Russia Defence Forum

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    A-235/PL-19 Nudol ABM-ASAT

    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon

    Posts : 11084
    Points : 11158
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    A-235/PL-19 Nudol ABM-ASAT - Page 8 Empty Re: A-235/PL-19 Nudol ABM-ASAT

    Post  PapaDragon Mon Jun 14, 2021 10:40 pm


    You can put much larger missiles in these old fixed sites

    Also, only thing that can attack them are the ones they are designed to defend against

    Plus they already exists and maintenance is much simpler

    No need to stop using them

    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 29875
    Points : 30403
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    A-235/PL-19 Nudol ABM-ASAT - Page 8 Empty Re: A-235/PL-19 Nudol ABM-ASAT

    Post  GarryB Tue Jun 15, 2021 8:41 am

    Will be interesting because with the ABM treaty the A-135 was limited to 100 interceptors around Moscow.

    I wonder if they will expand the numbers around Mosocow, or if when they replace the existing A-135s around Moscow that they might start basing some around St Petersberg...

    With a flight range of 3,000km you could base them anywhere you like really...
    Sujoy
    Sujoy

    Posts : 1354
    Points : 1512
    Join date : 2012-04-02
    Location : India || भारत

    A-235/PL-19 Nudol ABM-ASAT - Page 8 Empty Re: A-235/PL-19 Nudol ABM-ASAT

    Post  Sujoy Sun Jun 27, 2021 10:34 am

    GarryB wrote:THAAD is an anti theatre ballistic missile system or ATBM... it is for Scuds and enhanced Scuds at best.

    Even the S-300V is better than THAAD except altitude performance... the main difference is that the S-300V actually intercepts targets of all types including much harder targets than THAAD can't manage.

    S-400 and even S-350 is better in many ways... including cost.

    Nudol has a range of 3,000km... that is a huge step up from existing ABM missiles around Moscow and is better than GBI.
    It is very difficult to shoot down an incoming missile warhead with an anti-ballistic missile. Ballistic missile warheads are very small (US ones are typically about six feet long and eighteen inches wide at the base and rather resemble a large artillery shell) and travel 10 times faster than a rifle bullet (a typical ballistic missile warhead travels at about 15,000 mph). It is the equivalent of trying to shoot down a bullet with a bullet. In about seventeen tries since 1991, anti-ballistic missile interceptors (sometimes called ABMs) have successfully intercepted eight incoming missile warheads for a success rate of just under 50%. And this was under unrealistic conditions where the defenders knew everything there was to know about the "dummy" warhead's characteristics, trajectory, launch time, and no countermeasures were used by the offense!

    Sponsored content

    A-235/PL-19 Nudol ABM-ASAT - Page 8 Empty Re: A-235/PL-19 Nudol ABM-ASAT

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Wed Jul 28, 2021 1:43 pm