NO, I most definitely disagree. Russia was strongest [politically and arguably militarily] when it was the Soviet Union.
But was that because of what the former soviet republics added or was it simply where Russia was during that period?
Personally right now I would think restoring the Soviet Union would be an enormous step backwards and the complications it would add would be more negative than positive.
Much of the Soviet client states relied on handouts and economic subsidies to operate normally and when that all stopped they all blamed Russia from holding them back!
Any system that allows election of representatives can be and IS manipulated by money. Our so called, Western democratic system elects who the money says and this is why the Zionists so love it – it is so easily manipulated by “donations” and financial interference.
But every system has elected officials, it is just under the communist system you have to joint the communist party to get a vote. For everyone else they can ignore politics completely and just get on with things. In many western countries the majority of people don't bother voting or simply vote the way they have voted before unless "their party" does something that really upsets them and then they use their vote to punish their party.
And I personally think there might be some Zionists at work but I think you vastly overestimate their influence.
Any autocratic system is constantly under attack simply because it cannot be so easily manipulated and controlled by the NWO. Why do you think Amerikana [Israehell’s little lap-dog] is constantly attacking “despot dictatorships?]. They are despots because they won’t do Israehell’s beckoning.
There is certainly a juice faction in the US with power, but I really don't believe they are all powerful. It is a bit like the pro Pakistani faction in the US... it certainly exists... but when US big business sees 1.4 billion potential consumers in India then the pro Pakistani faction gets overruled. Just like there are plenty of anti communist Americans yet even after the so called end of the cold war and Russia is no longer communist the Americans are still much more in bed with the commie chinese than with the fledgling democracy of Russia. On a pure political level you would think they would immediately mobilise their forces to prop up and support Russian democracy to help make it succeed in the hopes that China will see the benefits of doing the same, but no, that is too long term and Russia has become a rival because the US can't control it so it keeps on trying to keep it down while at the same time investing in China.
Another case of an interest group being overruled by the potential of 1.5 billion potential consumers.
The huge irony is that if the US ever actually got its wish and turned both China and India into US like consumers the world really would be in trouble because oil would cost $1,000 per barrel if you could get it and of course Indian and Chinese people are not stupid either... as their market grows they will start their own companies that will eventually rival and then exceed US companies and the result is that the US will be swallowed up.
America’s founding fathers had lofty goals and ideals which have never been lived up too – they were hi-jacked by the International Jew.
I disagree that the Juice are that influential, but the US government has certainly managed a lot.
Have you read the declaration of rights?
The thing is that it was never intended to give the American people their rights, it was supposed to just remind them what they are. The point is that these rights are rights everyone is supposed to have... not just american people but all people... including criminals... including the victims of extraordinary rendition... including the prisoners at Guantanimo.
Its hysterically funny how the Jews get faulted for everyone else everytime!
I agree. If they really had that much influence and power around the world you'd think they would be a lot better off.
At least when it was the Soviet Union, there was free medical, housing was affordable, schooling was free - the very essentials of life were provided! Not so now! Now under the "free market" nonsense, Babuska starve while picking through rubbish cans at night. Drunks are left out on the street to freeze in winter, apartment costs are out of reach of the typical Russian! Do you really need more examples?
There was law and order... certainly, but the Soviet period was a long period and things were very different at different periods.
Don't get me wrong... personally I think communism has faults and advantages just like democracy does. I think history has shown that under a good leader that knows what they are doing things get better and under and idiot who is owned by big business or doesn't know what they are doing things can get really bad.
I would expect under Putin or Medvedev in a communist system things would be good.
The huge irony is that communism is all about a managed economy yet it was the west that developed some of the best management models.
On a ship there is no democracy though a good captain will listen to his crew the final decision is his and there can be no debate or dissension or the whole structure will fail.
You and others are made to feel guilty for the Jews supposed suffering – a suffering orchestrated by their own kind; the Zionists! The problem is, most of the supposed suffering never happened but the control of the media and the expertise of the propaganda has been such, that 60, 70 years later, we still believe the lies that were told.
The suffering of the Jews during WWII is well known and the Jewish lobby in the west is so strong that the suffering of other groups at the time is largely marginalised. 6 million juice were killed as part of an extermination campaign by the Nazis. The mentally handicapped, the physically handicapped, the Gypsies, the homosexuals, and the communists were also exterminated but figures are not kept and broadcast so they are forgotten. The Germans managed to kill an enormous number of Soviet slavic citizens and this is even more pronounced when you compare with German citizens killed because there was no strategic bombing campaign in the Soviet Union... there was no collateral damage so to speak. The slavs were killed because the Nazis wanted a living space in the east but they only needed a few slaves to work that land so anyone already there was superfluous to their needs so if they "died" that wouldn't be investigated.
Then the west has the gall to turn up its nose at the actions of the Soviet troops in Berlin after the Germans were defeated.
If the Germans wanted better treatment they should have surrendered and not killed hundreds of thousands of Soviet soldiers in the fight for Berlin alone. Their treatment after the war was 1,000 times better and more civilised than the treatment they inflicted on the Soviet villages they occupied.