Development of Russian civil society

After CBDC nonsense pushed by RCB, another potentially dangerous turn in development of Russian society. I hope that this is stopped at the level of scientific study.

https://t.me/rusbrief/160774

RGSU is developing a social rating system for Russians based on the Chinese model.
 University students are forced to take part in testing the “We” platform, which generates a social rating.  The authors of the project propose to link the scoring code (social rating) with SNILS, INN, passport and telephone number.  A year ago, the report openly stated that the university intended to offer a system not only to banks, but also to governors to divide citizens into classes according to their usefulness to the state: “If there are few resources, we need clear criteria for their distribution.”

Comment from University Vice-rector:

https://m.vk.com/wall-39683739_25785

Vice-Rector for Scientific Activities Vasily Viktorovich Urozhenko commented on the “We” project of the Russian State Social University

 “We are extremely grateful to the respected BRIEF portal for its attention to our project “We”.  The Russian State Social University conducts many scientific projects, exploring such important problems of Russian society as demography, the institution of family, and the effectiveness of various forms of social support.

 The “We” project is one of them.  Within its framework, our scientists set the task of developing a modern social scoring system on a specially created qualimetric platform using probabilistic and statistical assessment models.  One of the results of the study will be the creation of a system that can be used by authorities at all levels and public organizations to provide prompt and objective social support to the population.  Work in this direction started more than a year ago and involves collecting certain social information from respondents who take part in the study on a voluntary basis.  We are glad that both students and faculty took part in this work.  The research part of the project will be completed in 2023.

 For RGSU, the largest social, scientific and educational center in the country, it is extremely important to prepare innovative practical tools to improve the social landscape and social engineering.  It is especially gratifying that our students express a desire to take part in current scientific developments.

 Upon completion of this research, we will present its results at a scientific conference and reflect it in a release.  We will be glad to see representatives of the media at this conference and will be grateful to them for their interest in social science in general and the Russian State Social University in particular.”

Ever heard of the Tsarist table of ranks?
https://russiapedia.rt.com/of-russian-origin/table-of-ranks/

That is not at all same thing. Introduce yourself better to what social credit score system is.

LOoks like something that emanated from those satans at the World Economic Forum.
Universities around the World have that Davos shit endemic in them.
China, Russia as well as the usual suspects in GATO states.

Make no mistake, they are a huge threat to Russia. And they are clearly controlled by malignant foreign agents.

Russia should NOT fall for this shit. It is a direct attempt to destabilise Russia and take it under globalist control.

Very western sounding actually... where the department in a company to handle its workers is openly called human resources... like they are shelving or furniture, or bales of hay.

Of course it is important to dehumanise your workers because that makes it easier to insist they work harder for minimum wage.

ALAMO wrote:I can hardly get your serious outrage. Well, some of you.

It's not difficult to understand, Putin won't be Russia's president forever and Russia needs to be able to survive future leaders who are incompetent at best or compromised at worst. Having a social credit system already in place, like CBDC's, gifts the perfect tool for 5th columnists to impose their political, cultural and social values (which mirrors the EU, US, UK, Canada and Australia) on the populace with few options to protect themselves from abuse.

Of all countries in the last 100+ years, Russia has the most extensive (and painful) experience with leaders who despised their people when the Tsar was deposed and Boshleviks seized power over the Russian empire.

If you still don't understand, read this quote again from the article carefully.

RGSU is developing a social rating system for Russians based on the Chinese model.
University students are forced to take part in testing the “We” platform, which generates a social rating.  The authors of the project propose to link the scoring code (social rating) with SNILS, INN, passport and telephone number.  A year ago, the report openly stated that the university intended to offer a system not only to banks, but also to governors to divide citizens into classes according to their usefulness to the state: “If there are few resources, we need clear criteria for their distribution.”

Does that sound like the words of a Patriot or a petty tyrant salivating for control over his countrymen?

caveat emptor wrote:That is not at all same thing. Introduce yourself better to what social credit score system is.

Lol. Currently, there is a credit rating system. There is a rating system by qualification (qualification grades), by level of education, in each taxi call application you have a rating. One guy I know was notified by the police in 2018 that he was denied access to the World Cup matches - due to the fact that he was registered for drugs more than 15 years ago (he has not used anything for more than 10 years).
You are so afraid of the social rating system, although we ALREADY live in conditions where we somehow have a social rating. It's just that so far it's a lot of different estimates, not an integral indicator.

A year ago, the report openly stated that the university intended to offer a system not only to banks, but also to governors to divide citizens into classes according to their usefulness to the state: “If there are few resources, we need clear criteria for their distribution.”

It sounds a little sinister... if you are not deemed to be useful to the state you will not get funding or support... you will be de-funded.

This will be for commercial users and also government users of this information... and what do we know of their criteria?

Who controls the criteria and will that criteria change over time?

The values that are important to start with will change over time... look at all the amendments to the US constitution... most are rubbish... and of course those that are fixed are open to interpretation in any direction you please... look at how many different groups use the same bible yet are completely different...

I would wonder if they could not set up other criteria for funding that does not involve separating people into categories... when times get really tough are the over 65s to be shot or starved to save resources?


EDIT: I should add it was the British government under Boris Johnson who stated that Covid was a good thing to clear out some of the older less useful members of society. Did he mean Queen Elizabeth at the time? Who knows? In the US in various places old people with Covid were sent to old peoples homes for quarantine... which on reflection sounds like a cynical attempt to wipe out the aging portion of the population first. All those conspiracies about vaccines killing everyone make no sense because the rich and the powerful need smart people to continue technology and society going to keep their comfortable lives as they are. If everyone who makes 100,000 dollar watches dies how will they tell time? Vaccines were intended to be given to everyone in the west, most in the third world can't afford them or were not taking them anyway so as a conspiracy that really doesn't work because the rich and powerful in the west would not want random elimination of western people, that does not really effect the third world. They would want all the third and second world wiped out so they can send the poor in the west out to gather the resources of the rest of the world and bring it to them. Looks like they made the virus themselves in a US funded lab in China and they were the last to find solutions to the problem... they are clearly not working on defending from a viral attack, and perhaps this might have been a wakeup call that a viral attack is going to effect the west with its global transport links to the world more than many of the countries they want to target.

Back on topic:
Of course which is not to say categorisation and profiling of people is not already done... commercially there are credit ratings and criminal records that follow you too...

https://t.me/rybar_in_english/8173



Not sure where to post this, but its hard to believe this kind of BS is happening in Russia, all of the places. Why are these thugs getting a free pass? These individuals present a clear threat to society, similar to those who assaulted the airport in Dagestan as a result of NATO psyops.

This is what the police in Russia needs to do. Arrest these Turk Terrorists, castrate them to stop their potential to multiply, then send them to hard labor camps for a minimum stay of 50 years. When they are set free, they will be old and decrepit and will be in the ripe age to serve as fertilizer to enrich Russia's arable lands.

PhSt wrote:https://t.me/rybar_in_english/8173



Not sure where to post this, but its hard to believe this kind of BS is happening in Russia, all of the places. Why are these thugs getting a free pass? These individuals present a clear threat to society, similar to those who assaulted the airport in Dagestan as a result of NATO psyops.

This is what the police in Russia needs to do. Arrest these Turk Terrorists, castrate them to stop their potential to multiply, then send them to hard labor camps for a minimum stay of 50 years. When they are set free, they will be old and decrepit and will be in the ripe age to serve as fertilizer to enrich Russia's arable lands.

I hope these type of assholes are sent back, when the SMO is finished. There will be enough people available, to cover the job market.

Donetsk, Nov 8 — DAN. Some 2.5 million residents of the Donetsk People’s Republic have got their Individual Insurance Account Number (SNILS) since the beginning of this year, the press service of the Social Fund Department for the DPR told the Donetsk News Agency.

“The Social Fund issued 2,500 million SNILS cards and accepted some 400,000 documents for passport data changes in the first ten months of this year, ” the press service said.

Earlier reports said that DPR residents can request federal benefits from the Social Fund anywhere except the Lugansk People’s Republic and the Zaporozhye and Kherson regions.

Russia’s Social Fund was established in the summer of 2022 in a merger between the Pension Fund and the Social Insurance Fund.

Individual Insurance Account Number (SNILS) is used in the compulsory pension insurance system. It tracks all the amounts contributed by an employer to an employee’s individual retirement account in respect of a future pension.

https://dan-news.ru/en/society/2.5-mln-dpr-residents-get-individual-insurance-account-number-in-2023/

MOSCOW, November 15. /TASS/. Public confidence in the results of elections in Russia has grown from 46% to 61% in three years, according to polls from the Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM), conducted in September 2021 among 1,200 adult Russians, and in August 2023, when a total of 1,600 respondents were interviewed.

"Over three years, the level of public trust in the results of elections has increased from 46% (2021) to 61% (2023) - 1.3 times. In the August survey, 61% of Russians responded that they rather trust the results of elections, and 69% among voting adults (those who feel a duty to participate in all elections)," the report says.

Sociologists also found out that almost 70% of voting adults in Russia think that the results of the elections in their region are legitimate and believe that they are held fairly and without serious violations. "A total of 22% stated the opposite, while one in nine found it difficult to assess the fairness of elections in their region (11%)," the study, conducted in August 2023, said.

Over a third of the survey participants answered that they feel a duty to take part in all elections - federal, regional and local (38%), every fourth goes to the elections whenever possible (25%), about the same number of respondents go occasionally - 24%. Only every tenth admitted that they ignore elections on general principle (10%).

https://tass.com/society/1706735