Project 20380(5): Steregushchy Corvette #2

Arrow wrote:Ship 20385 burns at the St.Petersburg Shipyard  

https://radikal.ru/video/q38Ix7CXMF0

Arrow wrote:Ship 20385 burns at the St.Petersburg Shipyard  

https://radikal.ru/video/q38Ix7CXMF0

Isos wrote:Radar mast was on it. The ship was ready and all the stuff inside was there. Everything seems to have burnt and the structure is totally affected by such fire so you can't use the hull anymore.

The ship is dead unless the fire was less spectacular than what it seem on those poor quality images.

What time was it when it happened ? I have the feeling it is a sabotage after everyone left work and the shipyard was empty.

PapaDragon wrote:
Yeah, this thing is gone

Damn shame, it couldn't be one of the vanilla 20380, had to be the fancy version

Getting Amur shipyard back in shape has proven to be smart decision on multiple levels



How likely it is that this was a case of cigar break going wrong like on Bonnie Dick?

Anti smoking campaign in Russia should really be intensified either way



Upside is that this one is much cheaper than Bonnie Dick, downside is that warship construction in Russia takes longer than construction of pyramids


Hopefully they will be able to salvage the engines, that's the hardest part to come by for them

The_Observer wrote:

PapaDragon wrote:
Yeah, this thing is gone

Damn shame, it couldn't be one of the vanilla 20380, had to be the fancy version

Getting Amur shipyard back in shape has proven to be smart decision on multiple levels



How likely it is that this was a case of cigar break going wrong like on Bonnie Dick?

Anti smoking campaign in Russia should really be intensified either way



Upside is that this one is much cheaper than Bonnie Dick, downside is that warship construction in Russia takes longer than construction of pyramids


Hopefully they will be able to salvage the engines, that's the hardest part to come by for them

I also wouldn't discount the possibility of arson/sabotage driven by various motivations. It's especially peculiar since reports suggest that no active work was going on the ship at the time of the fire.

The_Observer wrote:
I also wouldn't discount the possibility of arson/sabotage driven by various motivations. It's especially peculiar since reports suggest that no active work was going on the ship at the time of the fire.

medo wrote:Ship will be delayed for a year for sure to replace burned and damaged parts.

franco wrote:Last evening EMERCON was worried about multiple tanks of various chemicals on site exploding... perhaps they were the major fuel of the fire.