What do you think should happen to the Ukrainian language after the SMO is successfully concluded?
Should it be suppressed or allowed to exist? Or perhaps even supported (since supporting minority languages is a huge trend worldwide)?
Any thoughts?
xeno, Big_Gazza, kvs, lyle6 and ucmvulcan like this post
GarryB, xeno, Big_Gazza, kvs, Rodion_Romanovic and lyle6 like this post
ucmvulcan likes this post
Firebird and lyle6 like this post
kvs wrote:I think that Ukrainian is more real than Ebonics. It emerged over the span of a few centuries and I would not attribute it to political engineering
in the last 150 years. The Rus living to the west of Kiev got colonized and assimilated by Poland and this process extended into the Austro-Hungarian
Empire. Around the turn of the last century was when you had the emergence of Ebonics and Afrocentric style Ukr academia that laid down the
fake history of Ukria. These scumbag academics have been going strong for the last 100 years primarily in the west. The really managed to shape
Ukr identity and effectively in the post 1990 period.
Academics have been key in foisting critical race theory and other degeneracy in the west as we can see with the woke spasm of the last 10 years.
It took them from the end of the WWII, but they succeeded. They are now pushing pedophilia acceptance and the abyss is bottomless with these
vermin.
GarryB likes this post
Walther von Oldenburg and ucmvulcan like this post
Big_Gazza and kvs like this post
LMFS and lancelot like this post
Odin of Ossetia dislikes this post
GarryB and Rodion_Romanovic like this post
xeno and kvs like this post
Odin of Ossetia dislikes this post
GarryB likes this post
Firebird and kvs like this post
I can't see why Russia can't follow their example.
More diversity is generally a good thing. If people (at least in Western Ukraine) want to speak Ukrainian, let them.
|
|