Western propaganda #2

higurashihougi wrote:https://www.rt.com/news/551868-meta-policy-assissinate-head-state/

Facebook’s parent company Meta has changed its policy guidance on tolerance to hate speech to prohibit “condoning violence” against “Russians in general” and to ban calls for the death of heads of state, Reuters reported on Monday, citing a memo posted on the company’s internal platform.

The Sunday post, published by Meta’s global affairs president, Nick Clegg, and seen by Reuters, suggests that Facebook is “narrowing the focus” of its content moderation policy to make it “explicitly clear” that a previous decisions made last week should not be interpreted as “condoning violence against Russians in general.”

Last Thursday, Reuters was also the first to report that Meta would begin allowing hate speech against Russians on Facebook and Instagram. Citing another batch of internal emails, the news agency initially reported that the platform would allow hate speech against all Russians amid the ongoing war in Ukraine. However, it later toned down its text to explain the measure referred specifically to the “invading Russians” and President Vladimir Putin.

Now Meta has apparently backtracked on that policy too, with Clegg reportedly writing that it would “not permit calls to assassinate a head of state.”  

“In order to remove any ambiguity about our stance, we are further narrowing our guidance to make explicit that we are not allowing calls for the death of a head of state on our platforms,” he wrote.

He added that since the situation in Ukraine is fast-moving, Meta will keep its guidance “under constant review” and claimed Meta “stands against Russophobia.”

The platform has “no tolerance for calls for genocide, ethnic cleansing, or any kind of discrimination, harassment, or violence towards Russians on our platform,” he said.

Meta’s earlier decision on violence against Russians was even met with criticism from the United Nations, with a spokesman for the UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres saying that such language is “unacceptable” in any context.

andalusia wrote:I saw this video on Youtube about this author who says that China will attack Russia if they fail in Ukraine.

What do you guys think of this?

PhSt wrote:saw this ad today, it seems the Ukronazis and their NATzO backers are getting desperate  

andalusia wrote:Just saw this today, what do you guys think of this from an ex-wife of an oligarch about Putin?

https://www.yahoo.com/news/ex-partner-russian-oligarch-close-151250730.html

andalusia wrote:I don't know if this is the appropriate section to put this in but American actor Sean Penn wants a boycott of Oscars if Ukrainean President Zelensky is not allowed to a
appear at Academy Awards.


https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/sean-penn-oscars-zelensky-212703032.html

magnumcromagnon wrote:

andalusia wrote:I don't know if this is the appropriate section to put this in but American actor Sean Penn wants a boycott of Oscars if Ukrainean President Zelensky is not allowed to a
appear at Academy Awards.


https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/sean-penn-oscars-zelensky-212703032.html

Sean Penn has always been a faggot, he used Hurricane Katrina as a PR op to boost his brand. He's a slimy opportunist pissant, a virtue signaling narcissistic POS!

magnumcromagnon wrote:

https://twitter.com/CarlZha/status/1509684788008947725

https://twitter.com/CarlZha/status/1509685728875220993

GarryB wrote:You are right in accusing the west of accusing China of doing something it has been doing for centuries to milk the rest of the world of resources and money, where you are wrong is suggesting what China is doing is bad.

To get a business going you need capital and lots of businesses fail for all sorts of reasons but one of those reasons is because the financial backers want returns on their investments and taking money out of the business makes the business fail.

Amazon didn't make any money at all for the first ten years it was operating but has since made the owner one of the richest men on the planet.

When Microsoft was starting out they didn't have enough money to pay their workers so they paid them in shares of the company, so even the janitor became super rich when the company finally started to make enormous money.

What the west would do is help finances to create a business in the third world... a business they know will be very profitable... and then even if they have to sabotage it they will to take control of the company... they do this to get around laws in other countries regarding foreign ownership, but once they have the company financially they can make demands to make sure all their profits and success goes to the west... some drinks company in some small country... suddenly ends up part of the Cocacola empire who starts selling that drink to the rest of the world and now owns the fizzy drink market in that country.

The money seems to be a help up, but really they are helping themselves.

The difference as mentioned in the apology is that China is just making money lending money, they are not stealing resources or stealing companies and don't demand local law changes to allow them to seize assets.

Chinese and Russian investment leads to real growth in other countries.... cutting Ukraine off from Russian investment was part of the plan to cripple their economy and make them more desperate to join HATO and the EU... but they were never going to let them join because nuclear war ends their game.

The west uses economics as a weapon to control and to isolate and contain and try to destroy... the chinese and the russians and most of the rest of the world uses economics and commerce to develop and grow and improve their situation... for themselves and their neighbours.

Western policy will leave the 1% in massive mansions with enormous guarded fences surrounded by ghettos of people who live in shacks.

The rest of the world don't want mansions, but they want out of the shacks too... they want the sprawling suburbia the US appeared to have in the 1950s where father worked and mother was mother and they had a nice house and a car each and a summer home to visit in the holidays.

Wanting 10 thousand dollar watches and 200 thousand dollar plus cars is the problem with the west.

Third world countries borrow to improve their lot... just like a citizen in any country will borrow money if they need a car or to buy a house... if they can get things now that makes their lives better and easier and makes it easier to earn money then it makes sense to borrow money to get it now.

Without a car keeping a job might be a problem.

Renting money means paying someone else, when if you worked it out you could probably get a deposit together to buy a house and get a loan from the bank that you can pay off that might not be much more expensive than your rent but instead of paying off someone elses mortgage you can pay off your own.

Buy a big house and get someone to rent a room in it to help pay the loan off faster.

Loans are not bad and do make sense.

The problem is when you make a loan to buy a 400K dollar sports car because you think they are cool... you will soon find out that parts and support are not cheap either and it costs too much and insurance is too high to even drive it regularly... especially the risk of an accident.

The west liked to suggest stupid loans for grand projects that were ego boosters for leaders of small countries that ended up creating a spiral of debt because even when complete they didn't earn money to pay for their creation and use.

Even 20 years ago it was pretty obvious that China was having a good effect on Africa... there was a TV series with a couple of actors riding motorbikes down through africa called the long way down, and they were worried about the roads... and some of them were terrible, but some of them were superb... built by China... along with houses and schools for their workers... the difference was obvious and very positive.

It is quite an insult for the western devils to accuse the Chinese of doing what they did and claiming it is immoral... why do the world courts not try them for their crimes... oh that is right.... the world court is for Putin and Serbs and Iranians and black people from Africa...