Syrian War: News #14

Militarov wrote:

eehnie wrote:

Benya wrote:I only wrote this post because time to time I got sick and tired reading your recent posts, which are aimed directly to derail the topics and spark hostility between members.

I'm also sick reading dirty propaganda here with negative value. Constant intoxication from a few people, likely being professionals of it. And still we will have to applaud a self labeled worker for the US in Syria, saying he will go to Deir Ezzor before than the Syrian and Russian Armed Forces. Well. A big NO. Will not have a nice welcome from me.

Taking this position you take your side. In the side of the intoxication. Good to know.

Now we have to see if you also begin intoxicating or not. Until now was not the case. I never said about your comments, with coincident or different oppinions, same or different oppinions never have been a problem. And I'm so sick reading your last comment too. As consequence the things changed.

I am being paid directly by US Military Industiral Complex and CIA. Me veri pro.

SeigSoloyvov wrote:

Militarov wrote:

eehnie wrote:

Benya wrote:I only wrote this post because time to time I got sick and tired reading your recent posts, which are aimed directly to derail the topics and spark hostility between members.

I'm also sick reading dirty propaganda here with negative value. Constant intoxication from a few people, likely being professionals of it. And still we will have to applaud a self labeled worker for the US in Syria, saying he will go to Deir Ezzor before than the Syrian and Russian Armed Forces. Well. A big NO. Will not have a nice welcome from me.

Taking this position you take your side. In the side of the intoxication. Good to know.

Now we have to see if you also begin intoxicating or not. Until now was not the case. I never said about your comments, with coincident or different oppinions, same or different oppinions never have been a problem. And I'm so sick reading your last comment too. As consequence the things changed.

I am being paid directly by US Military Industiral Complex and CIA. Me veri pro.

God dammit Militarov you know what they said at the briefing we cannot let anyone know the truth!

PapaDragon wrote:@eehenia

In short SAA command has realized they cannot seize Hama area from ISIs via front line assault without redeploying a large number of men

And they didn't. Russians done the work for them trough airstrikes, political pressure and settlements​.

SAA just walked in after someone else done all the work.

In the meantime SAA continues to operate in the same manner that Seig has described.

So how do I owe you an apology? If you want one then prove me wrong first.

50 years from now when Russia maybe builds half-large aircraft carrier will I owe apology too because I said now that they would not be able to do it in less than 30 years?

SeigSoloyvov wrote:PS we have started talks with russia to hand Tan-if over.

calm wrote:

SeigSoloyvov wrote:PS we have started talks with russia to hand Tan-if over.

What?
https://twitter.com/CivilWarMap/status/892819789525254144

calm wrote:ANNA!!!

calm wrote:

PapaDragon wrote:@eehenia

In short SAA command has realized they cannot seize Hama area from ISIs via front line assault without redeploying a large number of men

And they didn't. Russians done the work for them trough airstrikes, political pressure and settlements​.

SAA just walked in after someone else done all the work.

In the meantime SAA continues to operate in the same manner that Seig has described.

So how do I owe you an apology? If you want one then prove me wrong first.

50 years from now when Russia maybe builds half-large aircraft carrier will I owe apology too because I said now that they would not be able to do it in less than 30 years?

What have they captured in east Hama/Salamiya CS from IS? that is the worst front so far. Around 100 villages, SAA have captured 4/5 of them in 3 months.

eehnie wrote:

PapaDragon wrote:

eehnie wrote:

PapaDragon wrote:

eehnie wrote:

PapaDragon wrote:

eehnie wrote:

SeigSoloyvov wrote:

eehnie wrote:

SeigSoloyvov wrote:In short SAA command has realized they cannot seize Hama area from ISIs via front line assault without redeploying a large number of men, So they are focusing on the Raf road, hoping to choke ISIS out that way

One example of intoxication reversed by the facts this weekend

LoL in your head the SAA must have more men than they do and I guess the fact all their past attempts to break ISIS lines via Hama have failed but hey yeah "intoxication" alright.

Run along armchair general, because you once again have shown you know shit.

I mean gee...I wonder why the SAA forces are advancing along the Raf road....if I am "intoxicated". Hm....guess the SAA army is intoxicated also then~

Cause they are advancing EXACTLY how I said.

what a clown~

and what facts....do you know how to read a map....After they took Resafa they have been advancing down along that road ever since and all their gains are in those positions.

Oh let me be clear here because you cannot understand English!.

You see there is a road that attaches Resafa to sukan, the SAA are advancing down along this road to prevent ISis from getting supplies in Eastern Hama and if you called that "intoxication" you have something wrong with you mentally.

Which is your rank in the US forces exactly, Senior Shoe Shiner? You are not able to smell what is under your nose. You are not able to smell still the Russian/Syrian strategy.

So funny to see.

You do realize that he was right on everything that happened in previous couple of years?

Including accurately predicting Russian/Syrian strategy  

Everyone see how he was and is wrong.

Name one example.

Just one and I will apologize.

One is all it takes.

C'mon, prove me wrong, I dare ya' !!!

Time to remember you owe apologies

Do you see now more clearly how the initial comment of SeigSoloyvov was full wrong? Specially the bolded part. And the next answer? More mistakes to bold. Time talks and now we see who are the real clowns.

What a gang of intoxicators and "strategists" we have to suffer here. You are not able to smell the Russian/Syrian strategy despite having it under your nose. Not rare to see you defeated.

@eehenia

In short SAA command has realized they cannot seize Hama area from ISIs via front line assault without redeploying a large number of men

And they didn't. Russians done the work for them trough airstrikes, political pressure and settlements​.

SAA just walked in after someone else done all the work.

In the meantime SAA continues to operate in the same manner that Seig has described.

So how do I owe you an apology? If you want one then prove me wrong first.

50 years from now when Russia maybe builds half-large aircraft carrier will I owe apology too because I said now that they would not be able to do it in less than 30 years?

Lol you even qouted not the right part.

SeigSoloyvov wrote:

Militarov wrote:

eehnie wrote:

Benya wrote:I only wrote this post because time to time I got sick and tired reading your recent posts, which are aimed directly to derail the topics and spark hostility between members.

I'm also sick reading dirty propaganda here with negative value. Constant intoxication from a few people, likely being professionals of it. And still we will have to applaud a self labeled worker for the US in Syria, saying he will go to Deir Ezzor before than the Syrian and Russian Armed Forces. Well. A big NO. Will not have a nice welcome from me.

Taking this position you take your side. In the side of the intoxication. Good to know.

Now we have to see if you also begin intoxicating or not. Until now was not the case. I never said about your comments, with coincident or different oppinions, same or different oppinions never have been a problem. And I'm so sick reading your last comment too. As consequence the things changed.

I am being paid directly by US Military Industiral Complex and CIA. Me veri pro.

God dammit Militarov you know what they said at the briefing we cannot let anyone know the truth!

JohninMK wrote:

SeigSoloyvov wrote:

JohninMK wrote:

SeigSoloyvov wrote:PS we have started talks with russia to hand Tan-if over.

Good to hear, avoids misunderstandings. Wonder if there will be a 'return to nearly as found' clause from the US?

We started Talks, there is no guarantee we will, and keep in mind FSA may try and block it.

so don't assume this is a sure thing.

All too often some idiot throws sand in the works. Important part is your guys [US soldiers and paramilitary forces] get out clean and safe with all their gear.

eehnie wrote:
This is one example more of why you also deserve the decoration of intoxicator.

calm wrote:What is "Raf road"?

calm wrote:What is "Raf road"?

Regular wrote:SVBIED gunner?? I've seen it all now...

EIRUT, LEBANON (8:15 A.M.) – The battle for Al-Sukhnah has been ongoing for several days now and the Syrian Arab Army (SAA) is finding the fight far more violent and intense than initially expected.

The primary reason for the fierce battle is the Islamic State’s (ISIL) refusal to give-up the city, despite being outnumbered and surrounded from two different flanks.

While the Syrian Army has entered Al-Sukhnah, they have been unable to advance past the southwestern corridor of the city, as the Islamic State’s front-lines prove difficult to fracture.

Making matters worse, the Syrian military has suffered heavy casualties in their attempt to take Al-Sukhnah, which has frustrated the army’s High Command because there has been little progress in the last 24 hours.

Much is at stake for the Islamic State in Al-Sukhnah, as the potential loss of this city will leave dozens of kilometers of open desert for the Syrian Army to navigate through before reaching Deir Ezzor City.

KomissarBojanchev wrote:

This is really worrisome. Why cant they just smash ISIS with heavy artillery there? There arent any civilians and the SAA can destroy any ISIS position from afar. This is a small city. There shouldn't even  be urban fights there.

KomissarBojanchev wrote:

This is really worrisome. Why cant they just smash ISIS with heavy artillery there? There arent any civilians and the SAA can destroy any ISIS position from afar. This is a small city. There shouldn't even  be urban fights there.