Dr Carlo articles make me feel that F35 is just


Vladimir79 wrote:I am going to hold my vote until Su-35BM gets AESA.
nemrod wrote:Vladimir79 wrote:I am going to hold my vote until Su-35BM gets AESA.
Is AESA a miracle weapon ?
Could an AESA not be jammed ?
Could an AESA radar make the difference ?
Most of the air to air kills since the 50's occured in dogfights combats. In these occasions most of the time US used to play with 5 -if not 10- against 1 ennemy. Knowing the very genious russian engineers, I could not imagine they did not already find a parade against AESA's radar. Moreover the reliabilty of the AESA technology is....hummmm. Ask to the pilots.
type055 wrote:
AESA has more advantages over PESA
1 longer detected distance
2 anti-jaming
3 few unit losing efficacy don't effect whole rada
4 clearer view
5 more lighter
AESA is very useful ,but more expensive than PESA
its a matter of investment i suppose. the US has a lot of money to burn, and they invested that into AESA- there are currently hundreds of platforms employing various radar with AESA based tech. so its a very mature tech for them.higurashihougi wrote:
Replacing PESA with AESA is inevitable. Like fruit ripening is inevitable.
But the issue here is when and how. You have to wait until the mango turn yellow in order to fully enjoy its sweetness.
The Pentagon is jerking off with immature AESA which is ineffective and purely sextoy. On the other hand, Russia patiently develop the techs and wait until they fix all the problems.
Russia create weapons to fight, not to jerk off.
Vladimir79 wrote:Denmark and the Netherlands are cancelling their F-35 orders, UK is reducing theirs by half if not all together. There is still no agreement with Italy. It looks like the F-35 is headed for a lame duck in Europe.
|
|