You also contradict yourself by claiming that the aster does not need further proof than tests.
No I don't. Aster tests were realistic against a mach 3 sea skimming missile. Russian test their missiles against big old soviet missiles that flies at 100m.
Deos Russia need to fire a Sarmat at paris to prove that it works?
Yes it does. They never tested sending it in western europe and they never tested new made nuclear warheads so who knows if they will work.
Why us russia testing all of its weapons in Syria then ?
Thier ships in the 80's and 90's could not reliably shoot down P-15 Termits and not even wikipedia attempts to hide this, what chance do you think they have against even the P-500 Bazalt?
3rd time : when did they tried to shoot down a P-15 ??
My first statement was P-500 is outdated against modern air defence.
Well I guess I will have to take your word for it.
Yeah I never said it works as advertized. I said it was the best system and even said, like the redut, it should have almost 100% Pk against old soviet mach 2 missiles. You proved nothing there.
The exocet and harpoon are from the 70's and they were not even good for that time
They send tens of soviet made ships to the bottom. New exocet and harpoons are not the same as the first ones.
The S-125 could hit supersonic low flying targets back in the 1960's and don't try and tell me that the missile system that got the first kill on a stealth plane could not hit low RCS targets.
Western missiles fly at less than 5m. Low flying targets used by Russia fly at 100m and have the rcs of a su-27.
I think you will find it very easy to "hit targets" if the "targets" are decided upon after the attack. With of over a hundred missiles fired and only a few buildings destroyed thoes building were then designated as the targets, a 100% success.... for the propaganda department.
They intercept missiles but that stop the enemy to destroy their country.
See the pictures of Syrian targets. Everytime they destroy stuff.
They even shot down a friendly Il-20 with that wonderfull AD systems.
Northvietnamese AD downed lot of planes but that didn't stop US to destroy their country.
Such as? Old obsolete ICBM's that cannot manover and subsonic cruise missiles with stealth casings and new branding?
Old ICBM that can still do the job.
Cruise missiles and stealth tech that are so bad that Russia doesn't put money on it... wait... su-57 and kh-59mk2 are exactly that... keep trying.
It is not "When did I lied ?" it is 'When did I lie?', lied is past tense, you do not use past tense after the word 'did'.
Queens English please.
I stop here. You are just like leftist on facebook or twitter that can't find any arguments or admit they are wrong so they use stupid thing like grammar (which in this case isn't even if my native language) to change the subject.
You provide no facts, your only proofs are you pro-russian feelings "Russia strong ... French/western retarted... blah blah blah"
Btw while you are at it, know that its France who created England.
Get lost russian troll.