Home
Latest images
Register
Log in
The NATzO modus operandi is clear. Its fake stream media creates propaganda narratives and talking points. These are then
used to frame its actions against Russia. So NATzO pushes its offensive military infrastructure to Russia's border. But claims
it is defending against Russian aggression. It repeats the annexation of Crimea lie while in reality it was self-organized militias
not even armed who stopped the Ukr thugs sent by Kiev to take over like they did in Kharkov. Russian soldiers stationed
in Sevastopol did not participate in this. They secured the key airports to prevent military transport planes from Turkey and
rump Ukraine from injecting militants. A flight with Tatar jihadis trained in the Middle East was stopped from landing.
NATzO fake stream media consumers think that 12,000 soldiers (deployed already in Sevastopol and not moved in) can pacify 2.5
million people without firing any shots. The only incident during the "annexation" was a shootout at an Ukr military base where two
soldiers were victims. The so-called annexation is a referendum where the vast majority voted for a better life.
The "Putin offs his critics" narrative is a clear frame job. The tiny amounts of such critics and the lack of any real motive exposes
these narratives as lies. Putin is supposedly offing people after letting them run around for over a decade doing maximal PR
"damage" and then to do himself real damage. These "Putin victims" were all has-beens who were fading into obscurity such as
Politkovskaya and Nemtsov. Litvinenko fits this category as well since his non-existent suitcase full of "evidence" was never
produced even though he had years and years to do this. All of these "Putin offings" serve NATzO propaganda agendas and
it is NATzO deciders who had a clear motive to stage them. Putin is obviously not a retard and would understand that offing some
has-been serves no purpose. Regimes in Latin America wasted no time in offing trade union organizers and journalists as soon
as they had the chance. The victims did not get to run around for decades doing what they pleased.
We have "reports" produced by so-called "independent" NATzO outfits that attempt to attribute every journalist death in Russia
from 1992 on to Putin. This includes Russian journalists killed in Chechnya and those killed by mafias throughout Russia when they
did investigative reporting. It also includes Paul Khlebnikov who wrote The Godfather of the Kremlin (I own this book) who was
murdered. Khlebnikov's book is about Boris Berezovsky and his crimes so why would Putin kill him? This is the sort of inanity
that NATzO sheeple lap up as Gospel Truth (TM).
NATzO's hate campaign against Russia using Putin as the focus of its endless "two minutes' hate" is transparent.
used to frame its actions against Russia. So NATzO pushes its offensive military infrastructure to Russia's border. But claims
it is defending against Russian aggression. It repeats the annexation of Crimea lie while in reality it was self-organized militias
not even armed who stopped the Ukr thugs sent by Kiev to take over like they did in Kharkov. Russian soldiers stationed
in Sevastopol did not participate in this. They secured the key airports to prevent military transport planes from Turkey and
rump Ukraine from injecting militants. A flight with Tatar jihadis trained in the Middle East was stopped from landing.
NATzO fake stream media consumers think that 12,000 soldiers (deployed already in Sevastopol and not moved in) can pacify 2.5
million people without firing any shots. The only incident during the "annexation" was a shootout at an Ukr military base where two
soldiers were victims. The so-called annexation is a referendum where the vast majority voted for a better life.
The "Putin offs his critics" narrative is a clear frame job. The tiny amounts of such critics and the lack of any real motive exposes
these narratives as lies. Putin is supposedly offing people after letting them run around for over a decade doing maximal PR
"damage" and then to do himself real damage. These "Putin victims" were all has-beens who were fading into obscurity such as
Politkovskaya and Nemtsov. Litvinenko fits this category as well since his non-existent suitcase full of "evidence" was never
produced even though he had years and years to do this. All of these "Putin offings" serve NATzO propaganda agendas and
it is NATzO deciders who had a clear motive to stage them. Putin is obviously not a retard and would understand that offing some
has-been serves no purpose. Regimes in Latin America wasted no time in offing trade union organizers and journalists as soon
as they had the chance. The victims did not get to run around for decades doing what they pleased.
We have "reports" produced by so-called "independent" NATzO outfits that attempt to attribute every journalist death in Russia
from 1992 on to Putin. This includes Russian journalists killed in Chechnya and those killed by mafias throughout Russia when they
did investigative reporting. It also includes Paul Khlebnikov who wrote The Godfather of the Kremlin (I own this book) who was
murdered. Khlebnikov's book is about Boris Berezovsky and his crimes so why would Putin kill him? This is the sort of inanity
that NATzO sheeple lap up as Gospel Truth (TM).
NATzO's hate campaign against Russia using Putin as the focus of its endless "two minutes' hate" is transparent.
