Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    Soviet SAM systems. What are your thoughts?

    Share

    d_taddei2
    Captain
    Captain

    Posts : 775
    Points : 935
    Join date : 2013-05-11
    Location : Scotland UK

    Soviet SAM systems

    Post  d_taddei2 on Sat Jun 25, 2016 5:36 am

    With still a huge number of Soviet made SAM systems still in operation around the world i was looking to see what peoples views are on these systems and how capable they are on the modern battlefield up against NATO aircraft.

    the following systems are the ones in question. And we can assume that they have had the latest upgrades if it makes it easier to answer.


    SA-2 (S-75M)
    SA-3 (S-125 Neva/Pechora)
    SA-4 (2K11 Krug)
    SA-5 (S-200)
    SA-6 (2K12 Kub)
    SA-8 (9K33 Osa)
    SA-9 (9K31 Strela-1)
    SA-13 (9K35 Strela-10)
    SA-19 (2K22 Tunguska)


    I haven't included the MANPAD's SA-7, SA-14, SA-16, SA-18, but if you want to mention please feel free i also havent mentioned the SA-1 (S-25 Berkut) as North Korea is the only current operator and i guessing that the condition of these will be poor and possibly out of service due to condition, but yet again feel free to mention if you want.



    kvs
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 2616
    Points : 2747
    Join date : 2014-09-11
    Location : Canuckistan

    Re: Soviet SAM systems. What are your thoughts?

    Post  kvs on Sat Jun 25, 2016 5:54 am

    d_taddei2 wrote:With still a huge number of Soviet made SAM systems still in operation around the world i was looking to see what peoples views are on these systems and how capable they are on the modern battlefield up against NATO aircraft.

    the following systems are the ones in question. And we can assume that they have had the latest upgrades if it makes it easier to answer.


    SA-2 (S-75M)
    SA-3 (S-125 Neva/Pechora)
    SA-4 (2K11 Krug)
    SA-5 (S-200)
    SA-6 (2K12 Kub)
    SA-8 (9K33 Osa)
    SA-9 (9K31 Strela-1)
    SA-13 (9K35 Strela-10)
    SA-19 (2K22 Tunguska)


    I haven't included the MANPAD's SA-7, SA-14, SA-16, SA-18, but if you want to mention please feel free i also havent mentioned the SA-1 (S-25 Berkut) as North Korea is the only current operator and i guessing that the condition of these will be poor and possibly out of service due to condition, but yet again feel free to mention if you want.



    The story of the F-117 shootdown during the 1999 NATO war on Serbia is good indication that these system are only
    obsolete if not used creatively.

    http://www.defenceaviation.com/2007/02/how-was-f-117-shot-down-part-1.html

    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15722
    Points : 16427
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Soviet SAM systems. What are your thoughts?

    Post  GarryB on Sat Jun 25, 2016 11:35 am

    The issue is value for money.

    If you had no SAMs at all and were looking to buy then it would not make sense to buy old systems and then upgrade them.

    If however you already had lots of systems in service and they were getting long in the tooth the choice is upgrade or replace and that is where the decision becomes much less clear cut...

    The newer SAMs are rather more capable but also rather more expensive due to more sophisticated sensors and support systems.

    Of course the upgrades for older models include many of those improved sensors and systems so the costs are not that different, while performance will be different.

    An example would be the choice of TOR or OSA with an upgrade... ironically you could buy OSA and pay to have a ARH sensor for each missile dramatically increasing the cost of the SA-8 missiles but also making them vastly more capable and fully fire and forget. Or you could spend a small fortune on TOR with powerful 3D radar and tracking radar and simple and very cheap command guided missiles...

    It really depends on what you want or need and what you already have.

    Note they produced about 100,000 SA-1s and since the 1970s have used about 20,000 as training targets... and will likely continue to use them in such a role. they also have other model SAMs used as targets for newer systems too.


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order

    George1
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 9633
    Points : 10125
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Re: Soviet SAM systems. What are your thoughts?

    Post  George1 on Sat Jun 25, 2016 7:59 pm

    d_taddei2 wrote:With still a huge number of Soviet made SAM systems still in operation around the world i was looking to see what peoples views are on these systems and how capable they are on the modern battlefield up against NATO aircraft.

    the following systems are the ones in question. And we can assume that they have had the latest upgrades if it makes it easier to answer.


    SA-2 (S-75M)
    SA-3 (S-125 Neva/Pechora)
    SA-4 (2K11 Krug)
    SA-5 (S-200)
    SA-6 (2K12 Kub)
    SA-8 (9K33 Osa)
    SA-9 (9K31 Strela-1)
    SA-13 (9K35 Strela-10)
    SA-19 (2K22 Tunguska)


    I haven't included the MANPAD's SA-7, SA-14, SA-16, SA-18, but if you want to mention please feel free i also havent mentioned the SA-1 (S-25 Berkut) as North Korea is the only current operator and i guessing that the condition of these will be poor and possibly out of service due to condition, but yet again feel free to mention if you want.



    why you open threads of same subject?? there is already one exactly the same



    _________________
    "There's no smoke without fire.", Georgy Zhukov


    d_taddei2
    Captain
    Captain

    Posts : 775
    Points : 935
    Join date : 2013-05-11
    Location : Scotland UK

    reply

    Post  d_taddei2 on Sun Jun 26, 2016 12:29 am

    George1 wrote:
    d_taddei2 wrote:With still a huge number of Soviet made SAM systems still in operation around the world i was looking to see what peoples views are on these systems and how capable they are on the modern battlefield up against NATO aircraft.

    the following systems are the ones in question. And we can assume that they have had the latest upgrades if it makes it easier to answer.


    SA-2 (S-75M)
    SA-3 (S-125 Neva/Pechora)
    SA-4 (2K11 Krug)
    SA-5 (S-200)
    SA-6 (2K12 Kub)
    SA-8 (9K33 Osa)
    SA-9 (9K31 Strela-1)
    SA-13 (9K35 Strela-10)
    SA-19 (2K22 Tunguska)


    I haven't included the MANPAD's SA-7, SA-14, SA-16, SA-18, but if you want to mention please feel free i also havent mentioned the SA-1 (S-25 Berkut) as North Korea is the only current operator and i guessing that the condition of these will be poor and possibly out of service due to condition, but yet again feel free to mention if you want.



    why you open threads of same subject?? there is already one exactly the same


    sorry never realised there was one please share the link of the thread you are refering to for Soviet SAM's

    rambo54
    Junior Sergeant
    Junior Sergeant

    Posts : 111
    Points : 117
    Join date : 2014-04-01

    S-125

    Post  rambo54 on Fri Jul 01, 2016 6:55 pm

    Sat Pics from 2015 & 2016 show Pechora 2M equipment at Site 60, Kapustin Yar.
    Any ideas why they test this system? It is not new (in principle) and not intended for the Russian Army and I think they will not made final tests for export issues at Site 60




    Isos
    Master Sergeant
    Master Sergeant

    Posts : 367
    Points : 371
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Re: Soviet SAM systems. What are your thoughts?

    Post  Isos on Fri Jul 01, 2016 10:57 pm

    https://sites.google.com/site/samsimulator1972/home

    Just found that simulator. I didn't upload it but their are videos on the website made by ex profesioal radar oprators that show how they shoot F-117. If anyone has informations about it, please share them.

    d_taddei2
    Captain
    Captain

    Posts : 775
    Points : 935
    Join date : 2013-05-11
    Location : Scotland UK

    Re: Soviet SAM systems. What are your thoughts?

    Post  d_taddei2 on Sat Jul 02, 2016 5:07 am

    rambo54 wrote:Sat Pics from 2015 & 2016 show Pechora 2M equipment at Site 60, Kapustin Yar.
    Any ideas why they test this system? It is not new (in principle) and not intended for the Russian Army and I think they will not made final tests for export issues at Site 60


    Russia has developed a missile with the warhead replaced with telemetry instrumentation, for use as target drones. So i am guessing that this is being used for this purpose considering Kapustin Yars is a test facility.

    d_taddei2
    Captain
    Captain

    Posts : 775
    Points : 935
    Join date : 2013-05-11
    Location : Scotland UK

    Re: Soviet SAM systems. What are your thoughts?

    Post  d_taddei2 on Sat Jul 02, 2016 5:10 am

    Isos wrote:https://sites.google.com/site/samsimulator1972/home

    Just found that simulator. I didn't upload it but their are videos on the website made by ex profesioal radar oprators that show how they shoot F-117. If anyone has informations about it, please share them.

    you will need to try it out and let us know how it goes could be fun

    eehnie
    Captain
    Captain

    Posts : 748
    Points : 773
    Join date : 2015-05-13

    Re: Soviet SAM systems. What are your thoughts?

    Post  eehnie on Fri Aug 05, 2016 1:17 am

    rambo54 wrote:Sat Pics from 2015 & 2016 show Pechora 2M equipment at Site 60, Kapustin Yar.
    Any ideas why they test this system? It is not new (in principle) and not intended for the Russian Army and I think they will not made final tests for export issues at Site 60




    I think these would not be exactly SA-3 systems, but the target missiles developed from them.

    From what I see in the public reports, target missiles for development of new systems and training have been developed from:

    SA-1
    SA-2
    SA-3

    BM-21
    SA-6
    SA-8

    After a transformation changing the nature of the missiles and Rockets (being not more SAM or Surface-Surface weapons) these (and other) systems are used as target missiles. If fact it would not be right to say that SA-1, SA-2, SA-3, BM-21, SA-6 or SA-8 systems are used as target missiles. In the case of the BM-21, SA-6 and SA-8, the weapons remain in use for their original purpose.

    In the following link there is access to the different types of target missiles used, checking the "Rocket target and target systems" part. According to the information, some of them have been developed from SAM systems and others not.

    https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=es&sl=ru&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rusarmy.com%2Fpvo.html
    http://www.rusarmy.com/pvo.html


    Last edited by eehnie on Sat Oct 08, 2016 11:45 pm; edited 3 times in total

    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15722
    Points : 16427
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Soviet SAM systems. What are your thoughts?

    Post  GarryB on Fri Aug 05, 2016 9:44 am

    The Lissa-M mobile ground based system with Strizh training missiles is an example... it uses the vertically launched SA-1.

    The Peniye training target system uses the SA-6 missile, while the RM-75 uses the SA-2 missile system.

    There are even combinations where the SA-3 ground based fixed launcher with four launch rails can be used to launch four SA-3 missiles at training targets, but can also be fitted with the missile containers of the SAMAN missile system, so the launcher can be used to launch four SA-3s or four SA-8s to simulate multiple targets.

    Note the original OSA vehicle can carry 6 missiles but for a testing range the mobility is not so useful and cheaper static launchers of multiple missiles makes more sense.

    The single rail launcher for SA-3 missiles is called Pishchal... and of course the SA-8 Gecko system has Saman target missiles in a fully autonomous system able to simulate small targets like drones, cruise missiles, and HARM missiles.


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order

    eehnie
    Captain
    Captain

    Posts : 748
    Points : 773
    Join date : 2015-05-13

    Re: Soviet SAM systems. What are your thoughts?

    Post  eehnie on Thu Dec 22, 2016 5:58 pm

    d_taddei2 wrote:With still a huge number of Soviet made SAM systems still in operation around the world i was looking to see what peoples views are on these systems and how capable they are on the modern battlefield up against NATO aircraft.

    the following systems are the ones in question. And we can assume that they have had the latest upgrades if it makes it easier to answer.


    SA-2 (S-75M)
    SA-3 (S-125 Neva/Pechora)
    SA-4 (2K11 Krug)
    SA-5 (S-200)
    SA-6 (2K12 Kub)
    SA-8 (9K33 Osa)
    SA-9 (9K31 Strela-1)
    SA-13 (9K35 Strela-10)
    SA-19 (2K22 Tunguska)


    I haven't included the MANPAD's SA-7, SA-14, SA-16, SA-18, but if you want to mention please feel free i also havent mentioned the SA-1 (S-25 Berkut) as North Korea is the only current operator and i guessing that the condition of these will be poor and possibly out of service due to condition, but yet again feel free to mention if you want.

    According to the public reports, Syria is building a new air defense system, and is doing it with a mix of advanced and less modern systems.

    Everyone knows at this point about the presence of the SA-10/12/20/23 (S-300) and SA-22 systems. Also they increased the number of SA-11/17, SA-19 and SA-6. Only the SA-8 and the SA-13 seems to have a decline of its numbers since the begin of the war.

    But in adition to this, Syria also increased significantly its numbers of SA-3, SA-5, SA-2and S-60 towed systems, until a point that makes the SA-2 almost exhausted worldwide, keeping the numbers of SA-9 and ZSU-23-2 (also used for infantry) .

    The lower effectiveness of the oldest systems is a fact. But Syria is applying the easiest formula in case of lower effectivenes: Higher density of systems.

    The weakness of the SA-3, SA-5 and SA-2 is clear. Towed launchers that make more difficult its survivability in case of attacks. But like they have a range that is not easy to avoid, with high density of systems, they can be able of doing significant damage before to be destroyed, and more if are combined with more modern systems.

    Between the self propelled systems, the SA-9 has the smallest range. It would be the weakest in my opinion and the first to disappear totally (today totally retired in Russia). The next for me would be the SA-13, also by its shorter range.

    Sponsored content

    Re: Soviet SAM systems. What are your thoughts?

    Post  Sponsored content Today at 11:34 am


      Current date/time is Mon Jan 23, 2017 11:34 am