Syrian Civil War: News #4

Fair points, plus, we all know mr ropcke is a terrorists sympathiser, so I wouldnt take anything he reports too seriously.

I have a simple philosophy: Whatever that vile jihadi apologist scum posts, you can automatically assume the opposite is the truth.
He will get his comeuppance one day. I seriously doubt with his attitude and viewpoints that I've had the misfortune to see that he will die an old man in bed.
He is a strong enabler and mouthpiece of jihadi terrorism, and has never bothered to hide it.

flamming_python wrote:

Werewolf wrote:Sanction on import of food was just expanded that is still  not a war crime since that food is supply for turkish terrorist groups who else they would want to provide this "humanitarian aid" to SAA? to Kurds? or to ISIS?

100% legitimate target.

Maybe to the civilians that are living under the control of their proxy forces?

Can't be that much of a whack theory, wasn't so long ago that Russia was doing (and still is) something like that in a somewhat similar situation.

Shouldn't those boxes be burned to  a crisp if they were exposed to flames? And thrown all over the place instead of stacked neatly?

No way that was stuffed in the trailer after the bombing, no way!!!

"Are those boxes fire-resistant?" Had an actual LOL there. My GOD, fire-resistant cardboard! Why wasn't I told?

New South Front update

wilhelm wrote:I have a simple philosophy: Whatever that vile jihadi apologist scum posts, you can automatically assume the opposite is the truth.

Starting from > 50% of the so-called "TOW hit videos".

BKP wrote:"Are those boxes fire-resistant?" Had an actual LOL there. My GOD, fire-resistant cardboard! Why wasn't I told?

It exists actually, however its not something you apply to cardboard to pack carrots in it.

^Thx. Learned something new.

flamming_python wrote:

Werewolf wrote:Sanction on import of food was just expanded that is still  not a war crime since that food is supply for turkish terrorist groups who else they would want to provide this "humanitarian aid" to SAA? to Kurds? or to ISIS?

100% legitimate target.

Maybe to the civilians that are living under the control of their proxy forces?

Can't be that much of a whack theory, wasn't so long ago that Russia was doing (and still is) something like that in a somewhat similar situation.

FFS Azzaz is under JaN, I don't care what you guys have as brainfart, if you want to live under an Islamic Khilafat, you're dead to me. PERIOD. This is not some devious Oligarchic shit, we're talking Al qaeda here. Get that head out of your ass.

Elijah J. Magnier ‏@EjmAlrai 19 min

#Hezbollah #SAA and #IRGC are at the door of (south gate) #Palmyra. This is first

https://twitter.com/EjmAlrai

Hassan Ridha ‏@sayed_ridha 5
Hassan Ridha الميادين عاجل

#PYD Saleh Muslim told #Moscow: We are ready for military cooperation

https://twitter.com/sayed_ridha

Guys. The boxes. They're not burnt.

I've seen vehicles like that truck after they've been destroyed by fire, for the metal to be all twisted like that, and even some of the tires on the RH side to be melted and for the carried produce to survive? There's no way this isn't Jhadi Hollywood. C'mon guys.

Monarchist wrote:#PYD Saleh Muslim told #Moscow: We are ready for military cooperation  

https://twitter.com/sayed_ridha

This is pretty important if they're serious...been waiting for it since the start of all this.

PapaDragon wrote:

flamming_python wrote:

Ivan the Colorado wrote:Haha, 'humanitarian' convoy coming from Turkey mysteriously blows up! 7 Turks dead and 10 injured.

http://ren.tv/novosti/2015-11-26/na-gumanitarnyy-konvoy-iz-turcii-napali-na-granice-s-siriey

Yeah, I hope by these acts of 'vengeance' innocent people don't suffer. Did Russia have good intel as to what exact supplies this convoy was carrying? What if it really was carrying aid and humanitarian workers?

No offence, but you seem to be living in some sort of isolated fairy tale bubble...it's becoming pretty obvious that the gloves are off and that a serious effort is being made to cut the terrorist supply lines (among other things).

Project Canada wrote:What if TurkISIS blocks the Bosphorus? can Russia Liberate Constantinople?

Like I wrote a few pages back, we might actually witness that in our life times and correct a historical anomally....the Duma was actually proposing that Haia Sofia be returned under the juristiction of the Orthdox Church

Blease habibi, Y U bring brain dead people in topic. Blease don't do this.

OK from the looks of it Al Nusra's S. Aleppo counterattack has failed.

Here's the latest update I've seen, and I haven't heard of any change today.



http://www.almasdarnews.com/article/islamist-rebels-fail-recapture-tal-al-eiss-southern-aleppo-offensive-stalls/


This is good, the SAA didn't overextend, their lines held, and Al Nusra's Idlib reserves accomplished very little. The next order of business should be a SAA offensive, hopefully supported with Russian CAS and those T-90's.

KoTeMoRe wrote:Blease habibi, Y U bring brain dead people in topic. Blease don't do this.

I am doing my best i swear. But i cant handle to solo suffer reading this...i got to share pain...

JohnSnow wrote:

Militarov wrote:

"Some of the Russian-hit trucks and warehouses in Azaz WERE loaded with food."



I think he is trying to claim that ISIS fighters do not eat, drugs are enough they are self sufficient xD

Those boxes are either fire-resistant or this is Jihadi hollywood in action. lol

i dont get it , was this red cross or crescent truck?? / nope? then blast it to hell .

flamming_python wrote:

Werewolf wrote:Sanction on import of food was just expanded that is still  not a war crime since that food is supply for turkish terrorist groups who else they would want to provide this "humanitarian aid" to SAA? to Kurds? or to ISIS?

100% legitimate target.

Maybe to the civilians that are living under the control of their proxy forces?

Can't be that much of a whack theory, wasn't so long ago that Russia was doing (and still is) something like that in a somewhat similar situation.

Civilians??? The true "civilians" packed up and left long ago.... Where do your think the hordes of refugees entering Europe came from if not terrorist-Occupied North Syria?

The only civilians left in terrorist-controlled Northern Latakia are Islamist irredentist Turkish slimebags, and i care not a whit if they go hungry for the next 200 days...

Big_Gazza wrote:

flamming_python wrote:

Werewolf wrote:Sanction on import of food was just expanded that is still  not a war crime since that food is supply for turkish terrorist groups who else they would want to provide this "humanitarian aid" to SAA? to Kurds? or to ISIS?

100% legitimate target.

Maybe to the civilians that are living under the control of their proxy forces?

Can't be that much of a whack theory, wasn't so long ago that Russia was doing (and still is) something like that in a somewhat similar situation.

Civilians???  The true "civilians" packed up and left long ago.... Where do your think the hordes of refugees entering Europe came from if not terrorist-Occupied North Syria?

The only civilians left in terrorist-controlled Northern Latakia are Islamist irredentist Turkish slimebags, and i care not a whit if they go hungry for the next 200 days...

Not everyone can always leave, this applies especially to the poorer people.

On what planet do you live?

Odin of Ossetia wrote:

Big_Gazza wrote:

flamming_python wrote:

Werewolf wrote:Sanction on import of food was just expanded that is still  not a war crime since that food is supply for turkish terrorist groups who else they would want to provide this "humanitarian aid" to SAA? to Kurds? or to ISIS?

100% legitimate target.

Maybe to the civilians that are living under the control of their proxy forces?

Can't be that much of a whack theory, wasn't so long ago that Russia was doing (and still is) something like that in a somewhat similar situation.

Civilians???  The true "civilians" packed up and left long ago.... Where do your think the hordes of refugees entering Europe came from if not terrorist-Occupied North Syria?

The only civilians left in terrorist-controlled Northern Latakia are Islamist irredentist Turkish slimebags, and i care not a whit if they go hungry for the next 200 days...

Not everyone can always leave, this applies especially to the poorer people.

On what planet do you live?

Ignoring your last comment, you make a valid point. It is usually, as you say, the poor but also the old who are often the last to leave but when it does get bad they usually find a way. They have to, their villages get flattened.

JohninMK wrote:

Odin of Ossetia wrote:

Big_Gazza wrote:

flamming_python wrote:

Werewolf wrote:Sanction on import of food was just expanded that is still  not a war crime since that food is supply for turkish terrorist groups who else they would want to provide this "humanitarian aid" to SAA? to Kurds? or to ISIS?

100% legitimate target.

Maybe to the civilians that are living under the control of their proxy forces?

Can't be that much of a whack theory, wasn't so long ago that Russia was doing (and still is) something like that in a somewhat similar situation.

Civilians???  The true "civilians" packed up and left long ago.... Where do your think the hordes of refugees entering Europe came from if not terrorist-Occupied North Syria?

The only civilians left in terrorist-controlled Northern Latakia are Islamist irredentist Turkish slimebags, and i care not a whit if they go hungry for the next 200 days...

Not everyone can always leave, this applies especially to the poorer people.

On what planet do you live?

Ignoring your last comment, you make a valid point. It is usually, as you say, the poor but also the old who are often the last to leave but when it does get bad they usually find a way. They have to, their villages get flattened.

But you were talking about leaving their country, not only their villages.

That is much more complicated.

Odin of Ossetia wrote:

JohninMK wrote:

Odin of Ossetia wrote:

Big_Gazza wrote:

flamming_python wrote:

Werewolf wrote:Sanction on import of food was just expanded that is still  not a war crime since that food is supply for turkish terrorist groups who else they would want to provide this "humanitarian aid" to SAA? to Kurds? or to ISIS?

100% legitimate target.

Maybe to the civilians that are living under the control of their proxy forces?

Can't be that much of a whack theory, wasn't so long ago that Russia was doing (and still is) something like that in a somewhat similar situation.

Civilians???  The true "civilians" packed up and left long ago.... Where do your think the hordes of refugees entering Europe came from if not terrorist-Occupied North Syria?

The only civilians left in terrorist-controlled Northern Latakia are Islamist irredentist Turkish slimebags, and i care not a whit if they go hungry for the next 200 days...

Not everyone can always leave, this applies especially to the poorer people.

On what planet do you live?

Ignoring your last comment, you make a valid point. It is usually, as you say, the poor but also the old who are often the last to leave but when it does get bad they usually find a way. They have to, their villages get flattened.

But you were talking about leaving their country, not only their villages.

That is much more complicated.

I know that and I don't think that Big Gazza said that all the people who packed up and left joined the hordes on the way to Europe. Just looking at those hordes shows that they didn't, there were very few young, old and women of any age amongst them. Those people are still in the region.

Militarov wrote:

KoTeMoRe wrote:Blease habibi, Y U bring brain dead people in topic. Blease don't do this.

I am doing my best i swear. But i cant handle to solo suffer reading this...i got to share pain...

And we accept that pain my friend for it is our duty to bear that pain together...

This is really strange, from the HuffinghamPost in the US

"Alarmingly, President Obama has already expressed public support for Turkey's right to defend its airspace," the columnist wrote.

"Before Turkey's recklessly irresponsible leader drags the United States into an unintended military confrontation with Russia over events in Syria, President Obama should reconsider his blanket support for Turkey's belligerent and brazen acts of violence against Moscow, and make clear that the United States — and NATO — will not be dragged into a conflict with Moscow over Erdogan's dangerous adventurism."

Read more: http://sputniknews.com/politics/20151127/1030832965/obama-needs-to-reconsider-support-for-turkey.html#ixzz3se61EAwS