It is hard, indeed most difficult to ignore the depths of hatred that Eisenhower had for the German people; it is not only Bacque who has tabulated this, but many other scholars/historians and internet sleuths. Given the volume of such information now coming available, it is impossible to discredit all accounts.
Don’t get me wrong here either, it wasn’t just Eisenhower and the Merikans - the Poms were into it boots and all. Churchill most prominent in his hatred for the Hun; commenting that “we need to kill these bastards off, We can’t just keep fighting them”.
Despite official records [German and Allies], eyewitness accounts, detailed searches of archives and the like, which all pointed to the veracity of the article – the anti kook shouters would not even consider that there was a case to answer; “sure, no American could do that”! One might well ask – “was he really an American”? But that is for a different topic.
I want here, to move on from the deeds of just Eisenhower, and look at the whole situation post World War Two; to try and get past the GI Joe’s of this forum, who are still sitting on Omaha Beach sucking in the glories of a virtual defeat and forever grateful to their psychopathic leader(s).
I use the word psychopath, not lightly here as it truly reflects the nature of the beast(s). A psychopath is one who does not empathise at a normal human level – is incapable of love and human emotion.
“Psychopathy is a personality disorder characterized by an abnormal lack of empathy combined with strongly amoral conduct, masked by an ability to appear outwardly normal.”
There is no other way to describe the character of the commander [SHAPE – later to become HATO] in Germany 1945 – 1949 who over-saw the death of 6 million Germans, men, women and children and the total rape of the country.
Much of what has been written by Western press, regarding the post war era, centres [naturally] around Stalin and the Red Army. In such writings, Stalin is personally vilified and the Red Army denounced as a raping horde. Because the Red Army publicly announced the repatriation of Russians from occupied countries and the holding of a several hundred thousand German prisoners of war, it has been every easy for Western press to recount horrors associated with the repatriation and the hardship of the German prisoners for propaganda purposes, while at the same time remaining mute on the Allies atrocities.
Such stories have been carefully nurtured, scripted and shrouded with the same sort of miasma that surrounds the stories of the holocaust. But belie the fact that this was solely an Uncle Joe initiative. At Potsdam Conference, mid 1945, the three leaders, Truman, Churchill [latter Atlee joined] and Stalin agreed to the dividing of Europe post war. This was really nothing short of a crass grab at securing land and the forced repatriation of millions of people across Europe – the majority of them ethnic Germans who were about to pay the price for Zionist revenge. All allied powers, participated in the “repatriation” and the brutal methods used were barbaric by any standards. The French, Poles, Czechs and Americans all participated in rail-roading, and refugee convoying of citizens in a manner that made Nazi concentration camp journeys look like Sunday outings. Large numbers were “lost” in transit, but that wasn’t a real problem, as there were laterally millions of them. SHAPE [later to become HATO] condoned this practice and actively encouraged it. We now have a term for this – it is called ethnic cleansing – a process for which HATO now seems to consider a war crime! Churchill, in his ever correct statesmanlike manner added that the process should take place “in the most humane manner possible”. Obviously with an eye to future war crimes tribunals – so as to “distance” himself and the coalition from any blame. However, they were all in it together and Churchill commented that it was conducive “to lasting peace”.
At the earlier conference of Yalta, Churchill confessed that there were many people in Britain who were troubled by the thought of deportation but stated that he personally had no qualms about it. In his view, six or seven million Germans had already been killed, and at least 1 or 1.5 million more would probably be killed before the end of the war. These ideas for the future were by no means propaganda blather, but were the actual views of the British Prime Minister. At the 4th session of the Yalta Conference, on February 7, 1945, Churchill reinforced his anti-humanitarian conception by declaring "that he was not at all proposing to stop destroying the Germans." A week later the genocide of Dresden was committed by British and American bombers.
They committed the ethnic Germans to what they knew would be the death of many, many souls. The process was so barbaric that it amounted to one of the world’s worst atrocities with over two and a half million [men, women and children] perishing in the exodus. That is the “Official” figure and is the lower end of the scale. Konrad Adenauer, himself very much a friend of the west, stated “that among those expelled, six million Germans are dead – gone”. Consider the overall scale of this – 16.5 million Germans were expelled, driven from homes and country. 9.3 million were expelled from Eastern Germany – the part made into Poland. The other 7.2 million were forced from their central German region, where they had lived for generations. These are actual official records! Over 15% [official figures – 36% unofficially] of them died in transit! And through all of this, western press points the bloody finger at Stalin as some sort of butcher. What hypocrisy! What utter lying and deceit – perpetrated over 60 years. This has been one of the Zionists greatest cover-ups and almost equals the story of the Joo Holohoax.
Such accounts are confirmed by historian James Bacque who says that comparison of the census’s between October 1946, a full year and a half AFTER the war, and September 1950 – 5.7 million Germans were “missing”.
However, the Allies weren’t finished with the Germans just yet. While the leaders may have had their say, now the great Zionist, Eisenhower, as Supreme Commander, took charge of things and set about what was his mission “to kill Germans”. To carry out this mission, Eisenhower needed to literally “change the law”. As under the terms of the Geneva convention on Prisoners of War, minimum welfare standards were laid down and if he was to order against that, he would be setting himself up as a war criminal – cleaver animal this Eisenhower. So he “invented” the terms “Surrendered Enemy Persons” [SEP’s} and “Disarmed Enemy Persons” [DEP’s] and as such he excluded them from the terms of the Geneva Convention [sound familiar to America now? – Does a leopard change it’s spots?]. This meant that 4.2 million soldiers, captured during the war were treated differently to the 3.4 million surrendered at wars end. Of these, 1.7 million would never see Germany again. Half of those taken into custody!
Under American care, the SEP’s / DEP’s were starved to death – left in the cold and icy weather to freeze to death and generally just neglected so that disease and rats would finish them off. The Geneva convention laid down that POW’s were to receive a minimum of 2,000 calories per day. Red Cross, when they could inspect, reported that calorie levels were down around 1,300 per day and as low as 900 per day in one camp. Under Eisenhower’s express orders to starve off the SEP’s – American soldiers were under notice that they would be shot for feeding the prisoners. Bacque notes that from the archives, Capt Lee Berwick of the 424th Infantry Div, who commanded the guard towers at Camp Bretzenheim stated that “food was piled up all round the camp fence, Prisoners saw crates piles up as high as bungalows”. There most definitely was NO shortage of food – as often quoted as an excuse.
Americans were not averse to mass shootings. In Washington in August 1944 General Eisenhower told the British ambassador that all the officers of the Main Command of the German Armed Forces, as well as all the leadership of the NSDAP including town officials, and all members of the secret police, should be liquidated. Just not to be misunderstood here: in this regard we are talking about some defenceless 100,000 human beings. And yet, people insist on blaming Stalin for the Katyn murder of 2,500 Polish Officers! [Officers, who had participated in the execution of Russians caught in the “Polish pocket” at eth end of the 1918/23 war in which Poland annexed a huge slice off Western Russia.].
The condition of the German population was no better – generally labelled “Displaced Persons” and totally reliant on the Allies for their survival. Many did not survive. While they did not seemingly suffer to the extent as the people of Leningrad, during the siege, they were reduced to starvation point and were eating anything to survive – even boiling leather. In 1946 the calories provided in the American sector was 1,313 per person. The Germans refer to the 1947 year as Hungerjahr – (year of hunger). Victor Gollancz, a British (Jewish) author objected that “we are starving the Germans”. Sen. Capehart of Indiana on 5th Feb. 1946 stated in the Senate – “ For nine months mow this administration has been on a deliberate policy of mass starvation”.
Contrast this situation with the grotesque political gesture of the Berlin Airlift. Like, are these Allied leaders – really people? How can they wilfully condemn men women and children to a slow agonising death and then in order to demonstrate the evil of communism, spend millions on an air lift to Germans living in East Berlin? What utter hypocrisy! Actually, I cannot express my total outrage at such a situation - !
During the winter of 1945, the Red Cross, Quakers and many other charitable organisations all wanted to take in food but the Americans turned these away saying that they should be used in other war-torn parts of Europe! In the American sector of occupation, it was policy that nothing was to be given away – everything was to be THROWN away! This policy extended as far as; foreign relief workers were prevented from sending food into Germany, Red Cross trains were turned around at the boarders and returned to Switzerland, all foreign governments were denied permission to send food to Germany, fertilizer production was sharply reduced and farming was hampered and the fishing fleet was confined to port. Women who had work in American employment were well fed but unable to take home food for their families! Is this not genocide?! How incredibly barbaric and for 60 years we have been feed the rubbish of how chivalrous and humane the allies were towards the Germans. For 60 years we have been told the stories of how brutal the Soviets were towards the Germans - time to wake up!
My question is; I do not believe that the general position of the Allied soldier(s) was one of organised genocide – I believe that the majority of the Allied soldiers were chivalrous and caring; so how could a small group so effectively control the moral character of and entire Army(s).? The excuse, I presume, is that they were conditioned and forced into obeying orders – isn’t that the very excuse postulated by the Nazi’s at the Nuremburg revenge show-trials and denied as an excuse by the Allies?
Weather helped the Allies here too, as abnormally cold winters struck in succession – 1946/47 was possibly the coldest in living memory and 48/49 little better. Ensuring the very basics were denied the German people, thousands died of the cold. Fuel as well as food was denied and in Berlin alone over 60,000 died in the first 10 months post war; the following winter killed off a further 12,000. In the book “Gruesome Harvest” a noted German pastor is quoted as saying “thousands of bodies are hanging from the trees in the woods around Berlin and nobody bothers to cut them down. Thousands of corpses are carried into the sea by the Oder and Elbe rivers – one doesn’t notice it any longer. Thousands and thousands are starving in the highways children roam the highways alone”.
For 60 years we have been told the story of how the Red Army raped and pillaged it’s way across Europe – the inference being that only they were capable of such atrocities and of course, the Allies would never stoop to such barbaric tactics!
The truth is far from what we have been told. While accepting that rape occurred with the leading elements of the Red Army – a “tit-for-tat” revenge so to speak; the following echelons of the Red Army made concerted efforts to stop the practice and went as far as providing protection and care for women. There was a special unit of the Red Army, solely for this function, so that post occupation, women were given care and protection. Contrast that to the position in “Allied” occupied Germany – although there was a law against rape and some soldiers were executed for it, rape was widespread in the American zone – as in all the other “allied” zones. What measures that were taken against it were purely cosmetic [try telling that to the families of the execute “examples”] and was designed to show conformity to the Geneva Conventions so as to provide protection against war crimes laid against Eisenhower.
It is estimated that 94,000 children were born in the American zone of occupation in the months after the end of the war – 45/46 year. What Americans found out, very quickly that they could mitigate the crime of rape simply by exploiting the starvation of the peoples – [sound all too familiar, doesn’t it?]. Simply by offering a bar of chocolate, some cigarettes or even chewing gum, sexual activity “became” voluntary. In an article from the Christian Century [what an apt title] for 5 December 1945, there is a quote “The American Provost Marshal said that rape represents no problem for the military police because a bit of food, a bar of chocolate, or a bar of soap seems to make rape unnecessary!!!!!!!!!!!” Many women and very young children resorted to prostitution in order to survive – even boys performed services for the Allied servicemen.
In the book Gruesome Harvest, it records an alarming upswing in venereal disease, which reached epidemic proportions. Remember, that while American servicemen could get treatment for this – there was little or no treatment available for the unfortunate Germans. The book goes on to say that a large proportion of the contamination originated with the coloured American troops which were stationed in great numbers in Germany and among whom the rate of venereal disease was many times greater than among white troops” – [oops, I’ll be called a racist!]. The book notes that, in July 1946 the annual rate of infection for white soldiers was 19%, for black soldiers 77.1%. – it reiterated the point made between rape and the availability of food and basic necessities.
If you’re American, don’t feel so persecuted by this epistle – the others were no better. French troops behaviour in Stuttgart, where 3,000 women and 8 men were raped, a further 500 women raped in Vahingen and three days of killing plunder, arson and rape took place in Freundenstadt.
There were around two million DP’s returned from the Soviet Union who formed themselves into gangs and went around robbing and raping all over central Europe – under the policing and care of Allied Forces.
The Poles and Tito’s partisans also committed gross acts of rape and plunder. In Danzig, the Poles who liberated the town of Teschen in the North, on 10th May – for five days raped looted torched and killed.
The allies simply invented terms or introduced new laws or both, in their attempts to degrade and kill off the German peoples; such was the degree Zionist hate revenge.
Besides the introduction of SEP’s DEP’s and DP’s in order to circumvent the Geneva Convention – they also opened torture camps “on foreign sole”. Reuters reported in 2005, that Britain ran a secret camp in Germany for two years after WWII where inmates, including Nazi party members, were tortured and starved to death. Reported in “The Guardian”. Foreign Office files stated that men and women were held at Bad Nenndorf until 1947 – where these acts were carried out. Threats to execute the prisoners, or to arrest, torture and murder wives and children were considered “perfectly proper” on the grounds that these were not carried out. [doesn’t all this sound so familiar? American torture camps in Guantanamo; in Poland where CIA planes fly in and out and Polish Air Traffic controllers conveniently loose or delete their flight plans and records?].
“Art. 28 of the Hague Convention on Land Warfare, in which it is expressly stated, that is was forbidden to release cities or settlements to be plundered, even if they were taken in assault.”
Remember here that the Allies – with the EXCEPTION of the Soviet Union, were signatories to this treaty!
Calls for persecution of Germans were the order of the day and not only in the Soviet Union. Both in England and the USA many propaganda writings appeared calling for the persecution of Germans and Germany. In England Sir Robert Vansittart was one of the most influential inciters of Germanophobic acts. As First Diplomatic Councillor of the British Foreign Ministry he was known in diplomatic circles as the "German-hater." In his books Black Record (1941) and Lessons of my Life (1943) he put forth the idea that the German people were the eternal disturbers of world peace, the "killer bird" among the civilized nations. For this reason, it was necessary to destroy this barbaric, aggressive criminal people with a killer instinct. Vansittart's influence was enormous. He was a key figure in the British war clique that advocated draconic measures against Germany.
Likewise in America a series of racist and anti-humane publications appeared, such as “What about Germany?” (1942) by L. P. Lochner, “How to treat the Germans”, (1943) by Emil Ludwig, and Germany: “To be or not to be?” (1943) by G. H. Seger and S. V. Marck. When the Americans began the occupation of Germany in 1944/45, a booklet with the presumptuous title “What to do with Germany?” by Louis Nizer, a New York attorney and chairman of an aid society for Jewish immigrants, was distributed among the American troops for free. In this book, Nizer recommended, among other things, that every German officer of the rank of Colonel and above should be brought before a court, that the German school system should be put in Allied hands and that heavy industry should be taken from Germany. This pamphlet did not represent an unimportant propaganda piece of an insignificant German hater: According to the blurb on its wrapper later US President Harry S. Truman was deeply affected by it recommended that "every American" should read it.
President Roosevelt distributed the booklet to members of his Cabinet, while General Eisenhower sent out 100,000 copies and made the officers on his staff write comments on the book. Despite the fact that Nizer's book teemed with tirades against Germany and everything German, the deadly little hate-piece was taken as bare truth by many important figures in politics and science, in the military and in the media. The principal theme in this and in other propaganda pieces was that Germany had played a unique negative role in world history which was expressed in her philosophy, her politics and the character of her people. Nazism was just a contemporary expression of the inevitable German desire to plunder and enslave other peoples. All Germans, not just National Socialists, were branded as evil incarnate.
The Allies were determined to completely destroy Germany and “the Master Race”. So determined to do so, that they embarked on the genocide, the rape and “cross-pollination” of the gene pool and then the total stripping of all means of support and livelihood left in Germany. This was a planned and systematic action – orchestrated at the highest levels and actively promoted by Zionist intent on revenge and the destruction of Germany. Hitler had dared to challenge the NWO and the control of by the Zionist banks – his proclamations against the Jews would not go unpunished, least anyone else try it.
Prominent among the Jewish Zionists, was Mortgenthau.
United States Joint Chiefs of Staff ("JCS") directive 1067 embodied the Morgenthau Plan's goals, but implementation proved impractical because it prevented the effective functioning of the occupation, not least because it proscribed personal contact between Germans and Americans. Former US President Herbert Hoover, in one of his reports from Germany, argued for a change in occupation policy, amongst other things stating: "There is the illusion that the New Germany left after the annexations can be reduced to a 'pastoral state'. It cannot be done unless we exterminate or move 25,000,000 people out of it."
There was some argument among the Allies as to the implementation of the Plan – however, by design or de facto compliance; the Allies implemented most of the plan.
Under the Americans, the dismantling of industrial sites continued until General Lucius Clay stopped it a year after war's end. Until Clay acted, Clause 6 of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Order 1067 embodied the Morgenthau Plan. Where "American official theft was carried out on a massive scale" was in "seizing scientists and scientific equipment."
The British took much for themselves and passed other industrial property on to "client states" such as Greece and Yugoslavia. The British Royal Family received Goering's yacht, and the British zone of Germany was stripped of "plants that might later offer competition with British industries." The British had their own brand of organized theft in [something called] T-Force, which sought to glean any industrial wizardry.
For their part, the French asserted "the right to plunder." "The French made no bones about pocketing a chlorine business in Rheinfelden, a viscose business in Rottweil, the Preussag mines or the chemicals groups Rhodia," and much more.
Where is the justice? The war crimes tribunal sits in The Hague and rules over Serbs delivered to them by HATO and all along omits to bring to trial HATO members and government leaders of “the West” to face their atrocities. The Zionists scour the world for “Nazi war criminals” and 60 years after the event, force them to either stand trial – as some duplicate of Nuremburg show trials.
The “West” hides behind the propaganda of the evil Red Army and Stalin while for 60 years, conceal the true war crimes of WWII and we let the Zionists tell us ad nauseum about the holocaust in order to secure undying guilt.
The fact that, at the time of the events and for so many decades thereafter, enormities of the greatest importance have been scrubbed clean by propaganda, suggests implications far beyond the events themselves. Who is behind the propaganda – who stands to benefit from it?
The British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli observed that "all great events have been distorted; most of the important causes concealed," and went on to say that "If the history of England is ever written by one who has the knowledge and the courage, the world would be astonished."
How is it that a certain version of reality can, on so many subjects, hold almost total sway, while the voices of millions and of a good many serious scholars are marginalized into nothingness?
There can only be justice if sheepoeple are prepared to strip away the lies and illusions created by Zionists and Hollywood and the controlled MSM – and ASK QUESTIONS of our governments; actively seek truth and justice and accountability from our leaders – past and present.