ALAMO wrote:He is struggling to give his best to the community bro!
And it is his best!
Polish traitor says what?
ALAMO wrote:He is struggling to give his best to the community bro!
And it is his best!
GarryB, Werewolf, Big_Gazza, GunshipDemocracy and owais.usmani like this post
the Church has also spoken of communist propaganda still being alive and well in the school system.
flamming_python likes this post
Begome dislikes this post
sepheronx and GunshipDemocracy like this post
sepheronx, GunshipDemocracy and Begome like this post
TMA1 wrote:Is sprut b the cringy fedora spamming all image boards with antichristian posts? Gay
kvs wrote:Supposedly video shows a fuselage without wings falling. So the theory that it was improperly stored ammunition does not fly. It seems
that bombs were planted in the wheel wells of the jet.
Anyway, I would wait for the investigation. Anyone claiming it will be a cover up should take their tin foil hat off.
GunshipDemocracy, Begome and Broski like this post
flamming_python and Scorpius like this post
Begome dislikes this post
Especially since he is from India where there is a massive issue with inter-religious issues everywhere and the ultra lib universities are hotbeds for Jihadist apologists and trash talks India non stop (yes, Kashmir is the biggest example).
Anyone from India shouldn't be talking about education systems, religious centers or anything of the such anywhere around the world. Their problems are rather very stark. Wonderful country with lots of great people. But I have seen with my own eyes, my experiences and plenty of others, of the major problems of India.
Sprut-B wrote:@Begome
Soviet scientific atheism did not cause the current degradation of Russian society.
The Soviets actually liberated millions of people from slavery and promoted science, reasoning, and critical thinking over religious dogma. This emphasis on rationality and education led to a more intellectually developed population with increased scientific literacy. Plus, the Soviets were all about creating an egalitarian society that focused on human well-being, not the cult of Western Globohomo ideology. And let's not forget, under Soviet rule, there were no LGBTQ+, no radical feminism, and no pornography industry.
Soviet atheism is not the same as liberal ideology. Liberals aren't even true atheists, they just use anything to justify their cult ideology. Liberalism is an ideology and a religion born out of the uncontrolled hedonism and debauchery of Western society. Western liberals can be just as dogmatic as Wahabi Islam, the only difference is their set of beliefs.
The current problems in Russia can largely be attributed to the post-Soviet trauma associated with the collapse of the USSR. Suddenly, Russians were exposed to unfiltered Western liberal dogma without the iron curtain to shield them. Russian peoples at that time were fully convinced by Western propaganda that the Western way of living, aka hedonism and debauchery, was the only way to progress. Add in separatism and economic mayhem, and it's no wonder the current Russian mentality exists. Most people today between the ages of 30 and 40 grew up during that chaotic period of time.
Sprut-B wrote:
In India, anyone who now speaks out against the current Hindu extremist pro-Western government led by Modi is labelled a liberal. It's kind of ironic, though, considering that this same government recently legalised gay marriage, a move that flabbergasted even the loudest of those liberal university academias.
Sprut-B likes this post
flamming_python wrote:Gotta love them Serbs cucking for the Russian Orthodox Church
And I say this as an Orthodox Christian myself. I simply don't trust the Church itself
What else, God save the Tsar?
sundoesntrise wrote:flamming_python wrote:Gotta love them Serbs cucking for the Russian Orthodox Church
And I say this as an Orthodox Christian myself. I simply don't trust the Church itself
What else, God save the Tsar?
Our favorite (((Russian Orthodox))). Using his favorite (((my fellow Russian Orthodox))) line to subvert.
Remarkable how every time when a discussion that appears to slide into unwanted territory the (((gatekeeper))) of this forum appears to either deflect or re-adjust discussion onto the correct railway track.
Truly makes you think.
flamming_python likes this post
That was about the Pharisees, not the apostles, though.TMA1 wrote:Nah it is usually wise to distrust church institutions. Jesus Christ said as much for us here in Matthew 23:3
All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not.
TMA1 likes this post
Begome wrote:It's a load of crap: how is destroying the largest country in the world and murdering millions of innocent people "liberation"?
Begome wrote:murdering millions of innocent people "liberation"?
Begome wrote:What slavery existed just prior to the revolution that was in any way or even equal to the massive gulags the atheists set up?
Begome wrote:Look up how many people were executed in the Russian Empire 100 years before the revolution (hint: a very small, 3-digit number; and those were all criminals, not innocent people) and how many the filthy atheists murdered just in the first week of their revolution. Stop doing apologetics for mass murderers, it's disgusting!
Begome wrote:How egalitarian is a society that tortures and murders you for wrong-think lol...
Begome wrote:One of the biggest problems of Russia today is demographics. One of the first things the reds did was make abortion legal. In 1991 over 4 million people were aborted, the culmination of that degenerate legacy. You don't think that's a problem for Russian society?
Begome wrote:Anyway, I have to go Church now, so I'll reply to the other stupid points later if needed.
GunshipDemocracy and Mir like this post
TMA1 wrote:Is sprut b the cringy fedora spamming all image boards with antichristian posts? Gay
GunshipDemocracy and TMA1 like this post
GarryB wrote:Well like their anti ship missiles this new MRBM should have plenty of range to hit targets all through Europe and Asia if needed so it wont just be for hitting aircraft carriers, but their aircraft carriers are their best defended western targets in existence, so any weapon designed to sink a carrier will be useful to level HQs and bunkers in Brussels and Bonn and Paris and London and Washington DC.
Because the west relies so heavily on air power then weapons that take out runways and hangars and enemy aircraft become that much more valuable in destroying the enemy and making them come to terms that suit Russia.
GarryB, kvs, Hole and Broski like this post
rue, but Serpentine is just meant ot be better. Kinzhal -2000km (of which roughly half due to fighter-carrier) wrote:
kvs likes this post
Arrow wrote:
Kinzhal has a range of 2,000 km from the MiG-31K launch site. Some idiotic sources in the West add to this the range of the MiG-31K.
- Гиперзвуковая ракета "Кинжал", которая ставится сегодня на истребители МиГ-31К и по сути является адаптацией "Искандера" под авиационный носитель, имеет дальность поражения 1500 километров - втрое большую, чем у своей сухопутной версии, - рассказал РИА Новости источник в оборонно-промышленном комплексе. Он отметил, что дальние бомбардировщики Ту-22М3 смогут применять "Кинжалы" на той же дистанции.
{}
“The Kinzhal hypersonic missile, which is installed today on MiG-31K fighters and is essentially an adaptation of the Iskander for an aircraft carrier, has a destruction range of 1,500 kilometers - three times greater than that of its land version,” a source in the defense industry told RIA Novosti . industrial complex. He noted that long-range Tu-22M3 bombers will be able to use Kinzhals at the same distance.
lyle6 wrote:Or Russia was sobered by just how shit NATO IADS is and realized they can get away with Kalibrs and Gerans for the foreseeable future.
Probably also realized they underinvested in their airpower. Now they know why NATO went all in on JDAMs and glide bombs - its because that shit for IADS is all NATO knows .
kvs likes this post
“The Kinzhal hypersonic missile, which is installed today on MiG-31K fighters and is essentially an adaptation of the Iskander for an aircraft carrier, has a destruction range of 1,500 kilometers - three times greater than that of its land version,” a source in the defense industry told RIA Novosti . industrial complex. He noted that long-range Tu-22M3 bombers will be able to use Kinzhals at the same distance. wrote:
Big_Gazza and kvs like this post
Big_Gazza and Hole like this post
GunshipDemocracy wrote:
Your assessment of NATO is imho to optimistic. They know what they want and how to achieve this just there is inertia last 30 years they didn't need to fight on pair adversary. It's not that they dont have money or brains but just there was no need for this. And yes they might be later with hypersonic missiles but once they will catch they can make much more of of them.
GarryB, Big_Gazza, kvs, Hole and Broski like this post
true, but Serpentine is just meant ot be better. Kinzhal -2000km (of which roughly half due to fighter-carrier) . Serpentine - 4?5000 km. No need to use fighter...
Imagine missiles that could reach US fleet/military installations in Hawaii...
So you need to hit something moving 30knots with cep lett then 20m form thousands vkm distance flying 10omach r more. Quite a tech achievement if you ask me.
Me thinks nothing is wrong with air power but Russian never is going to be on pair with the whole West in this regard. Tech enabled an asymmetric way to counter it imho.
“The Kinzhal hypersonic missile, which is installed today on MiG-31K fighters and is essentially an adaptation of the Iskander for an aircraft carrier, has a destruction range of 1,500 kilometers - three times greater than that of its land version,” a source in the defense industry told RIA Novosti . industrial complex. He noted that long-range Tu-22M3 bombers will be able to use Kinzhals at the same distance.
Your assessment of NATO is imho to optimistic. They know what they want and how to achieve this just there is inertia last 30 years they didn't need to fight on pair adversary. It's not that they dont have money or brains but just there was no need for this. And yes they might be later with hypersonic missiles but once they will catch they can make much more of of them.
This source is clearly repeating erroneous nonsense. The range of Kinzhal is 2000 km, it has been repeatedly reported by many sources.
What brains and what production capacity?
The gato hordes real strength lies in thier numbers, hence Russia needs an arsenal optimised for culling, not pinpricks.
kvs and Broski like this post
Arrow wrote:
This source is clearly repeating erroneous nonsense. The range of Kinzhal is 2000 km, it has been repeatedly reported by many sources.
https://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/5383655MOSCOW, July 18. /TASS/. The range of use of the hypersonic missile of the Kinzhal complex will reach approximately 3000 km with the new carrier aircraft - the Tu-22M3 bomber; with the MiG-31K it is more than 2000 km. A source in the defense-industrial complex reported this to TASS on Wednesday.
|
|