kvs wrote:Fomenko lost the plot totally when he inserted his own retarded "chronology" in place of the original flawed one. It's totally unscientific.
I am not familiar with the "retarded "chronology""; I can only venture a guess that it has something to do with ...
However, Fomenko is affiliated, among other things, with a branch of science known as the "new chronology".
But, do you know what branches of science the new chronology, itself, is based on, especially its mathematical foundation?
By the way, have you read the new chronology series of books by him, the four translated into English, that is? What other books/articles on the new chronology have you read?
Also, if you don't mind, can you please tell me a bit about your background, especially regarding your background in science (including math—as anybody can guess, I have a predominantly empiricist view of the philosophy of mathematics)?