Of course you can shoot down an airship, but you can also shoot down an AWACS 747... but that has never happened AFAIK.
Because there are no AWACS 747's to shoot down
Of course you can shoot down an airship, but you can also shoot down an AWACS 747... but that has never happened AFAIK.
Isos wrote:I mean what's going on ? Who are they giving all that oil to ? Is the photo taken by turkish army ? Are they attacking it ? Is Russia attacking it ? Any other info about that shipement.
That's a big juicy target there.
The photo is cool and show interesting events but the tweets are poor in terms of informations.
starman likes this post
GarryB and kvs like this post
Hole likes this post
GarryB and Hole like this post
PhSt wrote:U.S. military hid airstrikes that killed dozens of civilians in Syria -NYT
https://nationalpost.com/pmn/news-pmn/crime-pmn/u-s-military-hid-airstrikes-that-killed-dozens-of-civilians-in-syria-nyt
GarryB likes this post
flamming_python, Hole and Mir like this post
PapaDragon likes this post
The operators also pressured analysts, who watched drone footage after strikes had taken place, to report that they had seen weapons or other evidence that would justify a strike hit. If they refused, the cell would simply ask for another analyst.
LMFS likes this post
Mig-31BM2 Super Irbis-E wrote:ELINT News
@ELINTNews
·
2 Std.
Strikes by Israel reported, Syrian Ministry of Defence reports 1 soldier killed and material losses have occurred
kvs wrote:
SAA Pantsir systems took out 40 Turkish UAVs, Bayraktars and Ankas.
Meanwhile Ukr-tards think that Bayraktar are "game changers" that allow them to take on the Russian army
supposedly about to invade their toilet state.
GarryB, kvs, JohninMK, x_54_u43, Mig-31BM2 Super Irbis-E, starman, LMFS and like this post
GarryB and starman like this post
GarryB, George1, PapaDragon, starman and Arkanghelsk like this post
Russian military forces are cooperating with Israel in Syria. Israelis inform them 15 minutes before each airstrike.Mindstorm wrote:Yes, the attack is the last of a long series of almost completely or totally failed attacks by part of IAF.
Or they are primarily performative strikes, meant to puff up egos, no so much inflict military damage. Sort of like the Palestinian bottle rocketsMindstorm wrote:
In mine opinion the most probable explanation is that a cell of moles working for Israel has been discovered among SAA's operatives but, instead of suppressing it , Syrian intelligence has used it to spread purposely false informations.
GarryB and Hole like this post
lyle6 wrote:Or they are primarily performative strikes, meant to puff up egos, no so much inflict military damage. Sort of like the Palestinian bottle rocketsMindstorm wrote:
In mine opinion the most probable explanation is that a cell of moles working for Israel has been discovered among SAA's operatives but, instead of suppressing it , Syrian intelligence has used it to spread purposely false informations.
GarryB, Mig-31BM2 Super Irbis-E, starman and LMFS like this post
Mindstorm wrote:lyle6 wrote:Or they are primarily performative strikes, meant to puff up egos, no so much inflict military damage. Sort of like the Palestinian bottle rocketsMindstorm wrote:
In mine opinion the most probable explanation is that a cell of moles working for Israel has been discovered among SAA's operatives but, instead of suppressing it , Syrian intelligence has used it to spread purposely false informations.
In a not distant past and several years before that, IAF was capable to repeatedly execute absolutely identical attacks (4-6 F-15/F-16 delivering 8-12 missiles from Lebanon airspace) matching exactly the transition to new positions of the few SAA's Панцирь-С1 or Бук-М1Э/M2Э vehicles or attacking targets partially outside theirs coverage's footprint .
The percentage of missiles on targets, when this situation was the rule and air defenses activated was only Оса and Стрела, was from 68 to 82% now this parameter plummeted to 7-8 %.
GarryB and starman like this post