Russia Defence Forum

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    Russia's National Defense Strategy issues

    Tsavo Lion
    Tsavo Lion

    Posts : 4719
    Points : 4715
    Join date : 2016-08-15
    Location : AZ, USA

    Russia's National Defense Strategy issues - Page 11 Empty Re: Russia's National Defense Strategy issues

    Post  Tsavo Lion on Tue Sep 29, 2020 8:25 pm

    China and Russia wary of German rearmament

    Caucasus conflict heralds clash of the titans


    Last edited by Tsavo Lion on Tue Sep 29, 2020 8:28 pm; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : add link)
    Tsavo Lion
    Tsavo Lion

    Posts : 4719
    Points : 4715
    Join date : 2016-08-15
    Location : AZ, USA

    Russia's National Defense Strategy issues - Page 11 Empty Re: Russia's National Defense Strategy issues

    Post  Tsavo Lion on Thu Oct 01, 2020 5:43 pm

    Russia’s foreign policy enters new China-aligned phase
    Tsavo Lion
    Tsavo Lion

    Posts : 4719
    Points : 4715
    Join date : 2016-08-15
    Location : AZ, USA

    Russia's National Defense Strategy issues - Page 11 Empty Re: Russia's National Defense Strategy issues

    Post  Tsavo Lion on Wed Oct 14, 2020 12:01 am

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NnoN8_iO4Jg
    LMFS
    LMFS

    Posts : 2098
    Points : 2100
    Join date : 2018-03-03

    Russia's National Defense Strategy issues - Page 11 Empty Re: Russia's National Defense Strategy issues

    Post  LMFS on Wed Oct 14, 2020 12:21 am

    Tsavo Lion wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NnoN8_iO4Jg

    Can you summarize what they are saying?
    Tsavo Lion
    Tsavo Lion

    Posts : 4719
    Points : 4715
    Join date : 2016-08-15
    Location : AZ, USA

    Russia's National Defense Strategy issues - Page 11 Empty Re: Russia's National Defense Strategy issues

    Post  Tsavo Lion on Wed Oct 14, 2020 12:35 am

    Since the Chinese BRI goes via Kazakhstan, with branches in Azerbaijan & Ukraine, & RF, destabilizing C. Asia & all of those is the way to derail it. Nazarbayev conducted power transfer to prevent turmoil like in Kirgizia, Armenia, Ukraine & Belarus.

    LMFS likes this post

    Tsavo Lion
    Tsavo Lion

    Posts : 4719
    Points : 4715
    Join date : 2016-08-15
    Location : AZ, USA

    Russia's National Defense Strategy issues - Page 11 Empty Re: Russia's National Defense Strategy issues

    Post  Tsavo Lion on Wed Oct 21, 2020 3:42 am

    Russia has an arc of instability on its periphery
    Tsavo Lion
    Tsavo Lion

    Posts : 4719
    Points : 4715
    Join date : 2016-08-15
    Location : AZ, USA

    Russia's National Defense Strategy issues - Page 11 Empty Re: Russia's National Defense Strategy issues

    Post  Tsavo Lion on Fri Oct 30, 2020 6:54 pm

    In general, some Ukrainian analysts posit, the results of recent weeks point to the emergence of the contours of a new transregional defense alliance that includes Ukraine, Azerbaijan, the UK, Turkey and Poland (Dsnews.ua, October 19).
    Russian experts have already termed the rapprochement between Ukraine and Turkey a “challenge” for Moscow. In their opinion, the possible “presence of Turkish drones in Ukraine is fraught with unpleasant consequences”: if they appear in Donbas, the Russian-controlled regimes of the Donetsk and Luhansk “people’s republics” (DPR, LPR) will have nothing comparable to oppose them. Furthermore, Russian experts are worried about Turkey’s support for the Crimean Tatar diaspora and the prospect of a joint Ukrainian-Turkish naval formation in the Black Sea (Gazeta.ru, October 14).
    miketheterrible
    miketheterrible

    Posts : 4877
    Points : 4855
    Join date : 2016-11-06

    Russia's National Defense Strategy issues - Page 11 Empty Re: Russia's National Defense Strategy issues

    Post  miketheterrible on Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:45 pm

    Those Russian experts are probably foreign funded. Cause no person with self inch of respect and intelligence would fear Tatars in Crimea since they account for 10% of crimeas population.

    Ukraine is broke, along with turkey.  If they decide to use drones in eastern Ukraine against DNR/LNR, expect Russian supplies is EW and anti drone tech.

    Ukraine has no navy either. Turkey's is pathetic.

    Man, people fear and or push fear over nothing.

    Russia will use Turkey cause Ukraine has no leverage over Turkey and Turkey had no friends now with cash.

    Ukraine won't be that nation.

    Lol.

    Turkey is trying (but failing) to use Ukraine as leverage over Russia.

    It's like Israel and all the Arab nations around it. Israel had even less capabilities but destroyed their enemy. Russia has all the capabilities and manpower to destroy Turkey multiple times over.  Ukraine isn't even a threat.  Georgia was more of a threat.

    Add Poland to the mix and it's hilarious. Country barely has its own armed forces.

    People are stupid in general. They think that a nation can't fight multiple fronts at once but there is a reason why Russia has military districts.

    LMFS, Hole and lancelot like this post

    kvs
    kvs

    Posts : 7089
    Points : 7240
    Join date : 2014-09-11
    Location : Canuckistan

    Russia's National Defense Strategy issues - Page 11 Empty Re: Russia's National Defense Strategy issues

    Post  kvs Yesterday at 2:13 am

    Russia has extremely strong leverage against Banderastan. Its NATzO pals are not prepared to pony up the money to keep it afloat.
    So Ukraine's economy is withering away since it chose to spite its face by slicing off its own nose when it comes to trade with Russia.
    It is gradually dawning on Banderite retards that Russia is the only real trading partner they had and without it they are screwed.
    No economy can function on vapours for decades waiting for the right trade opportunities to arise and those opportunities are
    actually generated by having a viable economy to create exportable goods and services and to create demand for imports.

    miketheterrible and lancelot like this post

    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 26315
    Points : 26861
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Russia's National Defense Strategy issues - Page 11 Empty Re: Russia's National Defense Strategy issues

    Post  GarryB Yesterday at 3:38 am

    Ukraine, Azerbaijan, the UK, Turkey and Poland

    Coalition of the abandoned and the fucked up... I mean just the fact that the Ukraine leads the list and the UK is third is amusing... how the mighty have fallen... and the irony that the UK started WWII over Poland but now Poland is the only country of that group actually in the EU...

    I would say rather than fear them they should be encouraging them to work together... I am sure they will be capable of great things... shouldn't be long before the Kiev regime is overrun by the forces from the Donbass... the way the UK has severed relations with its main trading block because it does not like to be dictated to by Brussels is amusing... the Ukraine has essentially done the same with Russia and isolated itself from its main trading partner and customer base, while Turkey survived an attempted coup supported by its HATO allies like the US which continues to protect the coup leader, and is in almost open conflict with France and Greece over a few regional issues... and then there is Poland and Azerbaijan... I don't think it should be ignored, but I also don't think it will be keeping Russian defence planners up at night.

    Regarding Turkish drones over the Ukraine... they already deal with them over Syria.... if the Ukraine wants to kill its own citizens with drones, I am sure they will respond with drones over Kiev and elsewhere... practise against drone attacks is ultimately a useful thing because planning and tactics need to be developed to counter them.

    LMFS likes this post

    George1
    George1

    Posts : 15049
    Points : 15552
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Russia's National Defense Strategy issues - Page 11 Empty Re: Russia's National Defense Strategy issues

    Post  George1 Yesterday at 2:34 pm

    Russia should further strenghten Black sea fleet
    franco
    franco

    Posts : 3462
    Points : 3494
    Join date : 2010-08-18

    Russia's National Defense Strategy issues - Page 11 Empty Re: Russia's National Defense Strategy issues

    Post  franco Yesterday at 2:50 pm

    Central District Short Blanket

    The military equipment of the Central Military District is not enough to repel likely threats
    About the author: Alexander Anatolyevich Khramchikhin - Deputy Director of the Institute of Political and Military Analysis.

    The Central Military District (headquartered in Yekaterinburg) is the largest in the country in terms of area of ​​responsibility. It exceeds 7 million square km (more than Australia), stretching from the Volga to Lake Baikal.

    CVO potential

    The grouping of the ground forces of the district (including the Airborne Forces) includes one military base, one tank division, six motorized rifle (including one mountain), one airborne assault, two special forces, two missile, two artillery, one MLRS, three anti-aircraft missile, one engineering, one communications, one electronic warfare, three battle management, two MTO brigades, two RChBZ brigades plus two RChBZ and two engineering regiments.

    The group is armed with 24 Iskander missile launchers, about 300 tanks (T-72 and possibly T-90), more than 700 BMP-2 and BMD-2M, more than 400 BTR-80/82A, up to 50 MTLB , at least 250 self-propelled guns, up to 150 towed guns and mortars, about 150 MLRS, up to 100 self-propelled anti-tank systems and anti-tank systems MT-12, two divisions of S-300V air defense systems and nine divisions of Buk air defense missile systems, more than 100 short-range air defense systems and Tunguska air defense systems ".

    In addition, a significant amount of equipment is in storage, given the fact that there are three central tank reserve bases on the territory of the Central Military District. Each of them has thousands of armored vehicles, though not always in a combat-ready state.

    As part of the aviation group of the 14th Air Army of the Central Military District, as well as the Long-Range Aviation and Military Transport Aviation Commands, there are seven air regiments, one air base, an army aviation brigade and a helicopter regiment in the Central Military District. It is armed with about 100 bombers, attack aircraft and reconnaissance aircraft, about 50 MiG-31B interceptors, up to 100 transport and passenger aircraft, 30 Mi-24P attack helicopters, at least 50 Mi-8 multi-purpose helicopters, 5 Mi-26 transport helicopters.

    The ground air defense grouping includes seven anti-aircraft missile regiments. Although the Central Military District accounts for the vast coastline of the Arctic Ocean, it does not include the forces and means of the Navy and Arctic units.

    Given the size of the district, the available amount of weapons and equipment is completely insufficient for its defense. The situation is aggravated by the fact that most of this technology is seriously outdated (the only exceptions are the BTR-82A, the Chrysanthemum-S ATGM, some ground-based air defense systems and, in part, the 2S19 ACS).

    A mitigating factor is the size of the territory, which is almost uninhabited in the north. Enemy air attack weapons (except for American and Chinese ICBMs, MRBMs and SLBMs) ​​simply will not reach many of the district's targets. It is because of the "central" location of the region that most of the ground component of the Russian strategic nuclear forces is deployed here: more than half of the strategic aviation, two of the three missile armies (9 out of 12 missile divisions) of the Strategic Missile Forces.

    Despite the favorable geographical position, the Central Military District, especially its Ural-Siberian part, requires a radical quantitative and qualitative strengthening. And not due to the weakening of other districts, but due to the formation of new units and formations, receiving not old equipment from warehouses, but the latest from factories.

    Unfortunately, so far the trends are rather opposite. The Central Military District is the last to receive new equipment, and its grouping is gradually "drifting" westward. From Siberia, connections are relocated to the Urals and the Volga region. First of all, due to the formations of the Central Military District, the ZVO grouping is formed on the border with Ukraine. Its creation is necessary, but the Central Military District must receive compensation.

    Due to its geographical location, the Central Military District should be a reserve for the rest of the districts and the closest rear for the military military district. New equipment should come here not last, but first of all, in order to be tested in polygon conditions. For example, it would be quite natural to transfer the first serial "Armata" to the 90th Panzer Division in Chebarkul, especially since it is very close to the manufacturing plant. Alas, so far everything is quite the opposite.

    There can be two potential wars in the Central Military District's area of ​​responsibility. They talk about one for a long time and regularly, about the other they are deafeningly silent.

    Islamic Caliphate


    The Russian military campaign in Syria was launched primarily in order to stop the expansion of radical Islam as far as possible from the Russian borders. There is another geographic area where Moscow may have to fight a war with similar goals. In the short term, this is generally the most likely war for Russia.

    It is already clear that the Afghan campaign of the United States and its allies has failed, the Afghan Armed Forces alone are not capable of defending the country. Apparently, the United States will surrender Afghanistan to the Taliban, considering them the lesser of evils in comparison with the "Islamic Caliphate" (banned in the Russian Federation - "NVO"). It is difficult to say whether the Taliban themselves will begin expansion to the north. The Taliban is a movement (banned in the Russian Federation - NVO), mainly Pashtun, they do not like to operate in ethnically alien areas. But Islamists from the countries of Central Asia are able to "take root" on the territory of Afghanistan. Having received combat training in Afghanistan, they will carry "knowledge and experience" home.

    Despite the ideological similarity, the Taliban are at war with the Islamic Caliphate. For the latter, expansion is a way of being. Central Asia and Afghanistan for him are a single "vilayat Khorasan". The Taliban will most likely simply push the “caliphate” to the north, that is, the expansion of the latter into Central Asia will happen automatically. It will take place in the form of infiltration of small sabotage and terrorist groups designed to "wake up" the "sleeping cells" of like-minded people that exist in all Central Asian countries.

    Members of the "sleeping cells" can be representatives of a wide variety of segments of the population, including businessmen, officials and security agencies. As a result, it is completely unclear where the "front line" will be. It is clear that the radicals will not observe the state borders. On the contrary, they will deliberately break them, creating in practice "wilayat Khorasan".

    Russia will not be able to stay on the sidelines not even because of its obligations under the CSTO, but because of the same considerations for which it launched the Syrian campaign. It is better to lose 200 servicemen in the south of Central Asia than 20 thousand military and civilians in the Volga region, the Urals and Siberia, if radicals break through there. The main problem will be on whose side will be a tangible part of the civilian population and security forces of the Central Asian countries. For one part of the region's population, the Russian military will be the defenders, for another part - the occupiers.

    On the part of the RF Armed Forces at the initial stage of the conflict, the Airborne Forces and front-line strike aviation will certainly be involved. It is impossible to answer now whether their potential will be enough to solve the problem or significantly reduce its severity. This answer depends primarily on the reaction of the local population, which will be different in different countries of Central Asia.

    If it becomes necessary to transfer tank and infantry units and formations to Central Asia, this will mean the development of the conflict according to the most unfavorable scenario, reminiscent of “our” Afghan war (“Afghan Lesson for Russia”, “NVO”, 06.04.18). If the Russian troops begin to incur significant losses in people and equipment, the analogy will become quite obvious and completely unpleasant.

    At the same time, Russia cannot simply admit defeat and leave. If only because in a few years at most we will have to wage the same war on our own territory. Therefore, there may be a variant of retreat from the southern countries of Central Asia, which do not have borders with us, with the simultaneous deployment of a military grouping on the southern border of Kazakhstan, which will have to be defended as our own.

    However, this "obvious" war seems like "flowers" in comparison with the one about which it is customary to keep silent.

    Strategic partners?

    The Chinese are moving to Central Asia very actively ("Beijing goes on the offensive", "NVO", 11/16/18). The invasion is being conducted in economic and demographic ways. Military expansion is likely to be overkill. Or it will look peaceful too: in Tajikistan, military facilities of the PLA, apparently, already exist now - with the consent of official Dushanbe.

    But no options can be ruled out. At least Kazakhstan may be ready to resist. Or Beijing, for some internal reason, wants to speed up the process. And then the likelihood of an openly military scenario will arise.

    In the event of an invasion of Central Asia by Chinese troops, Moscow will find itself in a difficult situation. All countries of the region bordering on the PRC are members of the CSTO, that is, Russia is legally obliged to protect them in the event of external aggression. In addition, the seizure of Central Asia by China and the PLA's access to the Russian-Kazakh border from Astrakhan to Barnaul will become a complete geopolitical disaster for Russia. On the other hand, you don't want to fight China at all, especially if it did not attack you.

    Nevertheless, refusing to defend at least Kazakhstan will become a delayed geopolitical suicide for Russia, and a very short delay. If Moscow has at least the instinct for self-preservation, it will have to fight. To try to avoid an escalation of the conflict, it will be possible to officially declare that the RF Armed Forces will conduct hostilities only in the territories of the Central Asian countries and will not be the first to strike at the territory of the PRC.

    It is quite obvious that the PLA grouping only of the Western Command and the Xinjiang Military District is much stronger than the Armed Forces of Kazakhstan and the Central Military District and the Airborne Forces of Russia combined (the Kyrgyz and Tajik armies can be neglected). On the side of the latter - only the terrain. Terrain conditions allow organizing a sufficiently strong defense and inflicting tangible losses on the aggressor. And if the Kazakh army is only able to detain the enemy on its eastern border, then with Russian help it is possible to grasp the mountain passes on this border seriously. Further, the main role will be played by logistics, the ability of the parties to build up forces in the theater of operations through the transfer of reinforcements. For both Russia and China, this problem will be difficult due to the large distances.

    Even if Moscow and Beijing initially agree to fight only in Central Asia, without touching the territories of the PRC and the Russian Federation, Russia will not be able to transfer military-military units to Kazakhstan. This is inconvenient in terms of transport and unacceptable from a safety point of view. If Moscow removes its troops from the Far East, Beijing will immediately "forget" about the original agreement, and this will be a disaster for us. Therefore, the grouping in Kazakhstan can be strengthened by the troops of the Western Military District and, to a lesser extent, the Southern Military District.

    There is no need to be afraid of being stabbed in the back by NATO. Not because NATO members are noble, and even more so not because they will be on our side, but because they are weak and cowardly. But it is better not to touch the grouping on the border with Ukraine until the last opportunity.

    The human resources of China are endless, but the number of military equipment is finite. Therefore, it is very difficult to contain the PLA offensive in the border regions of Kazakhstan, but it is possible. If this succeeds, Beijing will have to admit defeat. And if the PLA breaks into the operational space of the Kazakh steppes, Moscow will have to admit defeat, since it will have nothing more to cling to on the territory of Kazakhstan (except for the borders of the Irtysh rivers in the northeast and the Ural in the northwest). The first option will be painful for Beijing, but not disastrous. The second option will be a disaster for Moscow.

    However, the losing side may not want to admit defeat. And it will escalate by striking enemy territory. This almost automatically means a full-scale war, at the end of which an exchange of nuclear strikes is seen.

    Of course, neither Moscow nor Beijing needs this. But most wars in history have not been needed by either side. Nevertheless, they began. And then they ended very sadly. At least for one of the parties, and more often for all.
    miketheterrible
    miketheterrible

    Posts : 4877
    Points : 4855
    Join date : 2016-11-06

    Russia's National Defense Strategy issues - Page 11 Empty Re: Russia's National Defense Strategy issues

    Post  miketheterrible Yesterday at 3:15 pm

    They are probably upgrading the other districts who require the new equipment most, first.

    Central is important but it wouldn't be hard to quickly provide assets and men to it from the other districts.  While I agree they newer equipment and more men, they also need to prioritize.

    Over time, it will get its upgrades and probably increase in men and equipment.

    Does anyone have a good breakdown of Central military districts current equipment and total manpower?
    franco
    franco

    Posts : 3462
    Points : 3494
    Join date : 2010-08-18

    Russia's National Defense Strategy issues - Page 11 Empty Re: Russia's National Defense Strategy issues

    Post  franco Yesterday at 5:00 pm

    miketheterrible wrote:They are probably upgrading the other districts who require the new equipment most, first.

    Central is important but it wouldn't be hard to quickly provide assets and men to it from the other districts.  While I agree they newer equipment and more men, they also need to prioritize.

    Over time, it will get its upgrades and probably increase in men and equipment.

    Does anyone have a good breakdown of Central military districts current equipment and total manpower?

    The only T-90 tanks would be at the Tank Command Institute at Kazan. As for manpower my guesstimate is 162,000 which would include all services and military cadets. I show 15-16 battalions of tanks which makes it 450-500. For Motor Rifle battalions, 13 with BMP-2/2M and 10 with BTR-82A's. There is also 1 light battalion with SUV's and 2 Mountain battalions with Tigr's and Typhoons. The Airborne brigade has 2 battalions with BMD-4M's and 1 with BMD-2. There are 8 Spetsnaz battalions in addition. They are getting new equipment but not the priority of the West and South. Sorry but all the time I have presently.

    miketheterrible and LMFS like this post

    miketheterrible
    miketheterrible

    Posts : 4877
    Points : 4855
    Join date : 2016-11-06

    Russia's National Defense Strategy issues - Page 11 Empty Re: Russia's National Defense Strategy issues

    Post  miketheterrible Yesterday at 5:10 pm

    Thanks franco
    Hole
    Hole

    Posts : 3271
    Points : 3271
    Join date : 2018-03-24
    Age : 44
    Location : Merkelland

    Russia's National Defense Strategy issues - Page 11 Empty Re: Russia's National Defense Strategy issues

    Post  Hole Yesterday at 9:26 pm

    The author of this garbage is a moron.

    miketheterrible likes this post


    Sponsored content

    Russia's National Defense Strategy issues - Page 11 Empty Re: Russia's National Defense Strategy issues

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Sun Nov 01, 2020 2:48 am