Home
Latest images
Register
Log in
Question: you said part of the EM waves hit the nucleus. So what happen then?
+35
JohninMK
Odin of Ossetia
marcinko
Book.
victor1985
BTRfan
Svyatoslavich
PapaDragon
2SPOOKY4U
Dominus
zackyx
George1
mutantsushi
magnumcromagnon
mack8
Walther von Oldenburg
jhelb
Stealthflanker
Viktor
kvs
Regular
TR1
KomissarBojanchev
sepheronx
max steel
Mike E
GarryB
Morpheus Eberhardt
TheArmenian
VladimirSahin
RTN
medo
flamming_python
collegeboy16
Werewolf
39 posters
Questions and Ideas
victor1985- Posts : 632
Points : 659
Join date : 2015-01-02
victor1985- Posts : 632
Points : 659
Join date : 2015-01-02
Ok then is like this: you have a small nuclear fuel. You make it explode. Range to be 30 cm. All this in a chamber that is in air on a aerostat. In the chamber there is air. The EM waves from nuclear blast make a chain reaction in air . then the EM waves resulted are collected because they have induction. Thus you have lots of energy for a laser weapon or for EM waves that fryes the enemy
victor1985- Posts : 632
Points : 659
Join date : 2015-01-02
Ofcourse you could say that simply can use nukes to make the same. But....nukes on missiles can be and will be intercepted....but ...EM waves cant be intercepted.
victor1985- Posts : 632
Points : 659
Join date : 2015-01-02
Think to posibility to hit at distance whitout nothing that could be done by enemy
And here is the haarp like posibility to hit at distance. Make a chamber resistant to nuke blast....make a very small nuke...and colect the energy
And here is the haarp like posibility to hit at distance. Make a chamber resistant to nuke blast....make a very small nuke...and colect the energy
victor1985- Posts : 632
Points : 659
Join date : 2015-01-02
Another idea: make the electric circuit that take energy to antennas a superconductor. Whit a frozen aparatus you will have powerfull waves. Also a question: a antenna can be maked from a superconducter? My point is that not being a electric resistance you will have high move up and down in the antenna so high frecvency of waves. Theoretically whit few energy you could have gamma rays.
victor1985- Posts : 632
Points : 659
Join date : 2015-01-02
About the compton effect. From where do you know that the EM waves powered produce less energy than is plug in the forming of waves?
victor1985- Posts : 632
Points : 659
Join date : 2015-01-02
How a EM wave is form in a antenna?
max steel- Posts : 2930
Points : 2955
Join date : 2015-02-12
Location : South Pole
It would be nice if you could just club all your doubts in one post .
victor1985- Posts : 632
Points : 659
Join date : 2015-01-02
I know but things come to me after first post and is harrasing to edit and reedit same post
victor1985- Posts : 632
Points : 659
Join date : 2015-01-02
What all those are?
Morpheus Eberhardt- Posts : 1925
Points : 2032
Join date : 2013-05-20
victor1985 wrote:What all those are?
An "AFAR" is an "AESA", "active electronically scanned array".
victor1985- Posts : 632
Points : 659
Join date : 2015-01-02
Question: electrons level of energy has a connection whit the waves of a radar antenna?
Morpheus Eberhardt- Posts : 1925
Points : 2032
Join date : 2013-05-20
victor1985 wrote:About the compton effect. From where do you know that the EM waves powered produce less energy than is plug in the forming of waves?
For one thing, the Compton effect is an inelastic scattering which means that losses are involved (obvious losses).
max steel- Posts : 2930
Points : 2955
Join date : 2015-02-12
Location : South Pole
I can't acces PAK-DA thread . https://www.russiadefence.net/t2625p405-pak-da-news
Mods kindly inform whether you've merged it somewhere else ?
Mods kindly inform whether you've merged it somewhere else ?
GarryB- Posts : 39672
Points : 40168
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
I can see it OK.
Just go to the Russian Air Force thread and it is there as a sticky...
Just go to the Russian Air Force thread and it is there as a sticky...
PapaDragon- Posts : 13372
Points : 13414
Join date : 2015-04-26
Location : Fort Evil, Serbia
Guys I have a suggestion.
We have many treads on naval forum, often about a single class of ships. It can get crowded and many of them are barely active. They could be all bundled into larger categories. Would make for more dynamic treads.
We might pack them all together into several larger treads according to ship types and other general topics like this for example:
Aircraft carriers, helicopter carriers and landing ships
Submarines (nuclear and non-nuclear)
Battlecruisers, cruisers and destroyers
Corvettes and frigates
Patrol boats, small landing crafts, speedboats
Icebrakers, supply ships and tugs,
Hovercrafts, hydrofoils and ekranoplans
Coast guard and river police
Naval aviation (fixed wing and helicopters)
Naval UAVs, underwater drones and robots
Naval infantry
Naval weapon systems and radars
We have many treads on naval forum, often about a single class of ships. It can get crowded and many of them are barely active. They could be all bundled into larger categories. Would make for more dynamic treads.
We might pack them all together into several larger treads according to ship types and other general topics like this for example:
Aircraft carriers, helicopter carriers and landing ships
Submarines (nuclear and non-nuclear)
Battlecruisers, cruisers and destroyers
Corvettes and frigates
Patrol boats, small landing crafts, speedboats
Icebrakers, supply ships and tugs,
Hovercrafts, hydrofoils and ekranoplans
Coast guard and river police
Naval aviation (fixed wing and helicopters)
Naval UAVs, underwater drones and robots
Naval infantry
Naval weapon systems and radars
Mike E- Posts : 2619
Points : 2651
Join date : 2014-06-19
Location : Bay Area, CA
A question regarding the T-90...
Doesn't it remove all ammunition from the fighting compartment.? And if so... How?
Doesn't it remove all ammunition from the fighting compartment.? And if so... How?
Werewolf- Posts : 5921
Points : 6110
Join date : 2012-10-24
Mike E wrote:A question regarding the T-90...
Doesn't it remove all ammunition from the fighting compartment.? And if so... How?
Simply by not placing charges and warheads but autoloader but only reload the autoloader with 22 rounds. The ammunition holders are the dangerous problem.
The ammunition holders surrounding the carousel is just kept empty.
flamming_python- Posts : 9284
Points : 9346
Join date : 2012-01-30
PapaDragon wrote:Guys I have a suggestion.
We have many treads on naval forum, often about a single class of ships. It can get crowded and many of them are barely active. They could be all bundled into larger categories. Would make for more dynamic treads.
We might pack them all together into several larger treads according to ship types and other general topics like this for example:
What's wrong with:
Icebrakers, supply ships and tugs,
https://www.russiadefence.net/t3416-minesweepers-other-auxilliary-vessels-and-naval-innovations
Naval aviation (fixed wing and helicopters)
https://www.russiadefence.net/t2897-russian-naval-aviation-news
https://www.russiadefence.net/t1719-asw-aircrafts-for-russian-navy
Naval UAVs, underwater drones and robots
https://www.russiadefence.net/t4232-underwater-drones-of-the-russian-navy
Naval infantry
https://www.russiadefence.net/t2048-russian-naval-infantry-news
https://www.russiadefence.net/t1677-russian-naval-infantry-combat-vehicles
https://www.russiadefence.net/t1070-russian-navy-spetsnaz
Naval weapon systems and radars
https://www.russiadefence.net/t1032-naval-weapon-systems
https://www.russiadefence.net/t2965-anti-ship-missiles-discussion
and ekranoplans
https://www.russiadefence.net/t4141-surprise-caspian-monsters-are-back
Aircraft carriers, helicopter carriers and landing ships
Submarines (nuclear and non-nuclear)
Battlecruisers, cruisers and destroyers
Corvettes and frigates
Patrol boats, small landing crafts, speedboats
Coast guard and river police
Hovercrafts, hydrofoils
The rest of these are mostly larger or significant enough for individual classes to deserve their own threads.
However a few of these categories still do have general threads (e.g. https://www.russiadefence.net/t11-status-of-russia-s-navy-cruisers or https://www.russiadefence.net/t754-russian-nuclear-submarine-force ); for information on the vessels or vessel classes that don't have their own dedicated threads to be put in - but what actually ends up happening is that often users will post news in both the general and the specific thread; inflating the general thread with needless duplicate information.
I've been meaning to bring up this point for a while now.
Can everyone just check before they post and only post to a more general thread if a specific thread on that ship/sub/aircraft/weapon system/organization doesn't exist?
George1- Posts : 18400
Points : 18897
Join date : 2011-12-22
Location : Greece
Does anyone know which is the russian bank that grants loans to foreign states?
Svyatoslavich- Posts : 399
Points : 400
Join date : 2015-04-22
Location : Buenos Aires
VEB, perhaps? At least this is what the name means (Vnesheconombank - foreign economic affairs bank).George1 wrote:Does anyone know which is the russian bank that grants loans to foreign states?
George1- Posts : 18400
Points : 18897
Join date : 2011-12-22
Location : Greece
Svyatoslavich wrote:VEB, perhaps? At least this is what the name means (Vnesheconombank - foreign economic affairs bank).George1 wrote:Does anyone know which is the russian bank that grants loans to foreign states?
thanks
jhelb- Posts : 1090
Points : 1191
Join date : 2015-04-04
Location : Previously: Belarus Currently: A Small Island No One Cares About
George1 wrote:Does anyone know which is the russian bank that grants loans to foreign states?
Several. It depends whether the Russian bank in question has a branch in that particular foreign country.
Sberbank, VTB, Gazprombank have all provided loans to foreign countries. This is because the Central Bank of Russia (CBR) has been extremely accommodative extending Rbs7.4trn of loans to the above mentioned 3 banks.
Mike E- Posts : 2619
Points : 2651
Join date : 2014-06-19
Location : Bay Area, CA
Wait, so the tank would only hold 22 round? IMO it seems more likely such holders are just enclosed....and any loose ammunition is just removed.
GarryB- Posts : 39672
Points : 40168
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
The standard autoloader for the T-72/90 holds 22 rounds and charges and is under an armoured plate under the turret floor. The rest of the ammo is loose around the turret and beside the driver.
In combat it was found that any penetration would ignite the propellent stubs, whose cardboard skins are designed to combust fully in the gun chamber and any spark or hot ember will ignite.
when only carrying the 22 rounds in the underfloor autoloader the rounds and propellent stubs are protected from hot sparks and fragments and the vehicle is much safer.
In combat it was found that any penetration would ignite the propellent stubs, whose cardboard skins are designed to combust fully in the gun chamber and any spark or hot ember will ignite.
when only carrying the 22 rounds in the underfloor autoloader the rounds and propellent stubs are protected from hot sparks and fragments and the vehicle is much safer.
|
|
|