+82
Gomig-21
Tolstoy
ALAMO
TMA1
caveat emptor
Podlodka77
Mir
lancelot
Arrow
Krepost
Russian_Patriot_
Lurk83
limb
Finty
Backman
owais.usmani
magnumcromagnon
Isos
kvs
AlfaT8
thegopnik
ahmedfire
jhelb
AMCXXL
marcellogo
Azi
ATLASCUB
archangelski
Rodion_Romanovic
hoom
LMFS
GunshipDemocracy
Singular_Transform
Hole
GarryB
GJ Flanker
mnztr
dino00
Cheetah
MC-21
gaurav
Pierre Sprey
T-47
miketheterrible
PapaDragon
TheArmenian
ult
SeigSoloyvov
AK-Rex
Tsavo Lion
OminousSpudd
Benya
David-Lanza
bojcistv
eehnie
Morpheus Eberhardt
wilhelm
andrey19900
Giulio
Svyatoslavich
d_taddei2
JohninMK
Big_Gazza
franco
sepheronx
Mike E
Cyberspec
zg18
mack8
diabetus
Werewolf
flamming_python
Mindstorm
Austin
TR1
George1
IronsightSniper
Stealthflanker
haavarla
psg
Viktor
Admin
86 posters
Tu-22M3: News
owais.usmani- Posts : 1786
Points : 1782
Join date : 2019-03-28
Age : 37
- Post n°926
Re: Tu-22M3: News
GarryB, ahmedfire, TMA1 and 11E like this post
George1- Posts : 18315
Points : 18812
Join date : 2011-12-23
Location : Greece
- Post n°927
Re: Tu-22M3: News
Tu-22M3M
GarryB, ahmedfire and owais.usmani like this post
George1- Posts : 18315
Points : 18812
Join date : 2011-12-23
Location : Greece
- Post n°928
Re: Tu-22M3: News
Τhe video also says that Tu-22M3M will become part of the nuclear tiad. Probably they mean with the new Kh-50 cruise missile
GarryB likes this post
lancelot- Posts : 2696
Points : 2694
Join date : 2020-10-18
- Post n°929
Re: Tu-22M3: News
They should integrate the Kinzhal into it. Replace the Kh-32 with the Kinzhal.
sepheronx likes this post
ALAMO- Posts : 6708
Points : 6798
Join date : 2014-11-26
- Post n°930
Re: Tu-22M3: News
How did you figure that they didn't?
Besides, they still have Ch-22 stock and a working line for Ch-32.
Both are deadly and out of reach to any western AD system - which we know crystal clear.
Besides, they still have Ch-22 stock and a working line for Ch-32.
Both are deadly and out of reach to any western AD system - which we know crystal clear.
GarryB, LMFS and Hole like this post
lancelot- Posts : 2696
Points : 2694
Join date : 2020-10-18
- Post n°931
Re: Tu-22M3: News
It is basically a one of a kind weapon, it uses an engine nothing else uses, it requires handling of toxic hypergolic fuel at air bases. And it is slower and has less range than the Kinzhal.ALAMO wrote:How did you figure that they didn't?
Besides, they still have Ch-22 stock and a working line for Ch-32.
Both are deadly and out of reach to any western AD system - which we know crystal clear.
Little to recommend about it. It probably has more advanced guidance and sensors. But you could in theory put those in Kinzhal as well.
ALAMO- Posts : 6708
Points : 6798
Join date : 2014-11-26
- Post n°932
Re: Tu-22M3: News
No no no. It was not my point.
Tu-22M was cited as a Kinzhal carrier from the very beginning.
So I guess all of the modernized ones are capable of.
It will have a slightly smaller range as the release envelope won't match the MiG-31, but can be longer ranged as a system - Tu-22M has a much longer range rather than MiG-31 and is more suitable for long endurance flights.
But they have hundreds of Ch-22 in storage, an a running line for production of ch-32 and ch-22 modernization to the standard. It is a perfectly suitable missile with a devastating 1000km range. NATO can't intercept it as a log as they won't place an AEGIS on its flight path.
Tu-22M was cited as a Kinzhal carrier from the very beginning.
So I guess all of the modernized ones are capable of.
It will have a slightly smaller range as the release envelope won't match the MiG-31, but can be longer ranged as a system - Tu-22M has a much longer range rather than MiG-31 and is more suitable for long endurance flights.
But they have hundreds of Ch-22 in storage, an a running line for production of ch-32 and ch-22 modernization to the standard. It is a perfectly suitable missile with a devastating 1000km range. NATO can't intercept it as a log as they won't place an AEGIS on its flight path.
GarryB and Hole like this post
Arrow- Posts : 2721
Points : 2713
Join date : 2012-02-13
- Post n°933
Re: Tu-22M3: News
SM-3 Block II is able to cintercept Kinzhal, Kh-32, Tsirkon class missiles? Is the missile able to intercept targets only outside the atmosphere?
marcellogo- Posts : 638
Points : 644
Join date : 2012-08-02
Age : 55
Location : Italy
- Post n°934
Re: Tu-22M3: News
Arrow wrote:SM-3 Block II is able to cintercept Kinzhal, Kh-32, Tsirkon class missiles? Is the missile able to intercept targets only outside the atmosphere?
A missile designed specifically against ballistics missiles is not a good option for intercept manouvering missiles, they would use SM-6 instead.
GarryB, Arrow and owais.usmani like this post
Arrow- Posts : 2721
Points : 2713
Join date : 2012-02-13
- Post n°935
Re: Tu-22M3: News
SM-6 meringue is very difficult to capture Ch 22/35, Kinzhal/Tsirkon. The missiles fly much higher than the ceiling of the SM-6. The only chance of interception is in the terminal phase before the target.
GarryB likes this post
GarryB- Posts : 38999
Points : 39495
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
- Post n°936
Re: Tu-22M3: News
Τhe video also says that Tu-22M3M will become part of the nuclear tiad. Probably they mean with the new Kh-50 cruise missile
Now they have working scramjet motors and flying hypersonic missiles in operational service I rather suspect they will soon developing much longer ranged missiles with much better performance that are smaller and lighter than the Kh-32 rocket propelled missile.
They should integrate the Kinzhal into it. Replace the Kh-32 with the Kinzhal.
Kinzhal is probably only 50% lighter than the Kh-32 and uses solid rocket technology.
Right now carrying three Kh-32 is probably good enough, but the potential for carrying large missiles makes the Backfire useful, but they have MiG-31K for the Kinzhal, for which it is optimised. I would say the Tu-22M3M with the family members of Club but without the export restrictions makes rather more sense.
The mach 3 rocket propelled Club uses a turbofan engine for long range subsonic flight... in the export model it is limited to about 250km because the missile is limited to 300km range in total.
I would say a Club with a new rocket payload and 1,500km range of flight would be rather interesting.
But the new missiles they are working on should be plenty... scramjet propulsion on its own will revolutionise how Russian planes destroy western targets.
It is basically a one of a kind weapon, it uses an engine nothing else uses, it requires handling of toxic hypergolic fuel at air bases. And it is slower and has less range than the Kinzhal.
Most modern high energy fuels are going to be nasty.
It is an operational in service weapon that is probably amongst the most effective their navy currently operates.
I would say an air launched version of Zircon would make more sense... being much lighter and faster and with equivalent range from a Backfire.
SM-3 Block II is able to cintercept Kinzhal, Kh-32, Tsirkon class missiles?
If Patriot PAC-3 can't do it then SM-3 probably wont either... these missiles were designed with such defences expected and are designed to evade defences as much as to hit targets.
Is the missile able to intercept targets only outside the atmosphere?
AFAIK it is designed to hit ballistic targets that are just going fast. It is not designed to hit a target that is actively trying to evade its interception.
Big_Gazza likes this post
marcellogo- Posts : 638
Points : 644
Join date : 2012-08-02
Age : 55
Location : Italy
- Post n°937
Re: Tu-22M3: News
Yes. but ABM missiles couldn't catch a missile that could easily change its own direction in the horizontal plane, so game, set, match.Arrow wrote:SM-6 meringue is very difficult to capture Ch 22/35, Kinzhal/Tsirkon. The missiles fly much higher than the ceiling of the SM-6. The only chance of interception is in the terminal phase before the target.
GarryB and Hole like this post
mnztr- Posts : 2774
Points : 2812
Join date : 2018-01-22
- Post n°938
Tu22m3 bomber
Going back to the TU-22 M3M how many have they delivered? did they end up replacing the engine with the NK-32?
lancelot- Posts : 2696
Points : 2694
Join date : 2020-10-18
- Post n°939
Re: Tu-22M3: News
Zero. And no it is still using the NK-25.
I assume it was physically impossible to fit the NK-32 in the airframe. There was a Tu-22M4 variant which never entered serial production in Soviet times with the NK-32 but that was with a new airframe.
I assume it was physically impossible to fit the NK-32 in the airframe. There was a Tu-22M4 variant which never entered serial production in Soviet times with the NK-32 but that was with a new airframe.
mnztr- Posts : 2774
Points : 2812
Join date : 2018-01-22
- Post n°940
Re: Tu-22M3: News
the NK-32 is actually a smaller diameter then the 25 and only 15cm longer. So its definitely doable, but who knows if its worth it, how many 25's they have instorage, parts how long do they want to operate the tu22 or there maybe some other reason its not feasible to switch.
Eugenio Argentina- Posts : 3052
Points : 3056
Join date : 2018-02-26
- Post n°941
Re: Tu-22M3: News
Russian Tu-22M3 over the Baltic waters were escorted by F-18 fighter-bombers of Finland, which recently joined NATO. Finnish fighters are flying on a parallel course with Russian planes, one at close range, the other at a distance. At least one of the F-18s was armed with AIM-9 air-to-air missiles mounted on the wing tips.
https://t.me/geopolitics_live/18408
https://t.me/geopolitics_live/18408
|
|