Listen carefully....

The lack of respect on this forum for its members has gotten out of control. I don't want F bombs, calling people trolls for voicing an opinion whether it is pro-West or not. You can say what you want but attacks against the forum or its members and especially the staff will not be tolerated. If this board ends up just being Pro-Russian it is dead, alternative views will be tolerated and the people treated with respect just as you want to be.

Vladimir79 wrote:The lack of respect on this forum for its members has gotten out of control.  I don't want F bombs, calling people trolls for voicing an opinion whether it is pro-West or not.  You can say what you want but attacks against the forum or its members and especially the staff will not be tolerated.  If this board ends up just being Pro-Russian it is dead, alternative views will be tolerated and the people treated with respect just as you want to be.  

+1000

Vladimir79 wrote:The lack of respect on this forum for its members has gotten out of control.  I don't want F bombs, calling people trolls for voicing an opinion whether it is pro-West or not.  You can say what you want but attacks against the forum or its members and especially the staff will not be tolerated.  If this board ends up just being Pro-Russian it is dead, alternative views will be tolerated and the people treated with respect just as you want to be.  

Amen

Vladimir79 wrote:The lack of respect on this forum for its members has gotten out of control.  I don't want F bombs, calling people trolls for voicing an opinion whether it is pro-West or not.  You can say what you want but attacks against the forum or its members and especially the staff will not be tolerated.  If this board ends up just being Pro-Russian it is dead, alternative views will be tolerated and the people treated with respect just as you want to be.  

Are statements also off limit to ridicule or just ppl ?

TheGeorgian wrote:

Are statements also off limit to ridicule or just ppl ?

You can attack the message, not the messenger. You can ridicule it with facts. Just to call it stupid is not up to the standards I want.

Vladimir79 wrote:

TheGeorgian wrote:

Are statements also off limit to ridicule or just ppl ?

You can attack the message, not the messenger.  You can ridicule it with facts.  Just to call it stupid is not up to the standards I want.

Ok understood. Will do my best to avoid that in future.

Vladimir79 wrote:The lack of respect on this forum for its members has gotten out of control.  I don't want F bombs, calling people trolls for voicing an opinion whether it is pro-West or not.  You can say what you want but attacks against the forum or its members and especially the staff will not be tolerated.  If this board ends up just being Pro-Russian it is dead, alternative views will be tolerated and the people treated with respect just as you want to be.  

https://www.russiadefence.net/t1791p250-the-t-80s-future-in-the-russian-army#238659

d_taddei2 wrote:Already explained to you why but u failed to read because of ur mental illness. 
U don't accept links eehnie and you don't accept pics and you don't accept experience Infact u don't accept anything from anyone but yourself this is now a FACT everyone can see. Which hampers your own knowledge which is already small and limited and will not grow while you're mindset is in its current mode. Attitude change is severely needed and if it's not mental illness then it's quite clearly bigotry which I think should entail some kind of action from the mods. .

https://www.russiadefence.net/t3824p100-zsu-23-4-aa-gun-views#238717

d_taddei2 wrote:Its a fact you're a bigot.

To note several previous insults, and the following message to make him realize of what he is doing with these insults and disrespect:

https://www.russiadefence.net/t3824p100-zsu-23-4-aa-gun-views#238537

eehnie wrote:To try to impose your opinions with insults makes not you right, only undermines the authority of the Administrator of the Forum and their Moderators, contradicting their rules and messages to the forum. They are being very generous with you, pardoning your insults multiple times, at the cost of their own credit, but you continue abusing, feeling entitled to insult me without consequences.

eehnie wrote:.......

To note several previous insults, and the following message to make him realize of what he is doing with these insults and disrespect:

.....

You may want to be careful with those bricks because you are smack in the middle of very fragile glass house

List of rules you break with every one of your spam posts is quite lengthy

PapaDragon wrote:

eehnie wrote:.......

To note several previous insults, and the following message to make him realize of what he is doing with these insults and disrespect:

.....

You may want to be careful with those bricks because you are smack in the middle of very fragile glass house

List of rules you break with every one of your spam posts is quite lengthy

Agreed 

It's also clear in Vladimir79 post that telling someone wrong or stupid just because is also againstthe rules something he has done to me many times in the past. I treat others as they treat me. How long did he have a tag on every posts dissing people on this forum about hating zionists etc. A very long time he did. Suggesting people are liars and manipulating information as well. "People throwing stones in glass houses comes to mind. I've tried many times to agree on mutual agreements and solutions but he refused them all and on more than multiple occasions he has never offered anything similar because it seems he's right everyoneelse is wrong in every thread. I've had enough of long ago. Forum was great before he joined

Are descriptive words allowed to be used to describe third parties e.g. "The actions taken by the US only serve to clearly prove thier status as subhumans"
Or individual third parties e.g. "(some politician or diplomat) clearly lacks the mental functionality to fulfill a token role as a budget asswiper.

Furthermore do these rules extend to the use of descriptive termanology in reference to non forum members e.g. "(some youtuber or blogger) is a dissgrace to the species"


If the above is indeed prohibited It would be most helpfull is you were to provide examples of acceptable termanology.

Some information about the permanent ban of Eehnie, one of the main contributors raising the technical level of this forum, despite being constantly attacked.

https://www.russiadefence.net/t7771-follower-of-eehnie-and-mindstorm-the-best-brains-of-this-forum-by-far

Truck wrote:Some information about the permanent ban of Eehnie, one of the main contributors raising the technical level of this forum, despite being constantly attacked.

https://www.russiadefence.net/t7771-follower-of-eehnie-and-mindstorm-the-best-brains-of-this-forum-by-far

You are nothing more than the No1 TROLLER

You forgot to repost and quote the same things again and again as you DO 3 YEARS NOW

George1 wrote:

Truck wrote:Some information about the permanent ban of Eehnie, one of the main contributors raising the technical level of this forum, despite being constantly attacked.

https://www.russiadefence.net/t7771-follower-of-eehnie-and-mindstorm-the-best-brains-of-this-forum-by-far

You are nothing more than the No1 TROLLER

You forgot to repost and quote the same things again and again as you DO 3 YEARS NOW

so what did the almighty oracle eehnie do now to get himself finally banned?