This topic has gone straight into Tom Clancy Land with this ebola nonsense
Even Bolton said things are cooling off so there won't be anything (as expected)
Isos wrote:They were used more than once. Maybe YOU should try google.
Fluid exchange can happen if the fluid is on the skin. Like the guy touches his own mouth and then you touches his arm and finally you touch you mouth.
Why do you think those doctors are wearing military suits to see ebola infested patients ?
You are confusing biological weapons with chemical ones. Virus reproduce themselves and can be transmitted. They generally have an incumbation time to activate inside the victims. Chemical weapons act instantanly on the skin.
Japanese not only tested them but used them in real battles against Chinese and it did lot of damage. And they were not as advanced as today.
PapaDragon wrote:
This topic has gone straight into Tom Clancy Land with this ebola nonsense
Even Bolton said things are cooling off so there won't be anything (as expected)
ultimatewarrior wrote:Iran is difficult to beat because of Russia arms deliveries via Caspian sea. Americans don't dare to sink Russian cargo ships and transport planes. As a result, thousands of Kornet missiles get delivered by ships or air drops to northern Iran near Tehran. Russia is America's rival and would love to bleed America dry in Iran war. Trump is being smart and not falling for it. Trump ain't starting a war in Iran and fall into Russia's trap.
Tsavo Lion wrote:It's not as simple: Friction growing between Russia and Iran Moscow has more in common with Tel Aviv than it has with Tehran, as an upcoming security summit highlights
Russia needs Turkey & Israel more than Iran. The Iranians must make exceptions to Russia for allowing the use of military bases on its territory- perhaps then their relations will improve. The RF already has good relations with all of its neighbors & it will be a win-win for both. Russia won't be able to affect internal security of Iran even if she gets 2x more/bigger bases there than in Syria. Even their token presence will cool some hot heads in Washington.
It's not easy compared to Iraq, Libya & Syria, but easier than Russia & China that have nukes, IC/SLBMs & blue water navies. All that's needed is to keep its internal fires smoldering & sanctions in place. NK has the backing of China & Russia & succeeded against US pressure; Pakistan won't give Iran any useful help with nukes as not to ruin its relations with Turkey with whom Iran has a common border.With respect to the point you made about Iran being easy to break up . I could not disagree more.
AlfaT8 wrote:Let the Russians have a Naval and Airbase in Iran.
For me, the choice is obvious, do the latter first and gain time to do any of the former 2.
nomadski wrote:@ Tsavo lion
A month ago when Trump state visit was announced . After his outburst " ..destruction of Iran and suffering for Iranian people ..." , I knew that this visit to UK was to cement ties and obtain a political fig leaf , or an alliance to economically attack Iran . Like an English / French D - day against Germany !
But it looks like, all he got was photo opportunity . And no support for joining military campaign against Iran . I guess he will get the same response from the French . It looks like , far from Iran being isolated , it is Trump that is isolated . And as I have discussed , he " knows " , Iran has " no nukes " , and that is why he can not go to war with Iran .
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-48520406
And again , Iean said that they will export as much oil as they want . They do not make idle talk . So under what circumstances , can this statement be true ? Those that can reason , know well . Iran today gave ultimatum to Saudi to stop economic war against Iran , or be ready for a shocking response .