Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #7

No. It was that A-10 flight. Don't muddy the water when the answer is clear as day... I wish Assad would request a VKS policed NFZ already.

Don't be silly, if it were the Americans, there would be evidence, radar footage etc.


It wasn't the Russian Airforce either. If I remember correctly, the planes operate above 5000 meters and employ no rockets. And the guided projectiles in the Russian arsenal used in Syria wouldn't need 4 of them to annihilate a school.


Most likely it was Grad or Syrian Airforce rockets.


And I honestly don't understand what is the big deal? The propaganda hysteria is meant for simpltons who fail to realise that the war has probably reached the 300 000 dead/missing mark. And it was organised, funded and supplied by a coalition of Islamist and NATO scum. Death of civilians is always a tragedy, but an unavoidable reality of war. And spare me of the "50 civilian" nonsense, anyone ethnically, religiously different or just not sympathetic towards insurgency is long gone from there.

d_taddei2 wrote:not sure if this has already been shown, Su-34 with anti shipping missile in Syria,

http://www.janes.com/article/57975/russian-bomber-shown-carrying-anti-shipping-missile-in-syria?utm_campaign=PC6110_E16%20DF%20NL%20Defence%2002_16_16%20%3a&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Eloqua

So what.  Show me a photo with Su-34 with surface to ground missiles as part of its regular load.

This whole line of argument is so retarded it hurts. So according to you Russia decided to precision bomb hospitals?
Just when the situation in Aleppo got dire for an-Nusra and its Turk (aka NATO) backers? This is indeed another
Racak job designed for saps. Or another MH-17. Time to put Putin's face all over the precious NATzO media as
Satan incarnate.

You jumped on the wrong man.

He posted something not in any way connected to the "MSF" "hospital" episode - a Su-34 reportedly equipped for anti-ship strikes, a curiosity for Syrian theatre by itself.

Balistic missile from Caspian sea? Launched from what?

Or actually you know what, you guys just lack imagination and intelligence of one average Turk. Let me demonstrate.



Iskander M was loaded into Dyugon-class landing craft and then used to launch balistic missile attack. See, its simple explanation.

Militarov wrote:Balistic missile from Caspian sea? Launched from what?

Or actually you know what, you guys just lack imagination and intelligence of one average Turk. Let me demonstrate.



Iskander M was loaded into Dyugon-class landing craft and then used to launch balistic missile attack. See, its simple explanation.

Hahahahahahahahah. It's funny....NOT. ;-)

KoTeMoRe wrote:

Militarov wrote:Balistic missile from Caspian sea? Launched from what?

Or actually you know what, you guys just lack imagination and intelligence of one average Turk. Let me demonstrate.



Iskander M was loaded into Dyugon-class landing craft and then used to launch balistic missile attack. See, its simple explanation.

Hahahahahahahahah. It's funny....NOT. ;-)

Stop ruining my moment!

SturmGuard wrote:Don't be silly, if it were the Americans, there would be evidence, radar footage etc.


It wasn't the Russian Airforce either. If I remember correctly, the planes operate above 5000 meters and employ no rockets. And the guided projectiles in the Russian arsenal used in Syria wouldn't need 4 of them to annihilate a school.


Most likely it was Grad or Syrian Airforce rockets.


And I honestly don't understand what is the big deal? The propaganda hysteria is meant for simpltons who fail to realise that the war has probably reached the 300 000 dead/missing mark. And it was organised, funded and supplied by a coalition of Islamist and NATO scum. Death of civilians is always a tragedy, but an unavoidable reality of war. And spare me of the "50 civilian" nonsense, anyone ethnically, religiously different or just not sympathetic towards insurgency is long gone from there.

I pretty much agree that what ever hit the "Hospital" wasn't anything the US would use in such circumstances. It's the claim it was "rockets" that makes it funny. I think someone got a healthy dose of 122mm on breakfast.

Militarov wrote:

KoTeMoRe wrote:

Militarov wrote:Balistic missile from Caspian sea? Launched from what?

Or actually you know what, you guys just lack imagination and intelligence of one average Turk. Let me demonstrate.



Iskander M was loaded into Dyugon-class landing craft and then used to launch balistic missile attack. See, its simple explanation.

Hahahahahahahahah. It's funny....NOT. ;-)

Stop ruining my moment!

You too want to get quoted by CNN ;-).

KoTeMoRe wrote:

Militarov wrote:

KoTeMoRe wrote:

Militarov wrote:Balistic missile from Caspian sea? Launched from what?

Or actually you know what, you guys just lack imagination and intelligence of one average Turk. Let me demonstrate.



Iskander M was loaded into Dyugon-class landing craft and then used to launch balistic missile attack. See, its simple explanation.

Hahahahahahahahah. It's funny....NOT. ;-)

Stop ruining my moment!

You too want to get quoted by CNN ;-).

Yahoo news are my final goal. Crown jewel.

Not far from reality.

Hilarious... the west starts a civil war in several countries that have been going on 4 or 5 years and NOW they notice Civilian casualties?

I think the Russian military should drop pamphlets all over Syria and Northern Iraq saying you can live the good life if you throw away your ID papers and go to Europe and pretend to be Syrians...

Hahaha.

ult wrote:Not far from reality.

Club yeah, container launchers. You can use them from fishing ships too, as long as there is enough place on deck.

Mi24P launching Shturm

Militarov wrote:

KoTeMoRe wrote:

Militarov wrote:

KoTeMoRe wrote:

Militarov wrote:Balistic missile from Caspian sea? Launched from what?

Or actually you know what, you guys just lack imagination and intelligence of one average Turk. Let me demonstrate.



Iskander M was loaded into Dyugon-class landing craft and then used to launch balistic missile attack. See, its simple explanation.

Hahahahahahahahah. It's funny....NOT. ;-)

Stop ruining my moment!

You too want to get quoted by CNN ;-).

Yahoo news are my final goal. Crown jewel.

Rimshot for you!

ult wrote:

Fist there was anti-ship missiles seen on Su-34s. Now there is a report at bmpd that the Su-35s are also carrying bombs.

https://z5h64q92x9.net/proxy_u/ru-en.en/bmpd.livejournal.com/1743892.html

A video showing successful active defense against an ATGM. The protection activates at about 6 seconds in.

short_fuze wrote:

ult wrote:

Fist there was anti-ship missiles seen on Su-34s. Now there is a report at bmpd that the Su-35s are also carrying bombs.

https://z5h64q92x9.net/proxy_u/ru-en.en/bmpd.livejournal.com/1743892.html

Su35s were already used in airstrikes, you can watch report from few days ago on situation in Ukraine by Russian general. He showed video for which he says is result of strike performed by SU35.

..........................