Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    Soviet SAM systems. What are your thoughts?

    Share
    avatar
    kvs

    Posts : 2987
    Points : 3112
    Join date : 2014-09-11
    Location : Canuckistan

    Re: Soviet SAM systems. What are your thoughts?

    Post  kvs on Sat Jun 25, 2016 5:54 am

    d_taddei2 wrote:With still a huge number of Soviet made SAM systems still in operation around the world i was looking to see what peoples views are on these systems and how capable they are on the modern battlefield up against NATO aircraft.

    the following systems are the ones in question. And we can assume that they have had the latest upgrades if it makes it easier to answer.


    SA-2 (S-75M)
    SA-3 (S-125 Neva/Pechora)
    SA-4 (2K11 Krug)
    SA-5 (S-200)
    SA-6 (2K12 Kub)
    SA-8 (9K33 Osa)
    SA-9 (9K31 Strela-1)
    SA-13 (9K35 Strela-10)
    SA-19 (2K22 Tunguska)


    I haven't included the MANPAD's SA-7, SA-14, SA-16, SA-18, but if you want to mention please feel free i also havent mentioned the SA-1 (S-25 Berkut) as North Korea is the only current operator and i guessing that the condition of these will be poor and possibly out of service due to condition, but yet again feel free to mention if you want.



    The story of the F-117 shootdown during the 1999 NATO war on Serbia is good indication that these system are only
    obsolete if not used creatively.

    http://www.defenceaviation.com/2007/02/how-was-f-117-shot-down-part-1.html
    avatar
    GarryB

    Posts : 16196
    Points : 16827
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Soviet SAM systems. What are your thoughts?

    Post  GarryB on Sat Jun 25, 2016 11:35 am

    The issue is value for money.

    If you had no SAMs at all and were looking to buy then it would not make sense to buy old systems and then upgrade them.

    If however you already had lots of systems in service and they were getting long in the tooth the choice is upgrade or replace and that is where the decision becomes much less clear cut...

    The newer SAMs are rather more capable but also rather more expensive due to more sophisticated sensors and support systems.

    Of course the upgrades for older models include many of those improved sensors and systems so the costs are not that different, while performance will be different.

    An example would be the choice of TOR or OSA with an upgrade... ironically you could buy OSA and pay to have a ARH sensor for each missile dramatically increasing the cost of the SA-8 missiles but also making them vastly more capable and fully fire and forget. Or you could spend a small fortune on TOR with powerful 3D radar and tracking radar and simple and very cheap command guided missiles...

    It really depends on what you want or need and what you already have.

    Note they produced about 100,000 SA-1s and since the 1970s have used about 20,000 as training targets... and will likely continue to use them in such a role. they also have other model SAMs used as targets for newer systems too.


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order

    rambo54

    Posts : 118
    Points : 122
    Join date : 2014-04-01

    S-125

    Post  rambo54 on Fri Jul 01, 2016 6:55 pm

    Sat Pics from 2015 & 2016 show Pechora 2M equipment at Site 60, Kapustin Yar.
    Any ideas why they test this system? It is not new (in principle) and not intended for the Russian Army and I think they will not made final tests for export issues at Site 60



    avatar
    Isos

    Posts : 747
    Points : 749
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Re: Soviet SAM systems. What are your thoughts?

    Post  Isos on Fri Jul 01, 2016 10:57 pm

    https://sites.google.com/site/samsimulator1972/home

    Just found that simulator. I didn't upload it but their are videos on the website made by ex profesioal radar oprators that show how they shoot F-117. If anyone has informations about it, please share them.
    avatar
    d_taddei2

    Posts : 836
    Points : 998
    Join date : 2013-05-11
    Location : Scotland UK

    Re: Soviet SAM systems. What are your thoughts?

    Post  d_taddei2 on Sat Jul 02, 2016 5:07 am

    rambo54 wrote:Sat Pics from 2015 & 2016 show Pechora 2M equipment at Site 60, Kapustin Yar.
    Any ideas why they test this system? It is not new (in principle) and not intended for the Russian Army and I think they will not made final tests for export issues at Site 60


    Russia has developed a missile with the warhead replaced with telemetry instrumentation, for use as target drones. So i am guessing that this is being used for this purpose considering Kapustin Yars is a test facility.
    avatar
    d_taddei2

    Posts : 836
    Points : 998
    Join date : 2013-05-11
    Location : Scotland UK

    Re: Soviet SAM systems. What are your thoughts?

    Post  d_taddei2 on Sat Jul 02, 2016 5:10 am

    Isos wrote:https://sites.google.com/site/samsimulator1972/home

    Just found that simulator. I didn't upload it but their are videos on the website made by ex profesioal radar oprators that show how they shoot F-117. If anyone has informations about it, please share them.

    you will need to try it out and let us know how it goes could be fun
    avatar
    eehnie

    Posts : 1234
    Points : 1259
    Join date : 2015-05-13

    Re: Soviet SAM systems. What are your thoughts?

    Post  eehnie on Fri Aug 05, 2016 1:17 am

    rambo54 wrote:Sat Pics from 2015 & 2016 show Pechora 2M equipment at Site 60, Kapustin Yar.
    Any ideas why they test this system? It is not new (in principle) and not intended for the Russian Army and I think they will not made final tests for export issues at Site 60




    I think these would not be exactly SA-3 systems, but the target missiles developed from them.

    From what I see in the public reports, target missiles for development of new systems and training have been developed from:

    SA-1
    SA-2
    SA-3

    BM-21
    SA-6
    SA-8

    After a transformation changing the nature of the missiles and Rockets (being not more SAM or Surface-Surface weapons) these (and other) systems are used as target missiles. If fact it would not be right to say that SA-1, SA-2, SA-3, BM-21, SA-6 or SA-8 systems are used as target missiles. In the case of the BM-21, SA-6 and SA-8, the weapons remain in use for their original purpose.

    In the following link there is access to the different types of target missiles used, checking the "Rocket target and target systems" part. According to the information, some of them have been developed from SAM systems and others not.

    https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=es&sl=ru&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rusarmy.com%2Fpvo.html
    http://www.rusarmy.com/pvo.html


    Last edited by eehnie on Sat Oct 08, 2016 11:45 pm; edited 3 times in total
    avatar
    GarryB

    Posts : 16196
    Points : 16827
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Soviet SAM systems. What are your thoughts?

    Post  GarryB on Fri Aug 05, 2016 9:44 am

    The Lissa-M mobile ground based system with Strizh training missiles is an example... it uses the vertically launched SA-1.

    The Peniye training target system uses the SA-6 missile, while the RM-75 uses the SA-2 missile system.

    There are even combinations where the SA-3 ground based fixed launcher with four launch rails can be used to launch four SA-3 missiles at training targets, but can also be fitted with the missile containers of the SAMAN missile system, so the launcher can be used to launch four SA-3s or four SA-8s to simulate multiple targets.

    Note the original OSA vehicle can carry 6 missiles but for a testing range the mobility is not so useful and cheaper static launchers of multiple missiles makes more sense.

    The single rail launcher for SA-3 missiles is called Pishchal... and of course the SA-8 Gecko system has Saman target missiles in a fully autonomous system able to simulate small targets like drones, cruise missiles, and HARM missiles.


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order
    avatar
    eehnie

    Posts : 1234
    Points : 1259
    Join date : 2015-05-13

    Re: Soviet SAM systems. What are your thoughts?

    Post  eehnie on Thu Dec 22, 2016 5:58 pm

    d_taddei2 wrote:With still a huge number of Soviet made SAM systems still in operation around the world i was looking to see what peoples views are on these systems and how capable they are on the modern battlefield up against NATO aircraft.

    the following systems are the ones in question. And we can assume that they have had the latest upgrades if it makes it easier to answer.


    SA-2 (S-75M)
    SA-3 (S-125 Neva/Pechora)
    SA-4 (2K11 Krug)
    SA-5 (S-200)
    SA-6 (2K12 Kub)
    SA-8 (9K33 Osa)
    SA-9 (9K31 Strela-1)
    SA-13 (9K35 Strela-10)
    SA-19 (2K22 Tunguska)


    I haven't included the MANPAD's SA-7, SA-14, SA-16, SA-18, but if you want to mention please feel free i also havent mentioned the SA-1 (S-25 Berkut) as North Korea is the only current operator and i guessing that the condition of these will be poor and possibly out of service due to condition, but yet again feel free to mention if you want.

    According to the public reports, Syria is building a new air defense system, and is doing it with a mix of advanced and less modern systems.

    Everyone knows at this point about the presence of the SA-10/12/20/23 (S-300) and SA-22 systems. Also they increased the number of SA-11/17, SA-19 and SA-6. Only the SA-8 and the SA-13 seems to have a decline of its numbers since the begin of the war.

    But in adition to this, Syria also increased significantly its numbers of SA-3, SA-5, SA-2and S-60 towed systems, until a point that makes the SA-2 almost exhausted worldwide, keeping the numbers of SA-9 and ZSU-23-2 (also used for infantry) .

    The lower effectiveness of the oldest systems is a fact. But Syria is applying the easiest formula in case of lower effectivenes: Higher density of systems.

    The weakness of the SA-3, SA-5 and SA-2 is clear. Towed launchers that make more difficult its survivability in case of attacks. But like they have a range that is not easy to avoid, with high density of systems, they can be able of doing significant damage before to be destroyed, and more if are combined with more modern systems.

    Between the self propelled systems, the SA-9 has the smallest range. It would be the weakest in my opinion and the first to disappear totally (today totally retired in Russia). The next for me would be the SA-13, also by its shorter range.
    avatar
    d_taddei2

    Posts : 836
    Points : 998
    Join date : 2013-05-11
    Location : Scotland UK

    Re: Soviet SAM systems. What are your thoughts?

    Post  d_taddei2 on Tue Jan 31, 2017 3:18 am

    we have talked about the systems but not about the threat posed towards NATO aircraft such as Typhoon, Mirage, Rafale, Gripen, tornado, F-35, F-22, F-18, F-16, F-15, B2 spirit, maybe it might be easier to use a basic rating system of 1-10, 10 being the biggest threat and 1 the lowest on the following systems. Any views would be great.

    SA-7
    SA-14
    SA-16
    SA-18
    SA-24
    Verba

    ZSU-23-4
    Tunguska
    Panstir
    SOSNA-R

    TOR
    BUK
    SA-4
    SA-6
    SA-8
    SA-9
    SA-13

    SA-1
    SA-2
    SA-3
    SA-5
    S-300
    S-400
    avatar
    Isos

    Posts : 747
    Points : 749
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Re: Soviet SAM systems. What are your thoughts?

    Post  Isos on Tue Jan 31, 2017 1:29 pm

    Not this one, there was more missile ready to lunch. I found the picture :

    http://www.armyrecognition.com/russia_russian_missile_system_vehicle_uk/strelets_igla_igla-s_sa-24_sa-18_automatic_remote_firing_control_launcher_unit_data_sheet_uk.html

    Look at the the bottom the picture 3
    avatar
    Militarov

    Posts : 5497
    Points : 5542
    Join date : 2015-09-02
    Location : Serbia

    Re: Soviet SAM systems. What are your thoughts?

    Post  Militarov on Tue Jan 31, 2017 1:37 pm

    Isos wrote:Not this one, there was more missile ready to lunch. I found the picture :

    http://www.armyrecognition.com/russia_russian_missile_system_vehicle_uk/strelets_igla_igla-s_sa-24_sa-18_automatic_remote_firing_control_launcher_unit_data_sheet_uk.html

    Look at the the bottom the picture 3

    Its just Strelets variant placed on Strela-10 structure, i dont think any of those were really built for service.
    avatar
    eehnie

    Posts : 1234
    Points : 1259
    Join date : 2015-05-13

    Re: Soviet SAM systems. What are your thoughts?

    Post  eehnie on Sun Apr 02, 2017 8:05 pm


    According to The Military Balance 2017, the S-125 Pechora-2M mobile system, seems to have the designation of SA-26.
    avatar
    George1

    Posts : 10094
    Points : 10582
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Re: Soviet SAM systems. What are your thoughts?

    Post  George1 on Fri Apr 21, 2017 2:10 pm

    Czech Republic and Hungary are looking for a replacement for anti-aircraft missile systems "Kub"

    As Douglas Barrie writes in the article "Getting rid of the Gainful: replacing the Soviet-era 2K12 missile system", published on the website of the International Institute for Strategic Studies, the Czech Republic and Hungary are going to replace the old Soviet self-propelled anti-aircraft missile systems of medium range 2K12 "Kub".

    So, in 2016, the Czech Ministry of Defense issued a request for information (Request for information) for the purchase of a new SAM and may make a choice by the end of this year or in early 2018. The country intends to achieve the initial combat readiness of new complexes by 2021, and in the middle of the next decade to achieve a phase of full operational readiness.

    2K12 "Kub" entered the arsenal of Czechoslovakia, a member of the Warsaw Treaty Organization, in 1985, and was upgraded and extended its service life. By the end of the Cold War, Czechoslovak People's Army carried seven regiments of 2K12 in service.
    Similar situation also in Hungary. Rocket and technical support for the "Kub" complexes of the Hungarian armed forces and the supply of spare parts (which are getting harder to get today) is being handled by Poland. Poland also has 2K12 "Kub", but they will be replaced in the framework of the new program of air defense and anti-missile defense Wisla. By the end of this year, the Polish government is going to sign a contract with the American corporation Raytheon for the supply of the Patriot missile system.

    Hungary also began to study various options for replacing the SAM "Kub" and has already formed operational requirements (Operational requirements) for future complexes.

    The zone of destruction of the SAM "Kub" is up to 23 km in range and up to 14 km in height. The requirements of the Czech side include an enlarged range, as well as the possibility of hitting several targets at the same time (there is no such possibility for "Kub"). Under consideration are complexes of American, European and Israeli production, not only those SAMs that meet the requirements of the Czech Republic, but even with a range over 100 kilometers (like the American Patriot).

    http://bmpd.livejournal.com/2560062.html


    _________________
    "There's no smoke without fire.", Georgy Zhukov

    avatar
    nemrod

    Posts : 811
    Points : 1310
    Join date : 2012-09-11

    Re: Soviet SAM systems. What are your thoughts?

    Post  nemrod on Sun Apr 30, 2017 10:00 pm

    d_taddei2 wrote:Hi very true, i think against most modern aircraft these systems now struggle, i know SA-2, SA-3, SA-4 have had some upgrades in some way shape or form, but does these upgrades make them any good, or should countries look to replace these older soviet systems, ASAP???

    I read many many books about this topic in the past. In spite of many upgrade, nowadays the SA-2/3/4...most of them are completly ineffective against the actual generation of US fighters like the last model of F-4 Phantom II, F-15, F-16, F-18, F-111, F-35, and obviously F-22.
    Most the old Sam systems operate in X band, the concept of stealth fighters was aimed to neutralize these old SAM system. Moreover, most of the anti radar missiles were designed to destroy the X-Band.
    I don't know about the SA-11, and the last models of gainful if I recall called SA-17, could be effective against F-4, F-15, F-16, and probably F-18, but against the others I don't know. Maybe not.
    The new generation of SAM like the SA-22 Greyhound aka Pantsir could be more effective, and very lethal against all kind of US fighters, because it uses the passive detection. I heard that the aircraft could detect, and track without the stealth fighter understand that it was tracked.
    As it was said, more you spend money in the R&D, more your SAM system will be effective. The SA-2, SA-4, and SA-5 were aimed against B-52, and other US's assets like ELINT, AWACS of the 60's. 50 years after, these systems are completely outdated.
    avatar
    GarryB

    Posts : 16196
    Points : 16827
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Soviet SAM systems. What are your thoughts?

    Post  GarryB on Tue May 02, 2017 6:04 am

    Even SA-3 would be effective against cruise missile attacks and could be used in large numbers for that role.
    Mobile systems like SA-8 and SA-9/13 would also be very useful for that role too.


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order

    Sponsored content

    Re: Soviet SAM systems. What are your thoughts?

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Fri Jul 28, 2017 8:52 am