Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    Typhoon class SSBNs future:

    avatar
    Azi

    Posts : 260
    Points : 256
    Join date : 2016-04-05

    Typhoon class SSBNs future: - Page 5 Empty Re: Typhoon class SSBNs future:

    Post  Azi on Tue Sep 10, 2019 7:49 pm

    Isos wrote:
    Would love to see the Typhoon theme be continued in some way in the more distant future. They are amazing machines.

    And they are outdated and expensive. Useless for the modern Russian navy. A smaller borei converted to SSGN would be a much better choice.
    That's true. The biggest item in any military budget is the personnel costs...old Typhoon Class has a crew of 160, Borei only around 100. The maintenance of these subways would be too expensive. For their time they were great weapons, but today they are outdated.

    That's why the future is the Husky Class...high level of automation, new composites, new reactor etc.
    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 21788
    Points : 22334
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Typhoon class SSBNs future: - Page 5 Empty Re: Typhoon class SSBNs future:

    Post  GarryB on Wed Sep 11, 2019 3:35 am

    Well the whole point of an arsenal ship is large numbers of weapons on one vessel... it is not a stealthy ship... it is an overwhelm them with numbers ship, or to make all the attacks needed without needing to move the entire Russian navy into range to do so.

    Very few navies have the capacity to detect let alone track such subs.... even the really big ones.

    More to the point imagine operating this vessel for 2-3 months at a time in the southern oceans... it would cost the west a fortune to follow them around the place... and more to the point these subs are nuclear powered so they could sail around for two week stretches at 25 knots... how many US or NATO anti sub groups could even keep up?
    Tsavo Lion
    Tsavo Lion

    Posts : 2772
    Points : 2770
    Join date : 2016-08-15
    Location : AZ, USA

    Typhoon class SSBNs future: - Page 5 Empty Re: Typhoon class SSBNs future:

    Post  Tsavo Lion on Wed Sep 11, 2019 5:46 am

    operating this vessel for 2-3 months at a time in the southern oceans...
    U mean well below the Equator? Their CMs wouldn't have a range to hit anything relevant from there, unless their targets r in Chile, Falklands, Brazil, S. Africa, Australia/NZ, or French Polynesia.
    it would cost the west a fortune to follow them around the place...
    1-2 SSNs r enough for that.
    avatar
    Firebird

    Posts : 1008
    Points : 1034
    Join date : 2011-10-14

    Typhoon class SSBNs future: - Page 5 Empty Re: Typhoon class SSBNs future:

    Post  Firebird on Fri Sep 13, 2019 2:25 pm

    Isos wrote:
    Would love to see the Typhoon theme be continued in some way in the more distant future. They are amazing machines.

    And they are outdated and expensive. Useless for the modern Russian navy. A smaller borei converted to SSGN would be a much better choice.

    Outdated as a SSBM. But maybe have a use as an arsenal sub or test sub or some sort of transportation sub?
    Excellent flag flyers too. Would be worth keeping one for something or other.
    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon

    Posts : 8240
    Points : 8324
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    Typhoon class SSBNs future: - Page 5 Empty Re: Typhoon class SSBNs future:

    Post  PapaDragon on Fri Sep 13, 2019 7:47 pm

    Firebird wrote:...
    Outdated as a SSBM. But maybe have a use as an arsenal sub or test sub or some sort of transportation sub?
    Excellent flag flyers too. Would be worth keeping one for something or other.

    Doesn't make sense in any of those roles, it's twice cheaper to modify new Borei sub for any of those roles
    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 21788
    Points : 22334
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Typhoon class SSBNs future: - Page 5 Empty Re: Typhoon class SSBNs future:

    Post  GarryB on Sat Sep 14, 2019 6:46 am

    U mean well below the Equator? Their CMs wouldn't have a range to hit anything relevant from there, unless their targets r in Chile, Falklands, Brazil, S. Africa, Australia/NZ, or French Polynesia.

    They are nuclear powered and could get to most conflict zones within a couple of days... they could visit Venezuela on a good will visit and Vietnam and India and Iran and any coastal place in Africa on friendly terms.

    They could be fitted with 4,500km range conventionally armed cruise missiles, or 1,000km range hypersonic Zircon anti ship and land attack missiles and anything in between if needed.

    Having them sail around the arctic would be pointless as Russian land based IRBMs and aircraft launched cruise missiles could be used just as easily.

    Equally they could put 50 tubes especially for Burevesk cruise missiles (the unlimited range nuclear powered ones).

    1-2 SSNs r enough for that.

    They wouldn't carry enough cruise missiles on board for more than a couple of attacks before needing to head back to port to reload.


    Doesn't make sense in any of those roles, it's twice cheaper to modify new Borei sub for any of those roles

    Have you checked or are you making an assumption?

    Besides... any new Boreis make rather more sense carrying SLBMs with the new START treaty not seeming to be going to be replaced then they will need as many boomers operating as they can to make the US think it needs a new arms treaty to stop them pointing so many missiles at them.

    There is potential for a custom designed arsenal ship... perhaps based on the Husky design, but the Akula class are enormous and there is huge potential to place an enormous number of weapons on these vessels and to also test next generation large ship NPPs as well... If they test the NPPs and they have serious problems it would be better to find out sooner rather than later when several ships are laid down with them fitted and plans are made for EM CATS with CVNs only to find the NPPs are not up to the job. Getting them in to use now on a large heavy vessel is an opportunity and the resulting vessel can have a variety of uses... hell you could make the centre section modular and fully removable so it could be an arsenal sub or it could be a crude oil carrier that can't be stopped, or a transport vessel for sensitive materials. Hell, you could make an air defence module that has an airship attachment that attaches an airship to the rear of the vessel on a 10km tether that powers a 100m long AESA radar antenna and a 50m long AESA antenna in Ka and L band radar that can pick up enemy aircraft and missiles out to 2,500km, with upward looking radar too, and perhaps 100 x S-500 launch tubes and maybe 200 S-400 and 600 Pantsir/TOR missiles too to operate over the arctic and shoot down any US missile headed to Russia...
    Tsavo Lion
    Tsavo Lion

    Posts : 2772
    Points : 2770
    Join date : 2016-08-15
    Location : AZ, USA

    Typhoon class SSBNs future: - Page 5 Empty Re: Typhoon class SSBNs future:

    Post  Tsavo Lion on Sat Sep 14, 2019 7:33 am

    1-2 SSNs r enough for that.
    They wouldn't carry enough cruise missiles on board for more than a couple of attacks before needing to head back to port to reload.
    No, those subs r enough to follow & destroy the SSGN u r proposing.
    To have them on patrol 24/7/365, at least 3 will be needed. FYI, D. Donskoi's 3 sister subs were all scrapped, 2 more r in reserve. Will it be possible to reactivate them? The cost of operating them is so high that only 1 is now active, & w/o going on active patrols, with all test launches being conducted from the White Sea, i.e the home waters.


    Last edited by Tsavo Lion on Sat Sep 14, 2019 6:22 pm; edited 1 time in total
    avatar
    hoom

    Posts : 1974
    Points : 1964
    Join date : 2016-05-06

    Typhoon class SSBNs future: - Page 5 Empty Re: Typhoon class SSBNs future:

    Post  hoom on Sat Sep 14, 2019 11:32 am

    It'd be kinda cool to see it converted to a Kalibr arsenal ship.
    But probably cheaper/more useful to build a modified couple of Boreis for that.
    Isos
    Isos

    Posts : 3774
    Points : 3762
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Typhoon class SSBNs future: - Page 5 Empty Re: Typhoon class SSBNs future:

    Post  Isos on Sat Sep 14, 2019 12:02 pm

    Very few navies have the capacity to detect let alone track such subs.... even the really big ones.

    Against such small navy a barge fited with kalibr launchers and protected by a gorshkov is enough.

    The problem is the navies that can track such big ships. Against them you need something stealthy. And Borei is the best choice. They could also use only kalibr in Yasen, 40 in vls and 30 in torpedo room. Nato sonars won't track them at more than 20km so at 1500km from the shores they will be safe to fire.
    flamming_python
    flamming_python

    Posts : 3518
    Points : 3602
    Join date : 2012-01-30

    Typhoon class SSBNs future: - Page 5 Empty Re: Typhoon class SSBNs future:

    Post  flamming_python on Mon Sep 16, 2019 2:48 am

    I like the idea of a UAV command vessel

    Just release the swarm in support of any amphibious operation; with drones armed with Vikhr missiles and so on. Naturally the UAVs won't be too long ranged and the sub would have to be surfaced to launch and receive them - so the sub can only really be used in a secured maritime zone, protected by other assets

    Another possibility is as a UAV carrier for fighter UAVs, to secure airspace. This can again only be conducted with protection from other naval assets.
    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 21788
    Points : 22334
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Typhoon class SSBNs future: - Page 5 Empty Re: Typhoon class SSBNs future:

    Post  GarryB on Mon Sep 16, 2019 8:02 am

    Against such small navy a barge fited with kalibr launchers and protected by a gorshkov is enough.

    Not really. A barge would be noticed and people would take interest in following its movements around the place... especially the US so any use of it wont come as any surprise and you could fit a mortar on a fishing boat and get within 5km and have a good chance of landing a few rounds before they could stop you... with a submerged submarine they would have no idea until you launched a missile... and then you could move and they would still have no idea where you are.

    The problem is the navies that can track such big ships. Against them you need something stealthy. And Borei is the best choice. They could also use only kalibr in Yasen, 40 in vls and 30 in torpedo room. Nato sonars won't track them at more than 20km so at 1500km from the shores they will be safe to fire.

    They don't have any spare Boreis... they have two spare Akula SSBNs, which have the size to carry a decent number of weapons and still have room for other things too.

    And who is talking about NATO... Russia doesn't need an arsenal ship against NATO... hypersonic land based missiles would do the job much better and much cheaper.

    What Russia wants is something that can operate anywhere a group of Russian ships operate... it is the missile equivalent of an aircraft carrier... with UKSK-M tubes it might be able to carry SAMs as well.

    Just release the swarm in support of any amphibious operation; with drones armed with Vikhr missiles and so on. Naturally the UAVs won't be too long ranged and the sub would have to be surfaced to launch and receive them - so the sub can only really be used in a secured maritime zone, protected by other assets

    Should be OK in the rear of a land attack surface fleet... of course you could also modify the design and put a helicopter landing deck behind the sail and have the front of the vessel with the torpedo room removed and the entire front end of the vessel just filled with UKSK-M launchers able to carry anything from Zircon and 4,500km range cruise missiles through all the major naval SAM types.

    Store fuel and air to surface weapons... have the rear platform for helicopters and vertical takeoff and landing drones where they can land and refuel and rearm, and have the front for launching conventional drones with a net to recover them, and of course multiple launch tubes for a variety of missiles and weapons.

    You could make it modular so you can lift out the UKSK-M tubes and replace it with enormous fuel bladders and sit in the middle of the ocean to support helicopters or amphibious aircraft operating a long way from shore...

    Another possibility is as a UAV carrier for fighter UAVs, to secure airspace. This can again only be conducted with protection from other naval assets.

    Or massive AESA radar antennas on the sail and the entire front dedicated to UKSK-M tubes filled with SAMs of all types... or half cruise missiles and half SAMs as a sort of trap... sending out emissions to pretend to be a group of ships... launch a surface attack on the country and with the emissions luring enemy aircraft into a SAM trap... which could submerge and leave the area when needed.
    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 21788
    Points : 22334
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Typhoon class SSBNs future: - Page 5 Empty Re: Typhoon class SSBNs future:

    Post  GarryB on Mon Sep 16, 2019 8:03 am

    Of course a dedicated recon platform with UAVs and unmanned surface vessels and unmanned underwater vessels and mini subs could be used to test defences and examine submerged objects and cables etc...

    Sponsored content

    Typhoon class SSBNs future: - Page 5 Empty Re: Typhoon class SSBNs future:

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Sun Sep 22, 2019 7:16 pm