Morpheus Eberhardt wrote:
TR1 wrote:The hull interior is gutted. No carousel for one so there is plenty crew space.
Well, if you change the road wheel spacings, lengthen the hull, change the engine, change the transmission to an electromechanical transmission (just saying), change the seating arrangement, reduce the armor thickness to 2 cm, ..., then why do you say it uses a T-90 chassis?
Nothing else, thats why.
You are speculating on most of those changes btw, just wait until we see the uncovered vehicle.
There was that universal T-90 chassis:
Which had space for more crew in the hull. It is not exactly a hard solution. Same with armor.
Armata is well known to not be ready for Koalition yet.
The image you posted is not a T-90 chassis. I believe it was called Eh300. It has some commonality with T-90, for example, it is using T-90's road wheels. In reality the differences it has with a T-90 chassis is what I listed above, except for that of the electromechanical transmission.
A tank chassis is never suitable for an SP artillery system like Koalitsiya. A heavily modified tank chassis is a different matter.
Anyway, what I am saying is that the road wheel spacing in the latest pictures seem to be larger than those in the T-90; so the chassis can't be just a downarmored variant of a T-90 chassis.
Last edited by Morpheus Eberhardt on Fri Mar 06, 2015 9:16 pm; edited 1 time in total