Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    S-300/400/500 News [Russian Strategic Air Defense] #3

    Share
    avatar
    George1

    Posts : 12240
    Points : 12719
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Re: S-300/400/500 News [Russian Strategic Air Defense] #3

    Post  George1 on Mon Sep 18, 2017 6:59 pm

    Almaz-Antey provides first regimental set of S-400 for Russian Defense Ministry

    The Defense Ministry said that Russia’s Aerospace Force would obtain four S-400 systems this year

    MOSCOW, September 18. /TASS/. Russia’s Almaz-Antey concern has provided for the Defense Ministry this year’s first regimental set of S-400 air defense systems Triumf.

    "The parts and components of the air defense missile system S-400 Triumf are delivered by the sub-contractors to the assembly center at the Kapustin Yar proving ground, unloaded there and stored at technological areas. The components are then checked for quality and the systems assembled and tuned up," the concern’s press-service said.

    After that the assembled systems are handed over to the client for acceptance tests at the proving ground. The tests include live missile launches against target simulators.

    Earlier, the Defense Ministry said that Russia’s Aerospace Force would obtain four S-400 systems this year. In 2016 Almaz-Antey provided five regimental sets of this system.

    S-400 Triumf is a long-range air defense system authorized for service in 2007. Its task is to destroy enemy planes, cruise and ballistic missiles, including intermediate range ones, and surface targets. Last April the deputy chief of Russia’s Aerospace Force, Viktor Gumenny, said that S-400 capable of destroying targets in near space had begun to enter duty.


    More:
    http://tass.com/defense/966171
    avatar
    PapaDragon

    Posts : 7251
    Points : 7345
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    Re: S-300/400/500 News [Russian Strategic Air Defense] #3

    Post  PapaDragon on Mon Sep 18, 2017 8:51 pm


    Stating the obvious Wink

    'Taking It Apart Won't Help': Why S-400's Secrets Safe Despite Sale to Turkey

    https://sputniknews.com/military/201709181057496814-s400-turkey-secrets-safe/

    ...However, speaking to Stanavov, Viktor Murakshovsky, a retired army colonel and editor in chief of 'Arsenal of the Fatherland' magazine, allayed such fears, calling them "incompetent gossip."

    In fact, Murakshovsky said, the combat characteristics of the S-400's export models are significantly inferior to those found in Russia's arsenal, and lack the latest technologies protected as state secrets by the Defense Ministry.

    "The drafting of the passport of the export profile is controlled by a structure subordinated to the Defense Ministry – the Federal Service for Military Technical Cooperation. Without a visa from the Defense Ministry, no item can go abroad in a configuration that poses a threat to Russia's national security. The same applies to the S-400," the retired officer explained.....
    avatar
    KomissarBojanchev

    Posts : 1444
    Points : 1605
    Join date : 2012-08-05
    Age : 21
    Location : Varna, Bulgaria

    Re: S-300/400/500 News [Russian Strategic Air Defense] #3

    Post  KomissarBojanchev on Tue Sep 26, 2017 6:43 pm

    Does that mean that if a first strike of B-52s launch around 60 nuclear tipped cruise missiles to Irkutsk instead of Vladivostok, the S-400 wont be able to intercept said cruise missiles because they're not flying directly at the battery?

    Also, what's the progress on the S-500?
    avatar
    miketheterrible

    Posts : 2760
    Points : 2742
    Join date : 2016-11-06

    Re: S-300/400/500 News [Russian Strategic Air Defense] #3

    Post  miketheterrible on Wed Sep 27, 2017 12:01 am

    S-500 was shown in private exhibition. So we don't known much like how S-350 is being silently released. Add to that, depends how the cruise missile is launched. In this case, MiG-31's from afar would be launched as radar would have picked up the launches of the CM from far far away. In this case, they can be shot down by multitude of methods. If it flies too low, then it becomes a problem. Cruise missiles are a really good system that really trumps most other missile types while not being too complex or expensive. They just don't do the same damage as a BM.
    avatar
    Isos

    Posts : 2458
    Points : 2452
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Re: S-300/400/500 News [Russian Strategic Air Defense] #3

    Post  Isos on Wed Sep 27, 2017 10:55 am

    KomissarBojanchev wrote:Does that mean that if a first strike of B-52s launch around 60 nuclear tipped cruise missiles to Irkutsk instead of Vladivostok, the S-400 wont be able to intercept said cruise missiles because they're not flying directly at the battery?

    Also, what's the progress on the S-500?

    Even if they are lunched against S-400 directly they would be very hard to destroy. A cruise missile fly low and has a preprogramed flight route. Radars are no magic they see something that is in their "radar vision". Something flying at 50 km at an altitude of 20 m won t be seen by any radar. In the sea radar horizon is something like 30 km. On the land their are lot of obstacles because the land is not flat so the radar hirizon depend of the suroundings like mountains ... if the cruise missile comes from the mountains 10km from you and is a brahmos flying at mach 3 you won t intercept it specially if there are 60 of them.

    What you see on forums that s-400 can intercept anything in 400km from it is bullshit. Without smaller systems like buk and pantsirs and a network of radars put every where in the 400 km range of the main radar of the s-400 around it, the s 400 is not dangerous at all and can be easily destroyed like patriot and s 300 and every othr long range system.
    avatar
    KomissarBojanchev

    Posts : 1444
    Points : 1605
    Join date : 2012-08-05
    Age : 21
    Location : Varna, Bulgaria

    Re: S-300/400/500 News [Russian Strategic Air Defense] #3

    Post  KomissarBojanchev on Wed Sep 27, 2017 11:18 pm

    So that means that SAMs are situational garbage and that the only viable long range air defence is a large amount of interceptors?
    avatar
    miketheterrible

    Posts : 2760
    Points : 2742
    Join date : 2016-11-06

    Re: S-300/400/500 News [Russian Strategic Air Defense] #3

    Post  miketheterrible on Thu Sep 28, 2017 4:49 am

    The air defense systems with long range are ideal against ballistic missiles and high altitude, fast and big targets. Bombers, AWACS, etc. It also works great against jets and act as a force multiplyer without actually being jets themselves so they can provide great service in assisting fighter jets in vicinity of the combat engament. At point defense, they can work great against low flying objects. But, and big but to this too, is that they won't be able to engage at those long ranges. They can engage the targets, but they are not ideal. That is where SHORADS come into effect - protecting the places or things from such attacks. They are meant to be cheaper and be able to effectively protect their position.

    Basic breakdown, but that is the point.
    avatar
    Singular_Transform

    Posts : 721
    Points : 715
    Join date : 2016-11-13

    Re: S-300/400/500 News [Russian Strategic Air Defense] #3

    Post  Singular_Transform on Thu Sep 28, 2017 5:30 pm

    The SAM rockets are cost close as much as each tomahawk, means it can be saturated easily.


    The main advantage is the S-400 will force the B-52 to release its missile from 500 km, means that the interceptors will have 30 minutes more to reach the tomahawks , and the range of them decreased as well.

    It is fairly easy for the early warning radar system to spot the small cruise missiles, easier than to spot a big plane , due to the rayleigh scattering.

    ATLASCUB

    Posts : 411
    Points : 413
    Join date : 2017-02-13

    Re: S-300/400/500 News [Russian Strategic Air Defense] #3

    Post  ATLASCUB on Thu Sep 28, 2017 9:07 pm

    Singular_Transform wrote:The SAM rockets are cost close as much as each tomahawk, means it can be saturated easily.


    The main advantage is the S-400 will force the B-52 to release its missile from 500 km, means that the interceptors will have 30 minutes more to reach the tomahawks , and the range of them decreased as  well.

    It is fairly easy for the early warning radar system to spot the small cruise missiles, easier than to spot a big plane , due to the rayleigh scattering.

    The only thing capable of such thing is a MIG 31 with plenty of back-up.
    avatar
    GarryB

    Posts : 18644
    Points : 19200
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: S-300/400/500 News [Russian Strategic Air Defense] #3

    Post  GarryB on Fri Sep 29, 2017 2:50 am

    The heavy long range SAM protects your airspace so you can have MiG-31s and Su-35s and PAK FAs flying around and also AWACS and inflight refuelling aircraft to keep those aircraft airborne to defend from cruise missile attack.

    The R-77 is cleared to hit cruise missile targets from fairly long range and the R-33 and R-37 are both optimised to shoot down the launch platforms before they release missiles but they can also hit cruise missiles too.

    The new A-100 can direct missiles so an A-100 flying above an S-400 battery can provide that battery with long range low level target information.... and Su-35 with a dozen R-77s could fly 200km closer to where the cruise missiles are coming from and operate radar silent with target data from the A-100 and its own passive sensors.

    MiG-31s with R-60MKs and now perhaps R-73s could chase down cruise missiles fairly easily.... in fact a MiG-29/35 or Su-27/35 with IR guided R-27ETs could engage cruise missiles at long range over the cold tundra...
    avatar
    GarryB

    Posts : 18644
    Points : 19200
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: S-300/400/500 News [Russian Strategic Air Defense] #3

    Post  GarryB on Fri Sep 29, 2017 2:54 am

    The cheapest option would actually be the Igla-S MANPAD as it has a proximity fuse and a sensitive seeker for dealing with UAVs and UCAVs.

    Develop a long range UCAV and load it with quad packs of Igla-S for max kill probability with lowest cost.

    What they could do is develop a large rocket pod for Igla class MANPADs, with perhaps 10-16 tubes per pod.

    Slide missile tubes directly in to the pod and mount one under each wing of a UAV or perhaps have them in the fuselage so the can be lowered and fired and then retracted back up. Another option would be a wing tip 4-5 tube launcher with IR sensors front and back for looking for targets and acting as DIRCMs
    avatar
    miketheterrible

    Posts : 2760
    Points : 2742
    Join date : 2016-11-06

    Re: S-300/400/500 News [Russian Strategic Air Defense] #3

    Post  miketheterrible on Fri Sep 29, 2017 5:33 am

    I think Russia's current plans is to actually field a set of Blimp UAV's that would be able to fly for extreme periods of time with airborne radar in order to scan the skies constantly and without much supervision. The best system to detect cruise missiles at extreme ranges are AWAC's and airborne radar, so it makes it ideal to be able to detect them and send a jet to go intercept it/them. As GarryB said, the missiles available are enough. But I should mention that MiG-31 was actually designed, as an interceptor, to deal with engaging Cruise missiles, other kind of missiles and long range aircraft. It really isn't ideal to be used as a fighter jet. It is ideal in what it does.
    avatar
    flamming_python

    Posts : 3336
    Points : 3420
    Join date : 2012-01-30

    Re: S-300/400/500 News [Russian Strategic Air Defense] #3

    Post  flamming_python on Fri Sep 29, 2017 2:27 pm

    Blimp air defence radars would be the best IMO.

    Long endurance, enough space & payload for supplies and comforts for the crew (if manned at all) as well as a decent-sized powerplant, no radar horizon limits.

    It's disadvantage is that it will be easy to detect and shoot-down. However if ground-launch vehicles are covering it (particularly SHORADS) and friendly fighters are patrolling the airspace, etc.. then such blimps should be pretty survivable.

    AWACS is something you take along with you when you want to invade an enemy's airspace or otherwise need radar cover in a hurry somewhere in the world and promptly.
    For defending your own airspace, blimps, or even just tethered aerostats (the later definately not needing any crew onboard and immune to anti-UAV measures) - would seem to be more preferable.
    avatar
    GarryB

    Posts : 18644
    Points : 19200
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: S-300/400/500 News [Russian Strategic Air Defense] #3

    Post  GarryB on Sat Sep 30, 2017 9:46 am

    Actually build a modern bllmp out of carbon fibre and modern materials that don't burn and fill it full of a mix of helium and hydrogen with side arrays of those new AESA radars and send it up to above 30,000m altitude and it would actually be bloody hard to shoot down.

    Carbon fibre does not burn and various materials can be used like nomex that are fire retardant. Inside the structure you have bags of hydrogen but the "air" around the bags in the structure can be purged of oxygen and filled with nitrogen which is intert.

    A large airship penetrated by an AAM or large SAM might lose quite a few bags of helium or hydrogen but there can be no fire at 30km altitude... not enough air.

    That means a few bags deflated with their lifting gas escaping the airship would start to descend.... dropping ballast could arrest and even reverse that descent, but even if not then it wont be plummeting in flames like the hindenberg.

    More importantly the airship could be covered in radar and IR sensors so any incoming threats could be engaged with small light anti missile missiles like Morfei (9M100) whether it is ARH or IIR guided.

    the onboard jammers could have enormous power and of course thermal decoys and chaff are still options too. A powerful jamming beam could be reflected off the ocean so any home on jam missile would hit the water chasing the source of the jamming beam...

    the size of the airship means it could see threats hundreds or thousands of kms away... a tethered version could draw power from a destroyer or cruiser sized vessel it was tethered to....

    They already have blimps developed for mountains as a cruise missile detector and even just radio signal relay platform.
    avatar
    Isos

    Posts : 2458
    Points : 2452
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Re: S-300/400/500 News [Russian Strategic Air Defense] #3

    Post  Isos on Sat Sep 30, 2017 5:33 pm

    Nice idea garry but then it allows the opponent to develop space arms. Imagine you build something like that and US build a satelite with missiles in it and send it next russian borders. You won t know if it carries nuclear weapons and it will be at 500 km from moscow. It is more dangerous and hard to destroy than short range nuclear missiles like iskander... but if you send it at just 10 km and make it more cheaper and build in big numbers it would be very good. Radars are often static so easy targets. Its better to have lot of them working in a network than having just few very capable but extremly expensive.
    avatar
    GarryB

    Posts : 18644
    Points : 19200
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: S-300/400/500 News [Russian Strategic Air Defense] #3

    Post  GarryB on Mon Oct 02, 2017 2:34 am

    Nice idea garry but then it allows the opponent to develop space arms.

    30km up is not in space.

    A lightened MiG-25 has the world altitude record for an air breathing aircraft to 30,000m so it is not anywhere near space.

    Imagine you build something like that and US build a satelite with missiles in it and send it next russian borders.

    If you put it near an enemy border the simplest response would be an airborne laser system like the A-60 to simply cut it to bits... it still would not instantly go down in flames but it would not remain on station and active either.

    You won t know if it carries nuclear weapons and it will be at 500 km from moscow.

    Any US tactical strike aircraft could be 500km from Moscow with nuclear weapons, they could simply fly around Roshcha in the Ukraine which is less than 500km from Moscow by flight... Of course if it actually launched anything towards Moscow I would imagine the S-400 and S-300 batteries nearby would end its existence fairly quickly.

    Radars are often static so easy targets. Its better to have lot of them working in a network than having just few very capable but extremly expensive.

    Who said anything about expensive.

    We are not talking enormous blimp like the Hindenberg... it might be only slightly bigger than a bus... it does not need to carry people... just a very large radar antenna array of AESA elements and a very long tether back down to the ship it is operating with.
    avatar
    d_taddei2

    Posts : 1422
    Points : 1598
    Join date : 2013-05-11
    Location : Scotland UK

    Re: S-300/400/500 News [Russian Strategic Air Defense] #3

    Post  d_taddei2 on Tue Oct 10, 2017 10:41 pm

    Some interesting stuff. But slightly off current chat.

    Is anyone concerned about China getting the S-400 system considering that they will just copy it.

    Also which other countries do you think will end up purchasing s-400 apart from Belarus and Kazakhstan ?
    avatar
    GarryB

    Posts : 18644
    Points : 19200
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: S-300/400/500 News [Russian Strategic Air Defense] #3

    Post  GarryB on Wed Oct 11, 2017 9:23 am

    An Airship with radar arrays mounted on it of all types from high down to low frequency would be a very valuable asset for the Air Force and their heavy SAM batteries.

    The biggest threat to a SAM site is low flying missiles and an airship would be ideally placed to spot them at max distance allowing reactions including shutting down or even moving, or deploying aircraft to intercept.
    avatar
    Isos

    Posts : 2458
    Points : 2452
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Re: S-300/400/500 News [Russian Strategic Air Defense] #3

    Post  Isos on Wed Oct 11, 2017 1:03 pm

    GarryB wrote:An Airship with radar arrays mounted on it of all types from high down to low frequency would be a very valuable asset for the Air Force and their heavy SAM batteries.

    The biggest threat to a SAM site is low flying missiles and an airship would be ideally placed to spot them at max distance allowing reactions including shutting down or even moving, or deploying aircraft to intercept.

    I was thinking about this idea for their future big ships like Super Gorshkov or Liders. Another mast with a small airship onnected with wires and that could be send at 500m or more so it could spot antiship missiles further and maybe guide some active radar missiles to their location and let the missile find the target alone.
    avatar
    Stealthflanker

    Posts : 871
    Points : 951
    Join date : 2009-08-04
    Age : 30
    Location : Indonesia

    Re: S-300/400/500 News [Russian Strategic Air Defense] #3

    Post  Stealthflanker on Thu Oct 12, 2017 6:06 am

    d_taddei2 wrote:Some interesting stuff. But slightly off current chat.

    Is anyone concerned about China getting the S-400 system considering that they will just copy it.

    Also which other countries do you think will end up purchasing s-400 apart from Belarus and Kazakhstan ?

    Well is Russia concerned ? That's the first question.

    The one that couuld be concerned is other country that buys S-400...But well Vietnam operates S-300PMU-2 like China yet they doesn't seem to show any concern about it.
    avatar
    GarryB

    Posts : 18644
    Points : 19200
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: S-300/400/500 News [Russian Strategic Air Defense] #3

    Post  GarryB on Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:13 am

    Is anyone concerned about China getting the S-400 system considering that they will just copy it.

    They will learn from the technology, if they do copy it then Russia can demand royalties for the production of those copies.

    The fact is that if Russia does not sell S-400 to China and China gets the same technology some other way then China could copy that and produce as many as they like because there would be no paper work with Russia.

    By selling them the product they are then bound by the agreement not to make copies... or should I say unlicensed copies.

    There is talk of Turkey buying S-400... if they do then pretty much anyone could buy some.... India, China, perhaps even Iran and Syria...

    Austin

    Posts : 6840
    Points : 7229
    Join date : 2010-05-08
    Location : India

    S-300/400/500 News [Russian Strategic Air Defense] #3

    Post  Austin on Fri Oct 13, 2017 1:10 pm









    Austin

    Posts : 6840
    Points : 7229
    Join date : 2010-05-08
    Location : India

    S-300/400/500 News [Russian Strategic Air Defense] #3

    Post  Austin on Fri Oct 13, 2017 1:12 pm

    Note the Target Speed of 9M96E and 9M96E2 missile
    avatar
    Isos

    Posts : 2458
    Points : 2452
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Re: S-300/400/500 News [Russian Strategic Air Defense] #3

    Post  Isos on Fri Oct 13, 2017 1:51 pm

    Austin wrote:Note the Target Speed of 9M96E and 9M96E2 missile

    Any information about the radar in it ? It looks smaller than buk missiles and clearly much smaller than other S-300/400 missiles which would suggests that it is easier to jam.

    The 9M100 looks big too. Isn't it suppose to be quad pack instead of one 9M96 ?
    avatar
    miketheterrible

    Posts : 2760
    Points : 2742
    Join date : 2016-11-06

    Re: S-300/400/500 News [Russian Strategic Air Defense] #3

    Post  miketheterrible on Sun Oct 15, 2017 4:50 pm

    Apparently read that Morocco is interested in purchasing s-400 as well now.

    Sponsored content

    Re: S-300/400/500 News [Russian Strategic Air Defense] #3

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Tue Nov 20, 2018 11:45 pm