Western propaganda

The US is crapping its pants accusing Russia of totalitarian repression of dissident voices.   Why?  Because the law on foreign agent
activity is being tightened.   Oh, my.   Looks like the changes in the law are hitting right on target.    Foreign paid anti-Russian
propaganda inside Russia is not "freedom of thought and expression".   It is a class of hate speech.

Russia has upgraded a helicopter base on the small island Gogland in the Gulf of Finland and NATO's fake stream media is
crapping its pants like there is no tomorrow. My God what a collection of bloody hypocrites. When NATO deploys its
military right up to the Russian border that's fine and dandy. But my oh my when Russia deploys defensive military assets
on its own territory well removed from any NATO border, that's epic aggression. GTFO, NATO swine.

Hole wrote:Russia should follow suit with an S-400 and an Bastion system.

I agree since NATO is openly talking about invading former-Koenigsberg. Once again, when NATO talks open aggression it
is the same as angels singing, but Russia just has to move a military helicopter from one part of its territory to another to
get NATO propaganda orifices squealing with indignation.

OMG, Russians like cats and use them for propaganda against the west. If you wanted an example of the intellectual bankruptcy of
the western Russia haters, here you have it. Trying to make the Kerch Strait bridge mascot cat into something nefarious takes the
cake. Your retarded paranoia can't account for the love of cats in Japan and the routine use of them as mascots such as this case:

Remember the recent MSM splash about a "masive" radiation leak from a sunken Soviet nuclear submarine near Norway?
Here is the truth on the hysteria.

No wonder nuclear power is being deprecated and thus making global warming worse. Thanks you f*cking fake stream
media whores!

nomadski wrote:
NATO is not a nation. EU is not a nation. Yet Russia was attacked by Napoleon and Hitler. Both nations. I think it is the fate of  coastal nations to be at odds with continental nations. But NATO is falling apart.

https://youtu.be/LBjGD5VGVg0

You are insinuating that there is no coherence and coordination in NATO. The is obviously not true. NATO is part of the US empire and the deciders in
Washington and its NATO quislings are goose-stepping to greater glory.

Russia needs to continue to build up its military forces and to isolate its economy from NATzO blackmail and sabotage. NATzO can do
f*ck all about Russia's growth in power and economy. Their propaganda stunts serve only as preaching to the choir. Russia does
not need to win over brainwashed western hearts and minds. If NATzO lunatics think that they can take out Russia with a drang nach
osten like Napoleon and Hitler, they will suffer the same fate. Total defeat.

NATzO is just hoping that Russians themselves will crack under the propaganda attack. They think the liberast fringe in Russia has
potential to take over. They are sadly mistaken.

The western media is full bore spewing propaganda fiction. The usual orifices such as "The Economist" see
tinfoil hat conspiracy where none exists. Supposedly Putin has murdered too many people to leave office so
he is maneuvering to be leader for life. Yo, Economist swine, do the thousands of civilians butchered by Obama
during US drone operations in the Middle East (84% bystander to 16% target kill ratio) count? Putin is smeared
by you fake stream turds with the tin foil hat murder of Litvinenko and a handful of other "regime critics" without
a shred of actual proof. Shove your brain dead conjectures where the sun don't shine.

Another western fake stream media orifice is bemoaning the failure of Medvedev to move Russia away from its
supposed dependence on oil an gas exports. Wow. Some journalism there. Oil and gas account for around 7%
of Russia's GDP and this fraction as been systematically falling over the last 20 years, including under Medvedev's
tenure as president and prime minister. When will I see so much concern about oil and gas export dependence
in the case of Canada? Compared to Russia, Canada is actually dependent on oil and gas extraction and exports.

https://summit.news/2020/01/20/putin-rewrites-wwii-history-and-pushes-stalinist-propaganda/

A sample of the actual revisionism in the NATO west in the guise of a critique of "Russian revisionism"

A diplomatic row has emerged between Russia and Poland, after scandalous comments by Russian President Vladimir Putin emerged, in which he claimed that the invasion of Poland on the 17th of September 1939 was “necessary because the Polish government lost control of the country” and bizarrely claimed that the Soviet invasion “saved many lives”.

He further went on to accuse Poles of “negotiating with Hitler” and complained that the Poles have been dismantling Red Army memorials.

These comments are part of an increasingly worrying trend in Russian politics, which seeks to minimise and whitewash the crimes of the USSR, in particular their post war occupation of Central and Eastern Europe and their implementation of puppet governments which kept the region under the yolk of communism for almost half a century.

Pure spin and cherry picked quoting.

1) The "invasion" of "Poland" by the USSR in 1939 was the retaking of lands grabbed by the Poles in their 1920 military campaign that
actually invaded and annexed Soviet territory (eastern Belarus and Ukraine). Any discussion of the events without this context
is pure propaganda.

2) It is quite true that the Poland's regime was in a very weak state in 1939 and was not in any position to secure its territory in the
face of a Nazi invasion. The USSR knew that the Nazis were planning an invasion and thereby moved pre-emptively to create
land buffers for defense. Hitler had established a campaign of genocide so every target country was in a fight for
survival. So being "diplomatic" and worrying about Poland's territorial integrity (over illegally seize lands) was the last
thing on the list of concerns.

3) The Polish regime had no intention of allying with the USSR against the Nazis so the USSR could not be expected to support
it in 1939 in the face of a German invasion. Any support or "meddling" would have led to a military conflict with the Polish regime.
That would be an insane waste of men and munitions in the face of a Nazi drang nach osten.

4) The Polish regime had a non-aggression pact with Germany and did in fact negotiate with Hitler in Munich in 1938 where
Czechoslovakia was sold down the river and Poland invaded and grabbed a piece of its territory. So, in many ways, the
Poles were actual allies of Hitler in 1938 even this ally was preparing to invade them in 1939. How could the USSR be
expected to respect this Nazi ally regime?

5) The USSR's non-aggression pact with Germany was quite distinct from that of Poland. The USSR never supplied the
Nazis any industrial and military supplies. The prime exports were grain and food and similar civilian goods. Since it
was clear to anyone with a functional brain that Hitler was a nutjob bent on genocide and was planning to invade the
USSR, any "pact" that would buy time for the USSR to move its factories to the Urals and to build up its military potential
was not only sane but necessary.

6) The so-called carve up of "Poland" by the USSR and the Nazis was nothing of the sort. Stalin had managed to secure
a large territorial buffer by re-taking the lands annexed by Poland in 1920. That is a fail by Hitler who should have made
conditions in the non-aggression pact for Poland's territorial integrity. The fate of Poland-proper was none of the USSR's
concern because it was governed by a hostile regime that was playing footsie with Hitler.

7) The USSR did in fact save many lives (in the USSR) by creating land buffers since it prevented Hitler's success. This
is a stone hard fact that no amount of BS like the article above can obscure. All such propaganda pieces make it seem
that it would be no big deal if Hitler had won in the east. Thus they reveal their cryptic pro-Nazis agenda.