes this post
Disapproving random acts of violence is not racism. Besides didn't realize the words Morocco and France are racist.GarryB wrote:If I was banning for racism... do I ignore this:
Moroccan football supporters go on a rampage in France after Morocco lost to France. Why does France/Europe even import these scum?
France has riots and civil disobedience problems with or without soccer results... and it is not related to Moroccan soccer supporters.
There is no Hinduism. It's an english coinage, perhaps because they tried to equate local practices with Abrahamic religions.GarryB wrote:To be an ism it has to be a religion because races don't have a belief system.
What has Red Fort got to do with preventing invasion?Odin of Ossetia wrote:
Look at the Red Fort in Delhi, it is not primitive, but it failed to defend India from the British invaders.
Tolstoy dislikes this post
I am an ethnic Russian, and I DON'T hate Gypsies. So your statement is at least an exaggeration.jhelb wrote:Ethnic Russians hate these gypsies
GarryB, kvs and Hole like this post
New Zealand has gone full police state🧐
Anyone with a different POV is an enemy.
Disapproving random acts of violence is not racism. Besides didn't realize the words Morocco and France are racist.
Thousands of Indian students study in Russia, Ukraine and France. India has never won a single football match against Russia/Soviet Union or France. Not a single Indian went around destroying public property in Moscow, Kiev or Paris.
GarryB, flamming_python and Hole like this post
That is why Gypsies have a bad reputation among the Russian population - because of their involvement in street crime. At the same time, no one cares about race. No one will hate law-abiding Gypsies because of their ethnicity. Similarly, for example, the negative attitude towards migrants from Central Asia is not due to racism, but to the fact that in Moscow up to 90% of street crime and 70% of rapes are committed by migrants from Central Asia.
GarryB likes this post
scorpius wrote:I am an ethnic Russian, and I DON'T hate Gypsies. So your statement is at least an exaggeration.
The main problem of Gypsies is that they have a very large percentage of crime in their ranks. Especially in the nineties - many small drug dealers were Gypsies. They also often engage in street fraud, extortion and theft.
That is why Gypsies have a bad reputation among the Russian population - because of their involvement in street crime. At the same time, no one cares about race. No one will hate law-abiding Gypsies because of their ethnicity.
kvs and Odin of Ossetia like this post
GarryB likes this post