Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6

    thegopnik
    thegopnik

    Posts : 94
    Points : 100
    Join date : 2017-09-20

    Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6 - Page 4 Empty Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6

    Post  thegopnik on Sun Mar 01, 2020 4:32 am

    Everyone get the joke?  lol! I do not know what the hell Lockheed was thinking about when destroying their own reputation of what they preach.

    Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6 - Page 4 5th_ge10
    avatar
    Austin

    Posts : 7587
    Points : 7984
    Join date : 2010-05-08
    Location : India

    Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6 - Page 4 Empty Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6

    Post  Austin on Thu Mar 05, 2020 7:34 am

    Russian Embassy in Delhi has just put out this interesting docu comparing Russian mil hardware with US- EU-Chinese competitors.

    Hardware includes the #Su-57, #Okhotnik, #T-90M, #S-400, #IL-76. Ironically, many- HQ-9

    https://twitter.com/SandeepUnnithan/status/1229350428258648071

    Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6 - Page 4 EQ-HrxiUwAAkMKv?format=jpg
    avatar
    Austin

    Posts : 7587
    Points : 7984
    Join date : 2010-05-08
    Location : India

    Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6 - Page 4 Empty Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6

    Post  Austin on Sat Mar 07, 2020 8:12 am

    This info is official Russian embassy put up it confirms the next gen engine is known as AL-51 series and will be 18 T in Thrust class
    thegopnik
    thegopnik

    Posts : 94
    Points : 100
    Join date : 2017-09-20

    Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6 - Page 4 Empty Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6

    Post  thegopnik on Sat Mar 07, 2020 4:10 pm

    I am assuming that this can be the export version they are giving instead of the domestic one. I am glad you provided the info but I have a little criticism that might ruin the reputation of that information provided and that is the flying range with the over 9% claim. F-22 12,000kg with 2 added fuel tanks gives a range of 3,000kms while the su-57 shows 10,700kg with its own internal fuel with a 3,500km range........This is not taking into account the flying range of the newer engine which sources have said will offer a longer range with better fuel efficiency.

    Divide 3,500 by 3000 we get 1.16 or the su-57 being 16% higher than the F-22. This is not even taking into account that the Su-57 has 1,300kg lower fuel than the F-22 or what the new engine will bring which would set the performance parameters of the Su-57 being over 20% more of flight range instead of over 9%.
    Viktor
    Viktor

    Posts : 5766
    Points : 6401
    Join date : 2009-08-25
    Age : 39
    Location : Croatia

    Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6 - Page 4 Empty Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6

    Post  Viktor on Sat Mar 07, 2020 5:06 pm

    Austin wrote:This info is official Russian embassy put up it confirms the next gen engine is known as AL-51 series and will be 18 T in Thrust class

    Russian official from different agencies has rush forward with the same 18T number before so its not as this is something new beside another confirmation of whats already being

    said numerous times. That engine has passed designed and construction stage and now is at its end of the testing stage while production capacity is being assembled.

    thegopnik wrote:I am assuming that this can be the export version they are giving instead of the domestic one. I am glad you provided the info but I have a little criticism that might ruin the reputation of that information provided and that is the flying range with the over 9% claim. F-22 12,000kg with 2 added fuel tanks gives a range of 3,000kms while the su-57 shows 10,700kg with its own internal fuel with a 3,500km range........This is not taking into account the flying range of the newer engine which sources have said will offer a longer range with better fuel efficiency.

    Divide 3,500 by 3000 we get 1.16 or the su-57 being 16% higher than the F-22. This is not even taking into account that the Su-57 has 1,300kg lower fuel than the F-22 or what the new engine will bring which would set the performance parameters of the Su-57 being over 20% more of flight range instead of over 9%.

    Numbers promised with the Al-51 could be much higher than 16% and we will wait and we will see but as of now I think presented Russian data refers to Su-57/AL-41 combo.



    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 23631
    Points : 24171
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6 - Page 4 Empty Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6

    Post  GarryB on Sun Mar 08, 2020 5:27 am

    I suspect the numbers given will not be for Russian Su-57s, but for the export Su-57E model that customers can buy or invest in.
    JohninMK
    JohninMK

    Posts : 7079
    Points : 7152
    Join date : 2015-06-16
    Location : England

    Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6 - Page 4 Empty Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6

    Post  JohninMK on Sun Mar 08, 2020 10:13 pm

    Think you guys are going to like this one Smile

    ultimatewarrior
    ultimatewarrior

    Posts : 887
    Points : 895
    Join date : 2016-09-19
    Location : Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

    Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6 - Page 4 Empty Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6

    Post  ultimatewarrior on Wed Mar 11, 2020 3:43 pm

    Terrible timing of Su-57 first serial crash.
    Isos
    Isos

    Posts : 4955
    Points : 4947
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6 - Page 4 Empty Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6

    Post  Isos on Thu Mar 12, 2020 10:14 pm

    Related to 5th generation development but not to su57. I put it here however because it is interesting to know that germans once again did better than US. They developed this jet in 1975 and was cancelled due to US pressure. They wanted to be the only ones with a 5th jet with their f-117.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/MBB_Lampyridae

    Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6 - Page 4 Mbb-la10
    magnumcromagnon
    magnumcromagnon

    Posts : 5504
    Points : 5655
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6 - Page 4 Empty Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6

    Post  magnumcromagnon on Thu Mar 12, 2020 10:41 pm

    Isos wrote:Related to 5th generation development but not to su57. I put it here however because it is interesting to know that germans once again did better than US. They developed this jet in 1975 and was cancelled due to US pressure. They wanted to be the only ones with a 5th jet with their f-117.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/MBB_Lampyridae

    Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6 - Page 4 Mbb-la10

    I honestly it looks like it would of had poor flight performance, just like the F-117 Nighthawk. By cancelling they probably did themselves a favor.
    kvs
    kvs

    Posts : 5677
    Points : 5806
    Join date : 2014-09-11
    Location : Canuckistan

    Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6 - Page 4 Empty Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6

    Post  kvs on Fri Mar 13, 2020 12:57 am

    I agree. They went overboard in the 1970s to apply the angular surface stealth panacea. As a result the flight characteristics went to Hell.

    This should be a warning to all the stealth fanbois who think that the Su-57 is "inferior".

    Isos
    Isos

    Posts : 4955
    Points : 4947
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6 - Page 4 Empty Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6

    Post  Isos on Fri Mar 13, 2020 8:27 am

    It was made in 1975... no computer design, no super materials ...

    Soviet interceptors were terrible dogfighters too. That doesn't mean they were bad aircraft.

    Back then there was no multirole capability.

    Anyway it wasn't the goal of my post. I posted that here to show that US were not the only ones interested by stealth.
    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 23631
    Points : 24171
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6 - Page 4 Empty Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6

    Post  GarryB on Sat Mar 14, 2020 3:59 am

    Actually I would say definitely computer design... games from the 1980s used similar polygon shapes to depict aircraft... in fact that image actually reminds me of what F-16 fighters looked like in computer games of the period... I would suspect they would be using slightly more powerful vastly more expensive computers for the calculations... using brute force main frames to compensate for slower processors and efficient algorythms...

    And an interceptor is an interceptor and a dog fighter is something else... for instance a MiG-1 and MiG-3 were interceptors, while the Yak-3 and Yak-9 and La-5FN and La-7 were dog fighters.
    x_54_u43
    x_54_u43

    Posts : 211
    Points : 229
    Join date : 2015-09-19

    Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6 - Page 4 Empty Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6

    Post  x_54_u43 on Wed Mar 25, 2020 3:12 am

    Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6 - Page 4 Screen10

    Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6 - Page 4 Screen11

    WE HAVE LAUNCH

    FFS took them long enough to show the goods, I want more next year with the first non-crashed serial.
    avatar
    mnztr

    Posts : 223
    Points : 239
    Join date : 2018-01-21

    Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6 - Page 4 Empty Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6

    Post  mnztr on Wed Mar 25, 2020 4:26 am

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1242633551113265152


    SU-57 porn....hardcore. Man what a stunning machine!!! Shocked
    magnumcromagnon
    magnumcromagnon

    Posts : 5504
    Points : 5655
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6 - Page 4 Empty Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6

    Post  magnumcromagnon on Wed Mar 25, 2020 7:53 am




    Last edited by magnumcromagnon on Wed Mar 25, 2020 4:14 pm; edited 1 time in total
    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 23631
    Points : 24171
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6 - Page 4 Empty Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6

    Post  GarryB on Wed Mar 25, 2020 11:55 am

    That launch looks like the missile came from the wing mounted internal weapon bay...
    ahmedfire
    ahmedfire

    Posts : 957
    Points : 1131
    Join date : 2010-11-11
    Location : egypt

    Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6 - Page 4 Empty Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6

    Post  ahmedfire on Wed Mar 25, 2020 12:06 pm


    Why there is exhaust smoke at that moment although it's not existed at the whole video


    Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6 - Page 4 Screen48
    ahmedfire
    ahmedfire

    Posts : 957
    Points : 1131
    Join date : 2010-11-11
    Location : egypt

    Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6 - Page 4 Empty Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6

    Post  ahmedfire on Wed Mar 25, 2020 2:45 pm

    I guess if the engine reached near top shaft speed/power it can run , smoke will come out .

    To accelerate at the fastest possible rate, it will add fuel to make the turbine engine faster and when the burner there , the smoke will disappear because the augmentor cleans up the exhaust of the engine .

    Adding more fuel to the combustion chamber with a less efficient compressor (lower compression) then you will see the smoke .
    avatar
    Austin

    Posts : 7587
    Points : 7984
    Join date : 2010-05-08
    Location : India

    Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6 - Page 4 Empty Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6

    Post  Austin on Wed Mar 25, 2020 3:49 pm

    Good Details

    "Product 30". The first super-photo engine for the Su-57

    https://naukatehnika.com/izdelie-30-dvigatel-dlya-su-57-pervoe-kachestvennoe-foto.html
    kvs
    kvs

    Posts : 5677
    Points : 5806
    Join date : 2014-09-11
    Location : Canuckistan

    Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6 - Page 4 Empty Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6

    Post  kvs on Wed Mar 25, 2020 4:38 pm

    Isos wrote:It was made in 1975... no computer design, no super materials ...  

    Soviet interceptors were terrible dogfighters too. That doesn't mean they were bad aircraft.

    Back then there was no multirole capability.

    Anyway it wasn't the goal of my post. I posted that here to show that US were not the only ones interested by stealth.

    You are making rubbish up. There were serious computers in the 1960s and 1970s which could be used
    to design aircraft hulls. Specifically, ray tracing of EM scattering. According to you everything in industry
    was being designed using slide rules. So those IBMs and similar Soviet machines were some sort of art
    pieces aimed for display at museums.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_System/370

    Programming for science and engineering has zero to do with GUIs and 3D graphics cards.

    kvs
    kvs

    Posts : 5677
    Points : 5806
    Join date : 2014-09-11
    Location : Canuckistan

    Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6 - Page 4 Empty Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6

    Post  kvs on Wed Mar 25, 2020 4:39 pm

    ahmedfire wrote:I guess if the engine reached near top shaft speed/power it can run , smoke will come out .

    To accelerate at the fastest possible rate, it will add fuel to make the turbine engine faster and when the burner there , the smoke will disappear because the augmentor cleans up the exhaust of the engine .

    Adding more fuel to the combustion chamber with a less efficient compressor (lower compression) then you will see the smoke .

    No jet turbine operates at optimal efficiency during take offs and landings. In fact, they are designed for high altitude flying so even
    flying near the ground will result in poorer fuel combustion.

    Isos
    Isos

    Posts : 4955
    Points : 4947
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6 - Page 4 Empty Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6

    Post  Isos on Wed Mar 25, 2020 4:49 pm

    kvs wrote:
    Isos wrote:It was made in 1975... no computer design, no super materials ...  

    Soviet interceptors were terrible dogfighters too. That doesn't mean they were bad aircraft.

    Back then there was no multirole capability.

    Anyway it wasn't the goal of my post. I posted that here to show that US were not the only ones interested by stealth.

    You are making rubbish up.   There were serious computers in the 1960s and 1970s which could be used
    to design aircraft hulls.  Specifically, ray tracing of EM scattering.   According to you everything in industry
    was being designed using slide rules.   So those IBMs and similar Soviet machines were some sort of art
    pieces aimed for display at museums.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_System/370

    Programming for science and engineering has zero to do with GUIs and 3D graphics cards.


    There was no multirole jets back then. Any jet was specialized in one role. Interceptors were flying fast and firing big missiles. Air supremacy jets were manoeuvrable and had medium/short range missiles, bombers were only bomber ...

    This aircraft was design to be a stealth aircraft. So it was a good design with a better stealth than f117 which was a very hard target for soviet air defences.
    ahmedfire
    ahmedfire

    Posts : 957
    Points : 1131
    Join date : 2010-11-11
    Location : egypt

    Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6 - Page 4 Empty Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6

    Post  ahmedfire on Wed Mar 25, 2020 5:20 pm

    No jet turbine operates at optimal efficiency during take offs and landings. In fact, they are designed for high altitude flying so even
    flying near the ground will result in poorer fuel combustion.

    In the video , the pilot seems he was landing but went up again and the smoke disappeared .

    This means the pilot used a more power and the smoke will subside when the throttle is reduced or using the after burner .
    avatar
    Azi

    Posts : 367
    Points : 363
    Join date : 2016-04-05

    Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6 - Page 4 Empty Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6

    Post  Azi on Wed Mar 25, 2020 6:49 pm

    kvs wrote:
    Isos wrote:It was made in 1975... no computer design, no super materials ...  

    Soviet interceptors were terrible dogfighters too. That doesn't mean they were bad aircraft.

    Back then there was no multirole capability.

    Anyway it wasn't the goal of my post. I posted that here to show that US were not the only ones interested by stealth.

    You are making rubbish up.   There were serious computers in the 1960s and 1970s which could be used
    to design aircraft hulls.  Specifically, ray tracing of EM scattering.   According to you everything in industry
    was being designed using slide rules.   So those IBMs and similar Soviet machines were some sort of art
    pieces aimed for display at museums.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_System/370

    Programming for science and engineering has zero to do with GUIs and 3D graphics cards.

    Isos is right and you are right...both! Calculations for aerodynamic and EM scattering ("stealth") were done mostly manual. It was a mix of paperwork and calculations with computer. But the big great modelization of concepts were done with pen and paper. And today it's not different!!! Comptersimulations are ONLY used to prove a existing concept as good or bad, so you can reduce the risk of a practical failure. And of course computers helps saving manpower, time and the result of it...money! That's why we have so many funny but bad concepts in the past, for tanks, aircraft, spaceships, etc. The refinement of a concept is the work of engineers and their brains Wink The rate of failure is today less, that's true.

    A single human brain has more calculation power, than all computers and supercomputers combined. Computers are used to make the calculation of models easier and a lot faster. As far as I know only 1 technical concept was created with computer power...it's a twisted fusion ring for Tokamak reactors, that's the first concept that resulted only from calculation power.

    Isos is right in the meaning of "multirole". During cold war the aircrafts were highly specialized, but not due less computer power...it was because specialzed aircraft are simply better in their job! And old aircraft with up to date modern avionic are still very deadly. Multirole comes into play in times of cost reduction. And this was the only reason for the F-35...it was a political decision, not a solution prefered by US Military.

    Compters only save time! Everything that I can do in my laboratory at the compter in 5 minutes (analyzing data) I could do without a computer...but takes me 1 day instead of 5 minutes.

    Sponsored content

    Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6 - Page 4 Empty Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Sun Mar 29, 2020 7:30 am