Russia Defence Forum

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


+98
Cheetah
miketheterrible
A1RMAN
kopyo-21
pushkin
Viktor
OminousSpudd
eridan
Pincus Shain
ahmedfire
User 1592
HM1199
DerWolf
Singular_trafo
KiloGolf
auslander
william.boutros
Luq man
mack8
hoom
Rmf
Genjurooo
SeigSoloyvov
Redboy
tanino
Project Canada
triphosgene
KoTeMoRe
jaguar_br
Zivo
BKP
AK-Rex
Neutrality
Big_Gazza
artjomh
Sunbeam
Firebird
Vann7
Akula971
Isos
zg18
RTN
ult
Kimppis
x_54_u43
vultur
Hachimoto
TheArmenian
Berkut
JohninMK
marcellogo
Austin
Glyph
Mindstorm
VladimirSahin
GJ Flanker
mutantsushi
Pinto
havok
Mike E
kvs
par far
Cyrus the great
PapaDragon
chicken
max steel
Captain Nemo
Notio
franco
nemrod
magnumcromagnon
Cyberspec
Manov
2SPOOKY4U
Kyo
Morpheus Eberhardt
zepia
medo
Book.
GunshipDemocracy
Svyatoslavich
Flanky
wilhelm
Ranxerox71
collegeboy16
higurashihougi
George1
EKS
Stealthflanker
AlfaT8
Werewolf
victor1985
jhelb
flamming_python
GarryB
sepheronx
Alex555
type055
102 posters

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 40252
    Points : 40752
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 37 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  GarryB Mon Sep 05, 2016 5:49 am

    Keep in mind that increased thrust and improved fuel efficiency are both needed for real improvements.

    Making an engine twice as powerful alone does not off as much improvement as some might think as aircraft have fixed capacity internal fuel tanks that are designed for the engines available at the time of design.

    Fuel consumption is generally measured in weight of fuel burned to generate the energy developed per hour of operation... if you double you energy produced you double the fuel consumption if you don't improve fuel consumption.

    A case in point was the Yak-38 and Yak-38M VSTOL aircraft... the latter had a more powerful main engine, but because the aircraft itself was a subsonic design and no amount of extra thrust would allow it to be supersonic then the extra power increased take off weight but just shortened effective flight range.

    Extra power with these engines however... with the bonus of internal weapons carriage meaning low drag should allow a boost in super cruising speed extending range and lowering IR signature and expanding flight range and improving the ability to evade or to chase targets down.
    George1
    George1


    Posts : 18476
    Points : 18977
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 37 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  George1 Wed Sep 07, 2016 4:26 pm

    Russian Defense Ministry to Buy at Least 1 PAK FA Fighter Squadron in 2017

    Read more: https://sputniknews.com/military/20160907/1045056444/russia-mil-mod.html
    sepheronx
    sepheronx


    Posts : 8782
    Points : 9042
    Join date : 2009-08-05
    Age : 35
    Location : Canada

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 37 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  sepheronx Wed Sep 07, 2016 6:07 pm

    1 squadron is what? 12 aircrafts?
    George1
    George1


    Posts : 18476
    Points : 18977
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 37 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  George1 Wed Sep 07, 2016 7:37 pm

    sepheronx wrote:1 squadron is what? 12 aircrafts?

    In RuAF i think yes 12-14 aircrafts
    avatar
    hoom


    Posts : 2352
    Points : 2340
    Join date : 2016-05-06

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 37 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  hoom Thu Sep 08, 2016 6:17 am

    Incoming headlines from various bloggers/'Russia experts': "Russia slashes order for F-22ski!!!11!!" Suspect
    avatar
    eridan


    Posts : 188
    Points : 194
    Join date : 2012-12-13

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 37 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  eridan Thu Sep 08, 2016 1:43 pm

    That is perfectly in line with what's been announced by russian MoD before. A small quantity of preserial planes ordered, to develop tactics with and to practice on, before a larger contract (possibly with izd30 engines) is made sometime from 2020 onwards.

    magnumcromagnon
    magnumcromagnon


    Posts : 8138
    Points : 8273
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 37 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  magnumcromagnon Thu Sep 08, 2016 6:02 pm

    eridan wrote:That is perfectly in line with what's been announced by russian MoD before.  A small quantity of preserial planes ordered, to develop tactics with and to practice on, before a larger contract (possibly with izd30 engines) is made sometime from 2020 onwards.


    We've seen something similar with the T-14 Armata. Ru MOD buys a small batch to try to finds bug before mass production, fixing the problems now before paying for them later. That's the complete opposite approach philosophy then the one practiced by the Pentagon.
    OminousSpudd
    OminousSpudd


    Posts : 942
    Points : 947
    Join date : 2015-01-03
    Location : New Zealand

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 37 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  OminousSpudd Thu Sep 08, 2016 9:29 pm

    magnumcromagnon wrote:
    eridan wrote:That is perfectly in line with what's been announced by russian MoD before.  A small quantity of preserial planes ordered, to develop tactics with and to practice on, before a larger contract (possibly with izd30 engines) is made sometime from 2020 onwards.


    We've seen something similar with the T-14 Armata. Ru MOD buys a small batch to try to finds bug before mass production, fixing the problems now before paying for them later. That's the complete opposite approach philosophy then the one practiced by the Pentagon.
    It makes sense especially when considering the "5th gen" powerplants promised by 2019.
    AlfaT8
    AlfaT8


    Posts : 2487
    Points : 2478
    Join date : 2013-02-02

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 37 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  AlfaT8 Thu Sep 08, 2016 10:50 pm

    OminousSpudd wrote:
    magnumcromagnon wrote:
    eridan wrote:That is perfectly in line with what's been announced by russian MoD before.  A small quantity of preserial planes ordered, to develop tactics with and to practice on, before a larger contract (possibly with izd30 engines) is made sometime from 2020 onwards.


    We've seen something similar with the T-14 Armata. Ru MOD buys a small batch to try to finds bug before mass production, fixing the problems now before paying for them later. That's the complete opposite approach philosophy then the one practiced by the Pentagon.
    It makes sense especially when considering the "5th gen" powerplants promised by 2019.

    I thought it was 2018.
    OminousSpudd
    OminousSpudd


    Posts : 942
    Points : 947
    Join date : 2015-01-03
    Location : New Zealand

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 37 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  OminousSpudd Thu Sep 08, 2016 10:53 pm

    AlfaT8 wrote:
    OminousSpudd wrote:
    magnumcromagnon wrote:
    eridan wrote:That is perfectly in line with what's been announced by russian MoD before.  A small quantity of preserial planes ordered, to develop tactics with and to practice on, before a larger contract (possibly with izd30 engines) is made sometime from 2020 onwards.


    We've seen something similar with the T-14 Armata. Ru MOD buys a small batch to try to finds bug before mass production, fixing the problems now before paying for them later. That's the complete opposite approach philosophy then the one practiced by the Pentagon.
    It makes sense especially when considering the "5th gen" powerplants promised by 2019.

    I thought it was 2018.

    My bad. Literally one page back too. Rolling Eyes
    avatar
    pushkin


    Posts : 3
    Points : 3
    Join date : 2016-09-03

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 37 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  pushkin Tue Sep 13, 2016 3:31 pm



    Russia Agreed To Share Critical Technologies Of PAK-FA With India Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes

    avatar
    pushkin


    Posts : 3
    Points : 3
    Join date : 2016-09-03

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 37 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  pushkin Tue Sep 13, 2016 3:37 pm



    the video says that the indian version of pak fa (pmf) will be integrated with indo-russian supersonic BrahMos cruise missile....would the russian air force will also integrate the missile with its su30 and pak fa fighters?
    avatar
    Project Canada


    Posts : 662
    Points : 663
    Join date : 2015-07-20
    Location : Canada

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 37 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  Project Canada Tue Sep 13, 2016 5:20 pm

    pushkin wrote:

    Russia Agreed To Share Critical Technologies Of PAK-FA With India  Rolling Eyes  Rolling Eyes  Rolling Eyes


    Not really a good idea, however as technology progress, i hope Russia can introduce more improvements to their Own Pak-Fas so any leakage to foreign competitors of some weaknesses that this deal will result to would be nullified
    OminousSpudd
    OminousSpudd


    Posts : 942
    Points : 947
    Join date : 2015-01-03
    Location : New Zealand

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 37 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  OminousSpudd Tue Sep 13, 2016 6:40 pm

    Project Canada wrote:
    pushkin wrote:

    Russia Agreed To Share Critical Technologies Of PAK-FA With India  Rolling Eyes  Rolling Eyes  Rolling Eyes


    Not really a good idea, however as technology progress, i hope Russia can introduce more improvements to their Own Pak-Fas so any leakage to foreign competitors of some weaknesses that this deal will result to would be nullified
    Export is still export, the avionics packages will still be radically different compared to the domestic.
    zg18
    zg18


    Posts : 888
    Points : 958
    Join date : 2013-09-26
    Location : Zagreb , Croatia

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 37 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  zg18 Fri Sep 16, 2016 6:47 pm

    Very Happy

    JohninMK
    JohninMK


    Posts : 15517
    Points : 15658
    Join date : 2015-06-16
    Location : England

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 37 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  JohninMK Sun Sep 18, 2016 7:46 pm

    Sputnik write up. Note that the infographic in the article is from August last year.

    The 9-A1-4071K cannon for the Sukhoi PAK FA fifth generation jet fighter was developed by the Instrument Design Bureau for High Precision Weapons in 2014 and is an upgraded version of the GSh-30-1 30 mm automatic cannon.

    Weighing just 50 kilograms, the 9-A1-4071K is the most lightweight 30 mm cannon around and is ideal for aircraft. The cannon’s one-of-a-kind automatic fire system enables it to fire up to 1,800 rounds per minute – the best such performance for this type of weapon around. Another thing that makes the 9-A1-4071K so special is its autonomous water cooling system where the water inside the barrel jacket vaporizes as it heats up during operation.

    The 9-A1-4071K cannon can fire blast-fragmentation, incendiary and armor-piercing tracer rounds and is effective against even lightly armored ground, sea and aerial targets. The cannon can hit ground targets up to 1,800 meters away and aerial targets at a maximum distance of 1,200 meters.

    Flight tests of the 9A1-4071K modernized rapid-aircraft cannon were earlier conducted on the Sukhoi SU-27SM multirole jet fighter. Military experts believe that the latest targeting systems used on the T-50 PAK FA planes will dramatically improve the efficiency of aircraft cannons, which in some cases are way more preferable, compared to expensive missile systems.


    Read more: https://sputniknews.com/russia/20160918/1045429863/russia-gun-test.html

    avatar
    Austin


    Posts : 7617
    Points : 8014
    Join date : 2010-05-08
    Location : India

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 37 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  Austin Wed Sep 21, 2016 12:10 pm

    came across a longish writeup on PAK-FA on secretproject

    https://thaimilitaryandasianregion.wordpress.com/2016/04/27/sukhoi-t-50-pak-fa-russia/
    Luq man
    Luq man


    Posts : 67
    Points : 69
    Join date : 2016-03-26
    Location : The Netherlands

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 37 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  Luq man Wed Sep 21, 2016 1:41 pm

    Austin wrote:came across a longish writeup on PAK-FA on secretproject

    https://thaimilitaryandasianregion.wordpress.com/2016/04/27/sukhoi-t-50-pak-fa-russia/

    lol!  I already posted this, post nr 891 Razz
    avatar
    kopyo-21


    Posts : 203
    Points : 203
    Join date : 2013-08-21
    Location : Bangkok - Thailand

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 37 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  kopyo-21 Thu Sep 29, 2016 11:26 am

    I think the gun of T-50 will fire new 30mm ammunitions with plastic-driving-band and higher heat resistance primes that has just come into services recently. Firing new ammos, the gun muzzle velocity increases ~7% while the gun's combat readiness is 3 times higher. Besides, the new gun can eject completely all empty cartridges in any combat modes (upto 9 g-load?).

    Does any one know what is the limited g-load of gun firing on Mig-29 and Su-27 now?
    avatar
    hoom


    Posts : 2352
    Points : 2340
    Join date : 2016-05-06

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 37 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  hoom Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:04 pm

    So I've been reading some old threads on other forums & found this vid (presume been posted here before)

    And you really gotta say if it can do this on the 'weak' initial engines holy crap what will it be doing on the proper ones What a Face
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 40252
    Points : 40752
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 37 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  GarryB Tue Oct 04, 2016 3:18 am

    Does any one know what is the limited g-load of gun firing on Mig-29 and Su-27 now?

    From memory the only g limit for the early model MiGs was when the centreline fuel tank was fitted and that was a g limit for the tank and not actually the gun.

    Both the Flanker and Fulcrum were designed for dog fighting so I would think there was no limitation in firing the gun except when the ferry tank was being used by the MiG... the Flanker has no wet pylons and so could not carry ferry tanks.
    avatar
    hoom


    Posts : 2352
    Points : 2340
    Join date : 2016-05-06

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 37 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  hoom Wed Oct 05, 2016 12:16 am

    the Flanker has no wet pylons and so could not carry ferry tanks
    Huh, I knew pics with tanks were very rare, didn't sink in they are actually 0  Shocked
    It's quite shocking that they have that much range entirely on internal fuel while western planes are hardly ever seen without 2 or 3 huge tanks in any realistic load.

    I know I've seen Su-34s carrying a big centerline tank fairly often & Su-33 has the buddy fuelling pod so they must have a wet centerline, what about Su-30sm & Su-35?
    avatar
    Svyatoslavich


    Posts : 399
    Points : 400
    Join date : 2015-04-21
    Location : Buenos Aires

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 37 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  Svyatoslavich Wed Oct 05, 2016 12:58 am

    hoom wrote:
    the Flanker has no wet pylons and so could not carry ferry tanks
    Huh, I knew pics with tanks were very rare, didn't sink in they are actually 0  Shocked
    It's quite shocking that they have that much range entirely on internal fuel while western planes are hardly ever seen without 2 or 3 huge tanks in any realistic load.

    I know I've seen Su-34s carrying a big centerline tank fairly often & Su-33 has the buddy fuelling pod so they must have a wet centerline, what about Su-30sm & Su-35?
    Su-34 is the only of the Flanker family which can carry external fuel tanks.
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 40252
    Points : 40752
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 37 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  GarryB Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:14 am

    It was my understanding that pretty much any Flanker with inflight refuelling probes can carry the buddy refuelling pod and external tanks.

    The vast majority of inservice Flankers are Su-27s which generally fly with half their internal tanks empty so external tanks are not even considered important...
    magnumcromagnon
    magnumcromagnon


    Posts : 8138
    Points : 8273
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 37 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  magnumcromagnon Thu Oct 06, 2016 4:32 am

    GarryB wrote:It was my understanding that pretty much any Flanker with inflight refuelling probes can carry the buddy refuelling pod and external tanks.

    The vast majority of inservice Flankers are Su-27s which generally fly with half their internal tanks empty so external tanks are not even considered important...

    Aren't the Su-27 family/generation known for their huge gas tanks?

    Sponsored content


    PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 37 Empty Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Thu Oct 10, 2024 9:05 pm