Mindstorm ,But wont Kalbir like Tomahawk would be vulnerable to anti-missile system on ships like Aster , ESSM and on land against PAC-3 , European Land based air defence.
After all NATO has layered AD network with AWACS and Baloon based Radar.
NATO IADS ?
NATO lack even only the BASIS CONCEPTS
of the design ,architecture, organization and construction of an organic, advanced, multilayered IADS ,it lack even merely the elementary "pieces" to construct one
The historical reason leading to this is that both its Geography
(NATO lack the territorial deepness
for organize efficient IAD layers's nodes and is effectively splitted in two by Ocean
) and its Doctrine
(conceived around power-projection
with insulated bases spread around the globe impossible to insert in an effcient IADS) prevented NATO to hope to realize something even only near to URSS's titanic IADS
The result is that ,already since Soviet times, Russia prepared itself for repel
(and contemporaneously "dismember" one piece at time and degrade NATO's offensive structure up to its nullification through overwhelming concentrated attacks) coordinated stand-off air attacks with several hundreds of incoming cruise missiles and decoys released at the same time
On the other side we observe the lacking of even only the basis elements to organize one IADS : where are NATO's TOR-M1/2 ,Tunguska-M1, Strela-10M, BUK-M1/2 ,Pantsyr-S1,SPN-30, SPN-40/SPN-40M2, MiG-31/MiG-31BM etc.. etc..etc... ?
Also the systems you named (with the exception of Aster ,naturally at now in very low numbers) are not conceived to repel serious cruise misille attack : MIM-104 Patriot launchers are uncaple or 360 degrees coverage and it lack an equivalent of 76N6 Clam Shell....about RIM-162 i image that i must not explain that ship based defenses
,and even more short range ones, are totally useless to repel cruise missile attack against key ashore targets
(radar stations, C4, Airfields etc...) ,ships are too slow to be placed on the course of incoming cruise missiles.The unique asset in NATO aerospace defense structure, showing some good capabilities against cruise missiles attacks
- and anyhow limited in respect to highly optimized interceptors with very long range AAM such as MiG-31/31BM equiped with R-33M/R-37M, is F-22A
, but cause its numbers , limited range, lack of a very long range AAM and.... lack of any serious SAM defense for the airfields hosting them, those assets wouldn't last for long in a large scale war against a powerful enemy.