Boris Nemtsov killed

Lothar von Trotha wrote:Strelkov would make an excellent successor of Putin.

Strelkow is an unexperienced guy and there are much better people in line for presidency, Glazayev, Lawrow, Starikow and some other advisors.

Strekov should never get into politics :/ He cant keep quiet when he needs to

Lothar von Trotha wrote: But he does possess some admirable qualities. He is intelligent, a good administrator (he created an army from scrstch), he would be a new face in politics not associated overtly with factionalism etc. And he is a war hero - something that gives him more respect than politics ever would.

Haha...we got new joker here, was to quite with Porky007 anyway.

Lothar von Trotha wrote:Strelkov would make an excellent successor of Putin.

Early enough, you're already looking for Putin's successor. Does that have anything to do with Nemtsov's murder?

Once again... This is a mess of who benefits the most from his death. 

Putin had no reason to "fear" Nemtsov, who in all reality, didn't have a hundredth of the support that he has. 

The Western media drawing support for Nemtsov and those rallying also gives us a clue... 

Along with the fact that all of this is being used against Putin and his "gang of misfits/thugs" (quoting the ****-heads here in the U.S.)...

I think you all get what I'm implying here. Putin isn't the "suspect", in fact, he is the "victim" here. Nemtsov was just collateral damage in a war that, despite all the case against it, lurks in the mist.

Mike E wrote:Once again... This is a mess of who benefits the most from his death. 

Putin had no reason to "fear" Nemtsov, who in all reality, didn't have a hundredth of the support that he has. 

The Western media drawing support for Nemtsov and those rallying also gives us a clue... 

Along with the fact that all of this is being used against Putin and his "gang of misfits/thugs" (quoting the ****-heads here in the U.S.)...

I think you all get what I'm implying here. Putin isn't the "suspect", in fact, he is the "victim" here. Nemtsov was just collateral damage in a war that, despite all the case against it, lurks in the mist.

I have never seen such childish comments and open hostility in various asian countries, only western countries love to use childish comments and name calling. Really sad actually.

sepheronx wrote:I have never seen such childish comments and open hostility in various asian countries, only western countries love to use childish comments and name calling.  

How many Asian countries have you visited? Do you realize that Asian countries are third world shitholes and people migrate ti the west from these countries?

NickM wrote:

sepheronx wrote:I have never seen such childish comments and open hostility in various asian countries, only western countries love to use childish comments and name calling.  

How many Asian countries have you visited? Do you realize that Asian countries are third world shitholes and people migrate ti the west from these countries?

Real shithole countries are those without values, slavery and hypocricy aka US/UK, when this shithole countries become civilized you can come here and speak about other countries.

NickM wrote:

sepheronx wrote:I have never seen such childish comments and open hostility in various asian countries, only western countries love to use childish comments and name calling.  

How many Asian countries have you visited? Do you realize that Asian countries are third world shitholes and people migrate ti the west from these countries?

Japan is a third world shithole?

LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

I am anti-russian?

If the shoe fits.

Just because you are Russian does not mean you can't be anti russian...

Black people can be racist too.

People will be killed in the name of the Kremlin,

I am sure it is only a matter of time before video evidence appears showing Putin leaning out of a window in the Kremlin with an ORSIS 5000 doing the deed.

I guess the people murdered on 11/9 when that plane crashed into the Pentagon were killed in the name of the US military establishment too by your logic.

Simply for daring to oppose the Kremlin.

He was called the leader of the opposition in all the news reports I saw here in NZ... yet his party didn't have any sitting MPs... so he is no more a leader of an opposition party as I am.

He would be nothing to Putin... a nobody... the list of people he would want shot would likely not even include him... a waste of ammo.

If anyone shot him I would suspect the CIA wanted something to disguise the fact that the US is sending troops and military equipment to a country they have imposed sanctions against Russia simply based on the implied suggestion they might be interfering... with no proof what so ever.

I think you all get what I'm implying here. Putin isn't the "suspect", in fact, he is the "victim" here. Nemtsov was just collateral damage in a war that, despite all the case against it, lurks in the mist.

Well their bay of pigs in the Ukraine got the Crimea back into Russian hands and their forces defeated on the battlefield by an enemy they clearly underestimated... now they are trying assassinations.... will the CIA never learn?

How many Asian countries have you visited? Do you realize that Asian countries are third world shitholes and people migrate ti the west from these countries?

Careful Nick... now that both sides of the atlantic are broke stealing the resources of Russia was supposed to ease the pain, but now plan B will have Europe kissing ass in Asia in the next few years.. so pucker up buddy. Just smile and think of England...

TR1 wrote:

NickM wrote:

sepheronx wrote:I have never seen such childish comments and open hostility in various asian countries, only western countries love to use childish comments and name calling.  

How many Asian countries have you visited? Do you realize that Asian countries are third world shitholes and people migrate ti the west from these countries?

Japan is a third world shithole?

LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

Debt control wise - yes:) Hardly third world country tho:)


And UK is not shithole.. Yet..

On topic
Opposition in Russia are always fringes and marginals.
Why is that? Why can't be there proper oppostion, cause now all of them want to release gov and start a new. Aka Maidan style. Surely it shouldn't be the answer.

If the shoe fits.

Just because you are Russian does not mean you can't be anti russian...

Black people can be racist too.

He is no russian by ethnicity.

Werewolf wrote:

If the shoe fits.

Just because you are Russian does not mean you can't be anti russian...

Black people can be racist too.

He is no russian by ethnicity.

Was Lenin, Stalin russian by ethnicity?

Regular wrote:

Werewolf wrote:

If the shoe fits.

Just because you are Russian does not mean you can't be anti russian...

Black people can be racist too.

He is no russian by ethnicity.

Was Lenin, Stalin russian by ethnicity?

Nobody was talking about those two here so not sure where you are heading.

Werewolf wrote:
Nobody was talking about those two here so not sure where you are heading.

I'm heading there that there are plenty of people living and ruling Russia who are not native ethnic Russians. It doesn't strip them of any rights.
By the way, found video of TR1
http://www.tubechop.com/watch/5307570

Regular wrote:

Werewolf wrote:
Nobody was talking about those two here so not sure where you are heading.

I'm heading there that there are plenty of people living and ruling Russia who are not native ethnic Russians. It doesn't strip them of any rights.
By the way, found video of TR1  
http://www.tubechop.com/watch/5307570

Actually it does since he is an american citizen not a russian nor does he live there and surely not in any interest for russia as a country, which anyone can see from his various comments.

TR1 wrote:

NickM wrote:

sepheronx wrote:I have never seen such childish comments and open hostility in various asian countries, only western countries love to use childish comments and name calling.  

How many Asian countries have you visited? Do you realize that Asian countries are third world shitholes and people migrate ti the west from these countries?

Japan is a third world shithole?

LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

Neither is South Korea, or Singapore, and China is on the verge (10 years or less) of 1st world status.

Regular wrote:

Werewolf wrote:

If the shoe fits.

Just because you are Russian does not mean you can't be anti russian...

Black people can be racist too.

He is no russian by ethnicity.

Was Lenin, Stalin russian by ethnicity?

Stalin was no ethnic Russian, but in fact an ethnic Georgian, a fact that Georgian supremacists like Sockpuppetshivili are in immense denial of.

Sorry but South Korea is as advanced as any European country and Singapore beat the pants out of every other town around the world.
Singapore is probably not 1st world because it is 0th world

For people here that lack the knowledge, 1st 2nd and 3rd world are not about their wealth or their social status it is nothing else but a devision of hemispheres. 1st world was USA and NATO 2nd world was Warsaw Pact because they were against each other and 3rd World was every single country not in NATO not in Warsaw Pact, that counts in your little South Korea, Japan and other high debt nations.

Where do You pull this definition ?
Today 1st,2nd,3rd world is used more or less to state wealth of the country.

Regular wrote:Where do You pull this definition ?
Today 1st,2nd,3rd world is used more or less to state wealth of the country.

Yes, by the same retarded people AMERICANS, who don't know shit where countries on the globus are, the US is a 3rd world state in education and that is factual.

Regular wrote:Where do You pull this definition ?
Today 1st,2nd,3rd world is used more or less to state wealth of the country.

Werewolf is correct. Since cold war, first world country indicated countries allied to US, second world are countries allied to USSR and third world were neutral. Nowdays, idiots use it as an explanation of a measure of economic activity which is a piss poor method of trying to create a 'club' status.

Same thing with definition of class. High class, middle class and low class. Back in the middle ages and beginning of industrial revolution, high class were kings, queens and Dukes, Dutchesses. Middle class were the people like Aristrocrats, priestly, etc and low class were all the working class people.

We somehow changed it over the years based upon earnings, which is way too vague as it is. One can make triple more than the other, but they all get false views because someone who is near medium income may have all this junk like a BMW (rather than a Honda civic or something) they he may not have earned or is still paying for it, views he/she is a upper middle class or high class.

More of a marketing and political concept rather than anything else.

Not that Wikipedia is a sine qua non reference, but here is what it says:

The concept of the First World originated during the Cold War, involving countries that were aligned with the United States and were identified as capitalist and democratic countries. These countries were largely market economies and generally democracies.

During the Cold War, relationships between the "First World" and the "Second World" of Communist states were typically competitive, ideological and hostile. Relationships of both these "Worlds" with "Third World" countries (i.e. all the rest) were normally positive in theory, while some were quite negative in practice (such as with the practice of proxy war). Present inter-world relationships are not so rigid, although there is a disparity in terms of First World countries having more influence, wealth, information and advancements than others.