+98

Cheetah

miketheterrible

A1RMAN

kopyo-21

pushkin

Viktor

OminousSpudd

eridan

Pincus Shain

ahmedfire

User 1592

HM1199

DerWolf

Singular_trafo

KiloGolf

auslander

william.boutros

Luq man

mack8

hoom

Rmf

Genjurooo

SeigSoloyvov

Redboy

tanino

Project Canada

triphosgene

KoTeMoRe

jaguar_br

Zivo

BKP

AK-Rex

Neutrality

Big_Gazza

artjomh

Sunbeam

Firebird

Vann7

Akula971

Isos

zg18

RTN

ult

Kimppis

x_54_u43

vultur

Hachimoto

TheArmenian

Berkut

JohninMK

marcellogo

Austin

Glyph

Mindstorm

VladimirSahin

GJ Flanker

mutantsushi

Pinto

havok

Mike E

kvs

par far

Cyrus the great

PapaDragon

chicken

max steel

Captain Nemo

Notio

franco

nemrod

magnumcromagnon

Cyberspec

Manov

2SPOOKY4U

Kyo

Morpheus Eberhardt

zepia

medo

Book.

GunshipDemocracy

Svyatoslavich

Flanky

wilhelm

Ranxerox71

collegeboy16

higurashihougi

George1

EKS

Stealthflanker

AlfaT8

Werewolf

victor1985

jhelb

flamming_python

GarryB

sepheronx

Alex555

type055

102 posters

Go to page :

1 ... 18 ... 32, 33, 34 ... 36 ... 40

PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

hoom

hoom: Posts : 2352
Points : 2340
Join date : 2016-05-06

Post n°801

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

hoom Thu May 26, 2016 7:27 am

Right you are Embarassed

Now that I look for it there are plenty of pics of 055 & 054 with the tailcone one.
055 has it on the lerx flaps too.
Couldn't find any identifiable as 051/052/053 with the tailcone sign.

mack8

mack8: Posts : 1039
Points : 1093
Join date : 2013-08-02

Post n°802

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

mack8 Thu May 26, 2016 5:01 pm

056 again: Cool

zg18

zg18: Posts : 888
Points : 958
Join date : 2013-09-26
Location : Zagreb , Croatia

Post n°803

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

zg18 Fri May 27, 2016 3:47 pm

Differences between 5th & 6th prototype

PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 33 HVTSee3

Berkut

Berkut: Posts : 190
Points : 215
Join date : 2015-05-05

Post n°804

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

Berkut Fri May 27, 2016 10:50 pm

Zivo wrote:

hoom wrote:
Radiation sign next to the side radars & on the tail-cone, is this the first with those mounted?

I don't want to dig around, but supposedly the other prototypes had the full radar suite, just not all the stickers.

Not full no. L-band was planned to be fitted to -8, but it hasnt been fitted prior to that.

You missed one quite large mod zg18. Wink

There is bunch of smaller ones too.

medo

medo: Posts : 4342
Points : 4422
Join date : 2010-10-24
Location : Slovenia

Post n°805

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

medo Fri May 27, 2016 11:04 pm

Is 056 prototype equipped with Himalaya ECM complex?

x_54_u43

x_54_u43: Posts : 336
Points : 348
Join date : 2015-09-19

Post n°806

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

x_54_u43 Sat May 28, 2016 1:54 am

Berkut wrote:

Zivo wrote:

hoom wrote:
Radiation sign next to the side radars & on the tail-cone, is this the first with those mounted?

I don't want to dig around, but supposedly the other prototypes had the full radar suite, just not all the stickers.

Not full no. L-band was planned to be fitted to -8, but it hasnt been fitted prior to that.

You missed one quite large mod zg18. There is bunch of smaller ones too.

The stinger?

Zivo

Zivo: Posts : 1487
Points : 1511
Join date : 2012-04-13
Location : U.S.A.

Post n°807

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

Zivo Sat May 28, 2016 6:01 am

RAM

Berkut

Berkut: Posts : 190
Points : 215
Join date : 2015-05-05

Post n°808

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

Berkut Sat May 28, 2016 2:22 pm

medo wrote:Is 056 prototype equipped with Himalaya ECM complex?

Don't know with 100% certainty - but probably. Not complete L-402 tho, T-50-8 is supposed to get L-band and a more complete L-402. T-50-9 *should* have complete package of all the avionics and equipment.

Yes, i was hinting to stinger, and yes the whole plane is covered in RAM.

Luq man

Luq man: Posts : 67
Points : 69
Join date : 2016-03-26
Location : The Netherlands

Post n°809

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

Luq man Sat May 28, 2016 5:53 pm

More pictures of 056:

PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 33 768458_a934f52822ea8cdff10be024fb8968c1

PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 33 768459_16c83e04600683bcebdd20e72bd30c39

marcellogo

marcellogo: Posts : 638
Points : 644
Join date : 2012-08-02
Age : 55
Location : Italy

Post n°810

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

marcellogo Sat May 28, 2016 6:28 pm

Berkut wrote:

medo wrote:Is 056 prototype equipped with Himalaya ECM complex?

Don't know with 100% certainty - but probably. Not complete L-402 tho, T-50-8 is supposed to get L-band and a more complete L-402. T-50-9 *should* have complete package of all the avionics and equipment.

Yes, i was hinting to stinger, and yes the whole plane is covered in RAM.

May it is better to say the whole plane except the new engine cover?

Zivo

Zivo: Posts : 1487
Points : 1511
Join date : 2012-04-13
Location : U.S.A.

Post n°811

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

Zivo Sat May 28, 2016 6:37 pm

I was kind of hoping for a new paint scheme.

It's not like the T-50's even match, they might as well be liberal with the prototype's colors.

May it is better to say the whole plane except the new engine cover?

It doesn't make a lot of sense to apply RAM to a part that has to be opened/removed on the prototypes for tests.

Guest

Guest: Guest

Post n°812

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

Guest Sat May 28, 2016 8:14 pm

Wasnt actual RAM paint supposed to be dark gray on PAK-FA.

x_54_u43

x_54_u43: Posts : 336
Points : 348
Join date : 2015-09-19

Post n°813

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

x_54_u43 Sat May 28, 2016 8:35 pm

Militarov wrote:Wasnt actual RAM paint supposed to be dark gray on PAK-FA.

RAM has been painted over.

Also, I think RAM is missing in some places, it's definitly not on the engine cowlings and some other places.

Now we wait for the Phase 2 prototypes, didn't some official say it would look similar but have some huge changes?

kvs

kvs: Posts : 15135
Points : 15272
Join date : 2014-09-11
Location : Turdope's Kanada

Post n°814

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

kvs Sun May 29, 2016 3:03 am

There was all this bitching in various fora about how the T-50 engines are cylindrical and not angular prisms. This was
supposedly some super major flaw in the design. But it would have been trivial to put angular panels in the same location
where the 056 has white tube sections compared to the 055. The detail that all the F-22 fanboys missed was that
any scatter from the bottom of the aircraft is dominated by the wings and other parts of the body and not the engine
sections. From the side the T-50 has a smaller cross section than the F-22 and the contribution of the cylindrical
engine enclosure is irrelevant. Scatter from the front and back of the T-50 from signals hitting the bottom at some shallow
angle are basically equivalent for cylindrical and angled panels; there is negligible backscatter.

Berkut

Berkut: Posts : 190
Points : 215
Join date : 2015-05-05

Post n°815

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

Berkut Sun May 29, 2016 1:34 pm

Militarov wrote:Wasnt actual RAM paint supposed to be dark gray on PAK-FA.

Paint =/= RAM. They first coat RAM then paint it all. So RAM might as well be pink underneath the paint. RAM is medium gray in color.

x_54_u43 wrote:

Also, I think RAM is missing in some places, it's definitly not on the engine cowlings and some other places.

Now we wait for the Phase 2 prototypes, didn't some official say it would look similar but have some huge changes?

Well, they had issue with fire suppression system on T-50-6-2 so they had to remove cowlings multiple times i bet and just in preparation to flights in general, that is why we see the rivets, otherwise they would be covered by paint/RAM. I dont have any way to prove this; but i bet the cowlings are RAM treated.

And 6-2 IS Phase 2. The designation is kinda of a give away. Wink

Guest

Guest: Guest

Post n°816

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

Guest Sun May 29, 2016 2:06 pm

Berkut wrote:

Militarov wrote:Wasnt actual RAM paint supposed to be dark gray on PAK-FA.

Paint =/= RAM. They first coat RAM then paint it all. So RAM might as well be pink underneath the paint. RAM is medium gray in color.

I am aware, however i somehow expected them to keep RAM layer visible on later prototypes to make it easier for maintenance. Or actual surface "colored" paint has part in preserving RAM paint underneath?

triphosgene

triphosgene: Posts : 7
Points : 8
Join date : 2015-03-14

Post n°817

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

triphosgene Sun May 29, 2016 3:14 pm

Militarov wrote:

I am aware, however i somehow expected them to keep RAM layer visible on later prototypes to make it easier for maintenance. Or actual surface "colored" paint has part in preserving RAM paint underneath?

The pigmented top-coat certainly offers a certain protection to the RAM. Both materials should be designed to work as a sstem, though.

x_54_u43

x_54_u43: Posts : 336
Points : 348
Join date : 2015-09-19

Post n°818

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

x_54_u43 Sun May 29, 2016 7:05 pm

Berkut wrote:
And 6-2 IS Phase 2. The designation is kinda of a give away.

Wait what?

So the designation goes T-50-6-2?

Berkut

Berkut: Posts : 190
Points : 215
Join date : 2015-05-05

Post n°819

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

Berkut Sun May 29, 2016 7:48 pm

Yes.

marcellogo

marcellogo: Posts : 638
Points : 644
Join date : 2012-08-02
Age : 55
Location : Italy

Post n°820

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

marcellogo Mon May 30, 2016 9:18 am

Berkut wrote:Yes.

So , now all new prototypes would be phase 2?
And ezactly what are the differences? Initially it was thought that phase 2 would be the one with objekt 30 engines but this is not the case anymore.
So it would encompass structural changes, new materials and/or what other?
And the new engines would be installed on what prototype?

william.boutros

william.boutros: Posts : 157
Points : 159
Join date : 2015-08-13

Post n°821

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

william.boutros Mon May 30, 2016 5:57 pm

No that this 2. That would the future phase 2. I sispect they would do more than just engines.

Berkut

Berkut: Posts : 190
Points : 215
Join date : 2015-05-05

Post n°822

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

Berkut Mon May 30, 2016 8:34 pm

marcellogo wrote:

Berkut wrote:Yes.

So , now all new prototypes would be phase 2?
And ezactly what are the differences? Initially it was thought that phase 2 would be the one with objekt 30 engines but this is not the case anymore.
So it would encompass structural changes, new materials and/or what other?
And the new engines would be installed on what prototype?

Yes. T-50-6, stopped in production and then reborn as T-50-5R was the last "Phase 1" frame. The difference between them is what you see externally + RAM + heavy reworked airframe (T-50's had major structural issues) + more composites. Now on the last one there are many questions for 6-2 in particular, but it is planned that eventually almost whole surface will be covered in composites on Phase 2.

IIRC it was planned that T-50-9 was supposed to get new engines (doesnt mean Izd.30 necessarily) and currently the plan is to fit Izd.30 to a T-50 in late 2017-early 2018, what frame exactly unknown.

zg18

zg18: Posts : 888
Points : 958
Join date : 2013-09-26
Location : Zagreb , Croatia

Post n°823

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

zg18 Sun Jun 05, 2016 12:46 pm

T-50 in Crimea russia

PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 33 CkLNHl3W0AAmMqo

PAK-FA, T-50: News #3 - Page 33 CkLNHGfWUAA2Tu7

auslander

auslander: Posts : 1637
Points : 1715
Join date : 2015-04-25

Post n°824

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

auslander Sun Jun 05, 2016 2:25 pm

That's Feodosya in the southeast coast. Today is the final part of the exercises, for the last over two hours they've been running amok over our harbor and right over our house, literally so close to the house the windows shook, we could smell the fuel and all of our rather large dogs were together in a pile in their palace, said pile roughly 3 cubic centimeters they were huddled so close. They don't like very loud noises.

GarryB

GarryB: Posts : 39017
Points : 39513
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand

Post n°825

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

GarryB Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:29 pm

If you blinked and missed it and off topic discussion regarding an awful article posted by Militarov is now here:

(from page 12 post 276)

https://www.russiadefence.net/t3764p275-talking-bollocks-thread

Any further comments can go there regarding those issues.

this thread is for the PAK FA only.

Russia Defence Forum

PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

Re: PAK-FA, T-50: News #3

Similar topics

Similar topics