Russia Defence Forum

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    US (& Allies) Hypersonic developments and missiles

    JohninMK
    JohninMK

    Posts : 8687
    Points : 8780
    Join date : 2015-06-16
    Location : England

    US (& Allies) Hypersonic developments and missiles - Page 3 Empty Re: US (& Allies) Hypersonic developments and missiles

    Post  JohninMK Tue Mar 30, 2021 4:15 pm

    Big article


    Alerts from the Federal Aviation Administration strongly suggest that the U.S. Air Force's first flight test of its AGM-183A Air-launched Rapid Response Weapon hypersonic missile, or ARRW, is imminent. The recent arrival of the U.S. Army's missile range instrumentation ship USAV Worthy in San Diego and of one of NASA's WB-57F aircraft, which can be configured to help gather data from missile tests, at Naval Air Station Point Mugu outside of Los Angeles, also point to an impending launch.


    https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/39975/signs-point-to-imminent-debut-flight-test-of-the-air-forces-first-hypersonic-missile
    Hole
    Hole

    Posts : 4021
    Points : 4017
    Join date : 2018-03-24
    Age : 44
    Location : Merkelland

    US (& Allies) Hypersonic developments and missiles - Page 3 Empty Re: US (& Allies) Hypersonic developments and missiles

    Post  Hole Wed Mar 31, 2021 3:12 am

    Test of the booster, not the missile itself.
    JohninMK
    JohninMK

    Posts : 8687
    Points : 8780
    Join date : 2015-06-16
    Location : England

    US (& Allies) Hypersonic developments and missiles - Page 3 Empty Re: US (& Allies) Hypersonic developments and missiles

    Post  JohninMK Tue Apr 06, 2021 9:47 am

    Ooops.



    WASHINGTON — The first rocket booster test of the U.S. Air Force’s hypersonic AGM-183A Air-launched Rapid Response Weapon failed when the vehicle did not launch during an April 5 flight.

    During tests over Point Mugu Sea Range off the coast of California, a B-52 Stratofortress bomber attempted to launch the ARRW booster vehicle. However, “the test missile was not able to complete its launch sequence” and the bomber returned to Edwards Air Force Base, California, with the test vehicle, the Air Force said in a statement.

    The service plans to study the missile to understand why it didn’t launch, then make alterations and attempt to fire it in a future test, the service said.

    “The ARRW program has been pushing boundaries since its inception and taking calculated risks to move this important capability forward,” said Brig. Gen. Heath Collins, the Air Force’s program executive officer for its armaments directorate. “While not launching was disappointing, the recent test provided invaluable information to learn from and continue ahead. This is why we test.”

    Aside from demonstrating the safe separation of the ARRW booster from the B-52 during the April 5 test, the Air Force had intended to evaluate the performance of the missile at operational speeds through ignition and the boost phase, as well as simulate the separation of the booster from the glide vehicle.

    The test was carried out by the 419th Flight Test Squadron and the Global Power Bomber Combined Test Force at Edwards AFB.

    The ARRW test missile was delivered to the base on March 1, the service said in a March 5 release, and the first booster test flight was due to follow aboard a B-52 bomber “in the next 30 days.”
    Sign up for our Training & Sim Report

    “The BTF-1 test vehicle is complete and is progressing through ground testing to verify its readiness for flight. The team has successfully dealt with COVID challenges and resolved technical findings not uncommon in a first-of-a-kind weapon system. We have minimized schedule delays while maintaining a laser focus on engineering rigor,” Collins said then, according to the news release.

    The service plans to conduct additional booster and all-up-round test flights throughout 2021. The ARRW program previously flew seven captive carriage flight tests, where the weapon is carried by an aircraft but not released, allowing for the service to collect data on how the weapon impacts the flight profile of the aircraft.

    The Air Force awarded Lockheed Martin a contract worth up to $480 million for ARRW development activities in 2018, including the critical design review, testing and production readiness support.

    In fiscal 2021, Congress allotted $386 million to the Air Force for hypersonic prototyping — an increase of $5 million over the service’s budget request. But that funding came with sacrifices. Last year, the Air Force announced that it would cancel a separate hypersonic weapons program, the Hypersonic Conventional Strike Weapon also produced by Lockheed, due to budget constraints that forced the service to downselect to a single effort.

    Although the HCSW program had shown promise, ARRW had a more “unique glide body design” when compared to HCSW or some of the other hypersonic weapons under development by the Navy and Army, a service spokeswoman said at the time.

    Both ARRW and HCSW are boost glide hypersonic weapons, which fly just below space, but the service is also interested in hypersonic cruise missiles that would be able to take a flight path with lower trajectories.


    https://www.defensenews.com/air/2021/04/06/the-first-flight-test-of-the-air-forces-air-launched-hypersonic-booster-didnt-go-as-planned/

    LMFS likes this post

    LMFS
    LMFS

    Posts : 3363
    Points : 3365
    Join date : 2018-03-03

    US (& Allies) Hypersonic developments and missiles - Page 3 Empty Re: US (& Allies) Hypersonic developments and missiles

    Post  LMFS Tue Apr 06, 2021 12:52 pm

    That is how it looks like when you need to test a missile that does not actually exist Laughing

    magnumcromagnon and Backman like this post

    magnumcromagnon
    magnumcromagnon

    Posts : 7285
    Points : 7434
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    US (& Allies) Hypersonic developments and missiles - Page 3 Empty Re: US (& Allies) Hypersonic developments and missiles

    Post  magnumcromagnon Tue Apr 06, 2021 1:48 pm

    LMFS wrote:That is how it looks like when you need to test a missile that does not actually exist Laughing

    The reason why it failed is that they forget to drench the missile in maple syrup. How could their wunderwaffle function properly without it's appropriate lubricant? dunno Sad

    US (& Allies) Hypersonic developments and missiles - Page 3 EySKjNUWgAAt3kT?format=jpg&name=small

    LMFS likes this post

    magnumcromagnon
    magnumcromagnon

    Posts : 7285
    Points : 7434
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    US (& Allies) Hypersonic developments and missiles - Page 3 Empty Re: US (& Allies) Hypersonic developments and missiles

    Post  magnumcromagnon Tue Apr 06, 2021 2:08 pm

    BTW a US psuedo expert had the nerve to say Zircon is a 'wunderwaffle' when Uncle Sham's hypersuckass programs are already dead-on-arrival.

    Tsirkon wunderwaffle

    https://twitter.com/KofmanMichael/status/1379015456938360835
    Backman
    Backman

    Posts : 625
    Points : 633
    Join date : 2020-11-10

    US (& Allies) Hypersonic developments and missiles - Page 3 Empty Re: US (& Allies) Hypersonic developments and missiles

    Post  Backman Tue Apr 06, 2021 4:16 pm

    Who designed this thing ? SpaceX ? Smile

    magnumcromagnon and limb like this post


    Sponsored content

    US (& Allies) Hypersonic developments and missiles - Page 3 Empty Re: US (& Allies) Hypersonic developments and missiles

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Wed Apr 21, 2021 5:36 pm