Home
Latest images
Register
Log in
diabetusGarryB wrote: javelin doesn't have trouble locking onto vehicles.
+24
Regular
11E
Kiko
Werewolf
Broski
AlfaT8
marcellogo
Mir
Hole
xeno
galicije83
TMA1
Arrow
Mig-31BM2 Super Irbis-E
ALAMO
Isos
flamming_python
Azi
diabetus
Belisarius
caveat emptor
GarryB
lyle6
limb
28 posters
T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants #2
diabetus- Posts : 371
Points : 374
Join date : 2014-04-20
GarryB- Posts : 36380
Points : 36916
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
Of course Javelin is not great at locking targets.
Or do you think shooting range tanks just need pretty hair before they can launch missiles at them?
BTW regarding the ERA and roof racks... would add that the US is probably supplying Kiev with top attack munitions for their 155mm artillery or if they aren't how long before they do... and a roof rack and ERA plus a half metre gap and then ERA and roof armour is better than nothing to defend against that...
Or do you think shooting range tanks just need pretty hair before they can launch missiles at them?
BTW regarding the ERA and roof racks... would add that the US is probably supplying Kiev with top attack munitions for their 155mm artillery or if they aren't how long before they do... and a roof rack and ERA plus a half metre gap and then ERA and roof armour is better than nothing to defend against that...
Broski likes this post
diabetus- Posts : 371
Points : 374
Join date : 2014-04-20
GarryB wrote:Or do you think shooting range tanks just need pretty hair before they can launch missiles at them?
That's silly even coming from you. Attempt to use critical thinking skills and deduce why you would heat a target before testing an imaging infrared seeking missile. I'll give you a hint. It can't see the target if it's the same temperature as the background.
lyle6- Posts : 1747
Points : 1743
Join date : 2020-09-14
Location : Philippines
And you don't see a problem with that? Ahahahahaha
GarryB likes this post
GarryB- Posts : 36380
Points : 36916
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
That is exactly right, which explains the fabric coverings like Nakidka and also the slat armour and other add ons the Russians have been applying to their vehicles, but these roof racks with ERA would act like half a metre of spaced armour from above and a layer of ERA half a metre away from the actual roof of the vehicle with ERA applied is going to be rather effective against a range of threats... if one layer of ERA reduces penetration of HEAT charges and EFFs by 400mm to 500mm of armour penetration then what effect will two layers spaced half a metre to one metre apart will do... not to mention it would stop hand grenades from drones too.
Sounds like it is actually a good idea for tanks that don't have panoramic sights...
The cheap low resolution IIR sights on Javelin missiles are not really very good but still make the missiles horrendously expensive.
The Russians also use IIR guided missiles in the form of the LMUR but they waited till the IIR sensors got much higher resolution performance and also rather cheaper to mass produce... and work with a two way data link so the operator can select their target with the missile in flight...
Sounds like it is actually a good idea for tanks that don't have panoramic sights...
The cheap low resolution IIR sights on Javelin missiles are not really very good but still make the missiles horrendously expensive.
The Russians also use IIR guided missiles in the form of the LMUR but they waited till the IIR sensors got much higher resolution performance and also rather cheaper to mass produce... and work with a two way data link so the operator can select their target with the missile in flight...
kvs, ALAMO, Hole, lyle6, Broski and Belisarius like this post
ALAMO- Posts : 4737
Points : 4739
Join date : 2014-11-25
The level of some comments really pushes the retardness to another level, I must say.
What fukin APS?!?
Do any of you, armchair chief engineers, have a single idea of how complicated adding APS to a tank that was not constructed with such in mind?
It is a factory made extensive modernization, with multiple subsystems replaced/relocated, with kilometers of wiring to be redesigned and replaced new. At the end of a day, it costs half of a tank price.
This ERA erected construction costs perfectly nothing.
Can be applied to any vehicle in a field condition, using prefabricated parts and old ERA blocks that hundreds of thousands are stored.
And resolves the issue of top attacks in a very significant percentage. Expand a Nakidka on that, and you can play Goofy with Javelins all day long.
This pointless DMC realized me one more fantastic Wunderwaffe feature that the mighty westerners are so much better than the backward Russkie.
Not sure if any of you, my armchair tank warfare home-level expert realize a fact, the Challenger 2 tank does not have a laser warning system.
At all.
Back in 2018, this millennial step was proposed as a part of a modernization project, ad finally, the mighty Challenger 3 tank will get it, stepping proudly into 80s.
40 years post-factum, but let's not spoil the overall western incel masturbation orgy.
Behold!
What fukin APS?!?
Do any of you, armchair chief engineers, have a single idea of how complicated adding APS to a tank that was not constructed with such in mind?
It is a factory made extensive modernization, with multiple subsystems replaced/relocated, with kilometers of wiring to be redesigned and replaced new. At the end of a day, it costs half of a tank price.
This ERA erected construction costs perfectly nothing.
Can be applied to any vehicle in a field condition, using prefabricated parts and old ERA blocks that hundreds of thousands are stored.
And resolves the issue of top attacks in a very significant percentage. Expand a Nakidka on that, and you can play Goofy with Javelins all day long.
This pointless DMC realized me one more fantastic Wunderwaffe feature that the mighty westerners are so much better than the backward Russkie.
Not sure if any of you, my armchair tank warfare home-level expert realize a fact, the Challenger 2 tank does not have a laser warning system.
At all.
Back in 2018, this millennial step was proposed as a part of a modernization project, ad finally, the mighty Challenger 3 tank will get it, stepping proudly into 80s.
40 years post-factum, but let's not spoil the overall western incel masturbation orgy.
Behold!
GarryB, kvs, mnrck, Hole, lyle6, Mir, Broski and Belisarius like this post
Tolstoy- Posts : 158
Points : 154
Join date : 2015-07-12
ARENA has been designed to be effective against top attack ATGMs. Why will it not be effective against hand grenades dropped from drones?GarryB wrote:Would an APS system be effective against hand grenades dropped from drones?
TMA1- Posts : 888
Points : 890
Join date : 2020-11-30
Looks like it, and the state testing them confirms it. Issie is there are thousands of 5hings needing building and upgrading and Russia does not have the defense budget of China or America. There are priorities and plans. So it will still take time.
GarryB likes this post
diabetus- Posts : 371
Points : 374
Join date : 2014-04-20
lyle6 wrote:And you don't see a problem with that? Ahahahahaha
Wow another guy who doesn't know what IIR is. This is one of the dumbest posts ever. I mean you've never used thermal optics clearly. Guess what? You shoot at heated targets at the range when you use thermals.
limb- Posts : 1489
Points : 1515
Join date : 2020-09-17
The era roof panel is a great idea provided theres era plates on the roof armor itself. One layer for the precursor charge, another for the main charge.
GarryB and diabetus like this post
GarryB- Posts : 36380
Points : 36916
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
ARENA has been designed to be effective against top attack ATGMs. Why will it not be effective against hand grenades dropped from drones?
I don't know... that is why I am asking.
But whether it is effective or not a roof rack with ERA blocks attached to it can be done in the field in half an hour with a wielding kit and a few mates...
And APS would require more work and much more time and would be rather more expensive.
Wow another guy who doesn't know what IIR is. This is one of the dumbest posts ever. I mean you've never used thermal optics clearly. Guess what? You shoot at heated targets at the range when you use thermals.
He is saying that if you can't see or lock onto targets that are not heated then all the Russians have to do is cover their tanks and vehicles in things that hide the head... those rubberised outer coatings and Nakidka IR and radar camouflage material covers would hide the internal heat of a vehicle so an IIR guided missile would have trouble seeing it, and therefore also trouble getting a good lock to hit it.
Odd things are tested in the field all the time and are called field expedient measures... in WWII you can see T-34s driving around with bedsprings on them to try to stop Panzerfausts for instance... in the west some vehicles had sand bags piled onto them to improve protection from things like 50cal HMGs or defeat HESH rounds...
This is a field expedient too I suspect and if it works as intended you might see something adopted that is better designed and integrated... perhaps mast mounted sights mounted above the roof rack to improve visibility with a machine gun attached too so seeing and aiming and shooting at air targets is not effected by the rack.
Likely the best example is probably the log carried on Soviet tanks in case it got stuck in deep mud or deep snow.
Hole likes this post
diabetus- Posts : 371
Points : 374
Join date : 2014-04-20
GarryB wrote:He is saying that if you can't see or lock onto targets that are not heated then all the Russians have to do is cover their tanks and vehicles in things that hide the head...
You do realize they still emit hot exhaust when running right?
GarryB- Posts : 36380
Points : 36916
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
You do realize they still emit hot exhaust when running right?
They do, but a roof rack means from above that area is now cold and depending the angle the missile approaches from the hot parts of the exhaust might not be visible.
Another factor is that the missile seeker has to identify the target as being a tank and lots of small fires and smoke and dust in a combat zone will create lots of distractions.
The Ukrainians themselves have already said it is useless in built up areas because reflections of sunlight in the windows of buildings appear to be targets which confuses the missile sensor too.
When they fired them they could hit almost anything... and there was no way for them to get them back on target... in comparison with Kornet or Metis you can see what it is flying towards and if needed you can aim off till it gets closer so it flies clear of trees and wires and bushes in the way.
The packaging that the Javelin comes in probably costs more than the Kornet missiles.
Broski likes this post
limb- Posts : 1489
Points : 1515
Join date : 2020-09-17
lyle6 wrote:>$1.1 million a pop
**** outta here.
Theres also the israeli hero series loitering munitions. China's loitering various loitering munitions utterly shit on anything russia has. Iran's ababil series is equivalent to the lancet. Russia is catching up to iran now.
limb- Posts : 1489
Points : 1515
Join date : 2020-09-17
ALAMO wrote:The level of some comments really pushes the retardness to another level, I must say.
What fukin APS?!?
Do any of you, armchair chief engineers, have a single idea of how complicated adding APS to a tank that was not constructed with such in mind?
It is a factory made extensive modernization, with multiple subsystems replaced/relocated, with kilometers of wiring to be redesigned and replaced new. At the end of a day, it costs half of a tank price.
This ERA erected construction costs perfectly nothing.
Can be applied to any vehicle in a field condition, using prefabricated parts and old ERA blocks that hundreds of thousands are stored.
And resolves the issue of top attacks in a very significant percentage. Expand a Nakidka on that, and you can play Goofy with Javelins all day long.
This pointless DMC realized me one more fantastic Wunderwaffe feature that the mighty westerners are so much better than the backward Russkie.
Not sure if any of you, my armchair tank warfare home-level expert realize a fact, the Challenger 2 tank does not have a laser warning system.
At all.
Back in 2018, this millennial step was proposed as a part of a modernization project, ad finally, the mighty Challenger 3 tank will get it, stepping proudly into 80s.
40 years post-factum, but let's not spoil the overall western incel masturbation orgy.
Behold!
Then how does israel easily put trophy and iron fist on 100+ merkavas and achzarits? Are you saying russia cannot afford israeli expenditure on APS, or russian tankers deserve less protection abd money spent on them than israeli tankers? BTW iron fist works perfectly since 2009, can destroy APFSDS and can be put on any AFV. Wheres the afghanit meanwhile?
Mir- Posts : 2656
Points : 2660
Join date : 2021-06-10
GarryB, zardof, Hole, lyle6, Broski and Belisarius like this post
limb- Posts : 1489
Points : 1515
Join date : 2020-09-17
>2006
Mir- Posts : 2656
Points : 2660
Join date : 2021-06-10
Quite right. Quite a number of the Merkava 4's were disabled back then. Kornet came as a bit of a shock for the Israelis. Despite Trophy the main threat for these tanks are mostly IED's and AT mines.
GarryB, zardof, lyle6 and Broski like this post
Belisarius- Posts : 446
Points : 446
Join date : 2022-01-04
Theres also the israeli hero series loitering munitions. China's loitering various loitering munitions utterly shit on anything russia has. Iran's ababil series is equivalent to the lancet. Russia is catching up to iran now.
The Lancet's combat history "utterly shit" on the Chinese, Israeli and Iranian drones you mentioned.
sepheronx, GarryB, xeno, Hole, lyle6 and Broski like this post
GarryB- Posts : 36380
Points : 36916
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
Interesting there limb... one second a new Russian drone management and control system is shit because it uses cheap chinese junk components and drones and now it seems China is superior in drones and Russia needs to learn from them.
I mean obviously Chinas combat experience cannot be questioned... because it does not exist... unless you count suppressing unhappy groups amongst the population and delivering food to locked down cities... but in that regard then the UK should be leaders in drone technology too... they seem to have surveillance cameras on every corner, so they must have an abundance of cameras and people trained to monitor the video streams they create...
I mean obviously Chinas combat experience cannot be questioned... because it does not exist... unless you count suppressing unhappy groups amongst the population and delivering food to locked down cities... but in that regard then the UK should be leaders in drone technology too... they seem to have surveillance cameras on every corner, so they must have an abundance of cameras and people trained to monitor the video streams they create...
Hole, lyle6, Broski and Belisarius like this post
|
|
|