Vann7 wrote:
and to make things more harder to believe..ridiculous over the top.. they also claim ,
their electronic warfare can be integrated in planes and shut down the air defenses of the enemies.. This is mind blowing.. imagine that?
they use as example the shutdown of US aegis system in the donald cook..
Man this looks insanely too good to be true.. but will be really amazing if true.
Just imagine this? If Russia counter electronics can disable Aegis ,that is US best defense
system.. then pretty much Russia should have no problems to invade United States with
its Airforce and be immune to any system of defense or missile.. ALbeit Regular cannon fire
and anti air artillery should work..
Electromagnetic weapon of Russia
Looks like Alien technology to me.. don't know what to think really.. my guess is BS..
or simply a major exageration.
+56
Podlodka77
Atmosphere
limb
TMA1
mnztr
Big_Gazza
thegopnik
Tsavo Lion
Arrow
kvs
George1
Hole
LMFS
dino00
Benya
hoom
HM1199
Enera
Rmf
Tolstoy
RTN
Book.
Isos
franco
x_54_u43
Kimppis
GJ Flanker
Vann7
jhelb
Austin
sepheronx
2SPOOKY4U
whir
GunshipDemocracy
victor1985
max steel
AlfaT8
Walther von Oldenburg
Morpheus Eberhardt
MarshallJukov
NickM
Stealthflanker
ahmedfire
magnumcromagnon
flamming_python
Viktor
Mike E
Werewolf
Mindstorm
GarryB
CaptainPakistan
calripson
Cyberspec
Rpg type 7v
Flanky
medo
60 posters
Russian Electronic Warfare Systems
GJ Flanker- Posts : 38
Points : 38
Join date : 2012-07-28
- Post n°126
Re: Russian Electronic Warfare Systems
Putin called it, a long time ago, asymmetric countermeasures!
Viktor- Posts : 5796
Points : 6429
Join date : 2009-08-25
Age : 43
Location : Croatia
- Post n°127
Re: Russian Electronic Warfare Systems
All this ECM equipment is part mostly of PVO units and has been developed and introduced in service since Vietnam war - noting new here in that respect.
magnumcromagnon- Posts : 8138
Points : 8273
Join date : 2013-12-05
Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan
- Post n°128
Re: Russian Electronic Warfare Systems
State defense order for facilities EW "Moscow-1" and "Mercury-BM" fulfilled ahead of schedule
In the spring it was reported that the Russian military advance got three helicopters Mi-8MTPR EW-1, equipment which allows you to protect a group of aircraft, ships and ground vehicles on the air strikes in a radius of several hundred kilometers, inhibiting multiple targets.
Alexei Panin also said that the plant ahead of schedule this year, the state defense order for the delivery of electronic warfare (EW) "Moscow-1" and "Mercury-BM".
"Shipment of these products by state order in 2015 we have fully completed this year. They have already been delivered to the troops, made the Armed Forces and are serving," - he said.
Who added Panin, Kazan plant produces electronic warfare systems on state defense orders in 2016.
The serial production of modernized systems of electronic warfare (EW) "Arm-AB" will begin within two years, said deputy director general of September 25 issuing this equipment Kazan Optical and Mechanical Plant Alexei Panin.
According to him, the supply of the basic version of the "Arm-AB" on the helicopter Mi-8MTPR-1, scheduled for 2015, will be completed in the near future.
"We plan the development of mass production from next 2017 or the upgraded version of the complex - said Panin. - Currently Concern "Radio-electronic technology" finishes development work on the product. "
Deputy director of the plant said that the company "almost every year developing new products in the field of electronic warfare, without stopping the production of previous products." In particular, according to Panin, it is planned to produce new complexes of EW on the chassis of KAMAZ trucks.
http://sdelanounas.ru/blogs/68302/
Guest- Guest
- Post n°129
Re: Russian Electronic Warfare Systems
"Серийное производство модернизированных комплексов радиоэлектронной борьбы (РЭБ) «Рычаг-АВ» начнется в течение двух лет. В настоящее время КРЭТ завершает опытно-конструкторские работы по данному изделию. Поставки базовой версии «Рычаг-АВ» на вертолете Ми-8МТПР-1, запланированные на 2015 год, будут завершены уже в ближайшее время. Об этом сообщил ТАСС заместитель гендиректора выпускающего это оборудование Казанского оптико-механического завода Алексей Панин. «Планируем освоение серийного производства со следующего или с 2017 года модернизированного варианта этого комплекса. В настоящее время концерн «Радиоэлектронные технологии» завершает опытно-конструкторские работы по данному изделию», - заявил он."
Source and the rest of the article: http://kret.com/ru/news/4002/
Now ill translate it...sort of...
"Serial production of modernised system for radioelectronical warfare Lever-AV (i suppose lever would be appropriate) will begin within 2 years period. In meantime KRET shall finish testing and construction works on it. Initial, basic version of Lever-AV on the base of Mi8MTPR-1 which was planned for 2015. shall be finished very soon. CEO of Kazan Optical and Mechanical Plant Alexei Panin said: "We are planning to start serial production of this modernised system next year or in 2017. In meantime Radioelectronic technologies company is finishing testing and consturcion works on it".
Source and the rest of the article: http://kret.com/ru/news/4002/
Now ill translate it...sort of...
"Serial production of modernised system for radioelectronical warfare Lever-AV (i suppose lever would be appropriate) will begin within 2 years period. In meantime KRET shall finish testing and construction works on it. Initial, basic version of Lever-AV on the base of Mi8MTPR-1 which was planned for 2015. shall be finished very soon. CEO of Kazan Optical and Mechanical Plant Alexei Panin said: "We are planning to start serial production of this modernised system next year or in 2017. In meantime Radioelectronic technologies company is finishing testing and consturcion works on it".
magnumcromagnon- Posts : 8138
Points : 8273
Join date : 2013-12-05
Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan
- Post n°130
Re: Russian Electronic Warfare Systems
Russia: The King-maker of ECM Warfare since 1905...
About 150 units of electronic warfare hardware used in Russia's Center-2015 drills
About 150 units of electronic warfare hardware used in Russia's Center-2015 drills
George1- Posts : 18473
Points : 18974
Join date : 2011-12-22
Location : Greece
- Post n°131
Re: Russian Electronic Warfare Systems
The latest electronic warfare systems "Krasuha-4" came to East Military District
Cyberspec- Posts : 2904
Points : 3057
Join date : 2011-08-07
Location : Terra Australis
- Post n°132
Re: Russian Electronic Warfare Systems
Manufacturer: Russian Defense Ministry before the end of the year will receive nine complexes EW "Moscow-1"
"To date, we have delivered four sets of" Moscow-1 " still have to deliver five more. By the end of the year the Ministry of Defense will be delivered nine units. Of course, before the end of the year we will close the contract"
http://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/2348752
"To date, we have delivered four sets of" Moscow-1 " still have to deliver five more. By the end of the year the Ministry of Defense will be delivered nine units. Of course, before the end of the year we will close the contract"
http://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/2348752
max steel- Posts : 2930
Points : 2955
Join date : 2015-02-12
Location : South Pole
- Post n°133
Re: Russian Electronic Warfare Systems
Russia’s Winning the Electronic War
In Ukraine and Syria, Russian forces are using high-tech equipment to jam drones and block battlefield communications -- and forcing the U.S. to scramble to catch up.
Spy Planes, Signal Jammers, and Putin’s High-Tech War in Syria
Russian airplanes are battering rebel targets throughout Syria, but Moscow’s use of next-generation surveillance and communications-blocking equipment is packing a growing punch.
Is That an R-330Zh Zhitel on the Road in Crimea?
In Ukraine and Syria, Russian forces are using high-tech equipment to jam drones and block battlefield communications -- and forcing the U.S. to scramble to catch up.
Spy Planes, Signal Jammers, and Putin’s High-Tech War in Syria
Russian airplanes are battering rebel targets throughout Syria, but Moscow’s use of next-generation surveillance and communications-blocking equipment is packing a growing punch.
Is That an R-330Zh Zhitel on the Road in Crimea?
Kimppis- Posts : 617
Points : 617
Join date : 2014-12-23
- Post n°134
Re: Russian Electronic Warfare Systems
max steel wrote:Russia’s Winning the Electronic War
In Ukraine and Syria, Russian forces are using high-tech equipment to jam drones and block battlefield communications -- and forcing the U.S. to scramble to catch up.
Spy Planes, Signal Jammers, and Putin’s High-Tech War in Syria
Russian airplanes are battering rebel targets throughout Syria, but Moscow’s use of next-generation surveillance and communications-blocking equipment is packing a growing punch.
Is That an R-330Zh Zhitel on the Road in Crimea?
Could someone copy-paste those Foreign Policy articles? Thanks.
x_54_u43- Posts : 336
Points : 348
Join date : 2015-09-19
- Post n°135
Re: Russian Electronic Warfare Systems
Murmansk
franco- Posts : 6969
Points : 6995
Join date : 2010-08-17
- Post n°136
Re: Russian Electronic Warfare Systems
Part 1 of a 2-part article on Russian EW developments;
http://vpk-news.ru/articles/27272
http://vpk-news.ru/articles/27272
sepheronx- Posts : 8781
Points : 9041
Join date : 2009-08-05
Age : 35
Location : Canada
- Post n°137
Re: Russian Electronic Warfare Systems
franco wrote:Part 1 of a 2-part article on Russian EW developments;
http://vpk-news.ru/articles/27272
Anvar Rajabov, 19:01, 5 October 2015
Author hang noodles on the ears. What are the frequencies of the AWACS he knows, and that 200 megahertz - a UHF band, he does not understand. I saw the aerial banners, and did not understand what a range. And the size of the antenna can determine the wavelength of the radiation. Now, remember the Popova at the time were spark transmitters, frequency band emitted enormous. In the USSR proposed to use such generators for interference-free communication. Sitting on the couch picking your nose, you can not know the parameters of the equipment. Mishandled Cossack!
To me, this article is absolutely useless/pointless. Not only are they speculating everything (no actual data or evidence), but they are assuming a lot and cutting the systems down quite a bit from what I can read here. So far, we have a member here who stated how NATO is having a fun time getting info and getting jammed pretty hard. So I call BS on this article.
Edit: I just read through its article on electronics import substitution and how it wont work. What a load of shit. Didnt even bother even to mention about T-Platforms or their Baikal electronics subsidiary. Didn't bother to talk about the advancements actually made (mentioned a 300mhz elbrus processor but not the Elbrus 4C as an example or upcoming 8C). Then no mention of the Baikal T or upcoming M. No mention the new software available and upcoming. No mention about other plants like the one in St.Pete producing additional components only the one in Kazan, etc. I would say it was a total failure of an article.
franco- Posts : 6969
Points : 6995
Join date : 2010-08-17
- Post n°138
Re: Russian Electronic Warfare Systems
sepheronx wrote:franco wrote:Part 1 of a 2-part article on Russian EW developments;
http://vpk-news.ru/articles/27272
Anvar Rajabov, 19:01, 5 October 2015
Author hang noodles on the ears. What are the frequencies of the AWACS he knows, and that 200 megahertz - a UHF band, he does not understand. I saw the aerial banners, and did not understand what a range. And the size of the antenna can determine the wavelength of the radiation. Now, remember the Popova at the time were spark transmitters, frequency band emitted enormous. In the USSR proposed to use such generators for interference-free communication. Sitting on the couch picking your nose, you can not know the parameters of the equipment. Mishandled Cossack!
To me, this article is absolutely useless/pointless. Not only are they speculating everything (no actual data or evidence), but they are assuming a lot and cutting the systems down quite a bit from what I can read here. So far, we have a member here who stated how NATO is having a fun time getting info and getting jammed pretty hard. So I call BS on this article.
Edit: I just read through its article on electronics import substitution and how it wont work. What a load of shit. Didnt even bother even to mention about T-Platforms or their Baikal electronics subsidiary. Didn't bother to talk about the advancements actually made (mentioned a 300mhz elbrus processor but not the Elbrus 4C as an example or upcoming 8C). Then no mention of the Baikal T or upcoming M. No mention the new software available and upcoming. No mention about other plants like the one in St.Pete producing additional components only the one in Kazan, etc. I would say it was a total failure of an article.
The good, bad and ugly my friend. The truth always lies somewhere in between.
sepheronx- Posts : 8781
Points : 9041
Join date : 2009-08-05
Age : 35
Location : Canada
- Post n°139
Re: Russian Electronic Warfare Systems
franco wrote:sepheronx wrote:franco wrote:Part 1 of a 2-part article on Russian EW developments;
http://vpk-news.ru/articles/27272
Anvar Rajabov, 19:01, 5 October 2015
Author hang noodles on the ears. What are the frequencies of the AWACS he knows, and that 200 megahertz - a UHF band, he does not understand. I saw the aerial banners, and did not understand what a range. And the size of the antenna can determine the wavelength of the radiation. Now, remember the Popova at the time were spark transmitters, frequency band emitted enormous. In the USSR proposed to use such generators for interference-free communication. Sitting on the couch picking your nose, you can not know the parameters of the equipment. Mishandled Cossack!
To me, this article is absolutely useless/pointless. Not only are they speculating everything (no actual data or evidence), but they are assuming a lot and cutting the systems down quite a bit from what I can read here. So far, we have a member here who stated how NATO is having a fun time getting info and getting jammed pretty hard. So I call BS on this article.
Edit: I just read through its article on electronics import substitution and how it wont work. What a load of shit. Didnt even bother even to mention about T-Platforms or their Baikal electronics subsidiary. Didn't bother to talk about the advancements actually made (mentioned a 300mhz elbrus processor but not the Elbrus 4C as an example or upcoming 8C). Then no mention of the Baikal T or upcoming M. No mention the new software available and upcoming. No mention about other plants like the one in St.Pete producing additional components only the one in Kazan, etc. I would say it was a total failure of an article.
The good, bad and ugly my friend. The truth always lies somewhere in between.
Yes it does. But definitely not on the claims of your link. Specifically the fact that he doesn't bring to the table evidence but a statement. We actually do not know the specifications, but what Airbornwolf says is true, then kinda makes this article useless.
His article on the technology aspect of it also gives me indication that this VPK-Name website is garbage 5th column crap. Cause it really doesn't take much effort to do some research and already disprove a lot of claims. Some of the posts are not bad. But the titles to their pages are cringe worthy, much like the Globe and Mail or the Inquirer.
magnumcromagnon- Posts : 8138
Points : 8273
Join date : 2013-12-05
Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan
- Post n°140
Re: Russian Electronic Warfare Systems
franco wrote:
The good, bad and ugly my friend. The truth always lies somewhere in between.
Hardly the case here, just pure speculative baloney, which is unusual because vpk-news is usual a good site. As far as ECM goes, some of the claims of KRET leading a marketing campaign is pure supposition and hyperbole.
Real world experience is by far the best measuring stick, and why is it so hard to believe Russia has significant lead/advantage in ECM? I mean Russia has been experimenting in ECM warfare/tactics for 110 years, in which successfully deployed ECM tactics back in the 1905 Russo-Japanese war, specifically in the Defense of Port Arthur:
We can also look at NATO exercises with Slovakian S-300 PMU's, one of the most outdated and obsolete versions of the system and the relevance, context and circumstance of their performances against it using NATO standard ECM tactics.
magnumcromagnon- Posts : 8138
Points : 8273
Join date : 2013-12-05
Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan
- Post n°141
Re: Russian Electronic Warfare Systems
KRET general designer said on combating the doctrine of "prompt global strike"
Cyberspec- Posts : 2904
Points : 3057
Join date : 2011-08-07
Location : Terra Australis
- Post n°142
Re: Russian Electronic Warfare Systems
magnumcromagnon wrote:KRET general designer said on combating the doctrine of "prompt global strike"
Should be interesting....EW system to jam the Missile Defence System Radars.
max steel- Posts : 2930
Points : 2955
Join date : 2015-02-12
Location : South Pole
- Post n°143
Re: Russian Electronic Warfare Systems
Russia has just unveiled its cutting-edge weapon a ‘visual optical jammer’ called "Grach" which emits light so powerful that it can literally blind enemies.
This weapon is expected to be used in Russia’s ongoing military operation against ISIS militants in Syria.
This weapon is expected to be used in Russia’s ongoing military operation against ISIS militants in Syria.
magnumcromagnon- Posts : 8138
Points : 8273
Join date : 2013-12-05
Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan
- Post n°144
Re: Russian Electronic Warfare Systems
The Russian Defense Ministry recently demonstrated the effectiveness of President-S defense complex, which defeated a volley of Igla manpad missiles:
"President" to protect against rocket salvo
"President" to protect against rocket salvo
max steel- Posts : 2930
Points : 2955
Join date : 2015-02-12
Location : South Pole
- Post n°145
Re: Russian Electronic Warfare Systems
sort of flares only
franco- Posts : 6969
Points : 6995
Join date : 2010-08-17
- Post n°146
Re: Russian Electronic Warfare Systems
An article on Russian EW;
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Ftopwar.ru%2F&sandbox=1
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Ftopwar.ru%2F&sandbox=1
Cyberspec- Posts : 2904
Points : 3057
Join date : 2011-08-07
Location : Terra Australis
- Post n°147
Re: Russian Electronic Warfare Systems
max steel wrote:sort of flares only
IR jammer + Flares
max steel- Posts : 2930
Points : 2955
Join date : 2015-02-12
Location : South Pole
- Post n°148
Re: Russian Electronic Warfare Systems
EW systems undergo “reality check” in Syria
The Avtobasa proved instrumental in downing a number of U.S. and Israeli recce drones overflying Iranian territory. Some were captured in good condition and, following a reverse engineering process, went into quantity production in Iran.
The Avtobasa proved instrumental in downing a number of U.S. and Israeli recce drones overflying Iranian territory. Some were captured in good condition and, following a reverse engineering process, went into quantity production in Iran.
sepheronx- Posts : 8781
Points : 9041
Join date : 2009-08-05
Age : 35
Location : Canada
- Post n°149
Re: Russian Electronic Warfare Systems
http://sdelanounas.ru/blogs/70208/
CVO receives 2 sets of Leer-3 EW system.
CVO receives 2 sets of Leer-3 EW system.
jhelb- Posts : 1093
Points : 1194
Join date : 2015-04-04
Location : Previously: Belarus Currently: A Small Island No One Cares About
- Post n°150
How can Russia respond to such a program?
Just like the "Assault Breaker" program of the Cold War era the US military is now working on the RAID BREAKER program
Under this program the US Joint Electronic Warfare Center intends to neutralize 100s of incoming missiles with Electronic Warfare.
How can Russia respond to such a program?
Under this program the US Joint Electronic Warfare Center intends to neutralize 100s of incoming missiles with Electronic Warfare.
How can Russia respond to such a program?
|
|