+53
sepheronx
limb
Belisarius
caveat emptor
Rasisuki Nebia
AlfaT8
Arkanghelsk
ALAMO
Podlodka77
Lennox
d_taddei2
11E
AZ-5
Krepost
LMFS
Gomig-21
Sujoy
Stealthflanker
Kiko
slasher
Mir
Yugo90
PhSt
AMCXXL
galicije83
Big_Gazza
Mindstorm
calripson
nero
The_Observer
lancelot
Finty
TMA1
Backman
Scorpius
JohninMK
GarryB
medo
Isos
AJ-47
George1
marcellogo
ult
franco
Hole
miketheterrible
dino00
kvs
owais.usmani
magnumcromagnon
PapaDragon
mnztr
hoom
57 posters
Su-30 for Russian Air Force #2
lancelot- Posts : 2696
Points : 2694
Join date : 2020-10-18
- Post n°326
Re: Su-30 for Russian Air Force #2
Did they upgrade the engine and radar of the Su-30SM2 as originally planned or not?
AMCXXL- Posts : 985
Points : 985
Join date : 2017-08-08
- Post n°327
Re: Su-30 for Russian Air Force #2
GarryB, franco, George1, zardof, Gomig-21, LMFS, lancelot and like this post
AMCXXL- Posts : 985
Points : 985
Join date : 2017-08-08
- Post n°328
Re: Su-30 for Russian Air Force #2
Su-30SM of the "Russian Knigths" Squadron in a combat mission
It is impressive to see how radar tricks are played. A Su-30SM flies alongside 2 Mi-28 "Havoc" helicopters.
The radar operator will think that there are 3 helicopters, he will send 1 response, he will give away his position, and he will be counterattacked by the Sukhoi's missiles.
It is impressive to see how radar tricks are played. A Su-30SM flies alongside 2 Mi-28 "Havoc" helicopters.
The radar operator will think that there are 3 helicopters, he will send 1 response, he will give away his position, and he will be counterattacked by the Sukhoi's missiles.
GarryB, franco, George1, Big_Gazza, PapaDragon, Gomig-21, Hole and Arkanghelsk like this post
headshot69 dislikes this post
headshot69- Posts : 25
Points : 31
Join date : 2015-10-09
Location : Terra Incognita
- Post n°329
Re: Su-30 for Russian Air Force #2
...not a combat mission... SU has no weapons...m28 and SU in combat will never fly in so close formation(stupid from tactical point of view) also your imagination of how the combat mission works is very naive...sorry...
ALAMO- Posts : 6707
Points : 6797
Join date : 2014-11-26
- Post n°330
Re: Su-30 for Russian Air Force #2
Oink oink oink, troll alert!
Gomig-21- Posts : 659
Points : 661
Join date : 2016-07-18
- Post n°331
Re: Su-30 for Russian Air Force #2
That was tremendously impressive. Just goes to show one of the many incredible capabilities of the Su-30SM. Flying at such low speed and at what appears to probably be its maximum allowable angle of attack without a hint of stalling or even showing any signs of the need to constantly make adjustments. The aircraft's attitude was just as steady as can be which is amazing in of itself. That's pretty much the reason why this specific maneuver is one of the most popular ones showcased at almost every airshow with all different types of aircraft.
The one in Canada with the RCAF F/A-18 that was training for an upcoming airshow and as soon as he slowed down and went into that high AoA, the jet suffered a flameout in the portside engine from a bird ingestion I believe and went down in less than 1.5 seconds. Miracle that the pilot ejected safely.
I think everyone remembers the great Anatoly Kovutchur having the same exact thing happen to him in 1989 at the Farnborough air show in Paris. This was one of the first times the west was able to see the MiG-29 up close and everyone had eyes glued on this demonstration which was incredible. Kovutchur flew that thing like it was no one else's business then same thing, slowed down and went into that high AoA maneuver, and the same thing happened to the MiG with a bird ingestion. This is the best example of the closest to the ground safest ejection ever. It looked like his parachute canopy opened fully 1-1-millionth of a second before his feet touched the ground.
As far as the combat aspect, it's certainly a viable tactic, why not? That's what HARM missiles are specifically designed for so why not create offensive tactics to facilitate the destruction of enemy radar sites. That's pretty much the entire reason the USAF designated entire air force regiments in the Wild Weasels was to attack enemy radars and air defense sites.
Get into that formation with the helicopters quickly, move into the designated sector while the aircraft's RWR picks up the enemy's GC radar location, break off at the appropriate stand-off distance and fire a couple of HARM missiles and retreat. Makes perfect sense and it's only reasonable to see such a tactic being conducted in a training exercise like this one.
The one in Canada with the RCAF F/A-18 that was training for an upcoming airshow and as soon as he slowed down and went into that high AoA, the jet suffered a flameout in the portside engine from a bird ingestion I believe and went down in less than 1.5 seconds. Miracle that the pilot ejected safely.
I think everyone remembers the great Anatoly Kovutchur having the same exact thing happen to him in 1989 at the Farnborough air show in Paris. This was one of the first times the west was able to see the MiG-29 up close and everyone had eyes glued on this demonstration which was incredible. Kovutchur flew that thing like it was no one else's business then same thing, slowed down and went into that high AoA maneuver, and the same thing happened to the MiG with a bird ingestion. This is the best example of the closest to the ground safest ejection ever. It looked like his parachute canopy opened fully 1-1-millionth of a second before his feet touched the ground.
As far as the combat aspect, it's certainly a viable tactic, why not? That's what HARM missiles are specifically designed for so why not create offensive tactics to facilitate the destruction of enemy radar sites. That's pretty much the entire reason the USAF designated entire air force regiments in the Wild Weasels was to attack enemy radars and air defense sites.
Get into that formation with the helicopters quickly, move into the designated sector while the aircraft's RWR picks up the enemy's GC radar location, break off at the appropriate stand-off distance and fire a couple of HARM missiles and retreat. Makes perfect sense and it's only reasonable to see such a tactic being conducted in a training exercise like this one.
franco, Hole and Arkanghelsk like this post
GarryB- Posts : 38992
Points : 39488
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
- Post n°332
Re: Su-30 for Russian Air Force #2
...not a combat mission... SU has no weapons...m28 and SU in combat will never fly in so close formation(stupid from tactical point of view) also your imagination of how the combat mission works is very naive...sorry...
Pretty sure they are not suggesting this video was a combat usage of the tactic... more like it is perhaps testing the idea and seeing if it would work.
Of course the irony is that Russia has a range of anti radar missiles including old Kh-25MP and similar types (called AS-12 I believe) as well as Kh-31 which could be carried by their Ka-52 helicopters to hunt down and destroy radars exposing themselves.
I think everyone remembers the great Anatoly Kovutchur having the same exact thing happen to him in 1989 at the Farnborough air show in Paris.
It did display at Farnborough in 1988, but the crash was in Paris in 1989.
Gomig-21 likes this post
Gomig-21- Posts : 659
Points : 661
Join date : 2016-07-18
- Post n°333
Re: Su-30 for Russian Air Force #2
GarryB wrote:It did display at Farnborough in 1988, but the crash was in Paris in 1989.
That's what I meant to say.
GarryB likes this post
Arkanghelsk- Posts : 3592
Points : 3598
Join date : 2021-12-08
- Post n°334
Re: Su-30 for Russian Air Force #2
franco, Big_Gazza, Gomig-21, Hole and lancelot like this post
mack8- Posts : 1039
Points : 1093
Join date : 2013-08-03
- Post n°335
Re: Su-30 for Russian Air Force #2
Here is a video of the Su-30SM delivery plus Yak-130 delivery as well.
https://twitter.com/vicktop55/status/1730850490844344810
https://twitter.com/vicktop55/status/1730850490844344810
GarryB, franco and Hole like this post
George1- Posts : 18315
Points : 18812
Join date : 2011-12-23
Location : Greece
- Post n°336
Re: Su-30 for Russian Air Force #2
https://bmpd.livejournal.com/4778616.html
Hole and lancelot like this post
Arkanghelsk- Posts : 3592
Points : 3598
Join date : 2021-12-08
- Post n°337
Re: Su-30 for Russian Air Force #2
Do we have any information on su30sm2 upgrade contract?
MOD has been releasing when a "new batch" of su35 or su34 is released, and takes care to blur out numbers and not give away numbers of new aircraft
When it comes to upgraded aircraft I think we are even more blind
How would we know if these things aren't rolling off the line like cakes?
MOD has been releasing when a "new batch" of su35 or su34 is released, and takes care to blur out numbers and not give away numbers of new aircraft
When it comes to upgraded aircraft I think we are even more blind
How would we know if these things aren't rolling off the line like cakes?
lancelot- Posts : 2696
Points : 2694
Join date : 2020-10-18
- Post n°338
Re: Su-30 for Russian Air Force #2
Is the upgrade even worth it? We don't even know if the Su-30SM2 has the Irbis radar and AL-41F1 engines as originally planned or not. I keep hearing that it uses the same AL-31FP engines.Arkanghelsk wrote:Do we have any information on su30sm2 upgrade contract?
MOD has been releasing when a "new batch" of su35 or su34 is released, and takes care to blur out numbers and not give away numbers of new aircraft
When it comes to upgraded aircraft I think we are even more blind
How would we know if these things aren't rolling off the line like cakes?
In the case of other Flankers the VKS has typically preferred buying whole new airframes instead of upgrading existing older ones. It is only when the airframe is out of production like with the MiG-31 that proper upgrade programs actually have happened.
Hole- Posts : 10732
Points : 10710
Join date : 2018-03-24
Age : 47
Location : Scholzistan
- Post n°339
Re: Su-30 for Russian Air Force #2
Serious upgrades were planned for Su-34, S-35 and the Su-57 before serial prodcution started.
Why should the Su-30 be an exception?
They will bring them up to the standard of the Su-35 in the coming years.
Why should the Su-30 be an exception?
They will bring them up to the standard of the Su-35 in the coming years.
Eugenio Argentina likes this post
GarryB- Posts : 38992
Points : 39488
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
- Post n°340
Re: Su-30 for Russian Air Force #2
The point of this "upgrade" is more about standardisation than anything else, though it is certainly an upgrade it is more about unifying the Su-30 and Su-35 so they use the same engines and the same radar to make support and maintenance and training easier and cheaper.
I would suspect changing the engine makers and radar makers to make one type instead of two types makes things easier and cheaper and faster too.
Upgrades are ongoing things so this wont be the last... eventually they will probably upgrade the flankers with the new engines for the Su-57s too... to increase performance in the Su-30 and Su-35 and Su-34.
I would suspect changing the engine makers and radar makers to make one type instead of two types makes things easier and cheaper and faster too.
Upgrades are ongoing things so this wont be the last... eventually they will probably upgrade the flankers with the new engines for the Su-57s too... to increase performance in the Su-30 and Su-35 and Su-34.
d_taddei2 and Eugenio Argentina like this post
ALAMO- Posts : 6707
Points : 6797
Join date : 2014-11-26
- Post n°341
Re: Su-30 for Russian Air Force #2
Just take a closer look at the latest ideas coming from the USA.
No matter what we consider about their MIC and some of the ideas - objectively speaking they are world biggest airpower that mastered air operations for a last age.
They are coming back to the conception of a bomb/missile truck, and seriously discussing getting back to the 50s-70's approach.
Su-30 can achieve the role perfectly well, while Russia is closer to the idea of rolling progress than they are now.
I guess that the UkroWar will bring some new concepts, but ... let's wait and see.
No matter what we consider about their MIC and some of the ideas - objectively speaking they are world biggest airpower that mastered air operations for a last age.
They are coming back to the conception of a bomb/missile truck, and seriously discussing getting back to the 50s-70's approach.
Su-30 can achieve the role perfectly well, while Russia is closer to the idea of rolling progress than they are now.
I guess that the UkroWar will bring some new concepts, but ... let's wait and see.
GarryB, d_taddei2, Gomig-21 and TMA1 like this post
Stealthflanker- Posts : 1410
Points : 1486
Join date : 2009-08-04
Age : 36
Location : Indonesia
- Post n°342
Re: Su-30 for Russian Air Force #2
lancelot wrote:
Is the upgrade even worth it? We don't even know if the Su-30SM2 has the Irbis radar and AL-41F1 engines as originally planned or not. I keep hearing that it uses the same AL-31FP engines.
I think it has Irbis, given that SM-2 have that Leading Edge L-band radar, something which earlier SM does not need as N011M Bars already have IFF integrated in the main array.
Atmosphere- Posts : 272
Points : 276
Join date : 2021-01-31
- Post n°343
Re: Su-30 for Russian Air Force #2
Stealthflanker wrote:lancelot wrote:
Is the upgrade even worth it? We don't even know if the Su-30SM2 has the Irbis radar and AL-41F1 engines as originally planned or not. I keep hearing that it uses the same AL-31FP engines.
I think it has Irbis, given that SM-2 have that Leading Edge L-band radar, something which earlier SM does not need as N011M Bars already have IFF integrated in the main array.
L band radar does not necessairly mean IFF. It could very well be that IRBIS already has IFF integrated in the main array or that there is a separate small array in the aircraft for IFF work, it does not justify the two big jumbo size arrays on the wing edges.
GarryB and Hole like this post
GarryB- Posts : 38992
Points : 39488
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
- Post n°344
Re: Su-30 for Russian Air Force #2
The entire Su-30 branch of the Flanker family was about a two seater fighter with a rear cockpit guy for directing traffic and watching the radar screen for the PVO.
The unification of resources and assets makes sense in this case, there is no advantage to the Su-30 and Su-35 having different radar in their noses.
The unification of resources and assets makes sense in this case, there is no advantage to the Su-30 and Su-35 having different radar in their noses.
d_taddei2 and Atmosphere like this post
|
|