flamming_python Fri Feb 21, 2020 11:10 am
Odin of Ossetia wrote: Isos wrote:
US to Turkey : "Fuck off"
Sky News
@SkyNews
· 8h
.@OIRSpox Colonel Myles Caggins says the #Idlib province is a "magnet" for terrorist groups who are a "nuisance, a menace and a threat" to the hundreds of thousands of civilians in Syria, who are just "trying to make it through the winter."
@aldin_ww
Russian Air Force drone filming Turkish T-155 Firtina firing at Syrian Government Forces in support of rebel offensive earlier today
https://mobile.twitter.com/aldin_ww/status/1230499259767717889
So much so for the Western "freedom" and "democracy."
Milosevic's Yugoslavia was a
super democracy in comparison to the Alawite regime in Syria, but guess who got bombed and overthrown by NATO and its proxies.
Turkey should not count on these shits.
If Russia does something stupid to Turkey I do not think anybody will ever take seriously an alliance with Russia.
Turkey invested so much in its friendship with Russia, but an anti-Russian Ukraine gets free natural gas and free money from Russia.
Where is the logic here?
The logic is that Russia already has an ally - Syria. Why should it not protect Syrian soldiers?
Putin acquised to Turkish action in Syria, but within certain parameters. Erdogan was after all hardly invited by anyone in Damascus. He spent the last 8 years flooding Syria with jihadists at the behest of the US on the one hand, but more than that he was trying to do his own thing; like in Libya now as well. When it became clear the Muslim Brotherhood won't manage to take power in Syria through this war, he started just chomping off parts of Syria's territory and wielding them as protectorates. Above all, he simply doesn't know when to call it quits and bug out, like Saudi Arabia and even the USA did to some extent.
The refugee crisis in Turkey is the same result of Erdogan's policies towards Syria. So is the renewed war with the PKK, Erdo himself broke off the peace process
Now Russia offered Turkey a way to resolve all this, signed several treaties, roadmaps. They weren't followed, and instead Turkey justified its presence in Syria with humanitarian rhetoric about refugees; the same ones it generated through all its actions since 2011.
There was an opportunity to settle the Idlib issue without any fighting, without any loss of face for Turkey, with the ability to return refugees from Turkey and guarantee some Turkish security interests.
This wasn't followed, Idlib will be done the hard way.
Up to Erdogan whether he wants the same pattern to repeat for Jarablus, Afrin and the claimed safe-zone in North-East Syria, or whether he's ready to play ball and adhere to signed agreements, gradually regulate the conflict without a single further loss of life and making all efforts to ensure that Turkey's security interests are appeased.
Last edited by flamming_python on Fri Feb 21, 2020 11:20 am; edited 1 time in total