Russia Defence Forum

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    Tu-160 "White Swan"

    avatar
    mnztr

    Posts : 1091
    Points : 1125
    Join date : 2018-01-21

    Tu-160 "White Swan" - Page 39 Empty Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"

    Post  mnztr Fri Mar 19, 2021 11:03 pm

    In this case I don't see any need to restart production. They have HUNDREDS sitting in the boneyard. I am sure if India wanted one they could refurb as many as they want to M3M  export standard. I am sure the Brahmos would fit quite nicely as well. India should buy a bunch as they have nothing that remotely resembles a strategic bomber while China is about to roll out a flying wing bomber. In response to Joe Bidens nasty comments Putin should sell a bunch to Iran in return for oil. It would competely bypass sanction as there would be no $$. Iran's KH-55 copy would fit quite nicely as well. Putin can coyly argue with the TU-22 Iran will not need as many ballastic missiles so he is only trying to help Russia's partners come to an agreement. angel angel

    As for spares, I think with 800+ sets for a fleet of 120 engines you are in good shape, unless this engine is a really parts eater. (possible for sure). If that is the case, then they should explore NK-32-02 swap.

    TMA1 likes this post

    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 28962
    Points : 29492
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Tu-160 "White Swan" - Page 39 Empty Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"

    Post  GarryB Sat Mar 20, 2021 5:36 am

    Besides I like the blue afterburners, they are super cool.

    The ABs are beautiful...

    By the way after they modernize some the Tu22m3 they could even think about restarting production, if an interested foreign customer (as an example India or Iran) would pay for it. In that case also Russia could be interested in acquiring more of them.

    The advantage of the Backfire is its ability to carry bombs... an ability they have not given to the Blackjack apparently...

    The thing is that the PAK DA will also be a bomber and cruise missile carrier so the PAK DA will replace the Backfire most likely so there would be no need to put the Backfire back into production.

    I am sure if India wanted one they could refurb as many as they want to M3M export standard.

    Neither India nor China seem interested so I would just look at potential uses for Russia... I have mentioned low speed long range interceptor, but there is potential for jammer or other purposes...

    I am sure the Brahmos would fit quite nicely as well. India should buy a bunch as they have nothing that remotely resembles a strategic bomber while China is about to roll out a flying wing bomber.

    Could probably carry 8-12 externally on four weapon hard points (2-3 per pylon perhaps?)... the internal weapon bay could be filled with a fuel bladder to extend range performance...

    As for spares, I think with 800+ sets for a fleet of 120 engines you are in good shape, unless this engine is a really parts eater. (possible for sure). If that is the case, then they should explore NK-32-02 swap.

    The engines are essentially the same, but not designed to be compatible. Redesigning the aircraft to take the different engines makes sense simply because the new engines are being upgraded and improved with better thrust and better components and better design and better fuel efficiency... being able to use that in new bombers and retro fitting it to existing Blackjacks and Backfires means getting better value for money and improving the whole bomber force without having to duplicate the improvement effort across two different engines.

    Considering they generate 25 tons of thrust in full AB why not fit the old Backfire engines to the An-124... imagine a blue AB takeoff with that baby... Twisted Evil
    avatar
    mnztr

    Posts : 1091
    Points : 1125
    Join date : 2018-01-21

    Tu-160 "White Swan" - Page 39 Empty Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"

    Post  mnztr Sat Mar 20, 2021 6:00 am

    When you think about it, using an afterburner on a large civilian jet is not such a bad idea. Especially with twin engine planes. They have to be able to climb out on a single engine so they are very over powered for this reason. If they used afterburners they could fit much smaller engines on the planes and use them only on takeoff, making them much more efficient in cruise. But of course they would be crazy loud. Imagine what a busy airport would sound like with massive afterburning engines on takeoff.

    GarryB likes this post

    lyle6
    lyle6

    Posts : 530
    Points : 532
    Join date : 2020-09-14
    Location : Philippines

    Tu-160 "White Swan" - Page 39 Empty Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"

    Post  lyle6 Sat Mar 20, 2021 10:05 am

    Now that there's an environmentalist position if I heard one. Seems vaguely beneficial to the environment, if only on first glance, but sure to fuck the common people - put it on Greta's list of hostage demands for next time.
    Dorfmeister
    Dorfmeister

    Posts : 30
    Points : 30
    Join date : 2013-11-10
    Age : 39
    Location : Belgium

    Tu-160 "White Swan" - Page 39 Empty Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"

    Post  Dorfmeister Sat Mar 20, 2021 11:32 am

    mnztr wrote:I have read the dimensions of both engines are very close so its should not be a huge job to fit them, but if they have a huge stock of them from stored TU-22's then it not point to change the engines..

    Dimensions of both engines are indeed close BUT the way of attaching the engines to the airframe is not the same: so exchanging one for the other means redesigning parts of the fuselage. Would have been interesting 20 years ago, not anymore Wink
    avatar
    mnztr

    Posts : 1091
    Points : 1125
    Join date : 2018-01-21

    Tu-160 "White Swan" - Page 39 Empty Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"

    Post  mnztr Sat Mar 20, 2021 4:38 pm

    Its possible they could also create an adaptor to mount it, or build a variant of the NK32-02 that can mount on the TU-22. But without knowing the scope of the problem its hard to know. If they do have lots of spares and can still manufacture hot section parts, then I agree, not worth the trouble.
    Hole
    Hole

    Posts : 4084
    Points : 4080
    Join date : 2018-03-24
    Age : 44
    Location : Merkelland

    Tu-160 "White Swan" - Page 39 Empty Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"

    Post  Hole Mon Mar 29, 2021 8:22 pm

    Tu-160 "White Swan" - Page 39 002713
    Tu-160 "White Swan" - Page 39 002813
    Tu-160 "White Swan" - Page 39 002915

    dino00, magnumcromagnon, Big_Gazza, kvs, LMFS and Finty like this post

    magnumcromagnon
    magnumcromagnon

    Posts : 7326
    Points : 7475
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    Tu-160 "White Swan" - Page 39 Empty Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"

    Post  magnumcromagnon Mon Mar 29, 2021 9:01 pm

    Hole wrote:Tu-160 "White Swan" - Page 39 002713
    And they call the AC-130 the Angel of Death? Rolling Eyes

    Big_Gazza, DerWolf, mnztr, Hole and Finty like this post

    avatar
    mnztr

    Posts : 1091
    Points : 1125
    Join date : 2018-01-21

    Tu-160 "White Swan" - Page 39 Empty Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"

    Post  mnztr Mon Mar 29, 2021 11:11 pm

    magnumcromagnon wrote:
    And they call the AC-130 the Angel of Death? Rolling Eyes

    The AC130 is an angel of death, just the ugly angel. The TU-160 is one of the pretty ones.
    d_taddei2
    d_taddei2

    Posts : 1808
    Points : 1986
    Join date : 2013-05-11
    Location : Scotland UK

    Tu-160 "White Swan" - Page 39 Empty Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"

    Post  d_taddei2 Sun Apr 04, 2021 3:36 am

    GarryB wrote:

    Neither India nor China seem interested so I would just look at potential uses for Russia... I have mentioned low speed long range interceptor, but there is potential for jammer or other purposes...

    I think they could do a proper EW version, or just a cheap upgrade like Gefest program using the SVP-24, u could also add kaira system. It wouldn't cost much you could use the older versions for this simple upgrade, having 24,000kg of dumb bombs being dropped fairly accurately on enemy targets would be devastating and cheap, in fact very cheap. And as we both have talked in the past this concept could be used on a iL-76, An-12 , or even an-24/26

    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 28962
    Points : 29492
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Tu-160 "White Swan" - Page 39 Empty Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"

    Post  GarryB Sun Apr 04, 2021 7:47 am

    Actually rather than Kaira, I would go for several external small pylons located under the nose and belly and rear engine area clear of undercarriage and the main four weapons hard points and bomb bay where you could mount external weapons pods pointing forward and backwards that could use auto targeting to lock multiple targets at once and lase them for freefall laser guided bombs and missiles of other platforms... of course as well as various precision delivered dumb bombs and bomblets.

    Some of the underbelly pods developed for the Su-34 could be carried on the four main wing pylons for various EW and recon roles over COIN battlefields... with a bomb bay full of bombs.

    d_taddei2 likes this post

    magnumcromagnon
    magnumcromagnon

    Posts : 7326
    Points : 7475
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    Tu-160 "White Swan" - Page 39 Empty Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"

    Post  magnumcromagnon Sat Apr 10, 2021 3:30 am

    GarryB, kvs, PapaDragon and LMFS like this post

    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 28962
    Points : 29492
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Tu-160 "White Swan" - Page 39 Empty Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"

    Post  GarryB Sat Apr 10, 2021 12:07 pm

    That was very interesting... didn't realise how much of a gap in the wing when the wings are straight... shame they didn't use the AB and go for some high speed with a short climb and swept wings...
    avatar
    mnztr

    Posts : 1091
    Points : 1125
    Join date : 2018-01-21

    Tu-160 "White Swan" - Page 39 Empty Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"

    Post  mnztr Sun Apr 11, 2021 11:20 pm

    TU-160M3 video. Only interesting thing is at 4:40 where they show what I *assume* is a simulator with the new cockpit.


    https://rtd.rt.com/shows/the-kalashnikova-show-military-secrets-anna-knishenko/legendary-tupolev-tu-160-strategic-bomber/Tu-160 "White Swan" - Page 39 Captur10

    LMFS likes this post

    avatar
    mnztr

    Posts : 1091
    Points : 1125
    Join date : 2018-01-21

    Tu-160 "White Swan" - Page 39 Empty Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"

    Post  mnztr Mon Apr 12, 2021 8:30 am

    lyle6 wrote:Now that there's an environmentalist position if I heard one. Seems vaguely beneficial to the environment, if only on first glance, but sure to fuck the common people - put it on Greta's list of hostage demands for next time.

    True, but when I think of it they would only need to use the burners when they need emergency power. Typically takeoffs would be non afterburning.
    avatar
    Daniel_Admassu

    Posts : 81
    Points : 83
    Join date : 2020-11-18
    Age : 40
    Location : Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

    Tu-160 "White Swan" - Page 39 Empty Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"

    Post  Daniel_Admassu Mon Apr 12, 2021 10:07 am

    mnztr wrote:TU-160M3 video. Only interesting thing is at 4:40 where they show what I *assume* is a simulator with the new cockpit.


    Nope. The guy is just sitting in a cockpit/simulator of another plane (possibly a Tu-114) for the interview. The Tu-160 does not have yoke levers. It has gyrosticks like smaller fighters.
    Backman
    Backman

    Posts : 671
    Points : 679
    Join date : 2020-11-11

    Tu-160 "White Swan" - Page 39 Empty Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"

    Post  Backman Tue Apr 27, 2021 6:11 am

    The B1 Lancer gives the same power when in afterburner mode as the tu 160 does dry. - Megaprojects guy on Youtube. (not a big fan but YT always recommends his stuff)

    Cool eh.
    magnumcromagnon
    magnumcromagnon

    Posts : 7326
    Points : 7475
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    Tu-160 "White Swan" - Page 39 Empty Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"

    Post  magnumcromagnon Wed Apr 28, 2021 2:34 am

    Tu-160 "White Swan" - Page 39 EzVMorhVkAI7FUb?format=jpg&name=medium

    Big_Gazza, Maximmmm, LMFS, Hole and The_Observer like this post


    Sponsored content

    Tu-160 "White Swan" - Page 39 Empty Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Mon May 10, 2021 1:35 am