I have a book of French War Heroes around here somewhere. I'll send it to you, mind you it is rather small. Only having a female teenager and an Italian in it.
I appreciate what you are trying to do... return insults, and I don't believe I am saying this as a mod, but please make insults to this frog dick personal and don't colour all of France with the same brush... some French people are actually nice... there are a few on this board that show common sense and most of all respect for others.
Russia deployed no means to prevent this action and they had weeks to do so.
Are you suggesting a few weeks would have made all of Syria immune to a NATO attack?
I would say ask the serbs and they would say if NATO attacks and does not hit anything of value who gives a shit if they declare victory... only a fool tells the executioner that he missed and your head is still attached... have another go.
Oh incase anyone is wondering the rebels seized no ground during this, they tried but they failed.
Glad to hear it... it would be standard US procedure to tell them to rise up and strike while they are distracted... they did the same just after desert storm finished to get the majority shia to overthrow saddam... hoping for a freebee... ie the locals overthrow saddam so the US doesn't have to... of course they gave them no support and when small groups rose up heeding the call, saddam crushed them brutally... and the US didn't understand why they weren't helping the later US invasion...
If Syria gets S-300PMU2 or V4 as a result of the attacks, I forsee the same press/internet zombies protesting about it and calling in strikes.
They might want to call for air strikes but they run the risk that they start shooting down foreign aircraft over their occupied territory in retaliation...
I don't think they want that sort of escalation...
We do not run away. We said we dont allow chemical attacks. There was a chemical attack and we have prove that assad did it. We destroyed the chemical facilities. That was our goal and this goal was achieved.
Where are the bodies, where are the injured? You didn't have any proof it even happened and you attacked before the OPCW could even go in an examine the area... how many of those cruise missiles had chemicals to simulate the residue of a chem attack? Planting evidence? Destroying evidence that the west built any plant capable of making any chemical weapons they might have...
Russia wants that we accept Crimean occupation. Thats what matters for Russia.
Russia likely does not give a fuck what France thinks about the Crimea... just like I am sure France does not care about what Russia thinks about all of Frances little colonies around the world. I doubt the Crimea have lost any sleep over France not being happy they are part of Russia again.
They use Syria in this game to make our nations do concessions in a deal.
No... you CNN fed idiot... the help Syria fight islamist terrorists supported by Israel and Saudi Arabia and the US because if they succeeded in Syria they would likely move to the Caucasus next and continue their little war of Islam in Russia.
Russia could fight in Syria and help the Syrians fight these assholes with the help of Iran and even Turkey, or they could wait till they came to Russia and fight them on home soil alone.
Your leader is nothing more then one of our dogs that is all. He will bark when we say and he will walk when we say.
Sad thing is he is just a little french poodle... useless for a fight... an Alsation (German Shepherd... Merkel) would have been a better choice but Alsations are excellent attack dogs and loyal friends but they aren't stupid like Poodles or Bulldogs... May... you stupid ugly little bitch.
Assad would happily trade that with East Ghouta/Douma.
Assad didn't get the choice... the Americans probably knew about that facility because they probably built it... now I suspect they will want to rebuild it... for US dollars of course...
Not sure, one truck carries 12 missiles right? Looks like they fired 6 at once! Can Pantsir fire that many at once? Anyone knows?
Pantsir-S1 can track three targets at one time and guide three missiles with its radar and guide one other missile with optical tracking (autotracking), so it can engage 4 targets at one time. I was under the impression it could launch two missiles at each target tracked, which would make 8 missiles in the air per vehicle at one time but I am not so sure that is true and would certainly be rather wasteful. At least 4 missiles in the air at a time against four targets... possibly 8 missiles against four targets.
These missiles have a very high average speed so it would only be against critical targets you would do this...
Normally a battery has 6-8 launcher vehicles... so that would be 24 to 32 targets engaged at once with 24 to 64 missiles at once depending on number combinations...
Pantsir missiles use command guidance and are relatively cheap and can be used in enormous numbers without being too expensive. Later models have excellent precision but even the old model missiles are good.
Your problem here is that i´m not on Russias side.
Glad you are not on Russias side... what would they need a racist piece of shit like you to turn your nose up at them?
The best strategy i see for France is to play both sides and get the best out of it.
Yes, be a coward and change sides when it suits... everyone notices that you know... we are not stupid.
Nice. We can help them build a new one.
You would only overcharge them anyway.
I´m from southern france. That what mediterranean people look like.
So you look black but you hate coloured people... classic...
Nice, did she visit France? I hope she liked it. I was not aware it was easy for Russians. Thank you for teaching me.
Aren't you afraid that Russians might invade your pristine country and pollute it with their lack of culture?
Of course all those African migrants would probably increase the average IQ in most areas of France...
This propaganda here is amusing.
The information from SeigSoloyvov could be called propaganda... but he is on the US side literally...
Fucking stupid Uh'murikkkanz....
Not stupid at all... if they actually hit something there would be problems of escalation... if they didn't launch anything there would be problems for them too... the winners here are the people who make missiles who are making money hand over fist...
Wonder what schools in the US could do with the sort of money each of those 100+ missiles cost...
As far as ı know, Pechora-2М and Buk-M1 are capable of shot down cruise missiles but what about S-200 and Kvadrat(Kub) systems? These are capable of shot down cruise missiles?
The upgraded versions would be ideal for the purpose as their large size and low manouver performance make them less than ideal for more manouverable targets like fighterplanes...
For targets like JSTARS or AWACS or bomber types as well as cruise missiles they are actually rather good choices to save better missiles for more difficult targets.
You can use S-200 ,S-300 to shot down cruise missiles too.. but is overkill.. Not economically practical.
Lots of very old missiles are ideal for using up on cruise missile attacks as they are already paid for and are preventing the introduction of newer more modern missiles. Use them up on simple targets like cruise missiles (note I said simple... not easy) with a good chance of a kill and save more capable missiles for more difficult targets.