LMFS wrote:
Dont try to make up a discussion. I just stated the facts, until that date at least there were no firm requirements. My point is that they are at the earliest stage of development, at best. Not even a name for the project, no carrier decision, no number of units. What you call a clear and firm program basis.
I dotn cal anything stop making up stories. "damaged runway".
PAK far took 7 years form start till first flight. We are no after ~ 1,5 years from start, measuring for SLyusars interview.
OK but you know better. Again. Better then Russian MoD. Kudoa!
LMAO wrote:Lying again. 7-10 years to series, not to first flight. PAK-FA, taking lessons from MFI, in the works since 2002 at least and still not in service. Look the rest of fighter programs, longer even. That is the reality. Bet something on having the STOVL in series in 2025/2028 if you have the gutsyour opinion based on simple extrapolation of MiG-35 experiences is just false.
"The timeframe is defined by the technological cycle of the [plane’s] creation. Normally, this takes 7-10 years, if this goes into serial production," the vice-premier added.
"Сроки определяются технологическим циклом создания, как правило, это 7-10 лет, если выходить в серию", - отметил вице- премьер.
Genius he actually could also say " when it goes to series (= production ready).
Dont be moron, VSTOL in series? 2028 is fairly possible. After 11 years with engines and radars and factories ready? So again how mahy fighters did you design and build so far?
LMFS wrote:Check the damn simulation, come up with improvements if you can and stop making up crap. That's pretty much it.Simply MiG-29k requires 195m to take off on Kuz in short. I presume with any useful payload not empty on Vikiramedia with 125m.
video game about F-18 is you only proof? wow genius must you be
LMFS wrote:I said I saw in front of my eyes a Harrier destroying the runway. Said nothing about Yak, you made it up.wait, so you never said about damaged runway surface by V landing? shall I search in this thread?
wow and only you nobody else? never filmed too? so how large those slabs were?
LMFS wrote:Your mouth turned to arse in less than a day, brilliant performance!No MiG has been made since 2015. So 4 years.Simply it is dead.
"This relates to replacing special aviation aircraft with new models and arming the Navy with shipborne fighter jets (MiG-29K/KUB), attack, transport and landing helicopters (Ka-52K) and drones," Kozhin said.
perhaps you mouth and ass get bigger after reach visit to the "Blue Oyster" nevertheless Kozhin said:
Речь также идёт о замене воздушных судов специальной авиации на новые образцы, включение в боевой состав подразделений корабельной истребительной авиации (МиГ-29К/КУБ) штурмовых и транспортно-десантных вертолётов корабельного базирования (Ка-52К), корабельных беспилотных летательных аппаратов.
bolded:
We are also talking about the replacement of special aircraft with new types of models/samples, [b]the inclusion in the combat composition of ship fighter aviation units (MiG-29K / KUB), assault and transport-assault ship-based helicopters (Ka-52K), ship-borne unmanned aerial vehicles [/quote]
from when genius Ka-52k and drones are new MiGs?! yo yo so no MiG-29k is pretty much dead. Yo yo yo
check with natives , feel free
Last edited by GunshipDemocracy on Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:50 am; edited 1 time in total