
http://bmpd.livejournal.com/1727245.html
For the performance, the max speed of Mi-24 (335 km/h) is above of Mi-24PN and Mi-35M3 (~310 km/h) due to the foldable landing gears instead of fixed ones in Mi-24PN and Mi-35M3d_taddei2 wrote:wonder if anyone could answer these questions please.
1) is there any differences in terms of performance (speed/ceiling height etc) and if so what specs are there between Mi-24 compared to Mi-24PN/Mi-35M
2) The armour protection offered on the Mi-24 have read protection from 12.7mm i would have thought it would have been more.
3) The armour protection offered on the Mi-28 have from various sources stating windshield 7.62-12.7mm and others state 12.7-14.5mm, not sure what the rest of the Mi-28 protection is. Read new blades are protected up to 30mm.
4) The armour protection offered on the Ka-52. I would imagine similar to Mi-28.
5) The armour protection offered on the Mi-8AMTSh/Mi-17, read it has armour plating i am only guessing but i would expect up to 12.7mm.
any info would be great read so many conflicting reports and sources and guess this is the best place to get the facts.
2) The armour protection offered on the Mi-24 have read protection from 12.7mm i would have thought it would have been more.
3) The armour protection offered on the Mi-28 have from various sources stating windshield 7.62-12.7mm and others state 12.7-14.5mm, not sure what the rest of the Mi-28 protection is. Read new blades are protected up to 30mm.
4) The armour protection offered on the Ka-52. I would imagine similar to Mi-28.
5) The armour protection offered on the Mi-8AMTSh/Mi-17, read it has armour plating i am only guessing but i would expect up to 12.7mm.
George1 wrote:"Flying BMP" Mi-35M
Special training for the landing was conducted by special forces of the Southern Military District.
Why unusual? The fact is that in practice it has developed so that the main transport tasks are performed by Mi-8 helicopters and its modifications. Mi-8 has a more spacious cargo cabin, wide doorways, ramp and winch for easy loading and unloading of paratroopers and cargo.
However, the task of delivering the landing force can be carried out and traditionally used for the fire support of the Mi-35M, for this purpose the helicopter is equipped with a cargo cabin capable of accommodating 8 fighters in full equipment.
http://bmpd.livejournal.com/2711975.html
GarryB wrote:There would be a price range as there are several alternative setups including some systems etc.
I would check somewhere like that SIPRI organisation that keeps track of international military sales and compare prices...
https://www.sipri.org/databases/armstransfers
d_taddei2 wrote:GarryB wrote:There would be a price range as there are several alternative setups including some systems etc.
I would check somewhere like that SIPRI organisation that keeps track of international military sales and compare prices...
https://www.sipri.org/databases/armstransfers
Unable to download documents with mobile
franco wrote:d_taddei2 wrote:GarryB wrote:There would be a price range as there are several alternative setups including some systems etc.
I would check somewhere like that SIPRI organisation that keeps track of international military sales and compare prices...
https://www.sipri.org/databases/armstransfers
Unable to download documents with mobile
Sold 12 Mil-35M to Brazil for $150 ml US in 2014.
12.5MN each that's a good price.
GarryB wrote:12.5MN each that's a good price.
You can't really say that without further investigation...
Does it say the money was only for aircraft?
Did they already have that aircraft in service?
There are lots of potential variables.
Did they buy extra weapons or systems with the purchase of aircraft.... does it include a support package?
Are they all equipped to the same level?
KomissarBojanchev wrote:What is the logic in making Mi-35s fixed gear.
I have to admit, retractable gear Mi-24s look far more aesthetic.
|
|