Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues
countermeasures on submarines boats, surface ships, as well as in the composition of mobile coastal missile systems "Bastion".
Isos wrote:countermeasures on submarines boats, surface ships, as well as in the composition of mobile coastal missile systems "Bastion".
Funny how no one thought about it but ... russia is deploying oniks on coastal systems.A missile which has a range of more than 500km with ground attack mode. So they are violating the INF treaty actually since long time ago.
If they r only anti-ship, not land attack, there's no violation!..russia is deploying oniks on coastal systems.A missile which has a range of more than 500km with ground attack mode. So they are violating the INF treaty actually since long time ago.
Tsavo Lion wrote:If they r only anti-ship, not land attack, there's no violation!..russia is deploying oniks on coastal systems.A missile which has a range of more than 500km with ground attack mode. So they are violating the INF treaty actually since long time ago.
LMFS wrote:They used Kh-35 not Onix
Tsavo Lion wrote:Yes, they r different missiles. Inspections can confirm absence of LACMs at those coastal locations.
But it's a moot point: the Calibres on small ships/boats on internal waterways & closed seas made the NPT obsolete for the US.
No they did, but they didn't expect Russia to fit them on small boats instead of only big ships & subs, which they don't have in large #s.They were never expecting russia to create their own "tomahawk".
dino00 wrote:In Russia, the development of new anti-ship complexes with cruise missiles continues
Tsavo Lion wrote:No they did, but they didn't expect Russia to fit them on small boats instead of only big ships & subs, which they don't have in large #s.They were never expecting Russia to create their own "tomahawk".
Tsavo Lion wrote:Caspian Flotilla Highlights Growing International Role of Russia’s Coastal Navy
Oh well, its the Jamestown Foundation, and NATOist rats will do what's in their nature... 
Austin wrote:Looks what he says
===========
When asked by an audience member about how to deal with Russian aggression and military buildup in the Eastern Mediterranean and in the Black Sea, Richardson called for going on the offensive to put Russia on its heels.
The admiral said the U.S. needed to consider “not only responses in pushing back [against Russian aggression], but how do we push first in a couple of areas? I think it would be great if we could get folks, Russians, some of these competitors to respond to our first move. There’s an advantage every now and then to playing the white side of the board,” he said.
Speaking of previous deterrence efforts, CNO said “we’ve been consistently present in the Black Sea, the United States Navy, and in fact we did two deployments up there just in the month of January alone. We’re working very closely in exercising with the navies in the Eastern Mediterranean, the Black Sea region, so staying engaged in there, staying present. Actions consistent with words, I think, is an important part of that.”
==============
LMFS wrote:Even US military is in full retard mode now. Yes man, try to attack Russia in the Black Sea, that will be funny to see
|
|
|
Home
Latest images
Register
Log in
