Wael
????????
@WaelAlRussi
5m5 minutes ago
Today 4 #Russia/n il-76s and 3 An-124s landed on #Khmemeim AB
Making it one of the busiest days for the cargo flights to #Syria
WaelAlRussi
6h6 hours ago
More
#Russia/n Air Force #RuAF intercepted two #Israel/i F-16s over north #Lebanon
The two jets were flying over the sea 6 km away from the Lebanese coast line.
Pakistan Can destroy Israel in 12 minutes: General Zubair Mahmood Hayat - Republic World
A senior army commander claimed that Pakistan is capable of destroying Israel in 12 minutes.
General Zubair Mahmood Hayat, Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee said, "If Israel tries to invade our land, we will raze the Zionist regime in less than 12 minutes."
"Israel would have you believe that Palestinians are all terrorists and it's only defending its citizens from suicide bombers and Islamic extremists. The reality however is very different," he added.
"We cannot let our names represent an apartheid regime and ethnic cleansing of Palestinian people. We should push for peace in one of the most complex conflicts of our time, and simultaneously hold Israel accountable for its actions - something which the UN repeatedly fails to do," he said
George1 wrote:Russian Su-34 Fighter Bomber Spotted Over Northern Lebanon (Video)
On May 27, a Su-34 warplane of the Russian Aerospace Force Intercepted an F-16 warplane of the Israel Air Force over the northern Lebanese city of Tripoli, according to several Lebanese sources. Reportedly, the Su-34 took off from Hmeimim airbase in the Syria coast.
Lebanese sources released a video showing the Russian Su-34 flying over Tripoli. However, no Israeli F-16 was spotted. This led many observers into doubting that the Su-34 was intercepting an Israeli warplane.
https://southfront.org/russian-su-34-fighter-bomber-spotted-over-northern-lebanon-video/
Isos wrote:George1 wrote:Russian Su-34 Fighter Bomber Spotted Over Northern Lebanon (Video)
On May 27, a Su-34 warplane of the Russian Aerospace Force Intercepted an F-16 warplane of the Israel Air Force over the northern Lebanese city of Tripoli, according to several Lebanese sources. Reportedly, the Su-34 took off from Hmeimim airbase in the Syria coast.
Lebanese sources released a video showing the Russian Su-34 flying over Tripoli. However, no Israeli F-16 was spotted. This led many observers into doubting that the Su-34 was intercepting an Israeli warplane.
https://southfront.org/russian-su-34-fighter-bomber-spotted-over-northern-lebanon-video/
Interception without weapons ?
Isos wrote:Spy planes are not armed too. Israeli f-16 are and there is a war in Syria. If they want to intercept them they need to be armed. They probably likee said in the article made naval patrol. Su-35 are there to intercept other fighters.
eehnie wrote:..........
The most likely way a Su-34 would afford maritime work would be likely under a model of interception. Not random loitering.
For a more traditional work of maritime patrol, the mechanical reserve remaining in the last units of the Be-6/12 would be useful.
JohninMK wrote:Bit more on this sad incident
.............
.@CITeam_ru establishes the names of three more Russian fighters killed in Deir Ezzor on May 23, bringing current total to six. Currently appears as though poor communication b/w Russian and regime units allowed ISIS to slip through and attack.
JohninMK wrote:Can't remember another member of the Syrian Express having to be towed home. Think this was one of the merchant ships that Russia bought cheap at the start of the operation.
Yörük Işık
Verified account @YorukIsik
Back from Tartus Syria but Broken Down: #ВМФ Project 733S, Okhtenskiy class rescue tug BSF #ЧФ SB-5 towed
#ВМФ #ВФ Auxiliary Fleet cargo vessel Kyzyl-60 through BlackSea-bound Bosphorus. #ВФ Kyzyl-60 is not under its own power.
PapaDragon wrote:JohninMK wrote:Bit more on this sad incident
.............
.@CITeam_ru establishes the names of three more Russian fighters killed in Deir Ezzor on May 23, bringing current total to six. Currently appears as though poor communication b/w Russian and regime units allowed ISIS to slip through and attack.
SAA seems to be the main cause of Russian military losses in Syria...
eehnie wrote:
A good and effective management of the transport operation to Syria will surely lead to the total exhaustion and decommission of the following ships:
Amphibious Combat ships:
04650 tons Project 1171 Saratov http://fleetphoto.ru/ship/790/
04650 tons Project 1171 Orsk http://fleetphoto.ru/ship/17150/
04650 tons Project 1171 Nikolay Vilkov http://fleetphoto.ru/ship/17166/
04650 tons Project 1171 Nikolay Filchenkov http://fleetphoto.ru/ship/791/
Logistic Auxiliary ships:
01915 tons Project 572 Yrghiz http://fleetphoto.ru/ship/42760/
01915 tons Project 572 Bira http://fleetphoto.ru/ship/716/
07230 tons Project 596P Yamal http://fleetphoto.ru/ship/17555/
01192 tons Project 773 VTR-140 modified to dry-cargo ship http://fleetphoto.ru/ship/26719/
14165 tons Project 550 Yauza http://fleetphoto.ru/ship/20520/
03947 tons Project 740 Pechora http://fleetphoto.ru/ship/14386/
01243 tons Project 1807 VTR-139 modified to armament transport ship http://fleetphoto.ru/ship/35262/
04473 tons Project 1791 Daugaba http://fleetphoto.ru/ship/33930/
07250 tons Vologda-50 http://fleetphoto.ru/ship/54485/
09132 tons Dvinitsa-50 http://fleetphoto.ru/ship/54458/
02099 tons Kazan-60 http://fleetphoto.ru/ship/16128/
04509 tons Kyzyl-60 http://fleetphoto.ru/ship/55363/
I tend to think that the Russian Navy Combat and Auxiliary fleets had enough capability to afford completely the transport operation to Syria and the purchase of these last four ships was avoidable. But being purchased, also these four ships must be used until total exhaustion and decommission.
JohninMK wrote:I apologise in advance to those who have this poster on ignore.
Apart from the last 4, which were bought in specifically for the task, very few if any of those ships have been in continuous operation. In the main they have come in from their native Fleet, done a period of work and then gone home. At least a couple of the Black Sea fleet ships, which are already at home, have had major overhauls. THey even took part in a major operation near home last year.
You just have to look at the huge capacity of the RO-RO and the container ships to see that the RuN definitely didn't have the capacity to do this themselves over this period or the desire to run their ships completely into the ground (or sea actually). Instead they did the right thing and bought some cheap end of life ships and are using them till they are effectively scrap. They are also merchant ships not warships legally.
nomadski wrote:
I think if Usraeli or yank launch air attack on advancing SAA armour in South . Then this may not be big operation . Like before . Sneak attack by a few planes . For this reason the SAA might as well retaliate by SSBM against usraeli targets in Golan . Instead of Russia exposing it's super modern AD . For sake of few planes . If attack was huge . And significant . Ie ; it could stop offensive . Then it is best to use it . Altogether it is better to have S300 and s300 in Syria , and not need it . Than need it and not have it .
KiloGolf wrote:
SAA cannot and will not start a war with Israel.
|
|